Potential role of abbreviated MRI for breast cancer screening in an academic medical center

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update

Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Abbreviated Breast MRI: State of the Art

Abbreviated MRI is an umbrella term, defined as a focused MRI examination tailored to answer a single specific clinical question. For abbreviated breast MRI, this question is: "Is there evidence of breast cancer?" Abbreviated MRI of the breast makes maximum use of the fact that the kinetics of breast cancers and of benign tissue differ most in the very early postcontrast phase; therefore, abbreviated breast MRI focuses on this period. The different published approaches to abbreviated MRI include the following three subtypes: (a) short protocols, consisting of a precontrast and either a single postcontrast acquisition (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST]) or a time-resolved series of postcontrast acquisitions with lower spatial resolution (ultrafast [UF]), obtained during the early postcontrast phase immediately after contrast agent injection; (b) abridged protocols, consisting of FAST or UF acquisitions plus selected additional pulse sequences; and (c) noncontrast protocols, where diffusion-weighted imaging replaces the contrast information. Abbreviated MRI was proposed to increase tolerability of and access to breast MRI as a screening tool. But its widening application now includes follow-up after breast cancer and even diagnostic assessment. This review defines the three subtypes of abbreviated MRI, highlighting the differences between the protocols and their clinical implications and summarizing the respective evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

Implementation of abbreviated breast MRI in diagnostic and screening settings

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) includes fewer sequences than standard MRI, which could be utilized for breast cancer detection.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of abbreviated MRI protocol in screening and diagnostic settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All women with screening and diagnostic (problem-solving and preoperative staging) MRI examination were recruited from 2017 to 2020. Two expert radiologists assessed designed abbreviated protocol (fat-saturated T1-weighted [T1W] pre-contrast and two first fat-saturated T1W post-contrast series with reconstruction of their subtraction) including maximum intensity projection (MIP) and then evaluated standard protocol of breast MRI. Associated findings, including axillary lymphadenopathy and invasion to nipple, skin, or pectoralis muscle were also evaluated. The concordance rate of abbreviated with standard protocol in screening and diagnostic settings were also compared, based on BI-RADS classification. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 108 (26.5%) of 408 patients (mean age = 43 ± 9 years) were classified as BI-RADS 4-5 and considered positive findings based on suspicious enhancement (mass or non-mass enhancement). Compared to standard protocol, abbreviated protocol revealed >98% accuracy in the diagnostic setting as well as 100% accuracy in the screening setting. Concordance rates in screening and diagnostic settings were 99.6% and 98.1%, respectively. There was no discordance between abbreviated and standard protocol in the evaluation of associated findings.

CONCLUSION

Abbreviated MRI protocol possesses substantial diagnostic accuracy in both screening and diagnostic settings. Additional information provided by standard protocol might not require for cancer detection.

Evaluating the effectiveness of abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) interpretation training for mammogram readers: a multi-centre study assessing diagnostic performance, using an enriched dataset

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) is being introduced in breast screening trials and clinical practice, particularly for women with dense breasts. Upscaling abMRI provision requires the workforce of mammogram readers to learn to effectively interpret abMRI. The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers to interpret abMRI after a single day of standardised small-group training and to compare diagnostic performance of mammogram readers experienced in full-protocol breast MRI (fpMRI) interpretation (Group 1) with that of those without fpMRI interpretation experience (Group 2).

METHODS

Mammogram readers were recruited from six NHS Breast Screening Programme sites. Small-group hands-on workstation training was provided, with subsequent prospective, independent, blinded interpretation of an enriched dataset with known outcome. A simplified form of abMRI (first post-contrast subtracted images (FAST MRI), displayed as maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and subtracted slice stack) was used. Per-breast and per-lesion diagnostic accuracy analysis was undertaken, with comparison across groups, and double-reading simulation of a consecutive screening subset.

RESULTS

37 readers (Group 1: 17, Group 2: 20) completed the reading task of 125 scans (250 breasts) (total = 9250 reads). Overall sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-87%; 1776/2072) and specificity 86% (95%CI 85-86%; 6140/7178). Group 1 showed significantly higher sensitivity (843/952; 89%; 95%CI 86-91%) and higher specificity (2957/3298; 90%; 95%CI 89-91%) than Group 2 (sensitivity = 83%; 95%CI 81-85% (933/1120) p < 0.0001; specificity = 82%; 95%CI 81-83% (3183/3880) p < 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement was higher for Group 1 (kappa = 0.73; 95%CI 0.68-0.79) than for Group 2 (kappa = 0.51; 95%CI 0.45-0.56). Specificity improved for Group 2, from the first 55 cases (81%) to the remaining 70 (83%) (p = 0.02) but not for Group 1 (90-89% p = 0.44), whereas sensitivity remained consistent for both Group 1 (88-89%) and Group 2 (83-84%).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-day abMRI interpretation training for mammogram readers achieved an overall diagnostic performance within benchmarks published for fpMRI but was insufficient for diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers new to breast MRI to match that of experienced fpMRI readers. Novice MRI reader performance improved during the reading task, suggesting that additional training could further narrow this performance gap.

Biomimetic nanobubbles for triple-negative breast cancer targeted ultrasound molecular imaging

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous breast cancer subtype with poor prognosis. Although anatomical imaging figures prominently for breast lesion screening, TNBC is often misdiagnosed, thus hindering early medical care. Ultrasound (US) molecular imaging using nanobubbles (NBs) capable of targeting tumor cells holds great promise for improved diagnosis and therapy. However, the lack of conventional biomarkers in TNBC impairs the development of current targeted agents. Here, we exploited the homotypic recognition of cancer cells to synthesize the first NBs based on TNBC cancer cell membrane (i.e., NB_CCM) as a targeted diagnostic agent. We developed a microfluidic technology to synthesize NB_CCM based on the self-assembly property of cell membranes in aqueous solutions. In vitro, optimal NB_CCM had a hydrodynamic diameter of 683 ± 162 nm, showed long-lasting US contrast enhancements and homotypic affinity. In vivo, we demonstrated that NB_CCM showed increased extravasation and retention in a TNBC mouse model compared to non-targeted NBs by US molecular imaging. Peak intensities and areas under the curves from time-intensity plots showed a significantly enhanced signal from NB_CCM compared to non-targeted NBs (2.1-fold, P = 0.004, and, 3.6-fold, P = 0.0009, respectively). Immunofluorescence analysis further validated the presence of NB_CCM in the tumor microenvironment. Circumventing the challenge for universal cancer biomarker identification, our approach could enable TNBC targeting regardless of tumor tissue heterogeneity, thus improving diagnosis and potentially gene/drug targeted delivery. Ultimately, our approach could be used to image many cancer types using biomimetic NBs prepared from their respective cancer cell membranes.

MRI Screening of BRCA Mutation Carriers: Comparison of Standard Protocol and Abbreviated Protocols With and Without T2-Weighted Images

BACKGROUND. Increasing evidence supports the role of abbreviated MRI protocols for breast cancer detection. However, abbreviated protocols have been poorly studied in patients who are BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Furthermore, the need for T2-weighted sequences in abbreviated protocols remains controversial. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the evaluation of patients with BRCA mutations, the diagnostic performance of a standard full breast MRI protocol with the performance of abbreviated protocols that included and did not include a T2-weighted sequence. METHODS. This retrospective study included 292 patients (mean age, 47.9 years) who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent 427 screening breast MRI examinations according to a standard full protocol who could be classified as having benign (n = 407) or malignant (n = 20) findings based on histopathology or imaging follow-up. Four readers independently assessed examinations in three separate sessions (theoretic abbreviated protocol, which included the first postcontrast acquisition; theoretic abbreviated protocol with addition of a T2-weighted sequence; and the standard full protocol) and assigned BI-RADS categories. Categories 3-5 were considered to represent positive examinations. Interreader agreement was assessed, and diagnostic performance was compared by use of pooled reader data. RESULTS. Interreader agreement on BI-RADS category, expressed as kappa values, was 0.55 for the standard, 0.45 for the abbreviated, and 0.57 for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols. Pooled sensitivity was 94% for the standard, 92% for the abbreviated, and 90% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (all p > .001). Pooled specificity was 80% for the standard, 71% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated plus T2-weighted compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled PPV was 19% for the standard, 14% for the abbreviated, and 20% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated). Pooled NPV was 100% for the standard, 99% for the abbreviated, and 99% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted (all p > .001) protocols. Pooled accuracy was 80% for the standard, 73% for the abbreviated, and 83% for the abbreviated plus T2-weighted protocols (p < .001 for abbreviated compared with both standard and abbreviated plus T2-weighted). CONCLUSION. The abbreviated protocol without T2-weighted imaging had suboptimal performance. However, addition of the T2-weighted sequence yielded comparable sensitivity and accuracy and a small increase in specificity compared with the full protocol. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support implementation of abbreviated MRI with T2-weighted imaging for breast cancer screening of patients with BRCA mutations.

Small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI: training can improve diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) can be improved by training, and can achieve the level of full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 1165 breast lesions (≤ 2 cm; 409 malignant and 756 benign) from 1165 MRI examinations for reading test. Twelve radiologists were assigned into a trained group and a non-trained group. They interpreted each AB-MRI twice, which was extracted from FDP-MRI. After the first read, the trained group received a structured training for AB-MRI interpretation while the non-trained group did not. FDP-MRIs were interpreted by the trained group after the second read. BI-RADS category for each lesion was compared to the standard of reference (histopathological examination or follow-up) to calculate diagnostic accuracy. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using multirater k analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement were compared between the trained and non-trained groups, between the first and second reads, and between AB-MRI and FDP-MRI.

RESULTS

After training, the diagnostic accuracy of AB-MRI increased from 77.6 to 84.4%, and inter-reader agreement improved from 0.410 to 0.579 (both p < 0.001), which were higher than those of the non-trained group (accuracy, 84.4% vs 78.0%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.461; both p < 0.001). The post-training accuracy and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI were lower than those of FDP-MRI (accuracy, 84.4% vs 92.8%; weighted k, 0.579 vs 0.602; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Training can improve the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement for small lesion classification on AB-MRI; however, it remains inferior to those of FDP-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Training can improve the diagnostic performance for small breast lesions on AB-MRI. • Training can reduce inter-observer variation for breast lesion classification on AB-MRI, especially among junior radiologists. • The post-training diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of AB-MRI remained inferior to those of FDP-MRI.

Opportunities in cancer imaging: risk-adapted breast imaging in screening

In the UK, women between 50-70 years are invited for 3-yearly mammography screening irrespective of their likelihood of developing breast cancer. The only risk adaption is for women with >30% lifetime risk who are offered annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography, and annual mammography for some moderate-risk women. Using questionnaires, breast density, and polygenic risk scores, it is possible to stratify the population into the lowest 20% risk, who will develop <4% of cancers and the top 4%, who will develop 18% of cancers. Mammography is a good screening test but has low sensitivity of 60% in the 9% of women with the highest category of breast density (BIRADS D) who have a 2.5- to fourfold breast cancer risk. There is evidence that adding ultrasound to the screening mammogram can increase the cancer detection rate and reduce advanced stage interval and next round cancers. Similarly, alternative tests such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CESM) or abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) are much more effective in detecting cancer in women with dense breasts. Scintimammography has been shown to be a viable alternative for dense breasts or for follow-up in those with a personal history of breast cancer and scarring as result of treatment. For supplemental screening to be worthwhile in these women, new technologies need to reduce the number of stage II cancers and be cost effective when tested in large scale trials. This article reviews the evidence for supplemental imaging and examines whether a risk-stratified approach is feasible.

A meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and a full diagnostic protocol in breast cancer

AIM

To undertake a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of abbreviated (ABB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and full diagnostic protocol MRI (FDP-MRI) in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through August 2019 for studies comparing the diagnostic performance of ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI in the breast. Studies were reviewed by two authors independently according to eligibility and exclusion criteria and split into two subgroups (screening population studies and studies using cohorts enriched with known cancers) to avoid bias. Quality assessment and bias for diagnostic accuracy was determined with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The diagnostic accuracy for each subgroup was pooled using a bivariate random effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves produced. Sensitivities and specificities were compared using a paired t-test.

RESULTS

Five screening (62/2,588 cancers/patients) and eight enriched cohort (540/1,432 cancers/patients) studies were included in the meta-analysis. QUADAS-2 assessment showed a low risk of bias in most studies. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for screening studies was 0.90/0.92/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.92/0.95/0.97 for FDP-MRI. The pooled sensitivity/specificity/AUC for enriched cohort studies was 0.93/0.83/0.94 for ABB-MRI and 0.93/0.84/0.95 for FDP-MRI. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity using ABB-MRI or FDP-MRI (p=0.18 and 0.27, p=0.18 and 0.93, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performances of the ABB-MRI and FDP-MRI protocols used in either screening or enriched cohorts were comparable. There was a large variation in patient population, study methodology, and abbreviated protocols reported.

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs.

PURPOSE

: to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer.

METHODS

: a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct.

RESULTS

: forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

: the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.