1
|
Falcone V, Krotka P, Deutschmann C, Danzinger S, Reischer T, Pfeiler G, Singer C, Koch M. Use of polysaccharide hemostatic agent (HaemoCer™) in breast cancer surgery to reduce postoperative complications: A randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J 2023; 20:925-934. [PMID: 36448255 PMCID: PMC10031209 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Postoperative wound-site bleeding, tissue inflammation and seroma formation are well-known complications in the field of breast surgery. Hemostatic agents consisting of polysaccharides may be used intra-operatively to minimise postoperative complications. We conducted a prospective randomised-controlled, single-centre study including 136 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for invasive or intraductal breast cancer. Of these, 68 patients were randomised to receive an absorbable polysaccharide hemostatic agent into the wound site during surgery, while 68 patients were randomised to the control group and did not receive any hemostatic agent. Primary outcome was the total volume of postoperative drained fluid from the surgical site. Secondary outcomes were the number of days until drain removal and rate of immediate postoperative surgical site infection Patients in the intervention group had significantly higher drainage output volumes compared with the control group 85 mL (IQR 46.25-110) versus 50 mL (IQR 30-75), respectively; (P = .003). Univariable linear regression analyses showed a significant association between the surgical specimen and the primary outcome (P < .001). After multivariable analysis, the use of absorbable polysaccharide hemostatic product was no longer significantly associated with a higher drainage output and only the size of the surgical specimen remained a significant predictor. The number of days until drainage removal and the postoperative seroma formation were higher in the intervention group (P = .004) and (P = .003), respectively. In our study, intraoperative application of polysaccharide hemostatic agent during breast-conserving surgery did not decrease postoperative fluid production. Only the size of the surgical specimen was significantly associated with postoperative drainage volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Falcone
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Pavla Krotka
- Institute for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Christine Deutschmann
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Sabine Danzinger
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Theresa Reischer
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Christian Singer
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Marianne Koch
- Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen O, Chaushu H, Hod K, Kirshenbaum T, Khafif A. Drainless parotidectomy using tissue fibrin sealant - A retrospective case-control study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2022; 50:493-498. [PMID: 35672203 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of drainless parotidectomy using fibrin sealant on length of stay, post-operative seroma and related complications. For this purpose, a retrospective matched case-control series was held in a single academic center. All patients who underwent drainless parotidectomies, including deep lobe tumors and revision surgeries, were compared to matched controls in which a suction drain was inserted. Main outcomes were length of hospital stay and post-operative seroma. A total of 123 patients (41 cases and 82 controls) were included in the study. Fibrin sealant group had higher rates of total parotidectomy compared with the control group (25.0% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.054). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 ± 0.3 days vs. 1.5 ± 0.6 days, p < 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the fibrin sealant group and the control regarding post-operative seromas (9.8% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.574, respectively), aspirations rate (7.3% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.381), and infection rates (0% vs.3.7%, p = 0.550). In conclusion, drainless parotidectomy does not increase post operative seroma rates and related complications, and can also be implemented for revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oded Cohen
- A.R.M. Center of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
| | - Hen Chaushu
- A.R.M. Center of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | - Keren Hod
- Department of Academy and Research, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tzur Kirshenbaum
- A.R.M. Center of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | - Avi Khafif
- A.R.M. Center of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel. Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaker H, Leena N, Mayers V, Koussa F, Deshpande A. Day-case approach to immediate breast reconstruction: pushing the boundaries of ambulatory breast surgery in the post-COVID-19 era. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021; 103:426-431. [PMID: 34058121 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Day-case surgery is safe and efficacious for most breast surgical procedures. Limited data exist on its use in immediate breast reconstruction. We present our experience of day-case management of mastectomy with immediate pre-pectoral implant-based reconstruction (IBR). METHODS Data were collected on 47 patients who underwent day-case skin-sparing (SSM) or nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomy with pre-pectoral IBR between October 2017 and September 2019. Clinicopathological data were collected, including postoperative complications, re-admission and re-operation. The data were compared to published national standards. RESULTS Median age was 52 years (range 37-74). Thirty-two patients (68%) had an SSM and 15 (32%) had an NSM. Two patients (4%) had risk-reducing mastectomies and 45 had treatment for invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Mean tumour size was 33.3mm (range 7-85mm). Forty-two (89%) patients went home on the day of surgery. No patients required re-operation in the first 48 hours. The median postoperative follow-up time was 11.4 months (range 1.8-22.7 months). During the first 90-day postoperative period, eight patients (17%) developed superficial skin necrosis, five patients (10.6%) developed postoperative infections and five patients (10.6%) suffered an implant loss. Eight patients (17%) were readmitted for re-operation. Compared to UK national standards set in the iBRA study, our cohort has demonstrated comparable postoperative infection, implant loss and re-operation and re-admission rates. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated close to 90% day-case success rate for mastectomy with IBR. These early data suggest that immediate IBR can be carried out in a manner that is cost-efficient without impacting surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Shaker
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Nar Leena
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - V Mayers
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - F Koussa
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Deshpande
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gasparri ML, Kuehn T, Ruscito I, Zuber V, Di Micco R, Galiano I, Navarro Quinones SC, Santurro L, Di Vittorio F, Meani F, Bassi V, Ditsch N, Mueller MD, Bellati F, Caserta D, Papadia A, Gentilini OD. Fibrin Sealants and Axillary Lymphatic Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Randomized Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092056. [PMID: 33923153 PMCID: PMC8123055 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Axillary dissection is a highly mobile procedure with severe lymphatic consequences. The off-label application of fibrin sealants in the axilla, with the sole aim to eliminate dead space and to provoke sealing of the disrupted lymphatic vessels at the end of axillary dissection, is an experimental procedure to reduce lymphatic morbidity. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of fibrin sealants on lymphatic morbidity after axillary dissection. Our results show that this experimental procedure is able to decrease the total axillary drainage output, the number of days before the axillary drainage is removed, and the length of hospital stay. However, no effects on the occurrence rate of axillary lymphocele or on the surgical site complications rate were demonstrated Abstract Background: use of fibrin sealants following pelvic, paraaortic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy may reduce lymphatic morbidity. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate if this finding applies to the axillary lymphadenectomy. Methods: randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of fibrin sealants in reducing axillary lymphatic complications were included. Lymphocele, drainage output, surgical-site complications, and hospital stay were considered as outcomes. Results: twenty-three randomized studies, including patients undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer, melanoma, and Hodgkin’s disease, were included. Fibrin sealants did not affect axillary lymphocele incidence nor the surgical site complications. Drainage output, days with drainage, and hospital stay were reduced when fibrin sealants were applied (p < 0.0001, p < 0.005, p = 0.008). Conclusion: fibrin sealants after axillary dissection reduce the total axillary drainage output, the duration of drainage, and the hospital stay. No effects on the incidence of postoperative lymphocele and surgical site complications rate are found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (M.L.G.); (F.M.); (V.B.)
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Kuehn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 Neckar, Germany;
| | - Ilary Ruscito
- Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy; (I.R.); (F.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Veronica Zuber
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Galiano
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
| | | | - Letizia Santurro
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
| | - Francesca Di Vittorio
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
| | - Francesco Meani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (M.L.G.); (F.M.); (V.B.)
| | - Valerio Bassi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (M.L.G.); (F.M.); (V.B.)
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany;
| | - Michael D. Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 19, 3010 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Filippo Bellati
- Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy; (I.R.); (F.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Donatella Caserta
- Gynecology Division, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy; (I.R.); (F.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; (M.L.G.); (F.M.); (V.B.)
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Oreste D. Gentilini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (V.Z.); (R.D.M.); (I.G.); (L.S.); (F.D.V.); (O.D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|