1
|
Yilmaz ZB, Memisoglu F, Akbulut S. Management of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation. World J Transplant 2024; 14:93209. [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.93209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation (LT). Based on current worldwide guidelines, the most effective strategies for avoiding post-transplant CMV infection are antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment. CMV- IgG serology is the established technique for pretransplant screening of both donors and recipients. The clinical presentation of CMV infection and disease exhibits variability, prompting clinicians to consistently consider this possibility, particularly within the first year post-transplantation or subsequent to heightened immunosuppression. At annual symposia to discuss CMV prevention and how treatment outcomes can be improved, evidence on the incorporation of immune functional tests into clinical practice is presented, and the results of studies with new antiviral treatments are evaluated. Although there are ongoing studies on the use of letermovir and maribavir in solid organ transplantation, a consensus reflected in the guidelines has not been formed. Determining the most appropriate strategy at the individual level appears to be the key to enhancing outcomes. Although prevention strategies reduce the risk of CMV disease, the disease can still occur in up to 50% of high-risk patients. A balance between the risk of infection and disease development and the use of immunosuppressants must be considered when talking about the proper management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to establish a comprehensive framework for the management of CMV in patients who have had LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Burcin Yilmaz
- Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye
| | - Funda Memisoglu
- Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye
| | - Sami Akbulut
- Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piret J, Boivin G. Management of Cytomegalovirus Infections in the Era of the Novel Antiviral Players, Letermovir and Maribavir. Infect Dis Rep 2024; 16:65-82. [PMID: 38247977 PMCID: PMC10801527 DOI: 10.3390/idr16010005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections may increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Until recently, standard antiviral drugs against CMV were limited to viral DNA polymerase inhibitors (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir with a risk for cross-resistance. These drugs may also cause serious side effects. This narrative review provides an update on new antiviral agents that were approved for the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Letermovir was approved in 2017 for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adults who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maribavir followed four years later, with an indication in the treatment of adult and pediatric transplant patients with refractory/resistant CMV disease. The target of letermovir is the CMV terminase complex (constituted of pUL56, pUL89 and pUL51 subunits). Letermovir prevents the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids. Maribavir is a pUL97 kinase inhibitor, which interferes with the assembly of capsids and the egress of virions from the nucleus. Both drugs have activity against most CMV strains resistant to standard drugs and exhibit favorable safety profiles. However, high-level resistance mutations may arise more rapidly in the UL56 gene under letermovir than low-grade resistance mutations. Some mutations emerging in the UL97 gene under maribavir can be cross-resistant with ganciclovir. Thus, letermovir and maribavir now extend the drug arsenal available for the management of CMV infections and their respective niches are currently defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guy Boivin
- Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kleiboeker SB. Prevalence of cytomegalovirus antiviral drug resistance in transplant recipients. Antiviral Res 2023; 215:105623. [PMID: 37150409 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2023.105623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant human pathogen, especially for immunocompromised patients, often treated with one or more antiviral drugs. Although the prevalence of resistance is low, the impact of drug resistant CMV infections on patient outcomes is high and genotypic testing is recommended when resistance is suspected. To assess the prevalence of CMV drug resistance mutations among samples submitted for genotypic testing, 2750 patient sample results were analyzed. Testing was performed by sequencing for ganciclovir (GCV), cidofovir (CDV), foscarnet (FOS), maribavir (MBV) and/or letermovir (LMV) resistance conferring mutations. Of the 2750 patient samples, 826 (30.04%) had resistance to one or more anti-CMV drug. Resistance mutations were most common in UL97, with 27.64% and 9.96% of samples having GCV and MBV mutations, respectively. Resistance mutations in UL54 were less common, with 6.11%, 5.98% and 1.76% of samples having GCV, CDV and FOS mutations, respectively. For LMV, resistance mutations in UL56 were present in 7.17% of samples, with mutations at codon 325 representing 80.95% of the observed LMV resistance mutations. Resistance to two drugs was identified in 215 samples and to 3 or more drugs in 35 samples. While a high prevalence of CMV resistance mutations was identified, this must be taken in the context of healthcare providers submitting samples from patients with suspected resistant CMV strains. For these patients, rapid monitoring for resistance allows treatment modifications based on objective results rather than empiric drug selection, which is particularly relevant given the presence of mutations conferring resistance to more than one drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven B Kleiboeker
- Eurofins Viracor Clinical Diagnostics, 18000 West 99th Street, Lenexa, KS, 66219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Currier EE, Ichkanian Y, Dabaja M, Segovia MC, Patel Y, Nagai S, Sudan DL, Jafri SM. Cytomegalovirus Infection Management in Multivisceral and Intestinal Transplant: A Dual Institution Study. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:413-416. [PMID: 36792485 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplant and multivisceral transplant were originally in pediatric populations and are relatively new procedures in adults. Despite increasing success rates in the immediate post-transplant period, infectious complications and acute and chronic rejection remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Previous research has shown cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the main cause of infection in this population. Due to the limited patient population, incidence of CMV viremia ranges widely and there is lack of universal protocol for treatment. This dual institution retrospective chart review between Henry Ford Hospital and Duke University analyzed adult intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients between 2009 and 2019. Of the 32 patients identified and included in the study, 15 had CMV infection (46.9%). Of those with CMV infection, 5 (33.3%) had donor positive (D+)/recipient positive (R+) status; 5 had D-/R+; 4 had D+/R-; and one had D-/R-. There was no significant difference between mortality in those who had reported infection and not (80% vs 76.5%). The data from this study show significant rates of CMV viremia in patients undergoing intestinal transplant/multivisceral transplant with almost half of our study population having documented infection within 1 year of transplant, stressing the importance for universal protocol into CMV viremia treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Currier
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - Yervant Ichkanian
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mohamad Dabaja
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Yuval Patel
- Duke University Department of Gastroenterology, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Transplant Surgery, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Duke University, Department of Transplant Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Syed-Mohammed Jafri
- Henry Ford Hospital Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kotton CN, Kamar N. New Insights on CMV Management in Solid Organ Transplant Patients: Prevention, Treatment, and Management of Resistant/Refractory Disease. Infect Dis Ther 2023; 12:333-342. [PMID: 36583845 PMCID: PMC9925645 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00746-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can have both direct and indirect effects after solid-organ transplantation, with a significant impact on transplant outcomes. Prevention strategies decrease the risk of CMV disease, although CMV still occurs in up to 50% of high-risk patients. Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the main drugs currently used for preventing and treating CMV. Emerging data suggest that letermovir is as effective as VGCV with fewer hematological side effects. Refractory and resistant CMV also still occur in solid-organ-transplant patients. Maribavir has been shown to be effective and have less toxicity in the treatment of refractory and resistant CMV. In this review paper, we discuss prevention strategies, refractory and resistant CMV, and drug-related side effects and their impact, as well as optimal use of novel anti-CMV therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Nelson Kotton
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 5, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nassim Kamar
- grid.414295.f0000 0004 0638 3479Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, CHU Toulouse Rangueil, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
- grid.7429.80000000121866389INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, France
- grid.15781.3a0000 0001 0723 035XPaul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cytomegalovirus and other herpesviruses after hematopoietic cell and solid organ transplantation: From antiviral drugs to virus-specific T cells. Transpl Immunol 2022; 71:101539. [PMID: 35051589 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Herpesviruses can either cause primary infection or may get reactivated after both hematopoietic cell and solid organ transplantations. In general, viral infections increase post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic, preemptive, or therapeutically administered antiviral drugs may be associated with serious side effects and may induce viral resistance. Virus-specific T cells represent a valuable addition to antiviral treatment, with high rates of response and minimal side effects. Even low numbers of virus-specific T cells manufactured by direct selection methods can reconstitute virus-specific immunity after transplantation and control viral replication. Virus-specific T cells belong to the advanced therapy medicinal products, and their production is regulated by appropriate legislation; also, strict safety regulations are required to minimize their side effects.
Collapse
|
7
|
Saeed H, Thoendel M, Razonable RR. Individualized management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1964951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Huma Saeed
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Matthew Thoendel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and the William J Von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gómez-Massa E, Lasa-Lázaro M, Gil-Etayo FJ, Ulloa-Márquez E, Justo I, Loinaz C, Calvo-Pulido J, Paz-Artal E, Talayero P. Donor helper innate lymphoid cells are replaced earlier than lineage positive cells and persist long-term in human intestinal grafts - a descriptive study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1016-1029. [PMID: 32246810 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Intestinal grafts carry large donor lymphoid load that is replaced by recipient cells. The dynamics of this process may influence the tolerance, rejection or graft-versus-host disease. We analysed distribution and turnover of T and B (Lin+) lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) and helper innate lymphoid cells (hILC) in intestinal epithelium (IEp) and lamina propia (LP) from a long-term cohort of eight intestinal recipients and from a single patient monitored deeply during the first 8 months post-transplant (posTx). Long-term intestinal grafts showed significantly higher %hILC than native bowels in IEp and LP until 10 years posTx and recovery to normal levels was observed afterwards. We also observed an imbalance between hILC subsets in IEp [increase of type 1 (ILC1) and decrease in type 3 (ILC3) innate lymphoid cells] that persisted along posTx time even when %hILC was similar to native bowels. Regarding hILC origin, we still detected the presence of donor cells at 13 years posTx. However, this chimerism was significantly lower than in Lin+ and NK populations. According to these findings, observation from the patient monitored in early posTx period showed that recipient hILC repopulate earlier and faster than Lin+ cells, with increase in ILC1 related to rejection and infection episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Gómez-Massa
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Imas12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Lasa-Lázaro
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Imas12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Iago Justo
- HPB Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Unit, General Surgery Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmelo Loinaz
- HPB Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Unit, General Surgery Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Calvo-Pulido
- HPB Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Unit, General Surgery Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz-Artal
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Imas12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.,Section of Immunology, San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Talayero
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Imas12 Research Institute, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Global estimate of phenotypic and genotypic ganciclovir resistance in cytomegalovirus infections among HIV and organ transplant patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog 2020; 141:104012. [PMID: 32004622 DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV), an opportunistic pathogen belonging to Herpesviridae family, is considered as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among wide variety of patients, particularly in transplant recipients and HIV positive patients. As this virus can be resistant to treatment, frequency of CMV in patients who receive organ transplantation and people suffering from AIDS was studied between 1980 and 2019. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Iranian Database were reviewed, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (V2.0, Biostat) software analyzed all data. Finally, we used Cochran's Q-statistic to encounter heterogeneity between different studies. Meta-analyses indicated, GCV resistance was 14.1% (95% CI 11.2-17.7); however, in patients suffering from AIDS and organ transplantation were 19.5% (95% CI 14.7-25.4) and 11.4% (95% CI 8.1-15.8), respectively. There were increasing rates in the prevalence of GCV resistance in CMV among transplant recipients, and HIV positive patients. Therefore, evaluation of these refractory infections is beneficial.
Collapse
|
10
|
El Helou G, Razonable RR. Letermovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients: an evidence-based review. Infect Drug Resist 2019; 12:1481-1491. [PMID: 31239725 PMCID: PMC6556539 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s180908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading opportunistic infection in immune compromised patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, where primary infection or reactivation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are the mainstay for the prevention of CMV infection and disease, most commonly with valganciclovir. However, valganciclovir use is often associated with adverse drug reactions, most notably leukopenia and neutropenia, and its widespread use has led to emergence of antiviral resistance. Foscarnet and cidofovir, however, are associated with nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, a novel CMV viral terminase inhibitor drug, was recently approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT recipients. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence supporting the use of letermovir in allogeneic HSCT recipients, and how the drug impacts our contemporary clinical practice. In addition, we discuss the ongoing clinical trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV in SOT recipients. The use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection and disease is not yet approved. However, because of a unique mechanism of activity, we provide our perspective on the potential role of letermovir in the treatment of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and disease. Furthermore, drug-resistant CMV has emerged during use of letermovir for prophylaxis and treatment. Caution is advised on its use in order to preserve its therapeutic lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy El Helou
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,William J von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Razonable RR, Humar A. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13512. [PMID: 30817026 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 385] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atul Humar
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Transplant Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2019; 102:900-931. [PMID: 29596116 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 708] [Impact Index Per Article: 141.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.
Collapse
|
13
|
Koval CE. Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2018; 32:581-597. [PMID: 30146024 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in prevention and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease remain an expected problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Because of the effect of immunosuppressing medications, CMV primary, secondary, and reactivated infection requires antiviral medications to prevent serious direct and indirect effects of the virus. Side effects and drug resistance, however, often limit the capacity of traditional antiviral therapies. This article updates the clinician on current and promising approaches to the management and control of CMV in the solid organ transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Koval
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Box G21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Majeed A, Latif A, Kapoor V, Sohail A, Florita C, Georgescu A, Zangeneh T. Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid-organ Transplantation: Single-center Experience, Literature Review of Risk Factors, and Proposed Preventive Strategies. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3756-3762. [PMID: 30586840 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. Drug-resistant CMV is an emerging problem with poor survival outcomes and limited therapeutic options. In this study we comprehensively address the issue of drug resistance in CMV when compared with standard therapies, such as ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients diagnosed with CMV after solid-organ transplant at our center between 2013 and 2017, and identified 7 resistant CMV cases. To study risk factors in the published literature, we performed an extensive database search. RESULTS All patients had documented UL97 mutations, and 3 patients harbored both UL97 and UL54 mutations. For cases with increasing viral load or failure to achieve clinical improvement despite optimal therapy, genetic resistance testing was carried out. Patients received GCV and foscarnet combination therapy. As an adjunct, CMV immunoglobulin, cidofovir, and leflunomide were added. Risk factors, including donor+/recipient- serostatus, persistent high viral replication, prolonged therapeutic GCV exposure (>2.5 months), and allograft rejection, were assessed. CONCLUSION Patients at risk, especially those with D+/R- serostatus, should be judiciously monitored for resistance. Prolonged intravenous GCV exposure increases the risk for development of drug resistance. Therefore, precise guidelines are required for prevention of long-term GCV/VGCV exposure. Investigation regarding interferon-gamma release assay and adoptive transfer of T cells in diagnosed CMV patients is warranted to improve future prophylactic and management strategies against CMV, with a potential to reduce the requirement for available toxic antiviral drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Majeed
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
| | - A Latif
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - V Kapoor
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - A Sohail
- Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - C Florita
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - A Georgescu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - T Zangeneh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sandkovsky U, Qiu F, Kalil AC, Florescu A, Wilson N, Manning C, Florescu DF. Risk Factors for the Development of Cytomegalovirus Resistance in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3763-3768. [PMID: 30577267 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistance is an emerging problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors are not well defined. METHODS Recipients with CMV viremia of solid organ transplants who underwent CMV resistance testing between January 2010 and March 2016 were divided in 2 groups: proven CMV resistance and refractory CMV infection. A third group was added to compare patients with viremia during the study period with patients with no resistance proven or suspected. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of CMV genotypic resistance. RESULTS Forty-nine patients underwent resistance testing. Eleven (22.45%) developed genotypic mutations. Group 1 vs groups 2 and 3 had higher prednisone (P = .01) and tacrolimus levels (P = .03); did not respond to antivirals (P < .0001); and had a higher rate of fungal infections (P = .03). CMV resistance was less common in liver and kidney vs heart, small bowel, and mutivisceral recipients (P = .0007). There was no difference in duration of antiviral prophylaxis, viremia while on antiviral prophylaxis, rate of end-organ disease, graft loss, and overall survival. Persistent clinical disease and viremia despite antiviral therapy was the most important risk factor for development of CMV resistance. CONCLUSION Persistent clinical disease despite antiviral therapy is an important risk factor and may in part be due to a high degree of immunosuppression. Graft loss and survival were not impacted by CMV resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Sandkovsky
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
| | - F Qiu
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - A C Kalil
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - A Florescu
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | - N Wilson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - C Manning
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - D F Florescu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus: clinical implications of specific mutations. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2018; 23:388-394. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
17
|
Fisher CE, Knudsen JL, Lease ED, Jerome KR, Rakita RM, Boeckh M, Limaye AP. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 65:57-63. [PMID: 28369203 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an emerging and important problem in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Only through direct comparison of ganR- and ganciclovir-sensitive (ganS) CMV infection can risk factors and outcomes attributable specifically to ganciclovir resistance appropriately be determined. Methods We performed a retrospective, case-control (1:3) study of SOT recipients with genotypically confirmed ganR-CMV (n = 37) and ganS-CMV infection (n = 109), matched by donor/recipient CMV serostatus, year and organ transplanted, and clinical manifestation. We used χ2 (categorical) and Mann-Whitney (continuous) tests to determine predisposing factors and morbidity attributable to resistance, and Kaplan-Meier plots to analyze survival differences. Results The rate of ganR-CMV was 1% (37/3467) overall and 4.1% (32/777) among CMV donor-positive, recipient-negative patients, and was stable over the study period. GanR-CMV was associated with increased prior exposure to ganciclovir (median, 153 vs 91 days, P < .001). Eighteen percent (3/17) of lung transplant recipients with ganR-CMV had received <6 weeks of prior ganciclovir (current guideline-recommended resistance testing threshold), and all non-lung recipients had received ≥90 days (median, 160 [range, 90-284 days]) prior to diagnosis of ganR-CMV. GanR-CMV was associated with higher mortality (11% vs 1%, P = .004), fewer days alive and nonhospitalized (73 vs 81, P = .039), and decreased renal function (42% vs 19%, P = .008) by 3 months after diagnosis. Conclusions GanR-CMV is associated with longer prior antiviral duration and higher attributable morbidity and mortality than ganS-CMV. Upcoming revised CMV guidelines should incorporate organ transplant-specific thresholds of prior drug exposure to guide rational ganR-CMV testing in SOT recipients. Improved strategies for prevention and treatment of ganR-CMV are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia E Fisher
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
| | - Janine L Knudsen
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington
| | - Erika D Lease
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Keith R Jerome
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.,Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Robert M Rakita
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington
| | - Michael Boeckh
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
| | - Ajit P Limaye
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zilch A, Rien C, Weigel C, Huskobla S, Glück B, Spengler K, Sauerbrei A, Heller R, Gräler M, Henke A. Influence of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling on HCMV replication in human embryonal lung fibroblasts. Med Microbiol Immunol 2018; 207:227-242. [DOI: 10.1007/s00430-018-0543-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature on the current indications, surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx). RECENT FINDINGS Over recent years, ITx has become a more common operation with approximately 2500 procedures carried out worldwide by 2014. It is reserved for patients with intestinal failure and who have developed complications of home parenteral nutrition or who have a high risk of dying from their underlying disease. Recent advances such as the improvement in survival rates, not only for isolated small bowel transplants but also following inclusion of a liver graft in combined liver-small bowel transplant, and the utility of citrulline as a noninvasive biomarker to appreciate acute rejection herald an exciting shift in the field of ITx. SUMMARY With advancements in immunosuppressive drugs, induction regimens, standardization of surgical techniques and improved postoperative care, survival is increasing. In due course, it will most likely become as good as remaining on home parenteral nutrition and as such could become a viable first-line option.
Collapse
|