Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with resistant cytomegalovirus infection after face transplantation

Immunosuppressive strategies in face and hand transplantation: a comprehensive systematic review of current therapy regimens and outcomes

Background

Recipients of Vascularized Composite Allotransplants require effective immunosuppressive therapy to prevent graft rejection. This systematic review summarizes the current body of literature on immunosuppressive regimens used in face and hand transplants while summarizing their outcome in terms of rejection, renal failure, and infections.

Methods

A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies from 1998 until July 1st, 2023. We included all studies that discussed immunosuppressive strategies in face and hand transplant recipients according to PRISMA.

Results

The standard triple maintenance therapy was mostly adjusted due to nephrotoxicity or high incidence of rejection. The most common alternative treatments utilized were sirolimus (25/91; 27.5%) or everolimus (9/91; 9.9%) following hand- and photophoresis (7/45; 15.6%), sirolimus (5/45; 11.1%) or belatacept (1/45; 2.2%) following face transplantation. Episodes of rejection were reported in 60 (65.9%) of hand- and 33 (73%) of face transplant patients respectively. Graft loss of 12 (13.2%) hand and 4 (8.9%) face transplants was reported. Clinical CMV infection was observed in 6 (6.6%) hand and 7 (15.5%) face transplant recipients.

Conclusions

Based on the herein presented data, facial grafts exhibited a heightened incidence of rejection episodes and CMV infections. Facial mucosa adds complexity to the immunological graft composition highlighting the need of individualized immunosuppressive regimens and further research.

Special Considerations in Face Transplantation: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Vascularized composite allotransplantation of the face is an exceedingly complex procedure, requiring extensive planning and surgical precision in order to successfully manage patients with facial disfigurements. This review aims to present an overview of the salient anatomic considerations in facial transplantation, as well as give attention to unique patient populations and special considerations.A literature review was performed in search of articles pertaining to considerations in facial transplantation using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Articles selected for further review included full-text articles with an emphasis on specific anatomic defects and how they were addressed in the transplant process, as well as management of special patient populations undergoing facial transplantation. In total, 19 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion.The use of computer-assisted technologies for the planning portion of the procedure, as well as intraoperative efficiency, has yielded favorable results and can be considered as part of the operative plan. The ultimate outcome is dependent upon the synchronization of subunits of the allograft and the desired functional outcomes, including osseous, ocular, oral, and otologic considerations. Management of specific pathology and subgroups of patients are critical aspects. Although pediatric face transplantation has not yet been performed, it is a likely a future step in the evolution of this procedure.When performing a face transplantation, many components must be considered pre-, intra-, and post-operatively. This systematic review presents specific anatomic considerations, as well as information about special patient populations within this crosssection of multidisciplinary microsurgery, psychiatry, and transplant immunology.

Cytomegalovirus-related Complications and Management in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and CMV infection on outcomes in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation.

METHODS

This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study presents data on CMV and basic transplant-related demographics, including pretransplant viral D/R serostatus, and duration of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV-related complications (viremia, disease), allograft-related complications (rejection episodes, loss), and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 19 patients, 4 of whom received CMV high-risk transplants (D+/R-). CMV viremia was noted in 6 patients (all 4 D+/R- patients and 2 D-/R+), mostly within the first-year posttransplant, shortly after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis (median 2 mo). CMV disease occurred in 2 D+/R- patients. The high-risk group experienced relatively more rejection episodes per month follow-up. None of D+/R- patients suffered allograft loss due to rejection (longest follow-up: 121 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

D+/R- patients were at increased risk of CMV-related complications. Although a higher number of rejections was noted in this group, none of the D+/R- patients lost their allograft or died because of CMV or rejection. Thus, CMV D+/R- face transplantation can likely be safely performed with prophylaxis, active surveillance, and prompt treatment.

Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.

Application of a New Paradigm for Cytomegalovirus Disease Prevention in Mayo Clinic's First Face Transplant

The optimal approach to preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after face transplant is unknown. We report an individualized hybrid approach, initially using valganciclovir prophylaxis followed by surveillance and preemptive therapy guided by viral and immunologic markers. A 31-year-old man received a near-total face allotransplant for gunshot injury-related severe facial deformities. He was CMV seronegative, and the donor was CMV seropositive (D+/R- mismatch), and he received intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral valganciclovir prophylaxis. Monthly CD8⁺ T-cell immune competence assay revealed no CMV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell immunity development during valganciclovir prophylaxis. Because of severe leukopenia, valganciclovir was discontinued at 7 months after transplant when the patient had recovered and sustained normal global CD8⁺ T-cell function. Weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction testing detected asymptomatic CMV replication (plasma CMV, 549 IU/mL) 3 months later. Short-course preemptive valganciclovir treatment resulted in sustained virologic clearance. The patient had development of CMV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (12 cells/μL) together with CMV IgM and IgG. No rejection or infection relapse was detected 20 months after transplant. In conclusion, viral and immunologic monitoring allowed for an individualized approach to effective CMV disease prevention after face transplant. This case highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between the host immunity and the pathogen in determining the clinical course and outcome of CMV and other infectious disease syndromes.

Technical, Immunological, and Ethical Similarities and Differences Between Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation and Solid Organ Transplantation in Current Practice

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a surgical method used as the gold standard in end-term organ failure. Following SOT, successful results have also been achieved in vascularized composite tissue transplantation, which improves the quality of life with the success of solid organ transplants and the development of modern immunosuppressive regimens. This review discusses the preoperative, operative, postoperative, and immunological differences between vascularized tissue transplantation and SOT.

Facial restoration by transplantation

Hundred years ago, Sir Harold Gillies laid a foundation to the modern plastic surgery trying to reconstruct facial defects of severely disfigured soldiers of World War I. Some years later, Joseph Murray experimented with rejection of skin grafts aimed for treatment of burned patients who sustained their injuries on battlefields of World War II. In 1954, the acquired expertise and intensive research allowed him to perform the first successful kidney transplantation in the world at Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston. For his achievements in organ transplantation he was awarded Nobel Prize in 1990. The face transplantation appears to be a natural evolution of the work of these two extraordinary plastic surgeons. The first case of partial face transplant from 2005 in France revealed the world that facial restoration by transplantation is superior to conventional reconstruction methods. Since 2009, our team has performed 7 cases of face transplantation at Brigham and Women's Hospital, which is to our best knowledge the largest living single center face transplant cohort in the world. In this article, we want to reflect on the experience with face transplantation at our institution from the past years. We aim to briefly review the key points of the know-how which was given to us from the care of these unique patients.

Guillain-Barré syndrome: causes, immunopathogenic mechanisms and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare disease representing the most frequent cause of acute flaccid symmetrical weakness of the limbs and areflexia usually reaching its peak within a month. The etiology and pathogenesis remain largely enigmatic and the syndrome results in death or severe disability in 9-17% of cases despite immunotherapy. Areas covered: In terms of etiology, Guillain-Barré syndrome is linked to Campylobacter infection but less than 0.1% of infections result in the syndrome. In terms of pathogenesis, activated macrophages and T cells and serum antibodies against gangliosides are observed but their significance is unclear. Expert commentary: Guillain-Barré syndrome is a heterogeneous condition with numerous subtypes and recent data point towards the role of ganglioside epitopes by immunohistochemical methods. Ultimately, the syndrome results from a permissive genetic background on which environmental factors, including infections, vaccination and the influence of aging, lead to disease.