Prediction of BK viremia by urine viral load in renal transplant patients: An analysis of BK viral load results in paired urine and plasma samples

BK polyomavirus infection: more than 50 years and still a threat to kidney transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous human polyomavirus and a major infection after kidney transplantation, primarily due to immunosuppression. BKPyV reactivation can manifest as viruria in 30%-40%, viremia in 10%-20%, and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in 1%-10% of recipients. BKPyVAN is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Although the first case of BKPyV was identified in 1971, progress in its management has been limited. Specifically, there is no safe and effective antiviral agent or vaccine to treat or prevent the infection. Even in the current era, the mainstay approach to BKPyV is a reduction in immunosuppression, which is also limited by safety (risk of de novo donor specific antibody and rejection) and efficacy (graft failure). However, recently BKPyV has been getting more attention in the field, and some new treatment strategies including the utilization of viral-specific T-cell therapy are emerging. Given all these challenges, the primary focus of this article is complications associated with BKPyV, as well as strategies to mitigate negative outcomes.

Proteomic analysis investigating kidney transplantation outcomes- a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease given the significantly lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to remaining on dialysis. Rejection and graft failure remain common in transplant recipients with limited improvement in long-term transplant outcomes despite therapeutic advances. There is an unmet need in the development of non-invasive biomarkers that specifically monitor graft function and predict transplant pathologies that affect outcomes. Despite the potential of proteomic investigatory approaches, up to now, no candidate biomarkers of sufficient sensitivity or specificity have translated into clinical use. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise protein findings and protein pathways implicated in the literature to date, and potentially flag putative biomarkers worth validating in independent patient cohorts.

METHODS

This review followed the Joanna Briggs' Institute Methodology for a scoping review. MedlineALL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception until December 2022. Abstract and full text review were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Data was collated using a pre-designed data extraction tool.

RESULTS

One hundred one articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were single-centre retrospective studies of small sample size. Mass spectrometry was the most used technique to evaluate differentially expressed proteins between diagnostic groups and studies identified various candidate biomarkers such as immune or structural proteins.

DISCUSSION

Putative immune or structural protein candidate biomarkers have been identified using proteomic techniques in multiple sample types including urine, serum and fluid used to perfuse donor kidneys. The most consistent findings implicated proteins associated with tubular dysfunction and immunological regulatory pathways such as leukocyte trafficking. However, clinical translation and adoption of candidate biomarkers is limited, and these will require comprehensive evaluation in larger prospective, multicentre trials.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients With BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

Introduction

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is associated with graft dysfunction and loss; however, knowledge of immunosuppression reduction strategies and long-term graft, and patient outcomes across the disease spectrum is lacking.

Methods

This cohort study included 14,697 kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand (2005-2019), followed for 91,306 person years.

Results

BKPyVAN occurred in 460 recipients (3%) at a median posttransplant time of 4.8 months (interquartile range, 3.1-10.8). Graft loss (35% vs. 21%, P < 0.001), rejection (42% vs. 25%, P < 0.001), and death (18% vs. 13%, P = 0.002) were more common in the BKPyVAN group. The most frequent changes in immunosuppression after BKPyVAN were reduction (≤50%) in tacrolimus (172, 51%) and mycophenolate doses (134, 40%), followed by the conversion of mycophenolate to leflunomide (62, 19%) and tacrolimus to ciclosporin (20, 6%). Factors associated with the development of BKPyVAN included (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval) male sex (1.66; 1.34-2.05), recipient age (≥70 vs. <20 [2.46; 1.30-4.65]), recipient blood group (A vs. B [2.00; 1.19-3.34]), donor age (≥70 vs. <20 [2.99; 1.71-5.22]), earlier era (1.74; 1.35-2.25), donor/recipient ethnic mismatch (1.52; 1.23-1.87), tacrolimus use (1.46; 1.11-1.91), and transplantation at a lower-volume transplant center (1.61; 1.24-2.09). The development of BKPyVAN was associated with an increased risk of all-cause (1.75; 1.46-2.09) and death-censored graft loss (2.49; 1.99-3.11), but not mortality (1.15; 0.91-1.45).

Conclusions

BKPyVAN is associated with an increased risk of all-cause and death-censored graft loss, but not death. Interventional trials are urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction and novel strategies to minimize the adverse outcomes associated with BKPyVAN.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: A State-of-the-Art Review

BK virus maintains a latent infection that is ubiquitous in humans. It has a propensity for reactivation in the setting of a dysfunctional cellular immune response and is frequently encountered in kidney transplant recipients. Screening for the virus has been effective in preventing progression to nephropathy and graft loss. However, it can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In this in-depth state-of-the-art review, we will discuss the history of the virus, virology, epidemiology, cellular response, pathogenesis, methods of screening and diagnosis, evidence-based treatment strategies, and upcoming therapeutics, along with the issue of re-transplantation in patients.

Treatment of BK virus with a stepwise immunosuppression reduction and intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

BKV and BKVN are common in pediatric kidney transplant, but there is limited data on treatment approaches. Our objective was to study the prevalence of BKV and BKVN utilizing only plasma qPCR and report treatment outcomes with stepwise IR and IVIG.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric kidney transplants from 2013 to 2020. Excluded patients >21 years at transplant and immediate graft failure. Surveillance was conducted using only plasma BK qPCR at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually. BKV defined as ≥250 copies/ml and resolution as <250 copies/ml. Presumed BKVN as >10 000 copies/ml despite IR; and BKVN if confirmed on histology.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study; 20 (35.7%) had BKV. BKV was associated with longer duration of stent, 40 vs. 33.5 days (p = .004). Two patients (3.5%) had confirmed, and 2(3.5%) had presumed BKVN. The first-line treatment was IR in 100% of patients. BKVN confirmed and presumed received IVIG every month for six doses. Viral resolution was achieved in 70%, and no difference was noted in estimated glomerular filtration rate between BKV and non-BKV group (p = .438). There were no rejection episodes, and graft survival was 100% over median follow-up of 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma qPCR alone is adequate for screening and monitoring treatment of BKV and BKVN. A stepwise IR and IVIG resulted in BKV resolution in the majority of patients. Larger studies are required to study the role of IVIG in the treatment of BKVN.

Deciphering the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Urinary CXCL10 in Kidney Recipients With BK Virus Reactivation

BK virus (BKV) replication increases urinary chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 10 (uCXCL10) levels in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Here, we investigated uCXCL10 levels across different stages of BKV replication as a prognostic and predictive marker for functional decline in KTRs after BKV-DNAemia. uCXCL10 was assessed in a cross-sectional study (474 paired urine/blood/biopsy samples and a longitudinal study (1,184 samples from 60 KTRs with BKV-DNAemia). uCXCL10 levels gradually increased with urine (P-value < 0.0001) and blood BKV viral load (P < 0.05) but were similar in the viruria and no BKV groups (P > 0.99). In viremic patients, uCXCL10 at biopsy was associated with graft functional decline [HR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.08–2.51), P = 0.02], irrespective of baseline eGFR, blood viral load, or BKVN diagnosis. uCXL10/cr (threshold: 12.86 ng/mmol) discriminated patients with a low risk of graft function decline from high-risk patients (P = 0.01). In the longitudinal study, the uCXCL10 and BKV-DNAemia trajectories were superimposable. Stratification using the same uCXCL10/cr threshold at first viremia predicted the subsequent inflammatory response, assessed by time-adjusted uCXCL10/cr AUC (P < 0.001), and graft functional decline (P = 0.03). In KTRs, uCXCL10 increases in BKV-DNAemia but not in isolated viruria. uCXCL10/cr is a prognostic biomarker of eGFR decrease, and a 12.86 ng/ml threshold predicts higher inflammatory burdens and poor renal outcomes.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.