Liver transplantation for Hepatitis-B-associated liver disease - Three decades of experience

High-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues alone or plus immunoglobulin for HBV prophylaxis after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimum prophylactic regimen against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-infected patients is uncertain but of great clinical relevance. New evidence suggests that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-free approach would become a reasonable choice in the era of high-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues (HPNAs). We aimed to provide robust estimates for long-term survival and HBV recurrence in patients receiving different HBV-prophylaxis strategies after LT.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using both pseudo-individual patient data recovered from included studies (IPDMA) and conventional trial-level aggregate data meta-analysis (ADMA). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using different Cox proportional hazard models accounting for inter-study heterogeneity. ADMA was conducted to pool outcomes at specific time points.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 7897 patients and 41 studies involving 9435 were eligible for IPDMA and AMDA, respectively. Cumulative HBV recurrence rate and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years post-LT were 0.3%, 0.9%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 95.6%, 89%, 86.4%, 86.4% in the HPNAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir) + HBIG combination group vs. 0.6%, 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 94.5%, 86.8%, 84.8%, 81.2% in the HPNAs monotherapy group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.60, p = 0.64; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, p = 0.72), respectively. The results were compatible with AMDA.

CONCLUSION

A similar HBV recurrence and overall survival were found in patients who used HPNAs (mainly entecavir) monotherapy as in those who received a combination of HPNAs and HBIG. These findings address concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of HPNAs monotherapy.

Hepatitis B virus infection modeling using multi-cellular organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a global health concern despite the availability of vaccines. To date, the development of effective treatments has been severely hampered by the lack of reliable, reproducible, and scalable in vitro modeling systems that precisely recapitulate the virus life cycle and represent virus-host interactions. With the progressive understanding of liver organogenesis mechanisms, the development of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived hepatic sources and stromal cellular compositions provides novel strategies for personalized modeling and treatment of liver disease. Further, advancements in three-dimensional culture of self-organized liver-like organoids considerably promote in vitro modeling of intact human liver tissue, in terms of both hepatic function and other physiological characteristics. Combined with our experiences in the investigation of HBV infections using liver organoids, we have summarized the advances in modeling reported thus far and discussed the limitations and ongoing challenges in the application of liver organoids, particularly those with multi-cellular components derived from human iPSCs. This review provides general guidelines for establishing clinical-grade iPSC-derived multi-cellular organoids in modeling personalized hepatitis virus infection and other liver diseases, as well as drug testing and transplantation therapy.

Immunoglobulin, nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplant: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) represents an efficient strategy for reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Unfortunately, the long-term use of HBIG presents high costs. Therefore, the use of prophylaxis based only on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) has been recently postulated. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of HBIG ± NUC vs HBIG alone or NUC alone in post-LT HBV recurrence prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome investigated was the HBV recurrence after LT. Three analyses were done comparing the effect of (a) HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone; (b) HBIG+NUC vs NUC alone; and (c) HBIG alone vs NUC alone. Sub-analyses were also performed investigating the effect of low and high genetic barrierto-recurrence NUC.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included. The summary OR (95%CI) showed a decreased risk with the combination of HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone for HBV recurrence, being 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22-0.61; P < .001). HBIG + NUC combined treatment reduced HBV reappearance respect to NUC alone (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.16-0.30; P < .0001). Similarly, HBIG alone was significantly better than NUC alone in preventing HBV recurrence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.09-0.44; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with HBIG is relevant in preventing post-LT HBV recurrence. Its combination with NUC gives the best results in terms of protection. The present results should be considered in light of the fact that also old studies based on lamivudine use were included. Studies exploring in detail high genetic barrier-to-recurrence NUC and protocols with definite use of HBIG are needed.

Clinical and Histological Long-Term Follow-Up of De Novo HBV-Infection after Liver Transplantation

Background and Objectives: Development of hepatitis-B is considered a serious complication after liver transplantation. HBV de novo infection is a rather rare phenomenon, however it deserves attention in the era of donor organ shortage. The aim of the present analysis was to examine its course in liver transplant patients. Materials and Methods: Prevalence of de novo HBV-infections was extracted from our local transplant data base. Analysis focused on the moment of HBV-detection and on the long-term follow-up in terms of biochemical and histological changes over 30 years. Results: 46 patients were identified with the diagnosis of de novo hepatitis B. Median time from liver transplantation to diagnosis was 397 days (7-5505). 39 patients received antiviral therapy. No fibrosis progression could be detected, whereas the grade of inflammation significantly lessened from the moment of HBV detection to the end of histological follow-up over a median of 4344 days (range 123-9490). Patients with a poor virological control demonstrated a significantly poorer overall survival. Conclusions: De novo hepatitis B in liver transplant patients is a condition that can be controlled very well without significant fibrosis progression or graft loss if recognized on time within a regular transplant follow-up schedule.

Discontinuation of Passive Immunization Is Safe after Liver Transplantation for Combined HBV/HDV Infection

Patients after LT due to combined HBV/HDV infection are considered to be high-risk patients for recurrence of hepatitis B and D. To date, life-long prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and replication control with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) remains standard. We examined the course of 36 patients that underwent liver transplantation from 1989 to 2020 for combined HBV/HDV-associated end-stage liver disease in this retrospective study. Seventeen patients eventually discontinued HBIG therapy for various reasons. Their graft function, histopathological findings from routine liver biopsies and overall survival were compared with those that received an unaltered NA-based standard regimen combined with HBIG. The median follow-up was 204 and 227 months, respectively. The recurrence of HBV was 25% and did not differ between the groups of standard reinfection prophylaxis NA/HBIG (21.1%) and HBIG discontinuation (29.4%); (p = 0.56). No significant differences were found regarding the clinical course or histopathological aspects of liver tissue damage (inflammation, fibrosis, steatosis) between these two groups. Overall, and adjusted survival did not differ between the groups. Discontinuation of HBIG in stable patients after LT for combined HBV/HDV did not lead to impaired overall survival or higher recurrence rate of HBV/HDV infection in this long-term follow-up. Therefore, the recommendation of the duration of HBG administration must be questioned. The earliest time of discontinuation remains unclear.

HBV-infection rate and long-term outcome after liver-transplantation of anti-HBc-positive liver-grafts to HBV-naïve recipients: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anti-HBc only positive liver grafts may be suitable for HBV-naive recipients insofar as an appropriate infection prophylaxis is performed. Therefore, we investigated the effect of prophylactic regimens on HBV infection prevention and long-term outcome of anti-HBc-positive graft recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective monocenter study consisted of a cohort of 1912 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation at our transplant center between June 1987 and July 2019. 81 HBV-naïve patients after reception of an anti-HBc-positive liver-graft and consecutive HBV prophylaxis were selected for further examination. HBV infection rate and host- and graft-survival rates were compared to a matched control group consisting of 162 HBV-naïve patients after reception of anti-HBc-negative grafts. Pharmaceutical HBV prophylaxis included: only HBIG, only NUCs, or combined HBIG and NUCs.

RESULTS

Compared to control cases of HBV-naïve anti-HBc-negative graft recipients, no differences in host- and graft-survival rate were determined.13 of 81 anti-HBc-positive graft recipients (16%) developed HBV-infection after liver transplantation. No patient suffered from HBV infection after receiving modern NUCs. Survival analysis showed no statistical differences between patients with and without infection concerning host- and graft-survival.

CONCLUSION

Especially in times of organ shortage, anti-HBc-positive liver grafts may be useful for liver transplantation in HBV-naïve recipients. Efficient prophylactic regimens can prevent HBV-infection.

The strategy and efficacy of prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation for HBV-related diseases in the era of potent nucleos(t)ide analogues: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of liver transplant (LT) recipients under potent nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA)-based regimens and investigate different prophylactic schemes.

METHODS

We followed PRISMA statement to conduct this study. Two reviewers independently searched relevant literature via PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science and Insightmeme. Studies were included if they evaluated hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence under potent NA-based regimens in patients who received HBV-related LT. Primary and secondary outcomes were HBV recurrence, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, all-cause and HBV recurrence-related mortality. Incidences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and assessed by fixed and random effects models. Subgroup analyses were used to examine the impact of different treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Altogether 25 studies (N = 2327) were included, with a pooled HBV recurrence rate of 1.01% (95% CI 0.53%-1.59%). HBV viremia or hepatitis D virus superinfection did not influence HBV recurrence significantly (P = 0.23 and 0.71, respectively). The recurrence rate under an indefinite combination of potent NA and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was lower than that under potent NA monotherapy (P = 0.000) and similar to that under NA plus a finite course of HBIG (P = 0.48). The pooled HCC recurrence rate was 5.34% (95% CI 0.78%-12.48%). HBV recurrence-related mortality and all-cause mortality were 0% and 6.95% (95% CI 4.30%-10.08%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Potent NA-based regimens provide satisfactory HBV antiviral prophylaxis and improve long-term outcomes for LT recipients. A finite combination of potent NA and HBIG is an alternative to life-long dual therapy.

Fluoxazolevir inhibits hepatitis C virus infection in humanized chimeric mice by blocking viral membrane fusion

Fluoxazolevir is an aryloxazole-based entry inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV). We show that fluoxazolevir inhibits fusion of HCV with hepatic cells by binding HCV envelope protein 1 to prevent fusion. Nine of ten fluoxazolevir resistance-associated substitutions are in envelope protein 1, and four are in a putative fusion peptide. Pharmacokinetic studies in mice, rats and dogs revealed that fluoxazolevir localizes to the liver. A 4-week intraperitoneal regimen of fluoxazolevir in humanized chimeric mice infected with HCV genotypes 1b, 2a or 3 resulted in a 2-log reduction in viraemia, without evidence of drug resistance. In comparison, daclatasvir, an approved HCV drug, suppressed more than 3 log of viraemia but is associated with the emergence of resistance-associated substitutions in mice. Combination therapy using fluoxazolevir and daclatasvir cleared HCV genotypes 1b and 3 in mice. Fluoxazolevir combined with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir was also effective in clearing multidrug-resistant HCV replication in mice. Fluoxazolevir may be promising as the next generation of combination drug cocktails for HCV treatment.

Self-limited HBV infection of the recipient does not reactivate after liver transplantation: Observations from a 30-year liver transplant program

BACKGROUND

A self-limited hepatitis B infection can reactivate in patients under immunosuppression or chemotherapy (reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV-DNA). Exact circumstances of HBV reactivation in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver diseases (ESLD) unrelated to HBV are unknown, and recommendations on HBV prophylaxis remain unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 1273 liver transplants, 168 patients with a self-limited HBV hepatitis B infection prior to LT were identified from our prospective liver transplant database. Patients with underlying chronic HBV infection and recipients of an anti-HBc-positive liver were not included in the analysis. Demographic, laboratory, serological, and virological data were analyzed retrospectively. Appearance of HBsAg or HBV-DNA was defined as reactivation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after LT was 12.0 years (0.6-30.7 years). The rate of HBV reactivation was 0% independent of antiviral prophylaxis (n = 7; 4.2%), the etiology of ESLD, hepatitis C treatment, or the anti-HBs concentration. The overall patient survival with a history of a self-limited HBV infection before LT did not significantly differ from the rest of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues post-liver transplantation in order to prevent HBV reactivation in patients with a resolved self-limited hepatitis B infection prior to LT seems to be omittable since the main viral reservoir is removed by the hepatectomy. These findings may clarify the current uncertainty in the recommendations regarding the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with self-limited hepatitis B prior to LT.

Prevention of HBV Recurrence after Liver Transplant: A Review

Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as a major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and HBV-induced liver failure is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Until about two decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection was a relative contraindication, due to high risk of viral replication with the use of immunosuppressants which could result in graft infection. In the 1990s, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) use significantly reduced the risk of graft infection, improving outcomes of liver transplant in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, very high costs, especially with the need for long-term use, became a major concern. With the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), there was less need for high-dose, long-term HBIg use to prevent HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was initially used but resistance soon became a major issue. This was followed by more potent NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, emerging as the more preferred agents. Additionally, the use of these antiviral agents (HBIg and/or NAs) have made it possible to use the grafts from donors with positivity for hepatitis B core antibody, allowing for expansion of the donor pool. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on management protocols, which vary significantly amongst centers. In this review, we appraise studies on management strategies used and the role of active vaccination in the prevention of HBV recurrence in post-liver transplant patients.

Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin discontinuation in long-term liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95).

CONCLUSION

HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.

Evolution of Liver Transplantation in Kazakhstan: Two-Era Experience of a Single Center, the First Report

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation has been performed in Kazakhstan since 2011. The present study aimed to analyze the outcomes of the most experienced liver transplant center in Kazakhstan.

METHODS

Between December 2011 and December 2018, 131 liver transplantations were performed at A.N. Syzganov's National Scientific Center of Surgery. The clinical data of 88 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantations from December 2011 to December 2017 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the periods in which the procedure was performed: the early era (2011-2014; n = 25) and the late era (2015-2017; n = 63). The clinical course and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the characteristics of the recipients. The patients who were treated during the late era had significantly better survival rates compared with the early era (1 year, 90.5%; 3 year, 79.6%; vs 1 year, 67.7%; 3 year 63.3%; P < .05). Right lobe grafts were used significantly more frequently during the late era (P < .05), while splenectomy was indicated significantly less frequently (P < .05). We also noted a decrease in the complication rate, including early postoperative mortality (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 7 years, the liver transplant program has been established, and the operative techniques used in living donor liver transplant have changed dramatically. Patient survival has been improving with increased experience.