1
|
Hazenberg IT, Middelkoop SJM, de Joode AAE, Rabbeljee JD, Pol RA, Doornweerd BHJ, Sanders JSF, Stegeman CA. External ureteric stent versus internal double J stent in kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis on the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2023; 3:1130672. [PMID: 37675367 PMCID: PMC10479681 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2023.1130672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Urologic complications (UCs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common after kidney transplantation. Intraoperative stent placement at the vesicoureteric anastomosis reduces UC risk, but increases UTI risk. Methods In 2014 our stenting protocol changed from external ureteric stent (ES) to internal double J stent (DJ). We retrospectively studied the occurrence of UCs and UTIs in relation to ES or DJ in 697 kidney recipients. Methods An ES was used in 403 patients (57.8%), in 294 (42.2%) a DJ. ES was removed 7-12 days and DJ 3-4 weeks post-operative. Induction immunosuppression was the same in both groups. Primary outcomes at 6 months follow-up were UC (urinary leakage/ureter stenosis) and UTI; they were related to stenting procedure and clinical and transplant characteristics. The incidence of UCs was similar for ES (8.4%) and DJ (6.8%), p=0.389. ES use was a significant risk factor for UTI (OR 1.69 (1.15-2.50), p=0.008). Post-transplant hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DJ group. Despite more acute rejection episodes with ES (ES/DJ: 16.4%/6.1%, p<0.001), no clinical relevant differences in graft outcomes existed. Discussion A DJ is, compared to ES, associated with a lower incidence of UTIs and comparable occurrence of UCs and is therefore the preferred technique for stenting the vesicoureteric anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ietje T. Hazenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J. M. Middelkoop
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anoek A. E. de Joode
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Juliette D. Rabbeljee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robert A. Pol
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Benjamin H. J. Doornweerd
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F. Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Coen A. Stegeman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Recipients-Is There a Need for Antibiotic Stewardship? J Clin Med 2021; 11:jcm11010226. [PMID: 35011966 PMCID: PMC8745876 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common infections after kidney transplantation. Given the risk of urosepsis and the potential threat to the graft, the threshold for treating UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria with broad spectrum antibiotics is low. Historically fluoroquinolones were prescription favorites for patients that underwent kidney transplantation (KT). After the recent recommendation to avoid them in these patients, however, alternative treatment strategies need to be investigated (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 207 consecutive adult kidney transplantations that were performed at the department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery of the University Hospital of Tuebingen between January 2015 and August 2020. All charts were screened for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and urinary tract infections (UTI) and the patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. (3) Results: Of the 207 patients, 68 patients suffered from urinary tract infections. Patients who developed UTI had worse graft function at discharge (p = 0.024) and at the 12 months follow-up (p < 0.001). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were Ciprofloxacin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam. To both, bacterial resistance was more common in the study cohort than in the control group. (4) Conclusions: Urinary tract infections appear to be linked to worse graft functions. Thus, prevention and treatment should be accompanied by antibiotic stewardship teams.
Collapse
|
3
|
Suárez Fernández ML, Ridao Cano N, Álvarez Santamarta L, Gago Fraile M, Blake O, Díaz Corte C. A Current Review of the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081456. [PMID: 34441390 PMCID: PMC8392421 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with a potential impact on graft survival. UTIs after KT are usually caused by Gram-negative microorganisms. Other pathogens which are uncommon in the general population should be considered in KT patients, especially BK virus since an early diagnosis is necessary to improve the prognosis. UTIs following kidney transplantation are classified into acute simple cystitis, acute pyelonephritis/complicated UTI, and recurrent UTI, due to their different clinical presentation, prognosis, and management. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) represents a frequent finding after kidney transplantation, but ASB is considered to be a separate entity apart from UTI since it is not necessarily a disease state. In fact, current guidelines do not recommend routine screening and treatment of ASB in KT patients, since a beneficial effect has not been shown. Harmful effects such as the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and a higher incidence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea have been associated with the antibiotic treatment of ASB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Luisa Suárez Fernández
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Natalia Ridao Cano
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | - Lucia Álvarez Santamarta
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | - María Gago Fraile
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| | | | - Carmen Díaz Corte
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain; (N.R.C.); (L.Á.S.); (M.G.F.); (C.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Almaimani AO. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Post Renal Transplant Patients: To Treat or Not? Cureus 2021; 13:e15713. [PMID: 34159042 PMCID: PMC8213437 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) can commonly occur within the first few weeks following kidney transplantation procedures. Although the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria and acute graft pyelonephritis is important to reduce the risk of graft rejections following kidney transplantation, the efficacy of antibiotics administration remains controversial among studies in the literature. The aim of this review is to elaborate more on asymptomatic bacteriuria following kidney transplantation and try to formulate proper evidence about the efficacy of antibiotics administration on eliminating the frequency of infections and enhancing the quality of care for patients. Most studies in the literature are observational, which are usually biased in the interventions. However, the current evidence regarding the management and screening of asymptomatic bacteriuria seems to discourage such an approach. Almost all of the included studies reported that antibiotic administration did not significantly lower the rates of secondary symptomatic UTIs or enhance the functions of the graft. In addition, there is no significant impact on mortality and other clinical outcomes. Lastly, the frequent administration of antibiotics can significantly increase the risk of recurrence due to the emergence of novel strains of bacteria that are resistant to the currently administered antibiotics making it unfavorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas O Almaimani
- Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Airbase Hospital, Dhahran, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deininger S, Nadalin S, Amend B, Guthoff M, Heyne N, Königsrainer A, Strohäker J, Stenzl A, Rausch S. Minimal-invasive management of urological complications after kidney transplantation. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 53:1267-1277. [PMID: 33655463 PMCID: PMC8192401 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02825-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation represents the gold standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Improvements in surgical technique and pharmacologic treatment have continuously prolonged allograft survival in recent years. However, urological complications are frequently observed, leading to both postoperative morbidity and putative deterioration of allograft function. While open redo surgery in these patients is often accompanied by elevated surgical risk, endoscopic management of urological complications is an alternative, minimal-invasive option. In the present article, we reviewed the literature on relevant urological postoperative complications after kidney transplantation and describe preventive approaches during the pre-transplantation assessment and their management using minimal-invasive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Deininger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Salzburg University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bastian Amend
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martina Guthoff
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nils Heyne
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Strohäker
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|