1
|
Schreiber B, Tripathi S, Nikiforow S, Chandraker A. Adoptive Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Cancer and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review. Semin Nephrol 2024; 44:151498. [PMID: 38555223 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most devastating complications of kidney transplantation and constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Immunosuppression, although effective in preventing allograft rejection, inherently inhibits immune surveillance against oncogenic viral infections and malignancy. Adoptive cell therapy, particularly immune effector cell therapy, has long been a modality of interest in both cancer and transplantation, though has only recently stepped into the spotlight with the development of virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Although these modalities are best described in hematopoietic cell transplantation and hematologic malignancies, their potential application in the SOT setting may hold tremendous promise for those with limited therapeutic options. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the development of adoptive cell therapies with a focus on virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We also describe the current experience of these therapies in the SOT setting as well as the challenges in their application and future directions in their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Schreiber
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sudipta Tripathi
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Nikiforow
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anil Chandraker
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gorriceta JH, Lopez Otbo A, Uehara G, Posadas Salas MA. BK viral infection: A review of management and treatment. World J Transplant 2023; 13:309-320. [PMID: 38174153 PMCID: PMC10758681 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i6.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BK viral infection remains to be a challenging post-transplant infection, which can result in kidney dysfunction. The mainstay approach to BK infection is reduction of immunosuppression. Alterations in immunosuppressive regimen with minimization of calcineurin inhibitors, use of mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors, and leflunomide have been attempted with variable outcomes. Over the past few years, investigators have explored potential therapeutic options for BK infection. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and treatment was found to have no benefit in kidney transplant recipients. The utility of cidofovir is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Intravenous immunoglobulin is becoming a popular option for treatment and prophylaxis for BK infection, as it increases the neutralizing antibody titers against the most common BK virus serotypes. Virus-specific T cell therapy is an emerging treatment option for BK viremia. In this review, we will explore management and therapeutic options for BK infection and recent evidence available in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Lopez Otbo
- Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon 1112, Philippines
| | - Genta Uehara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
| | - Maria Aurora Posadas Salas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Probst V, Thomas SJ, Ouellette CP. Adopting a new approach to treat refractory or resistant viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14161. [PMID: 37793055 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Varvara Probst
- Host Defense Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Sanya J Thomas
- Host Defense Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher P Ouellette
- Host Defense Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elalouf A. Infections after organ transplantation and immune response. Transpl Immunol 2023; 77:101798. [PMID: 36731780 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD4+ helper T-cell subset and CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Elalouf
- Bar-Ilan University, Department of Management, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pathogen-specific T Cells: Targeting Old Enemies and New Invaders in Transplantation and Beyond. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e809. [PMID: 36698615 PMCID: PMC9831191 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Adoptive immunotherapy with virus-specific cytotoxic T cells (VSTs) has evolved over the last three decades as a strategy to rapidly restore virus-specific immunity to prevent or treat viral diseases after solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic cell-transplantation (allo-HCT). Since the early proof-of-principle studies demonstrating that seropositive donor-derived T cells, specific for the commonest pathogens post transplantation, namely cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and generated by time- and labor-intensive protocols, could effectively control viral infections, major breakthroughs have then streamlined the manufacturing process of pathogen-specific T cells (pSTs), broadened the breadth of target recognition to even include novel emerging pathogens and enabled off-the-shelf administration or pathogen-naive donor pST production. We herein review the journey of evolution of adoptive immunotherapy with nonengineered, natural pSTs against infections and virus-associated malignancies in the transplant setting and briefly touch upon recent achievements using pSTs outside this context.
Collapse
|
6
|
The effect of BK polyomavirus large T antigen on CD4 and CD8 T cells in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2022; 74:101655. [PMID: 35777612 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Human BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) can affect the machinery of the host cell to induce optimal viral replication or transform them into tumor cells. Reactivation of BKPyV happens due to immunosuppression therapies following renal transplantation which might result in BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and allograft loss. The first protein that expresses after entering into host cells and has an important role in pathogenicity is the Large T antigen (LT-Ag). In this review tries to study the molecular and cellular inter-regulatory counteractions especially between CD4 and CD8 T cells, and BKPyV LT-Ag may have role in nephropathy after renal transplantation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Agrawal A, Ison MG, Danziger-Isakov L. Long-Term Infectious Complications of Kidney Transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:286-295. [PMID: 33879502 PMCID: PMC8823942 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.15971020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Infections remain a common complication of solid-organ transplantation. Most infections in the first month after transplant are typically health care-associated infections, whereas late infections, beyond 6-12 months, are community-acquired infections. Opportunistic infections most frequently present in the first 12 months post-transplant and can be modulated on prior exposures and use of prophylaxis. In this review, we summarize the current epidemiology of postkidney transplant infections with a focus on key viral (BK polyomavirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and norovirus), bacterial (urinary tract infections and Clostridioides difficile colitis), and fungal infections. Current guidelines for safe living post-transplant are also summarized. Literature supporting prophylaxis and vaccination is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akansha Agrawal
- Division of Nephrology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beyond antivirals: virus-specific T-cell immunotherapy for BK virus haemorrhagic cystitis and JC virus progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2021; 34:627-634. [PMID: 34751182 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The clinical manifestations of the polyomaviruses BK and JC in immunocompromised patients include BK virus (BKV) induced haemorrhagic cystitis and nephropathy, and JC virus (JCV) associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and are typically a consequence of impaired adaptive immunity in the host. To date, little clinical success has been achieved with antiviral agents or other drug therapies to treat these conditions. Here we review the methods and outcomes of the most recent clinical studies utilising adoptive immunotherapy with BK and/or JC virus-specific T-cells (VST) as either prophylaxis or treatment alternatives. RECENT FINDINGS In the last 12-18 months, several clinical trials have been published in the post-haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting showing good clinical success with the use of VST for treatment of BK viremia ± haemorrhagic cystitis. Between 82 and 100% clinical response has been observed in haemorrhagic cystitis using either third-party or donor-derived VST. The therapy was well tolerated with few cases of graft versus host disease in HSCT recipients, but immune mediated renal allograft loss was observed in one renal transplant recipient. Studies using BKV/JCV VST to treat PML are hindered by few patients who are sufficiently stable to receive VST. In a condition that otherwise carries such poor prognosis, VST were associated with clearance of JC virus, clinical and radiological improvement in some patients. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was a noted adverse event. SUMMARY Restoration of BK and JC virus immunity using VST immunotherapy has shown good clinical outcomes in BKV associated infections. Further evaluation with the administration of VST earlier in the course of disease is warranted for the treatment of BKV associated nephropathy in renal allograft and in JCV PML. In both indications, larger cohorts and standardisation of dosing and outcome measures would be of benefit.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jahan S, Scuderi C, Francis L, Neller MA, Rehan S, Crooks P, Ambalathingal GR, Smith C, Khanna R, John GT. T-cell adoptive immunotherapy for BK nephropathy in renal transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13399. [PMID: 32608543 PMCID: PMC7816252 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction BK virus (BKPyV) nephropathy occurs in 1%‐10% of kidney transplant recipients, with suboptimal therapeutic options. Case A 54‐year‐old woman received a transplant in March 2017. BKPyV was detected at 1.5 × 102 copies/mL within a month, necessitating halving of mycophenolate and addition of leflunomide. Allograft histology in December showed polyomavirus nephropathy treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and cessation of mycophenolate. In February 2018, cidofovir and ciprofloxacin were commenced. In April, tacrolimus was reduced while introducing everolimus. A second graft biopsy in August showed increasing polyoma virus infection and a subsequent biopsy in September for worsening renal function showed 30% of tubular reactivity for simian virus 40 (SV40). Allogeneic BKPyV‐reactive T cells were generated from the patient's daughter and infused over 10 sessions starting late September. The fourth allograft biopsy in November 2018 demonstrated involvement of BKPyV in 50% of tubules. Allograft function continued to decline, requiring hemodialysis from December 2018. Allograft nephrectomy after 6 months showed <1% SV40 in preserved tubules and 80% interstitial fibrosis. Discussion We conclude that the T‐cell adoptive immunotherapy reduced BKPyV load significantly despite extensive infection, but attendant fibrosis and tubular atrophy led to graft failure. Early intervention with T‐cell therapy may prove efficacious in BKPyV nephropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Jahan
- Kidney Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Carla Scuderi
- Kidney Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Leo Francis
- Pathology Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Michelle A Neller
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Sweera Rehan
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Pauline Crooks
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - George R Ambalathingal
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Corey Smith
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Rajiv Khanna
- QIMR Berghofer Centre for Immunotherapy and Vaccine Development, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - George T John
- Kidney Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|