1
|
Goodlet KJ, McCreary EK, Nailor MD, Barnes D, Brokhof MM, Bova S, Clemens E, Kelly B, Lichvar A, Pluckrose DM, Summers BB, Szempruch KR, Tchen S. Therapeutic Myths in Solid Organ Transplantation Infectious Diseases. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae342. [PMID: 38983710 PMCID: PMC11232700 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Infection management in solid organ transplantation poses unique challenges, with a diverse array of potential pathogens and associated antimicrobial therapies. With limited high-quality randomized clinical trials to direct optimal care, therapeutic "myths" may propagate and contribute to suboptimal or excessive antimicrobial use. We discuss 6 therapeutic myths with particular relevance to solid organ transplantation and provide recommendations for infectious diseases clinicians involved in the care of this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kellie J Goodlet
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, USA
| | - Erin K McCreary
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael D Nailor
- Department of Pharmacy Services, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Darina Barnes
- Department of Pharmacy, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marissa M Brokhof
- Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah Bova
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Evan Clemens
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Beth Kelly
- Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alicia Lichvar
- Center for Transplantation, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Dawn M Pluckrose
- Department of Pharmacy, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bryant B Summers
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kristen R Szempruch
- Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephanie Tchen
- Department of Pharmacy, Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McMullan B, Kim HY, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Tacconelli E, Dao A, Oladele R, Tanti D, Govender NP, Shin JH, Heim J, Ford NP, Huttner B, Galas M, Nahrgang SA, Gigante V, Sati H, Alffenaar JW, Morrissey CO, Beardsley J. Features and global impact of invasive fungal infections caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii: A systematic review to inform the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med Mycol 2024; 62:myae038. [PMID: 38935910 PMCID: PMC11210620 DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the current global impact of invasive infections caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (principally pneumonia: PJP), and was carried out to inform the World Health Organization Fungal Priority Pathogens List. PubMed and Web of Science were used to find studies reporting mortality, inpatient care, complications/sequelae, antifungal susceptibility/resistance, preventability, annual incidence, global distribution, and emergence in the past 10 years, published from January 2011 to February 2021. Reported mortality is highly variable, depending on the patient population: In studies of persons with HIV, mortality was reported at 5%-30%, while in studies of persons without HIV, mortality ranged from 4% to 76%. Risk factors for disease principally include immunosuppression from HIV, but other types of immunosuppression are increasingly recognised, including solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, autoimmune and inflammatory disease, and chemotherapy for cancer. Although prophylaxis is available and generally effective, burdensome side effects may lead to discontinuation. After a period of decline associated with improvement in access to HIV treatment, new risk groups of immunosuppressed patients with PJP are increasingly identified, including solid organ transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan McMullan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hannah Yejin Kim
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney LHD, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo
- Mycology Reference Laboratory, National Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | - Aiken Dao
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney LHD, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rita Oladele
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Daniel Tanti
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nelesh P Govender
- Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George’s University of London, London, UK
- MRC Centre for Medical Mycology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jong-Hee Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Jutta Heim
- Scientific Advisory Committee, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
| | - Nathan Paul Ford
- Department of HIV, Viral Hepatitis and STIs, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Marcelo Galas
- Antimicrobial Resistance Special Program, Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washingdom, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Saskia Andrea Nahrgang
- Antimicrobial Resistance Programme, World Health Organization European Office, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jan Willem Alffenaar
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney LHD, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C Orla Morrissey
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justin Beardsley
- Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney LHD, North Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saadatzadeh T, Angarone M, Stosor V. Pneumocystis jirovecii in solid organ transplant recipients: updates in epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2024; 37:121-128. [PMID: 38230604 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000001002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review highlights the epidemiology of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid organ transplant recipients, advancements in the diagnostic landscape, and updates in treatment and prevention. RECENT FINDINGS The increasing use of immune-depleting agents in the context of solid organ transplantation has given rise to P. jirovecii pneumonia in this population. The use of prophylaxis has dramatically reduced risk of infection; however, late-onset infections occur after cessation of prophylaxis and in the setting of lymphopenia, advancing patient age, acute allograft rejection, and cytomegalovirus infection. Diagnosis requires respiratory specimens, with PCR detection of Pneumocystis replacing traditional staining methods. Quantitative PCR may be a useful adjunct to differentiate between infection and colonization. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing is gaining attention as a noninvasive diagnostic tool. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remains the drug of choice for treatment and prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia. Novel antifungal agents are under investigation. SUMMARY P. jirovecii is a fungal opportunistic pathogen that remains a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Early detection and timely treatment remain the pillars of management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Valentina Stosor
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases
- Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yetmar ZA, Chesdachai S, Duffy D, Smith BH, Challener DW, Seville MT, Bosch W, Beam E. Risk factors and prophylaxis for nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A nested case-control study. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15016. [PMID: 37170686 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nocardia is an opportunistic pathogen that primarily affects immunocompromised individuals, including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Up to 2.65% of SOT recipients develop nocardiosis; however, few studies have examined risk factors and prophylaxis for nocardiosis. METHODS We performed a multicenter, matched nested case-control study of adult SOT recipients with culture-confirmed nocardiosis from 2000 through 2020. Controls were matched up to 2:1 by sex, first transplanted organ, year of transplant, transplant center, and adequate post-transplant follow-up. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze associations with nocardiosis. Cox proportional hazards regression compared 12-month mortality between infection and uninfected patients. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-three SOT recipients were matched to 245 uninfected controls. Elevated calcineurin inhibitor level, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, lymphopenia, higher prednisone dose, and older age were significantly associated with nocardiosis while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was protective (odds ratio [OR] .34; 95% confidence interval [CI] .13-.84). The effect of prophylaxis was similar, though not always statistically significant, in sensitivity analyses that only included prophylaxis dosed more than twice-per-week (OR .30; 95% CI .11-.80) or restricted to years 2015-2020 (OR .33, 95% CI .09-1.21). Nocardiosis was associated with increased 12-month mortality (hazard ratio 5.47; 95% confidence interval 2.42-12.35). CONCLUSIONS Multiple measures of immunosuppression and lack of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis were associated with nocardiosis in SOT recipients. Effectiveness of prophylaxis may be related to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole dose or frequency. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be preferentially utilized over alternative agents in SOT recipients with augmented immunosuppression or signs of heightened immunocompromise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Supavit Chesdachai
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dustin Duffy
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Byron H Smith
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas W Challener
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Wendelyn Bosch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Advances in immunoglobulin E mediated antibiotic allergy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2022; 34:609-615. [PMID: 36036421 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to identify recent advances in our understanding and management of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated antibiotic allergy. RECENT FINDINGS Antibiotics remain a leading cause of fatal anaphylaxis reported to the FDA. However, recent advances have defined the features of adult and pediatric patients without true IgE-mediated allergy or any mechanism of anaphylaxis when tested. This has created opportunities to use direct challenges to disprove these allergies at the point-of-care and improves antibiotic stewardship. Additional advances have highlighted cross-reactive structural considerations within classes of drugs, in particular the R1 side-chain of cephalosporins, that appear to drive true immune-mediated cross-reactivity. Further advances in risk-based approaches to skin testing, phenotyping, and re-exposure challenges are needed to standardize antibiotic allergy evaluation. SUMMARY Recent advances in defining true IgE-mediated drug allergy have helped to identify patients unlikely to be skin-test positive. In turn, this has identified patients who can skip skin testing and proceed to direct ingestion challenge using history risk-based approaches. The ability to identify the small number of patients with true IgE-mediated allergy and study their natural history over time, as well as the vast majority without true allergy will facilitate important and novel mechanistic discoveries.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen RY, Li DW, Wang JY, Zhuang SY, Wu HY, Wu JJ, Qu JW, Sun N, Zhong C, Zhu C, Zhang M, Yu YT, Yuan XD. Prophylactic effect of low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in adult recipients of kidney transplantation: a real-world data study. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 125:209-215. [PMID: 36243280 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose trimethoprim (TMP)-sulfamethoxazole (SMX) (TMP-SMX) as the primary prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in adult recipients of kidney transplantation. METHODS Three kinds of prescriptions in kidney recipients were documented, including 20 mg TMP/100 mg SMX oral daily, 20 mg TMP/100 mg SMX oral every other day, and nonprophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of PJP in the first 180 days of follow-up after kidney transplantation. The secondary outcomes were changes in renal and liver function. RESULTS Among the 1469 recipients, 1066 (72.56%) received 20 mg TMP/100 mg SMX daily, 127 (8.65%) received 20 mg TMP/100 mg SMX every other day, and 276 (18.79%) did not have prophylaxis prescription. The 276 recipients in the nonprophylaxis group had 124.92 person-years of follow-up, during which PJP occurred in 29 patients, for an incidence rate of 23.21 (95% confidence interval 15.76-32.72) per 100 person-years. The TMP-SMX daily group and the TMP-SMX every other day group had 524.89 and 62.07 person-years of follow-up, respectively, with no occurrence of PJP. There was no significant difference among the three groups in changes in renal and liver function (P >0.05, respectively). A total of 111 recipients in each group were enrolled in the propensity score matching analysis. It was revealed that the 111 nonprophylaxis recipients had 51.27 person-years of follow-up and 10 PJP cases. Prophylaxis was considered effective because there was a significant difference between the three groups (P <0.001). CONCLUSION Low-dose TMP-SMX prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of PJP within 6 months after kidney transplantation and has a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruo-Yang Chen
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Da-Wei Li
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie-Ying Wang
- Department of Clinical Research Center, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shao-Yong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao-Yu Wu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia-Jin Wu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun-Wen Qu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Sun
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Zhong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng Zhu
- Department of Disease Prevention and Control, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yue-Tian Yu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xiao-Dong Yuan
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ham YY, Joshi S, Sukerman E. Delabeling penicillin and other antibiotic allergies in solid organ transplantation patients. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13897. [DOI: 10.1111/tid.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Young Yoon Ham
- Department of Pharmacy Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
| | - Shyam Joshi
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
| | - Ellie Sukerman
- Division of Infectious Diseases Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yetmar ZA, Wilson JW, Beam E. Recurrent nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: An evaluation of secondary prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13753. [PMID: 34724316 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised individuals are at risk for Nocardia infection, with a recurrence rate of approximately 5%. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients often receive secondary prophylaxis due to their requirement of lifelong immunosuppression. However, data supporting this practice is sparse. We sought to evaluate Nocardia recurrence in SOT recipients, specifically evaluating secondary prophylaxis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients diagnosed with nocardiosis from 2000 through 2020. We included adult SOT recipients who completed their course of Nocardia therapy and had at least 6 months of posttherapy follow-up. The primary outcome was Nocardia recurrence, which included relapse and reinfection. RESULTS One hundred two patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six (64.7%) were male and mean age was 58.6 ± 11.7 years. Most common SOT types were kidney (46.1%), heart (18.6%), kidney-pancreas (11.8%), and lung (10.8%). Most common sites of infection were lung (85.3%), skin (17.6%), and brain (14.7%). Secondary prophylaxis was utilized in 53 (52.0%) patients. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) single-strength daily was the most common prophylaxis agent and dose. Five patients (4.9%) experienced Nocardia recurrence, three of which were receiving secondary prophylaxis at time of recurrence. Two recurrences were with the same Nocardia species. Factors associated with recurrence were lung transplantation (p = .011), chronic lung disease (p = .032), and treatment ≤120 days (p = .006). Time from treatment completion to recurrence ranged from 107 to 875 days. CONCLUSIONS Nocardia recurrence in SOT recipients is an uncommon event. TMP-SMX secondary prophylaxis is incompletely protective and recurrence may be dependent upon other factors. Further study of secondary prophylaxis is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John W Wilson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|