1
|
Kleiboeker HL, Wang J, Borkowski N, Miner B, Prom A, Paplaczyk K, Wright J, Subramani MV, Arunachalam A, Betensley AD, Tomic R, Myers CN. Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2024:e14337. [PMID: 38980979 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). METHODS Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0 × 109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0 × 109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. RESULTS 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna L Kleiboeker
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jacob Wang
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicole Borkowski
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Canning Thoracic Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brad Miner
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Canning Thoracic Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alyson Prom
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Krista Paplaczyk
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer Wright
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Canning Thoracic Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mrinalini Venkata Subramani
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ambalavanan Arunachalam
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alan D Betensley
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rade Tomic
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Catherine N Myers
- Department of Transplant Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stewart AG, Kotton CN. What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2024; 108:884-897. [PMID: 37899366 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam G Stewart
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trappe M, Affeldt P, Grundmann F, Kann M, Koehler FC, Müller RU, Stippel D, Kaiser R, Knops E, Heger E, Steger G, Klein F, Kurschat C, Di Cristanziano V. Five-year single-center analysis of cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients and possible implication for novel prophylactic therapy approaches. Transpl Infect Dis 2024; 26:e14233. [PMID: 38180168 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are a common complication after kidney transplantation (KTx) and negatively affecting patient outcome. Valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis is often limited by drug-induced side effects and dose reduction due to decline in kidney function. METHOD In the present study, episodes of CMV viremia in the first year after KTx in a cohort of 316 recipients were analyzed retrospectively to identify risk factors linked to persistent infections. RESULTS In the studied cohort, 18.7% of patients showed a high-risk (HR) constellation (D+/R-) for CMV infections. CMV viremia affected 22% of our cohort, with HR patients being the most affected cohort (44.1%). Within this group, most viremic events (65.3%) occurred while patients were still on prophylactic therapy, showing significantly higher viral loads and a longer duration compared to seropositive recipients. CONCLUSION The analysis at hand revealed that detection of viremia under ongoing antiviral prophylaxis bears an increased risk for sustained viral replication and antiviral drug resistance in HR patients. We identified low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lower dose VGC prophylaxis post-KTx as a risk factor for breakthrough infections in HR patients in our single center cohort. These patients might benefit from a closer CMV monitoring or novel prophylactic agents as letermovir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Trappe
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick Affeldt
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Franziska Grundmann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kann
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix C Koehler
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roman-Ulrich Müller
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Rolf Kaiser
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Knops
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gertrud Steger
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Klein
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CECAD Research Center, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veronica Di Cristanziano
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yetmar ZA, Kudva YC, Seville MT, Bosch W, Huskey JL, Jarmi T, Kukla A, Dean PG, Razonable RR, Beam E. Risk of cytomegalovirus infection and subsequent allograft failure after pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:271-279. [PMID: 37839709 PMCID: PMC10843403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection after transplantation, but few studies have evaluated its epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes among pancreas transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, at 3 sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary outcome was clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi), defined as CMV disease or infection requiring antiviral therapy. The secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. Among 471 pancreas transplant recipients, 117 (24.8%) developed csCMVi after a median of 226 (interquartile range 154-289) days. CMV donor (D)+/R- patients had a significantly higher incidence of csCMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-7.64; P < .001). In adjusted analysis, a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was associated with a greater risk of csCMVi among seropositive recipients (HR 1.39 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 1.13-1.73; P = .002) but not among D+/R- patients (HR 1.04 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 0.89-1.23; P = .595). csCMVi, lower ALC, and acute rejection (P < .001) were independently associated with pancreas allograft failure. In conclusion, CMV D+/R- was associated with csCMVi in pancreas recipients, although ALC was associated with csCMVi only among seropositive patients. The development of csCMVi in pancreas recipients was associated with poor pancreas allograft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria Teresa Seville
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wendelyn Bosch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Janna L Huskey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tambi Jarmi
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick G Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dioverti MV, Bhaimia E, Yetmar ZA, Melendez DP, Misner L, Beito E, Deziel PJ, Theel ES, Razonable RR. Clinical utility of a cytomegalovirus-specific T cell assay in assessing the risk of post-prophylaxis cytomegalovirus infection and post-treatment relapse. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15143. [PMID: 37805968 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Measuring cell-mediated immunity (CMI) may inform the risk of CMV infection after antiviral prophylaxis and predict relapse after CMV treatment. METHODS We serially assessed CMV CMI using the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QF-CMV; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in two cohorts of SOTRs: during valganciclovir prophylaxis and during treatment of CMV viremia. Results of CMI were correlated with post-prophylaxis CMV infection and post-treatment relapse, respectively. RESULTS Only one (4.2%) of 24 CMV D+/R- patients demonstrated positive QF-CMV by the end of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Four (16.6%) patients developed post-prophylaxis CMV infection; all four had undetectable QF-CMV at end of prophylaxis. Among 20 patients treated for CMV infection, 18 (90%) developed QF-CMV levels >.2 IU/mL by end of antiviral treatment and none developed CMV relapse. In contrast, the single patient who relapsed after completing treatment had a CMV CMI <.2 IU/ml (p = .0036). CONCLUSION Since CMV D+/R- SOTRs are unlikely to develop adequate CMV CMI while receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, the utility of CMV CMI monitoring for risk stratification during time of prophylaxis had limited value. Conversely, CMV CMI testing may be a useful marker of the risk of CMV relapse after antiviral treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Bhaimia
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dante P Melendez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Lori Misner
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elaine Beito
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paul J Deziel
- William J von Leibig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elitza S Theel
- Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Raymund R Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine and the William J von Leibig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yetmar ZA, Kudva YC, Seville MT, Bosch W, Dean PG, Huskey JL, Budhiraja P, Jarmi T, Kukla A, Beam E. BK polyomavirus DNAemia in pancreas transplant recipients compared to pancreas-kidney recipients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15135. [PMID: 37705389 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is a common complication of kidney transplantation. While BKV has been described in non-kidney transplant recipients, data are limited regarding its epidemiology and outcomes in pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from 2010-2020. The primary outcome was BKV DNAemia. Secondary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction by 30%, eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , endstage kidney disease, and pancreas allograft failure. Cox regression with time-dependent variables was utilized. RESULTS Four hundred and sixty-six patients were analyzed, including 74, 46, and 346 with pancreas transplant alone (PTA), pancreas-after-kidney, or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, respectively. PTA recipients experienced a lower incidence of BKV DNAemia (8.8% vs. 32.9%; p < .001) and shorter duration of DNAemia (median 28.0 vs. 84.5 days). No PTA recipients with BKV DNAemia underwent kidney biopsy or developed endstage kidney disease. Lymphopenia, non-PTA transplantation, and older age were associated with BKV DNAemia, which itself was associated with pancreas allograft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.27-3.60; p = .004). Among PTA recipients, BKV DNAemia was not associated with eGFR reduction or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 . CONCLUSIONS BKV DNAemia was common among PTA recipients, though lower than a comparable group of pancreas-kidney recipients. However, BKV DNAemia was not associated with adverse native kidney outcomes and no PTA recipients developed endstage kidney disease. Conversely, BKV DNAemia was associated with pancreas allograft failure. Further studies are needed to estimate the rate of BKV nephropathy in this population, and further evaluate long-term kidney outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Yetmar
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yogish C Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria Teresa Seville
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wendelyn Bosch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick G Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Janna L Huskey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Pooja Budhiraja
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tambi Jarmi
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Aleksandra Kukla
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schoeberl AK, Zuckermann A, Kaider A, Aliabadi-Zuckermann A, Uyanik-Uenal K, Laufer G, Goekler J. Absolute Lymphocyte Count as a Marker for Cytomegalovirus Infection After Heart Transplantation. Transplantation 2023; 107:748-752. [PMID: 36228318 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies indicate an association between reduced absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation and have therefore highlighted the potential of ALC as a simple tool to predict CMV infection in transplant patients. This study aimed to examine the utility of ALC as a valuable marker for CMV infection in heart transplant patients. METHODS Clinical information and ALC data of all adult patients who received orthotopic heart transplantation at the Medical University of Vienna between January 2004 and May 2019 were collected. We performed a multivariable Cox regression model that incorporates repeated measurements of ALC as a time-varying continuous factor in 2 ways, first as continuous logarithmic factor considering a 50% decrease of ALC levels and second as binary factor using a threshold of 610 cells/μL. RESULTS One hundred fifty-eight (39%) patients developed CMV infection over the course of 2 y. Patients with lymphopenia were shown to be at higher risk of developing CMV infection both in the continuous approach (HR [per 50% reduction] 1.29; confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.53; P = 0.003) and the binary approach with a cutoff of 610 cells/μL (HR 1.74; CI, 1.20-2.51; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a strong association between reduced ALC and the development of CMV infection after heart transplantation. ALC value monitoring could provide an additional tool to assess individualized CMV risk after solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin-Kai Schoeberl
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Zuckermann
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandra Kaider
- Department of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems (CeMSIIS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Guenther Laufer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Goekler
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khawaja F, Spallone A, Kotton CN, Chemaly RF. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023; 29:44-50. [PMID: 35843567 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant. OBJECTIVES This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field. SOURCES We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest. CONTENT We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients. IMPLICATIONS Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareed Khawaja
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Spallone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camille N Kotton
- Transplant Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roy F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Effects of Different Induction Regimes on Serial Lymphocyte Subsets in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single Tertiary Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:299-306. [PMID: 35181166 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunosuppressive therapy is the backbone of kidney transplantation in preventing acute rejection. T-cell depletion after doses of thymoglobulin is dose-dependent, as are their side effects. At the same time, basiliximab and other maintenance immunosuppressive drugs act at different signals on T lymphocytes. Therefore, studying the pattern of lymphocyte subset depletion depending on the induction regime given at transplantation could be an added tool in managing post-transplant recipients. METHODOLOGY This prospective observational study recruited kidney transplant recipients from August 2019 through April 2021 at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Blood tests for lymphocyte subsets were taken at pre-transplant, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-transplantation. At transplantation, recipients received either basiliximab, low-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 1.5 mg/kg), or standard-dose thymoglobulin (cumulative dose: 5 mg/kg). RESULTS A total of 39 patients were recruited: 38.5% received basiliximab (15 of 39), 15.4% received low-dose thymoglobulin (6 of 39), and 46.2% received standard-dose thymoglobulin (18 of 39). Absolute lymphocyte counts 1 week post-transplantation were 1.5 ± 0.84 × 109/L for basiliximab, 0.7 ± 0.57 × 109/L for low-dose thymoglobulin, and 0.1 ± 0.08 × 109/L for standard-dose thymoglobulin (P < .001). The CD4+ and CD8+ counts were severely depleted in the standard-dose thymoglobulin group, with a statistically significant differenceup to 6 months post-transplantation. In the low-dose thymoglobulin group, the CD4+ and CD8+ counts were depleted at 1 week post-transplantation and recovered at 1 month post-transplantation. There was no difference in allograft function and incidence of allograft rejection across groups. CONCLUSIONS The effects on lymphocyte counts, CD4+ and CD8+, vary depending on the type and dose of induction immunosuppression. This could be a guiding tool in managing immunosuppression post-transplantation depending on the patient's immunologic risk.
Collapse
|
10
|
Jorgenson MR, Kleiboeker H, Garg N, Parajuli S, Mandelbrot DA, Odorico JS, Saddler CM, Smith JA. Letermovir conversion after valganciclovir treatment in cytomegalovirus high-risk abdominal solid organ transplant recipients may promote development of cytomegalovirus-specific cell mediated immunity. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 24:e13766. [PMID: 34799964 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association of conversion from valganciclovir to letermovir on cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity. METHODS Adult patients were included if they received a kidney or liver transplant between 8/1/2018-12/31/20, developed symptomatic, high-level CMV viremia and were converted to letermovir 480 mg daily as monotherapy after treatment with ganciclovir-derivatives for a minimum of 4 weeks and had subsequent CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMI) testing via ICS assay by flow cytometry (Viracor Eurofins T Cell Immunity Panel). RESULTS Seven patients met inclusion criteria; 87.5% were male and recipients of a kidney transplant. All patients were CMV high risk (D+/R-). Mean time from transplant to CMV disease was 200 ± 91 days. Peak viral load (VL) during CMV treatment was 540,341 ± 391,211 IU/mL. Patients received a mean of 30 ± 24 weeks (range: 4-78 weeks) of therapy with ganciclovir-derivatives at induction doses prior to letermovir introduction. The median absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at letermovir initiation was 400/μL (IQR 575) and the median VL was 51.6 (range: ND-490) IU/mL. Most patients (n = 5/7, 71.4%) experienced an increase in VL 1 and/or 2 weeks after conversion to letermovir. All patients had positive CMI per ICS assay after conversion. Patients received a mean of 10.3 ± 6.9 weeks of letermovir prior to having a positive result. Median ALC at positivity was 900/μL. Immunosuppression was not further reduced from initiation of letermovir to demonstration of CMV CMI. No patient had progressive replication or breakthrough disease while maintained on letermovir and three patients (42.9%) underwent antiviral withdrawal without recurrence at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION In this case series of abdominal transplant recipients with severe or persistent CMV infection, patients developed CMV-specific CMI after conversion to letermovir monotherapy. These data suggest that using letermovir in place of valganciclovir for secondary prophylaxis may address the lack of efficacy previously seen with this approach, as well as the issues that plague antiviral withdrawal with systematic monitoring. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate this effect in a more controlled research environment with serial CMI testing to elucidate the optimal duration of letermovir when used in this way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Hanna Kleiboeker
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Neetika Garg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christopher M Saddler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jeannina A Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deng R, Wu Y, Xu L, Liu K, Huang X, Zhang X. Clinical risk factors and prognostic model for idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol 2021; 96:1407-1419. [PMID: 34350623 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IIDDs) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare but serious neurological complications of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). However, the risk factors and a method to predict the prognosis of post-transplantation CNS IIDDs are not available. This retrospective study first reviewed data from 4532 patients who received haplo-HSCT during 2008-2019 in our center, and 184 patients (4.1%) with IIDDs after haplo-HSCT were identified. Grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (p < 0.001) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (p = 0.009) were identified as risk factors for developing IIDDs after haplo-HSCT. We then divided the 184 IIDD patients into a derivation cohort and validation cohort due to transplantation time to develop and validate a model for predicting the prognosis of IIDDs. In the multivariate analysis of the derivation cohort, four candidate predictors were entered into the final prognostic model: cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, IgG synthesis (IgG-syn) and spinal cord lesions. The prognostic model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.803-0.925) in the internal validation cohort and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.806-0.931) in the external validation cohort. The calibration plots showed a high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis indicated that IIDD patients could benefit from the clinical application of the prognostic model. The identification of IIDD patients after allo-HSCT who have a poor prognosis might allow timely treatment and improve patient survival and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui‐Xin Deng
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Ye‐Jun Wu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Lan‐Ping Xu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Kai‐Yan Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Xiao‐Jun Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| | - Xiao‐Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital Peking University Institute of Hematology Beijing China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology Peking University Beijing China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Beijing China
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jorgenson MR, Descourouez JL, Garg N, Parajuli S, Mandelbrot DA, Odorico JS, Saddler CM, Smith JA. The addition of adjunctive letermovir to valganciclovir for refractory cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2021; 23:e13693. [PMID: 34309158 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Persistent viral replication resulting in ongoing cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia despite adequate therapy is difficult to manage and associated with negative outcomes. We report a case series of kidney transplant recipients receiving adjunctive letermovir in combination with valganciclovir for refractory CMV. METHODS Adult patients receiving a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant were included if they developed CMV viremia and initiated letermovir 480 mg daily as part of a dual therapy regimen with valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily between 1/9/2020 and 31/12/2020. Included patients received ≥90 days of valganciclovir and had a detectable viral load less than 1000 Iu/ml (log10 < 3) at the time of letermovir initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of adjunctive letermovir on viral clearance to negativity. We also evaluated effect of letermovir on tacrolimus levels. RESULTS Eight patients were included. Letermovir was added 223 ± 105 days after initiation of CMV treatment with ganciclovir derivatives. Median viral load at initiation was 139.7 (range: 73-355) IU/ml and did not clear or change significantly after 2, 4 and 12 weeks of adjunctive letermovir (132.5 [range: 34.5-513] IU/ml vs. 68.7 [range: 34.5-574] IU/ml vs. 78.3 [range: 34.5-347] IU/ml, p > 0.05). Tacrolimus was reduced by ∼30% in anticipation of a letermovir-tacrolimus drug interaction. Despite this reduction, mean tacrolimus serum levels two weeks after adjunctive letermovir increased by 43% (5.6 ± 1.6 ng/ml vs 8.0 ± 4.6 ng/ml). CONCLUSION In kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients with refractory CMV, the use of adjunctive letermovir did not result in viral clearance. Additionally, despite a mean tacrolimus dose reduction of 30% at letermovir initiation, serum concentrations increased by over 40%. Further investigation into the optimal approach to refractory CMV is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jillian L Descourouez
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Neetika Garg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sandesh Parajuli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Didier A Mandelbrot
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christopher M Saddler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jeannina A Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|