Donor-derived tuberculosis among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States - 2008-2018

Minimizing risk while maximizing opportunity: The infectious disease organ offer process survey

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management.

METHODS

We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk-mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced-based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management.

Tuberculosis in kidney transplant candidates and recipients

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of infectious mortality and morbidity in the world, second only to coronavirus disease 2019. Patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients are at a higher risk of developing TB than the general population. Active TB is difficult to diagnose in this population due to close mimics. All transplant candidates should be screened for latent TB infection and given TB prophylaxis. Patients who develop active TB pre- or post-transplantation should receive multidrug combination therapy of antitubercular therapy for the recommended duration with optimal dose modification as per glomerular filtration rate.

The American Association of Tissue Banks tissue donor screening for Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Recommended criteria and literature review

After two multistate outbreaks of allograft tissue-transmitted tuberculosis (TB) due to viable bone, evidence-based donor screening criteria were developed to decrease the risk of transmission to recipients. Exclusionary criteria, commentary, and references supporting the criteria are provided, based on literature search and expert opinion. Both exposure and reactivation risk factors were considered, either for absolute exclusion or for exclusion in combination with multiple risk factors. A criteria subset was devised for tissues containing viable cells. Risk factors for consideration included exposure (e.g., geographic birth and residence, travel, homelessness, incarceration, healthcare, and workplace) and reactivation (e.g., kidney disease, liver disease, history of transplantation, immunosuppressive medications, and age). Additional donor considerations include the possibility of sepsis and chronic illness. Donor screening criteria represent minimal criteria for exclusion and do not completely exclude all possible donor TB risks. Additional measures to reduce transmission risk, such as donor and product testing, are discussed but not included in the recommendations. Careful donor evaluation is critical to tissue safety.

Miliary Tuberculosis as Postmortem Diagnosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients presents challenges that may lead to treatment delay. These include atypical clinical presentations, increased likelihood of negative tuberculin skin test or/and interferon-gamma release assays, and negative sputum smear results despite active disease. The treatment poses challenges due to pharmacokinetic interactions, allograft-related toxicity, and inadequate immune response.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 70-year-old man after kidney transplantation in 2012. The patient was transferred from the urology unit with deteriorating renal function and presumed urosepsis. His pulmonary chest X-ray showed hilar pulmonary infiltrates. Computed tomography of the chest/abdomen/pelvis revealed mediastinal lymphadenopathy, pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary effusion, and splenomegaly. His blood results showed pancytopenia and high inflammatory and renal markers. He was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics covering bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. Despite initial clinical improvement, his kidney function deteriorated, and he required hemodialysis. His temperature continued to spike. On physical examination, he was confused and lethargic. He was scheduled to have a mediastinoscopy with lymph node biopsy, but he died the day before. The postmortem examination revealed miliary tuberculosis with tuberculosis of many organs: kidney transplant, native kidney, bone marrow, mediastinal lymph nodes, lungs, and spleen.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of active TB in transplant recipients requires a high index of suspicion and invasive procedures. The majority of all cases of active TB after SOT are disseminated or occur at extrapulmonary sites. Only a small minority of patients have classic cavitary changes on pulmonary imaging.

Donor-derived endemic mycoses after solid organ transplantation: A review of reported cases

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived endemic mycoses are infrequently reported. We summarized the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these infections to provide guidance to transplant clinicians.

METHODS

Multiple databases were reviewed from inception through May 31, 2023 using endemic fungi as key words (e.g., Coccidioides, histoplasma, blastomyces, talaromyces, paracoccidioides). Only donor-derived infections (DDI) were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases of DDI were identified from 18 published reports; these included 16 coccidioidomycosis, seven histoplasmosis, and one talaromycosis. No cases of blastomycosis and paracoccidiodomycosis were published. The majority were male (17/24,70.8%). Half of the cases were probable (12/24, 50%), seven were possible (29.2%), and only five were proven DDI (20.8%). Donor-derived coccidioidomycosis were observed in kidney (n = 11), lung (n = 6), liver (n = 3), heart (n = 2) and combined SOT recipients (1 KP, 1 KL) at a median time of .9 (range .2-35) months after transplantation. For histoplasmosis, the majority were kidney recipients (6 of 7 cases) at a median onset of 8 (range .4-48) months after transplantation. The single reported possible donor-derived talaromycosis occurred in a man whose organ donor had at-risk travel to Southeast Asia. Collectively, the majority of donors had high-risk exposure to Coccidioides (9/11) or Histoplasma sp. (6/6). Most donor-derived endemic mycoses were disseminated (18/24, 75%), and mortality was reported in almost half of recipients (11/24, 45.8%).

CONCLUSION

Donor-derived endemic mycoses are often disseminated and are associated with high mortality. A detailed evaluation of donors for the potential of an undiagnosed fungal infection prior to organ donation is essential to mitigate the risk of these devastating infections.

Minimizing the Risk of Donor-Derived Events and Maximizing Organ Utilization Through Education and Policy Development

Herein, we review the current knowledge of donor-derived disease and current US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policies to minimize the risk. During the process, we also consider actions to further mitigate the risk of donor-derived disease. The overarching goal is to provide an infectious disease perspective on the complex decision of organ acceptance for transplant programs and candidates.

Mycobacteria in Organ Transplant Recipients

This review describes the epidemiology and risk factors of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant recipients. We discuss the pre-transplant screening for risk of TB and management of latent TB in this population. We also discuss the challenges of management of TB and other difficult to treat mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium avium complex. The drugs for the management of these infections include rifamycins which have significant drug interactions with immunosuppressants and must be monitored closely.

Solid organ transplant recipients with tuberculosis disease in California, 2010 to 2020

Using California Tuberculosis (TB) Registry data from 2010-2020, we compared the presentation and outcomes of patients with TB aged >15 years with and without solid organ transplantation (SOT). We matched to the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for 1987-2020 and the estimated time from transplantation to the diagnosis of TB, the incidence of posttransplant TB, and the probability of death and graft failure in SOT recipients with TB, compared to those without TB. From 2010-2020, there were 148 posttransplant TB cases. Patients with posttransplant TB were more likely to have extrapulmonary disease and more than twice as likely to die as TB patients without SOT (relative risk [RR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.9). The median time from transplantation to TB diagnosis was 1.2 years, with the shortest time among lung transplant recipients. The incidence of TB disease among Californians with SOT was 56.0 per 100 000 person-years. The risk of death was higher among SOT recipients with posttransplant TB than those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.0-4.1); the risk of graft failure was higher among kidney transplant recipients with posttransplant TB than those without (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-6.9). An increased risk of death and graft failure in SOT recipients with posttransplant TB highlights the need for enhanced pretransplant TB prevention.

Nationwide tuberculosis outbreak in the USA linked to a bone graft product: an outbreak report

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission through solid organ transplantation has been well described, but transmission through transplanted tissues is rare. We investigated a tuberculosis outbreak in the USA linked to a bone graft product containing live cells derived from a single deceased donor.

METHODS

In this outbreak report, we describe the management and severity of the outbreak and identify opportunities to improve tissue transplant safety in the USA. During early June, 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) worked with state and local health departments and health-care facilities to locate and sequester unused units from the recalled lot and notify, evaluate, and treat all identified product recipients. Investigators from CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed donor screening and tissue processing. Unused product units from the recalled and other donor lots were tested for the presence of M tuberculosis using real-time PCR (rt PCR) assays and culture. M tuberculosis isolates from unused product and recipients were compared using phylogenetic analysis.

FINDINGS

The tissue donor (a man aged 80 years) had unrecognised risk factors, symptoms, and signs consistent with tuberculosis. Bone was procured from the deceased donor and processed into 154 units of bone allograft product containing live cells, which were distributed to 37 hospitals and ambulatory surgical centres in 20 US states between March 1 and April 2, 2021. From March 3 to June 1, 2021, 136 (88%) units were implanted into 113 recipients aged 24-87 years in 18 states (some individuals received multiple units). The remaining 18 units (12%) were located and sequestered. 87 (77%) of 113 identified product recipients had microbiological or imaging evidence of tuberculosis disease. Eight product recipients died 8-99 days after product implantation (three deaths were attributed to tuberculosis after recognition of the outbreak). All 105 living recipients started treatment for tuberculosis disease at a median of 69 days (IQR 56-81) after product implantation. M tuberculosis was detected in all eight sequestered unused units tested from the recalled donor lot, but not in lots from other donors. M tuberculosis isolates from unused product and recipients were more than 99·99% genetically identical.

INTERPRETATION

Donor-derived transmission of M tuberculosis via bone allograft resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. All prospective tissue and organ donors should be routinely assessed for tuberculosis risk factors and clinical findings. When these are present, laboratory testing for M tuberculosis should be strongly considered.

FUNDING

None.