TheRHD*weak D type 4.0allele is predominantly but not exclusivelycis-associated with the alteredRHCE*ce(c.48C,c.105T,c.733G,c.744C,c.1025T) allele in the French population

DNA Reference Reagents for Genotyping RH Variants

Patients who carry Rhesus (RH) blood group variants may develop Rh alloantibodies requiring matched red blood cell transfusions. Serologic reagents for Rh variants often fail to specifically identify variant Rh antigens and are in limited supply. Therefore, red blood cell genotyping assays are essential for managing transfusions in patients with clinically relevant Rh variants. Well-characterized DNA reference reagents are needed to ensure quality and accuracy of the molecular tests. Eight lyophilized DNA reference reagents, representing 21 polymorphisms in RHD and RHCE, were produced from an existing repository of immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/US Food and Drug Administration. The material was validated through an international collaborative study involving 17 laboratories that evaluated each DNA candidate using molecular assays to characterize RHD and RHCE alleles, including commercial platforms and laboratory-developed testing, such as Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and third-generation sequencing. The genotyping results showed 99.4% agreement with the expected results for the target RH polymorphisms and 87.9% for RH allele agreement. Most of the discordant RH alleles results were explained by a limited polymorphism coverage in some genotyping methods. Results of stability and accelerated degradation studies support the suitability of these reagents for use as reference standards. The collaborative study results demonstrate the qualification of these eight DNA reagents for use as reference standards for RH blood group genotyping assay development and analytical validation.

Transfusion strategy for weak D Type 4.0 based on RHD alleles and RH haplotypes in Tunisia

BACKGROUND

With more than 460 RHD alleles, this gene is the most complex and polymorphic among all blood group systems. The Tunisian population has the largest known prevalence of weak D Type 4.0 alleles, occurring in one of 105 RH haplotypes. We aimed to establish a rationale for the transfusion strategy of weak D Type 4.0 in Tunisia.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donors were randomly screened for the serologic weak D phenotype. The RHD coding sequence and parts of the introns were sequenced. To establish the RH haplotype, the RHCE gene was tested for characteristic single-nucleotide positions.

RESULTS

We determined all RHD alleles and the RH haplotypes coding for the serologic weak D phenotype among 13,431 Tunisian donations. A serologic weak D phenotype was found in 67 individuals (0.50%). Among them, 60 carried a weak D Type 4 allele: 53 weak D Type 4.0, six weak D Type 4.2.2 (DAR), and one weak D Type 4.1. An additional four donors had one variant allele each: DVII, weak D Type 1, weak D Type 3, and weak D type 100, while three donors showed a normal RHD sequence. The weak D Type 4.0 was most often linked to RHCE*ceVS.04.01, weak D Type 4.2.2 to RHCE*ceAR, and weak D Type 4.1 to RHCE*ceVS.02, while the other RHD alleles were linked to one of the common RHCE alleles.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the weak D phenotypes in Tunisia, no novel RHD allele was found and almost 90% were caused by alleles of the weak D Type 4 cluster, of which 88% represented the weak D Type 4.0 allele. Based on established RH haplotypes for variant RHD and RHCE alleles and the lack of adverse clinical reports, we recommend D+ transfusions for patients with weak D Type 4.0 in Tunisia.

Insights into RHCE Molecular Analysis in Samples with Partial D Variants: the Experience of Western France

BACKGROUND

Although systematic blood group genotyping of patients/donors is virtually possible, serological studies remain the gold standard to identify samples of clinical interest that may be further genotyped. In this context, we sought to identify variant D alleles that are likely to be clinically relevant in terms of other Rh antigens in a subset of population genotyped in Western France.

METHODS

Samples presenting with the RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele (n = 47) were selected for the study. RHCE exons 1-7 were directly sequenced, and expression of Rh antigens was predicted on the basis of the molecular data.

RESULTS

Of the 47 samples tested, 19 (40.4%) were predicted to be of potential clinical interest. Moreover, we could show that selecting the samples to be genotyped by the nature of their variant D allele (i.e., RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 allele) rather than by their Duffy-null status appears to increase significantly the likelihood of identifying clinically relevant individuals for Rh status.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our findings we suggest that all individuals genotyped as weak D type 4.2.2 should be systematically screened for RHCE variants by molecular analysis on a routine basis.