Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Benchmarking in CD34+ cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the "performance ratio" (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the "cell throughput" (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and mobilization regimens.

RESULTS

CTs (× 106 CD34+ cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).

CONCLUSIONS

CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34+ cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.

Apheresis collection of mononuclear cells for chimeric-antigen receptor therapies

Collections of lymphocytes to be genetically modified to treat hematologic malignancies have seen a dramatic increase over the last few years as commercial products have been approved. Reports of new products in development that can possibly treat solid organ malignancies represent a massive change in the field. Apheresis is at the center of the collection of cells for the manufacture of these chimeric-antigen receptor therapy products. The expansion of these collections represents one of the areas of apheresis procedures growth. This review will summarize concepts important to this type of collection and variables that need to be optimized to obtain desired cell yields while increasing patients' safety.

Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ABSCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As a prerequisite, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) must be mobilized and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Many factors can hamper PBSC mobilization/collection. Here, we provide a comprehensive multiparametric assessment of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters in a large cohort.

Methods

In total, 790 MM patients (471 [60%] male, 319 [40%] female) who underwent PBSC mobilization/collection during first-line treatment were included. Evaluated PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters included the prolongation of PBSC mobilization, plerixafor administration, number of LP sessions, and overall PBSC collection goal/result.

Results

741 (94%) patients received cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/dexamethasone (CAD) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Plerixafor was administered in 80 (10%) patients. 489 (62%) patients started LP without delay. 530 (67%) patients reached the PBSC collection goal at the first LP session. The mean overall PBSC collection result was 10.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.4) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. In a multiparametric analysis, variables negatively associated with PBSC mobilization/collection outcomes were female gender, age >60 years, an advanced ISS stage, and local radiation pre-/during induction, but not remission status postinduction. Notably, the identified risk factors contributed differently to each PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameter. In this context, compared to all other induction regimens, lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies negatively affected only the number of LP sessions required to reach the collection goal, but no other PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters. In contrast, the probability of reaching a high collection goal of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was higher after lenalidomide-based induction compared to VCD/PAD or VAD - taking into account - that a higher G-SCF dosage was given in approximately one-third of patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies.

Conclusion

Considering the identified risk factors in the clinical setting can contribute to optimized PBSC mobilization/collection. Moreover, our study demonstrates the necessity for a differentiated evaluation of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters.

Predicting Successful Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Healthy Allogeneic Donors

Introduction

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from healthy donors is a well-established process. We aimed to identify factors predictive of successful CD34+ PBSC collection and established a formula capable of predicting CD34+ cell yield.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 588 healthy adult donors (median age 29 years, range 18-69 years) at our institution from 2017 to 2022. The predicted minimal number of CD34+ cells was calculated as follows: (peripheral CD34+ cells/µL × adjusted collection efficiency of 30%) × total liters processed. This formula was further modified according to donor and recipient body weight (BW).

Results

Median total collection was 8.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg BW (range 1.0-47.1 × 106 cells/kg BW) with 522 donors (89%) collecting ≥5.0 × 106 cells/kg of recipient BW. A second leukapheresis (LP) was performed in 49 donors. Need for two LPs was more common in female donors (OR 6.68, 95% CI, 2.62-17.05; p < 0.001), donors with higher age (OR for 10 years difference 1.53, 95% CI, 1.15-2.03, p = 0.003), donors with WBC count <30 × 109/L after 5 days of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulation (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.59-11.83; p = 0.004), and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 (OR 6.21, 95% CI, 2.69-14.34; p < 0.001). Predictive factors for optimal LP (i.e., ≥5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of recipient BW) were peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count >50/µL (OR 12.82, range 6.34-25.92, p < 0.001), male donor (OR 2.77, range 1.06-7.23, p = 0.04), and a donor/recipient weight ratio >1 (OR 3.12, range 1.57-6.24, p = 0.001). WBC, platelets, hemoglobin, and age had no significant predictive value. Predicted versus observed number of CD34+ cells/kg BW collected demonstrated a very strong linear correlation (r = 0.925, 95% CI, 0.912-0.936, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Of the routinely monitored indicators in PBSC donors, CD34+ cell count in PB is the most important factor in predicting G-CSF-induced PBSC yields. Higher age, female sex, WBC <30 × 109/L, and a donor/recipient weight ratio <1 are useful indicators for identifying suboptimal mobilizers. The modified formula has shown successful and consistent performance in the prediction of key outcome measures including the minimum CD34+ cell collection, determination of the required length of apheresis, and whether a second day of PBSC collection was necessary to achieve the respective collection goal.

Collection efficiency in apheresis

Significant advances in procedural information displayed by current apheresis machines have been made, but analyses of cell collection efficiency (CE) still rely on calculations done by apheresis professionals. Accordingly, understanding CE equations can support the optimization of apheresis techniques and identification of incidents that could impact the procedure's effectiveness. This report summarizes classical and novel CE analyses applied to apheresis exemplified by an actual case of hematopoietic progenitor cell collection. In addition to the apheresis yield and most common CE1 and CE2 formulas, we present the instantaneous and corrected CE, fold enrichment, collection throughput, collection rate and its variants, average inlet rate, classical and adjusted captured cells, recruitment pool, recruitment factor, recruitment coefficient, blood component loss, predictive apheresis yield, and performance ratio calculations. Moreover, the mathematical relationship between these CE equations is also shown, which can be helpful in many apheresis procedures.

Impact of Mobilization Strategies on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection Efficiency and Product Quality: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Autologous stem cell transplantation is routinely used in the management of several hematological diseases, solid tumors, and immune disorders. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection performed by apheresis is the preferred source of stem cells. In this study, the potential impact of mobilization regimens on the performance of the Spectra Optia^® continuous mononuclear cell collection system was evaluated. We performed a retrospective data analysis for patients undergoing autologous PBSC collection at the Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital between September 2016 and June 2018. Collections were divided into two main groups according to the mobilization regimen received: without (210 collections) or with (99 collections) plerixafor. Assessed variables included product characteristics and collection efficiency (CE). Overall, product characteristics were similar between the groups. Median CD34+ CE2 was 50.1% versus 53.0%, and CE1 was 66.9% versus 69.9% following mobilization without and with plerixafor, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. Simple linear regression showed a very weak positive correlation between the mobilization method and CE1 or CE2 (mobilization with plerixafor increased CE2 by 4.106%). In conclusion, the Spectra Optia^® apheresis system led to high CE and a good quality of PBSC products when mobilization regimens with or without plerixafor were used.

Local Radiation Therapy Before and During Induction Delays Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

In multiple myeloma, local radiation therapy (RT) of osseous lesions before peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization is assumed to impair the PBSC mobilization and collection. However, the results of previously published studies are inconsistent and do not evaluate detailed metrics of RT and PBSC outcome parameters. In total, 352 patients undergoing PBSC mobilizations and RT in first-line treatment were evaluated. Patients were grouped into RT (n = 283) and no RT (n = 69) before PBSC mobilization. Except for the International Staging System score, both groups were homogeneous regarding the first diagnosis characteristics, first-line treatments, and response parameters. RT metrics (RT yes versus no, volume of irradiated hematopoietic bone marrow [BM], biologically equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]) were analyzed for the following PBSC outcome parameters: achievement of the PBSC collection goal, CD34+ cell collection yield, duration of the mobilization phase, and number of leukapheresis (LP) sessions to reach the collection goal. No statistically significant differences in the percentage of collection failures to reach at least 3 sufficient PBSC transplants were identified comparing patients with (n = 32 [11%]) and without RT (n = 4 [6%]) before PBSC mobilization (P = .265). However, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization showed a significant prolongation of the PBSC mobilization (median 1 day, P =.026) and required a higher number of LP sessions to reach the collection goal (median 1 LP, P < .001) compared with patients who received RT after PBSC mobilization. Moreover, patients with RT before PBSC mobilization reached a significantly lower CD34+ cell collection result (mean 8.94 versus 9.81 × 10⁶/kg body weight [bw], P = .002). No correlation was identified between the overall CD34+ cell yield and the volume of irradiated hematopoietic BM or EQD2, respectively. In the RT before PBSC mobilization group, patients who required more than 1 LP session to reach the PBSC collection goal after RT had a significantly higher percentage of radiated hematopoietic BM compared to those who required only 1 LP session (mean 9.7% versus 7.2%, P = .002). Overall, our study indicates a negative impact of RT on PBSC mobilization and collection. Apart from emergency settings, it might be beneficial to postpone RT to a post-PBSC collection time point. © 2021 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mobilization and Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Adults: Focus on Timing and Benchmarking

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferentially used as a hematopoietic stem cell source for autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) upon high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) in a variety of hemato-oncologic diseases. As a prerequisite, hematopoietic stem cells have to be mobilized into the peripheral blood (PB) and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Despite continuous improvements, e.g., the introduction of plerixafor, current challenges are the further optimization regarding the leukapheresis procedure, preventing collection failures, as well as benchmarking and harmonization of mobilization approaches between institutions.This chapter summarizes the current PBSC mobilization and collection approaches and is focusing on timely orchestration of mobilization therapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) application, and peripheral blood (PB) CD34⁺ cell assessment. Moreover, strategies for prediction and performance assessment of the PBSC collection yield are discussed.

Low-Volume Leukapheresis in Non-Cytokine-Stimulated Donors for the Collection of Mononuclear Cells

Background

There is an increasing demand for products containing mononuclear cells (MNCs) for cellular immune therapy. Hence, leukapheresis is increasingly performed in healthy volunteer donors.

Methods

We evaluated 147 low-volume leukapheresis procedures from 77 healthy non-cytokine-stimulated donors. Complete blood counts (CBCs) of the donors were measured before and directly after the procedures as well as from the MNC products. Follow-up CBCs were collected from donors within 21 days.

Results

The product hematocrit within a range from 1.2 to 6.0% did not correlate with the collection efficiency of any cell population or the granulocyte and platelet yield. There was a strong correlation between the CBC values before leukapheresis and the cell yield of lymphocytes and monocytes as well as a perfect negative correlation between cell recruitment and cell loss in all cell populations. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease in the CBC values in all cell populations directly after leukapheresis, which recovered within a mean of 16.1 days (SD ± 2.1 days) and even showed a significant increase in granulocytes and platelets.

Conclusion

Low-volume leukapheresis is feasible for the collection of MNCs in which the product hematocrit is negligible for the collection efficiency, cell yield, or contamination of residual cells under operational settings recommended by the manufacturer. Our data suggests that cell recruitment is regulated by the number of cells removed, which may also be the stimulus to induce granulo- and thrombopoiesis within the first days after leukapheresis.

Orchestration of Chemomobilization and G-CSF Administration for Successful Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection

Successful collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) depends on the optimal orchestration of mobilization chemotherapy, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) application, and CD34⁺ cell number assessment in the peripheral blood (PB). However, determining the optimal timing in accordance to the applied chemomobilization regimen can be challenging. Although most centers apply their own local timing schedules, a reliable timetable including the currently most often used mobilization regimens is lacking. We present a comprehensive analysis of the timing modalities for 11 of the most commonly used chemomobilization regimens. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and PBSC collection parameters (including duration of G-CSF application, time point of CD34⁺ assessment, PB CD34⁺ cell count, number of leukapheresis [LP] sessions, processed blood volume, and CD34⁺ collection results) of 91 representatively selected patients who had undergone stem cell mobilization at 2 collection centers. Six to 10 patients were analyzed per regimen with a variety of diagnoses, including multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma, and sarcoma. No collection failures (<2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg body weight) were observed. All analyzed patients successfully reached their individual collection goal in adherence to the given schedule of chemotherapy, application of G-CSF, measurement of CD34⁺ cells, and subsequent LP. The presented data on the timing of chemomobilization, G-CSF application, and stem cell collection may be helpful in clinical decision making and contribute to a more transparent and predictable treatment process.

Platelet Count before Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Is Associated with the Need for Plerixafor But Not with the Collection Result

BACKGROUND

A low platelet count before mobilization has recurrently been identified as risk factor for poor mobilization.

METHODS

To determine the relevance of this finding for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, including pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor in the case of poor mobilization, we retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing PBSC collection at our institution between January 2014 and December 2015 (n = 380).

RESULTS

In total, 99% of the patients (377/380) successfully collected a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight sufficient for a single transplant. Rescue or pre-emptive plerixafor was administered to 11% of the patients (42/380). No correlations between the platelet count before mobilization and the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells or the CD34+ cell collection result were detected in the entire population or the subgroups according to diagnosis (newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, relapsed multiple myeloma, lymphoma, amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, sarcoma, or germ cell tumor). However, patients requiring pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor had a significantly lower platelet count before mobilization (217/nl vs. 245/nl; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

With the current state of the art PBSC mobilization strategies, the platelet count before mobilization was not associated with the CD34+ cell collection result but was associated with the need for pre-emptive or rescue application of plerixafor.

Storage Duration of Autologous Stem Cell Preparations Has No Impact on Hematopoietic Recovery after Transplantation

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are widely used for autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). These cells must be stored for months or even years, usually at temperatures ≤-140°C, until their use. Although several in vitro studies on CD34⁺ viability and clonogenic assays of PBSCs after long-term storage have been reported, only a few publications have investigated the influence of long-term storage on in vivo hematopoietic reconstitution. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed hematopoietic recovery after storage of PBSCs via controlled-rate freezing (CRF) and cryostorage in 10% DMSO at ≤-140°C in 105 patients with multiple myeloma who received high-dose melphalan before ABSCT. Three groups of PBSC transplantation (n = 247) were delineated based on the storage period: short-term (≤12 months, n = 143), medium-term (>12 and ≤60 months, n = 75), and long-term storage (>60 months, n = 29). A neutrophil increase of ≥.5 × 10⁹/L in medium-term or long-term PBSC cryopreservation groups was observed at day 14 after ABSCT; this increase was comparable to patients who received briefly stored PBSCs (day 15). No negative effect of PBSC storage duration was observed on leucocyte or neutrophil reconstitution. Platelet reconstitutions of ≥20  × 10⁹/L and 50 × 10⁹/L were observed after median times of 10 to 11 and 13 to 14 days after ABSCT, respectively. No influence of PBSC storage duration on platelet recovery of ≥20  × 10⁹/L and ≥50 × 10⁹/L was observed in the 3 storage groups (P = .07, P = .32). The number of previous ABSCTs also had no significant impact upon hematopoietic reconstitution. In conclusion, these results indicate that long-term cryopreservation of PBSC products at vapor nitrogen temperature after CRF does not have a negative effect on hematopoietic recovery even after prolonged storage.