Parental reports of behavioural outcome among paediatric leukaemia survivors in Malaysia: a single institution experience

Social exclusion and behavior problems in adolescents with cancer and healthy counterparts

PURPOSE

This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine social exclusion, internalized and externalized behavioral problems in adolescents with cancer and to compare them with healthy counterparts.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The sample consisted of adolescents age 10-19 years (N = 70) followed up in the hemato-oncology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital and healthy adolescents age 10-19 years (N = 92) who were studying in secondary and high schools. The data were collected with a questionnaire for adolescents with cancer and healthy adolescents, The Ostracism Experience Scale for Adolescents (OES-A), Youth Externalizing Behavior Screener (YEBS), and Youth Internalizing Problems Screener (YIPS).

RESULTS

The OES-A mean scores of cancer and healthy adolescents in the study were 35.68 ± 9.38 and 27.64 ± 5.35 (p ≤ 0.001), the YEBS mean scores were 23.51 ± 4.88 and 20.52 ± 5.42 (p ≤ 0.001), and the YIPS mean scores were 21.72 ± 6.48 and 19.18 ± 7.60 (p = 0.007), respectively. There was a low-level positive correlation between the mean scores of the OES-A and YEBS (r = 0.345, p < 0.05) and mean scores of the YEBS and YIPS (r = 0.308, p < 0.05) of adolescents with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with cancer had higher scores on social exclusion, internalized and externalized behavioral problems than healthy counterparts in the current study.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The current study should lead pediatric oncology nurses to be more aware of social exclusion and internalized and externalized behavioral problems in adolescents with cancer after clinical treatment, and to provide appropriate psycho-oncological care.

Social adjustment across the lifespan in survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The objectives of this review were to (1) summarize studies that described social adjustment in survivors of pediatric ALL across the lifespan, (2) summarize social adjustment outcomes reported across studies, and (3) examine associations between social adjustment and disease/treatment- and non-treatment-related factors.

METHODS

Searched databases included EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCO Information Services), and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters). Eligible studies included: (1) original research; (2) published in English; (3) a diagnosis of cancer between 0 and 21 years; (4) survivors at least 5 years from diagnosis and/or 2 years from therapy completion; and (5) quantitative assessment of social adjustment.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 3698 articles of which 43 were included in the final review. Risk of bias was assessed using domains adapted from the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Quality of evidence was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. There was some evidence that school-aged and adolescent/young adult survivors experienced worse social adjustment compared to controls. There was some evidence suggesting cranial radiation therapy (CRT) is associated with social adjustment difficulties among young adult survivors. Inconsistent evidence was found for relapse, age at diagnosis and study, sex, and late effects in relation to social adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Survivors of pediatric ALL were at higher risk of social adjustment difficulties compared to controls. However, evidence for treatment and non-treatment risk and resilience factors require stronger evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Information on modifiable factors that modulate social adjustment may influence targets of intervention and follow-up guidelines.

Social adjustment in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate group differences in social adjustment in survivors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) compared to survivor siblings and controls; identify disease-related predictors of social adjustment in survivors; and explore whether executive functioning explained differences in social adjustment across groups and between disease-related predictors.

METHODS

Survivors of pediatric ALL (n = 38, average age at diagnosis = 4.27 years [SD = 1.97]; average time off treatment = 4.83 years [SD = 1.52]), one sibling (if available, n = 20), and one parent from each family were recruited from a long-term survivor clinic. Healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 38) and one parent from each family were recruited from the community. Parents completed the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Parent Rating Scale (BASC-3) Social Withdrawal subscale as a measure of social adjustment, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF-2) as a measure of executive function for each of their children. Multilevel modeling and mediation analysis were used to achieve the study aims.

RESULTS

Parents reported that survivors had significantly worse social adjustment compared to controls (b = 6.34, p = .004), but not survivor siblings. Among survivors, greater time off treatment (b = 2.06, p = .058) and poorer executive functioning (b = 0.42, p = .006) were associated with worse social adjustment. Executive function did not mediate differences in social withdrawal between survivors and controls or the relationship between time off treatment and social withdrawal among survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of pediatric ALL presenting to follow-up programs should be screened for difficulties with social adjustment. Future research should examine treatment- and nontreatment-related factors contributing to poorer social outcomes.