1
|
Nilima S, Sen KK, Fatima-Tuz-Zahura, Bari W. Prevalence and determinants of readiness of health facilities for quality antenatal care services in Bangladesh. J Public Health Policy 2024:10.1057/s41271-024-00514-0. [PMID: 39147827 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-024-00514-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
This study investigates the prevalence and determinants of readiness for quality antenatal care (ANC) services in Bangladesh using data from the 2017 Bangladesh Health Facility Survey (BHFS). We assessed the association between selected factors and the readiness index using multinomial logistic regression. We identified a significant gap in the availability and quality of ANC services, only 4.26% of health facilities provide quality ANC services, with rural facilities showing lower readiness compared to urban facilities (RRR:0.13; 95% CI: 0.06-0.31; p < 0.001). Community clinics and private hospitals have a lower likelihood of medium or high readiness compared to public hospitals or clinics. Health facilities with specialized care are more likely to demonstrate readiness for quality ANC services. Policy recommendations include increased healthcare funding, implementation of ANC guidelines, strengthened monitoring and evaluation of health facilities, and heightened community awareness. These measures should improve ANC, overall health outcomes, and public health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahnaz Nilima
- Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
| | - Kanchan Kumar Sen
- Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| | - Fatima-Tuz-Zahura
- Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| | - Wasimul Bari
- Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
George J, Jack S, Gauld R, Colbourn T, Stokes T. Impact of health system governance on healthcare quality in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073669. [PMID: 38081664 PMCID: PMC10729209 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improving healthcare quality in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs) is a critical step in the pathway to Universal Health Coverage and health-related sustainable development goals. This study aimed to map the available evidence on the impacts of health system governance interventions on the quality of healthcare services in LMICs. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the literature. The search strategy used a combination of keywords and phrases relevant to health system governance, quality of healthcare and LMICs. Studies published in English until August 2023, with no start date limitation, were searched on PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and ProQuest. Additional publications were identified by snowballing. The effects reported by the studies on processes of care and quality impacts were reviewed. RESULTS The findings from 201 primary studies were grouped under (1) leadership, (2) system design, (3) accountability and transparency, (4) financing, (5) private sector partnerships, (6) information and monitoring; (7) participation and engagement and (8) regulation. CONCLUSIONS We identified a stronger evidence base linking improved quality of care with health financing, private sector partnerships and community participation and engagement strategies. The evidence related to leadership, system design, information and monitoring, and accountability and transparency is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joby George
- Department of General Practice & Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Susan Jack
- Te Whatu Ora - Southern, National Public Health Service, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Robin Gauld
- Department of Preventive & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Tim Stokes
- Department of General Practice & Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Louart S, Hedible GB, Ridde V. Assessing the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review and a best fit framework synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:930. [PMID: 37649024 PMCID: PMC10469465 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09897-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Acceptability is a key concept used to analyze the introduction of a health innovation in a specific setting. However, there seems to be a lack of clarity in this notion, both conceptually and practically. In low and middle-income countries, programs to support the diffusion of new technological tools are multiplying. They face challenges and difficulties that need to be understood with an in-depth analysis of the acceptability of these innovations. We performed a scoping review to explore the theories, methods and conceptual frameworks that have been used to measure and understand the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa. The review confirmed the lack of common definitions, conceptualizations and practical tools addressing the acceptability of health innovations. To synthesize and combine evidence, both theoretically and empirically, we then used the "best fit framework synthesis" method. Based on five conceptual and theoretical frameworks from scientific literature and evidence from 33 empirical studies, we built a conceptual framework in order to understand the acceptability of technological health innovations. This framework comprises 6 determinants (compatibility, social influence, personal emotions, perceived disadvantages, perceived advantages and perceived complexity) and two moderating factors (intervention and context). This knowledge synthesis work has also enabled us to propose a chronology of the different stages of acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Louart
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8019 - CLERSE - Centre Lillois d'Etudes Et de Recherches Sociologiques Et Economiques, 59000, Lille, France.
- ALIMA, the Alliance for International Medical Action, Dakar, Senegal.
| | | | - Valéry Ridde
- Université Paris Cité, IRD, INSERM, Ceped, 75006, Paris, France
- Institut de Santé Et Développement, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Braimah A, Aninanya GA, Senu E. Proportion and factors influencing client satisfaction with delivery services in health facilities in the Sissala East Municipality, Ghana: A cross‐sectional study. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1166. [PMID: 37008814 PMCID: PMC10055499 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Client satisfaction is the difference between the healthcare services delivered and the needs of the client. Anecdotal evidence suggests the quality of maternal health and delivery services in Ghana especially in the Upper West Region is appalling. Moreover, there is a paucity of data on clients' satisfaction with maternal and delivery services rendered by healthcare. This study, therefore, assessed clients' satisfaction with delivery services and their associated factors. Methods This analytical cross‐sectional study included 431 women who had delivered in the last 7 days from four health facilities within Sissala East Municipality using a multistage and simple random sampling technique. A well‐structured questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic and client satisfaction data. All statistical analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 26.0 and GraphPad Prism Version 8.0. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Clients’ satisfaction with general delivery services was rated as 80.3% and was significantly associated with process‐related factors (p < 0.0001) and structural‐related factors (p < 0.0001) of the health facilities. This study found that health facilities' delivery services differed significantly and were associated with clients’ satisfaction (p < 0.0001). Moreover, age group (p = 0.0200), occupation (p = 0.0090), kind of delivery (p = 0.0050), and delivery outcome (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with client satisfaction with delivery services. Conclusion More than two‐thirds of women are satisfied with delivery services within selected health facilities in the Sissala East municipality, although satisfaction within health facilities differs. Furthermore, age group, occupation, kind of delivery, delivery outcome, process, and structural‐related factors significantly contribute to client satisfaction with delivery services. To provide more comprehensive coverage of customers' satisfaction with delivery services in the municipality, strategies such as free maternal health initiatives and health education on the significance of facility delivery should be reinforced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alijata Braimah
- Department of MidwiferyMidwifery Training CollegeTumuUpper West RegionGhana
| | - Gifty A. Aninanya
- Department of Health Services Policy, Planning, Management and Health Economics, School of Public HealthUniversity for Development StudiesTamaleNorthern RegionGhana
| | - Ebenezer Senu
- Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine and DentistryKwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyKumasiGhana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clarke-Deelder E, Opondo K, Oguttu M, Burke T, Cohen JL, McConnell M. Immediate postpartum care in low- and middle-income countries: A gap in healthcare quality research and practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100764. [PMID: 36216312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The immediate postpartum period carries significant risks for complications such as postpartum hemorrhage and sepsis. Postpartum monitoring, including taking vital signs and monitoring blood loss, is important for the early identification and management of complications, but many women in low- and middle-income countries receive minimal attention in the period following childbirth to facility discharge. The World Health Organization recently released new guidelines on postnatal care, which include recommendations for immediate postpartum monitoring. In light of the new guidelines, this presented an opportune moment to address the gaps in postpartum monitoring in low- and middle-income countries. In this commentary, we bring attention to the importance of immediate postpartum monitoring. We identified opportunities for strengthening this often overlooked aspect of maternity care through improvements in quality measurement and data availability, research into barriers against high-quality care, and innovations in service delivery design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Clarke-Deelder
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Drs Clarke-Deelder, Burke, Cohen, and McConnell); Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland (Dr Clarke-Deelder).
| | - Kennedy Opondo
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust, Kisumu, Kenya (Mr Opondo and Dr Oguttu); Vayu Global Health Foundation, Boston, MA (Mr Opondo and Dr Burke)
| | - Monica Oguttu
- Kisumu Medical and Education Trust, Kisumu, Kenya (Mr Opondo and Dr Oguttu)
| | - Thomas Burke
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Drs Clarke-Deelder, Burke, Cohen, and McConnell); Vayu Global Health Foundation, Boston, MA (Mr Opondo and Dr Burke); Global Health Innovation Laboratory, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Burke); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr Burke)
| | - Jessica L Cohen
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Drs Clarke-Deelder, Burke, Cohen, and McConnell)
| | - Margaret McConnell
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Drs Clarke-Deelder, Burke, Cohen, and McConnell)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rokicki S, Mwesigwa B, Waiswa P, Cohen J. Impact of Solar Light and Electricity on the Quality and Timeliness of Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial in Uganda. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021; 9:777-792. [PMID: 34933975 PMCID: PMC8691890 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Lack of access to reliable energy is a major neglected health system challenge to maternal and child health. We found that installing a solar energy system intervention in rural Ugandan maternity facilities led to modest increases in the quality of maternity care and reductions in delays in care. Background: We evaluated the impact of solar light installation in Ugandan maternity facilities on implementation processes, reliability of light, and quality of intrapartum care. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of the We Care Solar Suitcase, a complete solar electric system providing lighting and power for charging phones and small medical devices, in 30 rural Ugandan maternity facilities with unreliable lighting. Facilities were randomly assigned to receive the intervention in the first or second sequence in a 1:1 ratio. We collected data from June 2018 to April 2019. The intervention was installed in September 2018 (first sequence) and in December 2018 (second sequence). The primary effectiveness outcomes were a 20-item and a 36-item index of quality of intrapartum care, a 6-item index of delays in care provision, and the percentage of deliveries with bright light, satisfactory light, and adequate light. Results: We observed 1,118 births across 30 facilities. The intervention was successfully installed in 100% of facilities. After installation, the intervention was used in 83% of nighttime deliveries. Before the intervention, providers on average performed 42% of essential care actions and accumulated 76 minutes of delays during nighttime deliveries. After installation, quality increased by 4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI]=1,8) and delays in care decreased by 10 minutes (95% CI=−16,−3), with the largest impacts on infection control, prevention of postpartum hemorrhage, and newborn care practices. One year after the end of the trial, 90% of facilities had LED lights in operation and 60% of facilities had all components in operation. Conclusions: Reliable light is an important driver of timely and adequate health care. Policy makers should invest in renewable energy systems for health facilities; however, even when reliable lighting is present, quality of care may remain low without a broader approach to quality improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slawa Rokicki
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA. .,University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Peter Waiswa
- Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Centre of Excellence, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.,Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Busoga Health Forum, Jinja, Uganda
| | - Jessica Cohen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choudhury A, Asan O, Choudhury MM. Mobile health technology to improve maternal health awareness in tribal populations: mobile for mothers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2467-2474. [PMID: 34459478 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) applications have the potential to improve health awareness. This study reports a quasi-controlled intervention to augment maternal health awareness among tribal pregnant mothers through the mHealth application. Households from 2 independent villages with similar socio-demographics in tribal regions of India were selected as intervention (Village A) and control group (Village B). The control group received government mandated programs through traditional means (orally), whereas the intervention group received the same education through mHealth utilization. Postintervention, awareness about tetanus injections and consumption of iron tablets was significantly (P < .001) improved in the intervention group by 55% and 58%, respectively. Awareness about hygiene significantly (P < .001) increased by 57.1%. In addition, mothers in the intervention group who recognized vaginal bleeding, severe abdominal pain, severe blurring of vision, or convulsions as danger signs during pregnancy significantly (P < .001) increased by 18.30%, 23.2%, 20.0%, and 4.90%, respectively. Our study indicates that despite the low literacy of users, mHealth intervention can improve maternal health awareness among tribal communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avishek Choudhury
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
| | - Onur Asan
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
| | - Murari M Choudhury
- Network for Enterprise Enhancement and Development Support (NEEDS), Deoghar, Jharkhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Diaconu K, Falconer J, Verbel A, Fretheim A, Witter S. Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 5:CD007899. [PMID: 33951190 PMCID: PMC8099148 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007899.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in paying for performance (P4P) as a means to align the incentives of healthcare providers with public health goals. Rigorous evidence on the effectiveness of these strategies in improving health care and health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is lacking; this is an update of the 2012 review on this topic. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of paying for performance on the provision of health care and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and 10 other databases between April and June 2018. We also searched two trial registries, websites, online resources of international agencies, organizations and universities, and contacted experts in the field. Studies identified from rerunning searches in 2020 are under 'Studies awaiting classification.' SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized or non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies, or interrupted time series studies conducted in LMICs (as defined by the World Bank in 2018). P4P refers to the transfer of money or material goods conditional on taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target. To be included, a study had to report at least one of the following outcomes: patient health outcomes, changes in targeted measures of provider performance (such as the delivery of healthcare services), unintended effects, or changes in resource use. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted data as per original review protocol and narratively synthesised findings. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Given diversity and variability in intervention types, patient populations, analyses and outcome reporting, we deemed meta-analysis inappropriate. We noted the range of effects associated with P4P against each outcome of interest. Based on intervention descriptions provided in documents, we classified design schemes and explored variation in effect by scheme design. MAIN RESULTS We included 59 studies: controlled before-after studies (19), non-randomized (16) or cluster randomized trials (14); and interrupted time-series studies (9). One study included both an interrupted time series and a controlled before-after study. Studies focused on a wide range of P4P interventions, including target payments and payment for outputs as modified by quality (or quality and equity assessments). Only one study assessed results-based aid. Many schemes were funded by national governments (23 studies) with the World Bank funding most externally funded schemes (11 studies). Targeted services varied; however, most interventions focused on reproductive, maternal and child health indicators. Participants were predominantly located in public or in a mix of public, non-governmental and faith-based facilities (54 studies). P4P was assessed predominantly at health facility level, though districts and other levels were also involved. Most studies assessed the effects of P4P against a status quo control (49 studies); however, some studies assessed effects against comparator interventions (predominantly enhanced financing intended to match P4P funds (17 studies)). Four studies reported intervention effects against both comparator and status quo. Controlled before-after studies were at higher risk of bias than other study designs. However, some randomised trials were also downgraded due to risk of bias. The interrupted time-series studies provided insufficient information on other concurrent changes in the study context. P4P compared to a status quo control For health services that are specifically targeted, P4P may slightly improve health outcomes (low certainty evidence), but few studies assessed this. P4P may also improve service quality overall (low certainty evidence); and probably increases the availability of health workers, medicines and well-functioning infrastructure and equipment (moderate certainty evidence). P4P may have mixed effects on the delivery and use of services (low certainty evidence) and may have few or no distorting unintended effects on outcomes that were not targeted (low-certainty evidence), but few studies assessed these. For secondary outcomes, P4P may make little or no difference to provider absenteeism, motivation or satisfaction (low certainty evidence); but may improve patient satisfaction and acceptability (low certainty evidence); and may positively affect facility managerial autonomy (low certainty evidence). P4P probably makes little to no difference to management quality or facility governance (low certainty evidence). Impacts on equity were mixed (low certainty evidence). For health services that are untargeted, P4P probably improves some health outcomes (moderate certainty evidence); may improve the delivery, use and quality of some health services but may make little or no difference to others (low certainty evidence); and may have few or no distorting unintended effects (low certainty evidence). The effects of P4P on the availability of medicines and other resources are uncertain (very low certainty evidence). P4P compared to other strategies For health outcomes and services that are specifically targeted, P4P may make little or no difference to health outcomes (low certainty evidence), but few studies assessed this. P4P may improve service quality (low certainty evidence); and may have mixed effects on the delivery and use of health services and on the availability of equipment and medicines (low certainty evidence). For health outcomes and services that are untargeted, P4P may make little or no difference to health outcomes and to the delivery and use of health services (low certainty evidence). The effects of P4P on service quality, resource availability and unintended effects are uncertain (very low certainty evidence). Findings of subgroup analyses Results-based aid, and schemes using payment per output adjusted for service quality, appeared to yield the greatest positive effects on outcomes. However, only one study evaluated results-based aid, so the effects may be spurious. Overall, schemes adjusting both for quality of service and rewarding equitable delivery of services appeared to perform best in relation to service utilization outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence base on the impacts of P4P schemes has grown considerably, with study quality gradually increasing. P4P schemes may have mixed effects on outcomes of interest, and there is high heterogeneity in the types of schemes implemented and evaluations conducted. P4P is not a uniform intervention, but rather a range of approaches. Its effects depend on the interaction of several variables, including the design of the intervention (e.g., who receives payments ), the amount of additional funding, ancillary components (such as technical support) and contextual factors (including organizational context).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Diaconu
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jennifer Falconer
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Adrian Verbel
- Research Group for Evidence Based Public Health, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Atle Fretheim
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie Witter
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Negero MG, Sibbritt D, Dawson A. How can human resources for health interventions contribute to sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn healthcare quality across the continuum in low- and lower-middle-income countries? A systematic review. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2021; 19:54. [PMID: 33882968 PMCID: PMC8061056 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00601-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Well-trained, competent, and motivated human resources for health (HRH) are crucial to delivering quality service provision across the sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health (SRMNH) care continuum to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) maternal and neonatal health targets. This review aimed to identify HRH interventions to support lay and/or skilled personnel to improve SRMNH care quality along the continuum in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). METHODS A structured search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library/trials, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and HRH Global Resource Centre databases was undertaken, guided by the PRISMA framework. The inclusion criteria sought to identify papers with a focus on 1. HRH management, leadership, partnership, finance, education, and/or policy interventions; 2. HRH interventions' impact on two or more quality SRMNH care packages across the continuum from preconception to pregnancy, intrapartum and postnatal care; 3. Skilled and/or lay personnel; and 4. Reported primary research in English from LLMICs. A deductive qualitative content analysis was employed using the World Health Organization-HRH action framework. RESULTS Out of identified 2157 studies, 24 intervention studies were included in the review. Studies where ≥ 4 HRH interventions had been combined to target various healthcare system components, were more effective than those implementing ≤ 3 HRH interventions. In primary care, HRH interventions involving skilled and lay personnel were more productive than those involving either skilled or lay personnel alone. Results-based financing (RBF) and its policy improved the quality of targeted maternity services but had no impact on client satisfaction. Local budgeting, administration, and policy to deliver financial incentives to health workers and improve operational activities were more efficacious than donor-driven initiatives. Community-based recruitment, training, deployment, empowerment, supportive supervision, access to m-Health technology, and modest financial and non-financial incentives for community health workers (CHWs) improved the quality of care continuum. Skills-based, regular, short, focused, onsite, and clinical simulation, and/or mobile phone-assisted in-service training of skilled personnel were more productive than knowledge-based, irregular, and donor-funded training. Facility-based maternal and perinatal death reviews, coupled with training and certification of skilled personnel, positively affected SRMNH care quality across the continuum. Preconception care, an essential component of the SRMNH care continuum, lacks studies and services in LLMICs. CONCLUSIONS We recommend maternal and perinatal death audits in all health facilities; respectful, woman-centered care as a critical criterion of RBF initiatives; local administration of health worker allowances and incentives; and integration of CHWs into the healthcare system. There is an urgent need to include preconception care in the SRMNH care continuum and studies in LLMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melese Girmaye Negero
- School of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - David Sibbritt
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angela Dawson
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aninanya GA, Otupiri E, Howard N. Effects of combined decision-support and performance-based incentives on reported client satisfaction with maternal health services in primary facilities: A quasi-experimental study in the Upper East Region of Ghana. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249778. [PMID: 33878127 PMCID: PMC8057590 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized decision-support systems (CDSS) and performance-based incentives (PBIs) have potential to contribute to client satisfaction with health services. However, rigorous evidence is lacking on the effectiveness of these strategies in lower-income countries such as Ghana. This study aimed to determine the effect of a combined CDSS-PBI intervention on client satisfaction with maternal health services in primary facilities in the Upper East Region of Ghana. METHODS We employed a quasi-experimental controlled baseline and endline design to assess the effect of the combined interventions on client satisfaction with maternal health services, measured by quantitative pre/post-test client satisfaction survey. Our analysis used difference-in-difference logistic regression, controlling for potential covariates, to compare variables across intervention and comparison facilities at baseline and endline. RESULTS The combined CDSS-PBI intervention was associated with increased or unchanged client satisfaction with all maternal health services compared at endline. Antenatal client difference-in-difference of mean satisfaction scores were significant at endline for intervention (n = 378) and comparison (n = 362) healthcare facilities for overall satisfaction (DiD 0.058, p = 0.014), perception of providers' technical performance (DiD = 0.142; p = 0.006), client-provider interaction (DiD = 0.152; p = 0.001), and provider availability (DiD = 0.173; p = 0.001). Delivery client difference-in-difference of satisfaction scores were significant at endline for intervention (n = 318) and comparison (n = 240) healthcare facilities for overall satisfaction with delivery services (DiD = 0.072; p = 0.02) and client-provider interaction (DiD = 0.146; p = 0.02). However, mean overall satisfaction actually reduced slightly in intervention facilities, while DiD for technical performance and provider availability were not significant. CONCLUSION This combined CDSS-PBI intervention was associated with greater antenatal and delivery client satisfaction with some aspects of maternity services within two years of implementation. It could be expanded elsewhere if funds allow, though further research is still required to assess cost-effectiveness and long-term effects on client satisfaction and maternal health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gifty Apiung Aninanya
- Department of Health Services Policy, Planning, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Easmon Otupiri
- College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Natasha Howard
- National University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Usmanova G, Lalchandani K, Srivastava A, Joshi CS, Bhatt DC, Bairagi AK, Jain Y, Afzal M, Dhoundiyal R, Benawri J, Chaudhary T, Mishra A, Wadhwa R, Sridhar P, Bahl N, Gaikwad P, Sood B. The role of digital clinical decision support tool in improving quality of intrapartum and postpartum care: experiences from two states of India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:278. [PMID: 33827459 PMCID: PMC8028806 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03710-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized clinical decision support (CDSS) -digital information systems designed to improve clinical decision making by providers - is a promising tool for improving quality of care. This study aims to understand the uptake of ASMAN application (defined as completeness of electronic case sheets), the role of CDSS in improving adherence to key clinical practices and delivery outcomes. METHODS We have conducted secondary analysis of program data (government data) collected from 81 public facilities across four districts each in two sates of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The data collected between August -October 2017 (baseline) and the data collected between December 2019 - March 2020 (latest) was analysed. The data sources included: digitized labour room registers, case sheets, referral and discharge summary forms, observation checklist and complication format. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate and interrupted time series regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS The completeness of electronic case sheets was low at postpartum period (40.5%), and in facilities with more than 300 deliveries a month (20.9%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the introduction of technology yielded significant improvement in adherence to key clinical practices. We have observed reduction in fresh still births rates and asphyxia, but these results were not statistically significant in interrupted time series analysis. However, our analysis showed that identification of maternal complications has increased over the period of program implementation and at the same time referral outs decreased. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates CDSS has a potential to improve quality of intrapartum care and delivery outcome. Future studies with rigorous study design is required to understand the impact of technology in improving quality of maternity care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulnoza Usmanova
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | | | - Ashish Srivastava
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | | | | | | | - Yashpal Jain
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | - Mohammed Afzal
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | - Rashmi Dhoundiyal
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | - Jyoti Benawri
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| | - Tarun Chaudhary
- Department of Health and Family Welfare, NHM, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302001, India
| | - Archana Mishra
- Maternal Health, NHM, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462011, India
| | - Rajni Wadhwa
- Project Management Unit, ASMAN: Alliance for Saving Mothers and Newborns, Mumbai, 400021, India
| | | | - Nupur Bahl
- Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, 400021, India
| | | | - Bulbul Sood
- Jhpiego-An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, New Delhi, 110020, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Teasdale CA, Geller A, Shongwe S, Mafukidze A, Choy M, Magaula B, Yuengling K, King K, De Gusmao EP, Ryan C, Ao T, Callahan T, Modi S, Abrams EJ. Patient feedback surveys among pregnant women in Eswatini to improve antenatal care retention. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248685. [PMID: 33760864 PMCID: PMC7990172 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uptake and retention in antenatal care (ANC) is critical for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants. Methods We implemented a rapid quality improvement project to improve ANC retention at seven health facilities in Eswatini (October-December 2017). All pregnant women attending ANC visits were eligible to participate in anonymous tablet-based audio assisted computer self-interview (ACASI) surveys. The 24-question survey asked about women’s interactions with health facility staff (HFS) (nurses, mentor mothers, receptionists and lab workers) with a three-level symbolic response options (agree/happy, neutral, disagree/sad). Women were asked to self-report HIV status. Survey results were shared with HFS at monthly quality improvement sessions. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in responses between months one and three, and between HIV-positive and negative women. Routine medical record data were used to compare retention among pregnant women newly enrolled in ANC two periods, January-February 2017 (‘pre-period’) and January-February 2018 (‘post-period’) at two of the participating health facilities. Proportions of women retained at 3 and 6 months were compared using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Wilcoxon tests. Results A total of 1,483 surveys were completed by pregnant women attending ANC, of whom 508 (34.3%) self-reported to be HIV-positive. The only significant change in responses from month one to three was whether nurses listened with agreement increasing from 88.3% to 94.8% (p<0.01). Overall, WLHIV had significantly higher proportions of reported satisfaction with HFS interactions compared to HIV-negative women. A total of 680 pregnant women were included in the retention analysis; 454 (66.8%) HIV-negative and 226 (33.2%) WLHIV. In the pre- and post-periods, 59.4% and 64.6%, respectively, attended at least four ANC visits (p = 0.16). The proportion of women retained at six months increased from 60.9% in the pre-period to 72.7% in the post-period (p = 0.03). For HIV-negative women, pre- and post-period six-month retention significantly increased from 56.6% to 71.6% (p = 0.02); however, the increase in WLHIV retained at six months from 70.7% (pre-period) to 75.0% (post-period) was not statistically significant (p = 0.64). Conclusion The type of rapid quality improvement intervention we implemented may be useful in improving patient-provider relationships although whether it can improve retention remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe A. Teasdale
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, New York, NY, United States of America
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Amanda Geller
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Siphesihle Shongwe
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Arnold Mafukidze
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Michelle Choy
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Bhekinkhosi Magaula
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Katharine Yuengling
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Katherine King
- NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, NYC Health Training—Clinical Operations and Technical Assistance Program, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Caroline Ryan
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mbabane, Eswatini
| | - Trong Ao
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mbabane, Eswatini
| | - Tegan Callahan
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Surbhi Modi
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Elaine J. Abrams
- Mailman School of Public Health, ICAP-Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rokicki S, Mwesigwa B, Cohen JL. Know-do gaps in obstetric and newborn care quality in Uganda: a cross-sectional study in rural health facilities. Trop Med Int Health 2021; 26:535-545. [PMID: 33529436 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Variable and inadequate quality of maternity care is a critical factor in persistently high rates of maternal and neonatal mortality in Uganda. We investigated whether provider quality of care deviates from knowledge and the factors associated with these 'know-do gaps' in Ugandan maternity facilities. METHODS Data were collected from 109 providers in 40 facilities. Quality was measured using direct observations of intrapartum care, and scores were based on the percentage of essential care actions provided out of a 20-item validated quality index. Knowledge was measured based on the percentage of items that providers reported knowing to do using vignette surveys. The know-do gap was the difference between knowledge and quality. Multivariable models were used to assess the association between provider- and facility-level characteristics and knowledge, quality and know-do gaps. RESULTS The average quality score was 45%, with quality varying widely within and across providers. The mean knowledge score was 70%, yielding a mean know-do gap of 25%. Know-do gaps were largest for practices related to infection control, vitals monitoring, and prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. The association between quality and knowledge scores was positive but small (P = 0.08), so know-do gaps were largest for providers with the highest knowledge scores. Greater provider training was positively associated with knowledge (P = 0.005) but not with quality (P = 0.60). Having 10 or more years of work experience was associated with higher quality scores (5.3, 95%CI: 0.6 to 10.1), while higher patient volumes were associated with lower quality scores (-2.2, 95%CI: -3.7 to - 0.07). None of the factors of provider motivation, cadre, availability of essential medicines and supplies or facility staffing were associated with quality or know-do gaps. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that, in Uganda, gaps between knowledge and quality do not appear to be explained by factors such as lack of motivation, education, training or supplies. Gaps are particularly large for essential practices related to prevention of postpartum haemorrhage, a leading cause of maternal mortality in Uganda and similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slawa Rokicki
- Department of Health Behavior, Society & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.,Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jessica L Cohen
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med 2020; 270:113624. [PMID: 33373774 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pay for performance (P4P) programmes are popular health system-focused interventions aiming to improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). This realist review aims to understand how, why and under what circumstance P4P works in LMICs.We systematically searched peer-reviewed and grey literature databases, and examined the mechanisms underpinning P4P effects on: utilisation of services, patient satisfaction, provider productivity and broader health system, and contextual factors moderating these. This evidence was then used to construct a causal loop diagram.We included 112 records (19 grey literature; 93 peer-reviewed articles) assessing P4P schemes in 36 countries. Although we found mixed evidence of P4P's effects on identified outcomes, common pathways to improved outcomes include: community outreach; adherence to clinical guidelines, patient-provider interactions, patient trust, facility improvements, access to drugs and equipment, facility autonomy, and lower user fees. Contextual factors shaping the system response to P4P include: degree of facility autonomy, efficiency of banking, role of user charges in financing public services; staffing levels; staff training and motivation, quality of facility infrastructure and community social norms. Programme design features supporting or impeding health system effects of P4P included: scope of incentivised indicators, fairness and reach of incentives, timely payments and a supportive, robust verification system that does not overburden staff. Facility bonuses are a key element of P4P, but rely on provider autonomy for maximum effect. If health system inputs are vastly underperforming pre-P4P, they are unlikely to improve only due to P4P. This is the first realist review describing how and why P4P initiatives work (or fail) in different LMIC contexts by exploring the underlying mechanisms and contextual and programme design moderators. Future studies should systematically examine health system pathways to outcomes for P4P and other health system strengthening initiatives, and offer more understanding of how programme design shapes mechanisms and effects.
Collapse
|
15
|
Larson E, Mbaruku GM, Cohen J, Kruk ME. Did a quality improvement intervention improve quality of maternal health care? Implementation evaluation from a cluster-randomized controlled study. Int J Qual Health Care 2020; 32:54-63. [PMID: 31829427 PMCID: PMC7172021 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the success of a maternal healthcare quality improvement intervention in actually improving quality. DESIGN Cluster-randomized controlled study with implementation evaluation; we randomized 12 primary care facilities to receive a quality improvement intervention, while 12 facilities served as controls. SETTING Four districts in rural Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS Health facilities (24), providers (70 at baseline; 119 at endline) and patients (784 at baseline; 886 at endline). INTERVENTIONS In-service training, mentorship and supportive supervision and infrastructure support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We measured fidelity with indictors of quality and compared quality between intervention and control facilities using difference-in-differences analysis. RESULTS Quality of care was low at baseline: the average provider knowledge test score was 46.1% (range: 0-75%) and only 47.9% of women were very satisfied with delivery care. The intervention was associated with an increase in newborn counseling (β: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.35) but no evidence of change across 17 additional indicators of quality. On average, facilities reached 39% implementation. Comparing facilities with the highest implementation of the intervention to control facilities again showed improvement on only one of the 18 quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS A multi-faceted quality improvement intervention resulted in no meaningful improvement in quality. Evidence suggests this is due to both failure to sustain a high-level of implementation and failure in theory: quality improvement interventions targeted at the clinic-level in primary care clinics with weak starting quality, including poor infrastructure and low provider competence, may not be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elysia Larson
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jessica Cohen
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Margaret E Kruk
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sombié I, Méda ZC, Blaise Geswendé Savadogo L, Télesphore Somé D, Fatoumata Bamouni S, Dadjoari M, Windsouri Sawadogo R, Sanon-Ouédraogo D. [Is the fight against maternal mortality in Burkina Faso adapted to reduce the three delays?]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2018; 30:273-282. [PMID: 30148315 DOI: 10.3917/spub.182.0273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternal mortality remains high in Burkina Faso despite numerous interventions designed to reduce this mortality. It therefore appeared important to analyse attempts to lower maternal mortality in Burkina Faso over the last fifteen years in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses and to improve the national programme. METHODS Analysis according to the ?three delays? model using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats method was conducted. Data sources were scientific publications as well as national gray literature. RESULTS Many studies have identified factors predisposing to the first delay, but very few effective interventions covering all of the country have been conducted to reduce this delay. The development of infrastructures, a rapid transfer system and integration of the cost of transfer into the cost of delivery subsidy were interventions designed to reduce the second delay. The promotion of blood transfusion, emergency obstetric and neonatal care, an increased number of trained health professionals, delegation of tasks, subsidy and then free delivery costs were interventions designed to reduce the third delay. The analysis globally demonstrated that interventions on the first delay were insufficient and rarely implemented and weaknesses were observed in relation to the intervention designed to act on the last two delays. CONCLUSION Due to their inadequacy and poor quality, the interventions failed to significantly reduce the three delays. Priority needs to be given to new interventions, especially community-based interventions, and reinforcement of the quality of care by health training.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abejirinde IOO, Ilozumba O, Marchal B, Zweekhorst M, Dieleman M. Mobile health and the performance of maternal health care workers in low- and middle-income countries: A realist review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2018; 21:73-86. [PMID: 30271609 PMCID: PMC6151957 DOI: 10.1177/2053434518779491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Maternal health and the performance of health workers is a key concern in low- and middle-income countries. Mobile health technologies are reportedly able to improve workers' performance. However, how this has been achieved for maternal health workers in low-resource settings is not fully substantiated. To address this gap by building theoretical explanations, two questions were posed: How does mobile health influence the performance of maternal health care workers in low- and middle-income countries? What mechanisms and contextual factors are associated with mobile health use for maternal health service delivery in low- and middle-income countries? Methods Guided by established guidelines, a realist review was conducted. Five databases were searched for relevant English language articles published between 2009 and 2016. A three-stage framework was developed and populated with explanatory configurations of Intervention-Context-Actors-Mechanism-Outcome. Articles were analyzed retroductively, with identified factors grouped into meaningful clusters. Results Of 1254 records identified, 23 articles representing 16 studies were retained. Four main mechanisms were identified: usability and empowerment explaining mobile health adoption, third-party recognition explaining mobile health utilization, and empowerment of health workers explaining improved competence. Evidence was skewed toward the adoption and utilization stage of the framework, with weak explanations for performance outcomes. Conclusions Findings suggest that health workers can be empowered to adopt and utilize mobile health in contexts where it is aligned to their needs, workload, training, and skills. In turn, mobile health can empower health workers with skills and confidence when it is perceived as useful and easy to use, in contexts that foster recognition from clients, peers, or supervisors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Institute of Tropical Medicine, Department of Public Health, Maternal and Reproductive Health Unit, Antwerp, Belgium.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Spain
| | - Onaedo Ilozumba
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Spain.,Institute of Tropical Medicine, Department of Public Health, Health Systems Unit, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bruno Marchal
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Department of Public Health, Health Systems Unit, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Marjolein Dieleman
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Saronga HP, Duysburgh E, Massawe S, Dalaba MA, Wangwe P, Sukums F, Leshabari M, Blank A, Sauerborn R, Loukanova S. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic clinical decision support system for improving quality of antenatal and childbirth care in rural Tanzania: an intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:537. [PMID: 28784130 PMCID: PMC5547541 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2457-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND QUALMAT project aimed at improving quality of maternal and newborn care in selected health care facilities in three African countries. An electronic clinical decision support system was implemented to support providers comply with established standards in antenatal and childbirth care. Given that health care resources are limited and interventions differ in their potential impact on health and costs (efficiency), this study aimed at assessing cost-effectiveness of the system in Tanzania. METHODS This was a quantitative pre- and post- intervention study involving 6 health centres in rural Tanzania. Cost information was collected from health provider's perspective. Outcome information was collected through observation of the process of maternal care. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for antenatal and childbirth care were calculated with testing of four models where the system was compared to the conventional paper-based approach to care. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether changes in process quality score and cost would impact on cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS Economic cost of implementation was 167,318 USD, equivalent to 27,886 USD per health center and 43 USD per contact. The system improved antenatal process quality by 4.5% and childbirth care process quality by 23.3% however these improvements were not statistically significant. Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the system were 2469 USD and 338 USD per 1% change in process quality for antenatal and childbirth care respectively. Cost-effectiveness of the system was sensitive to assumptions made on costs and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Although the system managed to marginally improve individual process quality variables, it did not have significant improvement effect on the overall process quality of care in the short-term. A longer duration of usage of the electronic clinical decision support system and retention of staff are critical to the efficiency of the system and can reduce the invested resources. Realization of gains from the system requires effective implementation and an enabling healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered clinical trial at www.clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01409824 ). Registered May 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Happiness Pius Saronga
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Els Duysburgh
- International Centre for Reproductive Health (ICRH), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Siriel Massawe
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Maxwell Ayindenaba Dalaba
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana
- Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Wangwe
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Felix Sukums
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Antje Blank
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rainer Sauerborn
- Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Svetla Loukanova
- Department of General Medicine and Implementation Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Adepoju IOO, Albersen BJA, De Brouwere V, van Roosmalen J, Zweekhorst M. mHealth for Clinical Decision-Making in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5:e38. [PMID: 28336504 PMCID: PMC5383806 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2016] [Revised: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In a bid to deliver quality health services in resource-poor settings, mobile health (mHealth) is increasingly being adopted. The role of mHealth in facilitating evidence-based clinical decision-making through data collection, decision algorithms, and evidence-based guidelines, for example, is established in resource-rich settings. However, the extent to which mobile clinical decision support systems (mCDSS) have been adopted specifically in resource-poor settings such as Africa and the lessons learned about their use in such settings are yet to be established. Objective The aim of this study was to synthesize evidence on the use of mHealth for point-of-care decision support and improved quality of care by health care workers in Africa. Methods A scoping review of 4 peer-reviewed and 1 grey literature databases was conducted. No date limits were applied, but only articles in English language were selected. Using pre-established criteria, 2 reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Articles were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and MAXQDA. Results We retained 22 articles representing 11 different studies in 7 sub-Saharan African countries. Interventions were mainly in the domain of maternal health and ranged from simple text messaging (short message service, SMS) to complex multicomponent interventions. Although health workers are generally supportive of mCDSS and perceive them as useful, concerns about increased workload and altered workflow hinder sustainability. Facilitators and barriers to use of mCDSS include technical and infrastructural support, ownership, health system challenges, and training. Conclusions The use of mCDSS in sub-Saharan Africa is an indication of progress in mHealth, although their effect on quality of service delivery is yet to be fully explored. Lessons learned are useful for informing future research, policy, and practice for technologically supported health care delivery, especially in resource-poor settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Adepoju
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Institute of Tropical Medicine, Maternal and Reproductive Health Unit, Department of Public Health, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bregje Joanna Antonia Albersen
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Vincent De Brouwere
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Maternal and Reproductive Health Unit, Department of Public Health, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jos van Roosmalen
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Zweekhorst
- Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wichaidit W, Alam MU, Halder AK, Unicomb L, Hamer DH, Ram PK. Availability and Quality of Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016; 95:298-306. [PMID: 27273640 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 05/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Bangladesh's maternal mortality and neonatal mortality remain unacceptably high. We assessed the availability and quality of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and emergency newborn care (EmNC) services at health facilities in Bangladesh. We randomly sampled 50 rural villages and 50 urban neighborhoods throughout Bangladesh and interviewed the director of eight and nine health facilities nearest to each sampled area. We categorized health facilities into different quality levels (high, moderate, low, and substandard) based on staffing, availability of a phone or ambulance, and signal functions (six categories for EmOC and four categories for EmNC). We interviewed the directors of 875 health facilities. Approximately 28% of health facilities did not have a skilled birth attendant on call 24 hours per day. The least commonly performed EmOC signal function was administration of anticonvulsants (67%). The quality of EmOC services was high in 33% and moderate in 52% of the health facilities. The least common EmNC signal function was kangaroo mother care (7%). The quality of EmNC was high in 2% and moderate in 33% of the health facilities. Approximately one-third of health facilities lack 24-hour availability of skilled birth attendants, increasing the risk of peripartum complications. Most health facilities offered moderate to high quality services for EmOC and low to substandard quality for EmNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wit Wichaidit
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
| | - Mahbub-Ul Alam
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Amal K Halder
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Leanne Unicomb
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Davidson H Hamer
- Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pavani K Ram
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|