Association between surgical resident involvement and blood use in noncardiac surgery

Hospital characteristics and perioperative complications of Hispanic patients following reverse shoulder arthroplasty-a large database study

BACKGROUND

Hispanic patients are the youngest and fastest-growing ethnic group in the USA. Many of these patients are increasingly met with orthopedic issues, often electing to undergo corrective procedures such as reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This patient population has unique medical needs and has been reported to have higher incidences of perioperative complications following major procedures. Unfortunately, there is a lack of information on the hospitalization data and perioperative complications in Hispanic patients following procedures such as RSA. This project aimed to query the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to assess patient hospitalization information, demographics, and the prevalence of perioperative complications among Hispanic patients who received RSA.

METHODS

Information from 2016-2019 was queried from the NIS database. Demographic information, incidences of perioperative complications, length of stay, and costs of care among Hispanic patients undergoing RSA were compared to non-Hispanic patients undergoing RSA. A subsequent propensity matching was conducted to consider preoperative comorbidities.

RESULTS

The query of NIS identified 59,916 patients who underwent RSA. Of this sample, 2,656 patients (4.4%) were identified to be Hispanic, while the remaining 57,260 patients (95.6%) were found to belong to other races (control). After propensity matching, Hispanic patients had a significantly longer LOS (median = 1.4 days) than the patients in the control group (median = 1.0, P < 0.001). The Hispanic patients (89,168.5 USD) had a significantly higher cost of care than those in the control group (67,396.1 USD, P < 0.001). In looking at postoperative complications, Hispanic patients had increased incidences of acute renal failure (Hispanics: 3.1%, control group: 1.1%, P = 0.03) and blood loss anemia (Hispanics: 12.7%, control group: 10.9%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic patients had significantly longer lengths of stay, higher costs of care, and higher rates of perioperative complications compared to the control group. For patients who are Hispanic and undergoing RSA, this information will aid doctors in making comprehensive decisions regarding patient care and resource allocation.

Impact of resident involvement on cervical and lumbar spine surgery outcomes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Resident involvement in the operating room is a vital component of their medical education. Conflicting and limited research exists regarding the effects of surgical resident participation on spine surgery patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of resident involvement on surgery duration, length of hospital stay and 30-day postoperative complication rates in common spinal surgery using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 1,441 patients met the inclusion criteria: 1,142 patients had surgeries with an attending physician alone and 299 patients had surgeries with trainee involvement. All anterior cervical or posterior lumbar surgery patients were identified. Patients who had missing trainee involvement information, surgery for cancer, preoperative infection or dirty wound classification, spine fractures, traumatic spinal cord injury, intradural surgery, thoracic surgery, and emergency surgery were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes of interest analyzed from the ACS-NSQIP database included surgical complications, medical complications, length of hospital stay, and surgery duration.

METHODS

Propensity score for risk of any complication was calculated to account for baseline characteristic differences between the attending alone and trainee present group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of resident involvement on surgery duration, length of hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative complication rates.

RESULTS

After adjusting using the calculated propensity score, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in any complication rates between surgeries involving trainees compared to surgeries with attending surgeons alone. Surgery times were found to be significantly longer for surgeries involving trainees. To further explore this relationship, separate analyses were performed for tertiles of predicted surgery duration, cervical or lumbar surgery, fusion or nonfusion, and inpatient or outpatient surgery. The effect of trainee involvement on increasing surgery time remained significant for medium predicted surgery duration, longer predicted surgery duration, cervical surgery, lumbar surgery, fusion surgery, and inpatient surgery. There were no significant differences reported for any other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for confounding, we demonstrated in a national database that resident involvement in surgeries did not increase complication rates. We demonstrated that surgeries with more complex features may lead to an increase in operative time when trainees are involved. Further study is required to determine how to efficiently integrate resident involvement in surgeries without affecting their medical education.

Resident and Attending Perceptions of Resident Involvement: An Analysis of ACGME Reporting Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

For general surgery residents (Residents) to log an operation, the ACGME requires "significant involvement" in diagnosis (DX), operation selection (SEL), operation (OPR), preoperative (PRE), and postoperative (POC) care. We compared how residents and attending surgeons (Attendings) perceived residents' role in each of these core requirements.

DESIGN

Residents and attendings completed surveys postoperatively regarding responsibility for each core requirement on a 5-point Likert scale from "Completely Attending" to "Completely Resident." Significance was determined using Chi-square analysis (p < 0.05) and degree of agreement was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation (r_s).

SETTING

Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (tertiary institution).

RESULTS

A total of 302 paired surveys were analyzed. Residents more often performed a significant portion of the later stages of care (DX = 27%, PRE = 29%, SEL = 27%, OPR = 87%, and POC = 84%). Residents completed the majority of each requirement more frequently in operations performed in the acute setting compared to elective operations: DX (70% vs 8%, p < 0.01), PRE (74% vs 10%, p < 0.01), SEL (65% vs 11%, p < 0.01), OPR (100% vs 89%, p = 0.02), POC (100% vs 77%, p < 0.01). Resident participation was inversely related to operational complexity for DX (p < 0.01), PRE (p < 0.01), SEL (p < 0.01), and OPR (p = 0.01). Resident involvement in OPR increased at the end of the academic year (p = 0.05) and when working with junior attendings (<5 years in practice) (p = 0.01). Interpair agreement was greatest for DX (r_s = 0.70) and lowest for POC (r_s = 0.35). When residents and attendings did not agree in their answers, residents generally overstated their contribution to the DX (68%), PRE (58%), and SEL (64%) but understated their contribution in OPR (63%) and POC (62%).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents and attendings demonstrated reliable agreement for most core requirements, but residents were often unable to be involved in all 5 core requirements. Resident involvement was weighted toward later stages of patient care, yet residents often underestimated their contributions. Operational acuity, complexity, and attending experience correlated with resident operative involvement.

Racial disparities in the use of blood transfusion in major surgery

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in healthcare in the United States are widespread and have been well documented. However, it is unknown whether racial disparities exist in the use of blood transfusion for patients undergoing major surgery.

METHODS

We used the University HealthSystem Consortium database (2009-2011) to examine racial disparities in perioperative red blood cells (RBCs) transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), total hip replacement (THR), and colectomy. We estimated multivariable logistic regressions to examine whether black patients are more likely than white patients to receive perioperative RBC transfusion, and to investigate potential sources of racial disparities.

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient-level factors, black patients were more likely to receive RBC transfusions for CABG (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI: [1.13, 1.76], p = 0.002) and THR (AOR = 1.39, 95% CI: [1.20, 1.62], p < 0.001), but not for colectomy (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI: [0.90, 1.30], p = 0.40). Black-white disparities in blood transfusion persisted after controlling for patient insurance and hospital effects (CABG: AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: [1.30, 1.56], p < 0.001; THR: AOR = 1.43, 95% CI: [1.29, 1.58], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We detected racial disparities in the use of blood transfusion for CABG and THR (black patients tended to receive more transfusions compared with whites), but not for colectomy. Reporting racial disparities in contemporary transfusion practices may help reduce potentially unnecessary blood transfusions in minority patients.