Infusion technique of hematopoietic progenitor cells and related adverse events (CME)

The impact of infused red blood cell volume on major and bidirectional ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND AIMS

ABO incompatibility does not hinder bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but it has been associated with worse outcomes and additional adverse events. This study aimed to verify the impact of incompatible red blood cells (iRBCs) in allogeneic BMT and to determine a safe number of iRBCs to be infused.

METHODS

We compared ABO-incompatible (iABO) allogeneic BMT (n = 42) with ABO-compatible allogeneic BMT (n = 44) and evaluated the impact of the number of infused iRBCs on outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

The iABO patients demonstrated delayed time to transfusion independence at 30 days and 60 days, increased requirement for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and greater hemolysis signals and incidence of pure red cell aplasia. Neutrophil/platelet engraftment, length of hospitalization post-transplant, platelet units required, graft-versus-host disease occurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. Patients in the iABO group received 1.03 × 1010 iRBCs/kg (range, 0.36-3.88). Infusion of iRBCs >1.0 × 1010 /kg was related to graft failure or death before neutrophil engraftment or platelet engraftment or both as well as increased plasma requirement and increased creatinine. Our results also suggest that antibody titers impact the transplantation scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

The iABO transplantation showed some unfavorable outcomes. It is important to monitor the value of iRBCs to be infused, considering the recipient antibody titers. We propose using the number of iRBCs (iRBCs/kg) as a dose parameter with regard to infused iRBCs. Further studies are necessary to clarify the maximum safe number of iRBCs in iABO transplants.

Higher Age (≥60 Years) Increases the Risk for Adverse Events during Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) is a standard of care for patients with hemato-oncologic diseases. This procedure is highly regulated, and a quality assurance system needs to be in place. Deviations from defined processes and outcomes are reported as adverse events (AEs: any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with an intervention that may or may not have a causal relationship), including adverse reactions (ARs: a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended). Only a few reports on AEs cover the procedure of autoHSCT from collection until infusion. Our aim was to investigate the occurrence and severity of AEs in a large data set of patients who were treated by autoHSCT. In this retrospective, observational, single-center study on 449 adult patients during the years 2016-2019, AEs occurred in 19.6% of the patients. However, only 6.0% of patients had ARs, which is a low rate compared to the percentages (13.5-56.9%) found in other studies; 25.8% of the AEs were serious and 57.5% were potentially serious. Larger leukapheresis volumes, lower numbers of collected CD34+ cells and larger transplant volumes significantly correlated with the occurrence and number of AEs. Importantly, we found more AEs in patients >60 years (see graphical abstract). By preventing potentially serious AEs of quality and procedural issues, AEs could be reduced by 36.7%. Our results provide a broad view on AEs and point out steps and parameters for the potential optimization of the autoHSCT procedure, especially in elderly patients.

Patients experienced serious adverse reactions within one hour of hematopoietic stem-cell infusion

METHODS

SARs were examined occurred within 1 hour after initiating HSC product infusions in all HSCT done in Turkey's Anadolu Medical Center Hospital accredited for HSCTs between 2013 and 2015, targeting 315 patients.

RESULTS

SARs were carefully evaluated in this study based on a comparison of the amount of stem cells infused, age, frozen sample (FS) / non-frozen samples (NFS) between HSCs sources. Rate of SARs is significantly higher in FS infusions supports the hypothesis that DMSO plays an important role in the development of SAR.

CONCLUSION

The rate of SARs is significantly higher in infusions given using FSs confirms the hypothesis that the preservative agent DMSO plays an important role in the development of SAR. Our study provides guidance for future studies on the necessity of reducing the amount of DMSO in the HSCT product and using other alternative freezing agents instead of DMSO.

Adverse events caused by cord blood infusion in Japan during a 5-year period

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In Japan, cord blood is used for more than half of all unrelated stem cell transplantations. The public cord blood banks (CBBs) have been collecting information on cord blood transplantation-related adverse events from physicians on a voluntary basis, without common definitions of the adverse reactions. The aims of this study were to compare two classification systems to improve the reporting system and to clarify the actual risk from cord blood infusion, which can then provide the impetus to take appropriate measures to reduce adverse events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We classified the reports according to existing criteria; one is the Proposed Standard Definitions for Surveillance of Non-Infectious Adverse Transfusion Reactions by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) Working Party on Haemovigilance, and the other is the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). There were 140 cases with adverse events reported from April 2014 through March 2019.

RESULTS

Twelve cases, such as donor-derived leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chromosomal aberrations reported after engraftment, were excluded from this analysis. Of the 128 cases with adverse events at cord blood infusion, the CTCAE and ISBT criteria could not classify 6 cases and 68 cases, respectively. Classifying by the CTCAE, the most common side effect was hypertension in 35 cases, followed by anaphylaxis, allergic reactions, nausea, urticaria, etc. Serious adverse events (grades 4 and 5) were mainly anaphylaxis, with a frequency of 0.23%.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary not only to provide information on adverse events but also to standardize the reporting of adverse events to support measures to reduce them.

PROTOCOL OF NURSING CARE ON ZERO DAY OF THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HEMATOPOETIC STEM CELLS: COLLECTIVE CONSTRUCTION

ABSTRACT Objective: to construct a protocol of nursing care to the patient on day zero of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Method: a convergent care research was developed from August to December 2016 in a Bone Marrow Transplant Service. The participants were twenty-two nurses from this service. The technique of data collection used was discussion groups. For the analysis the following steps were taken: transcription of the data, highlighting the suggestions of the participants; distribution of contributions by theme, for synthesis of the elements in a coherent whole, scientific evidence and contributions of the participants; and construction of the protocol, with refinement and approval of the final version by nurses. Results: the protocol, guides nursing care to be provided by the nurse on day zero of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, according to the infusion mode: fresh and cryopreserved-thawed. These precautions aim to prevent, identify and intervene early in complications related to cell infusion. Conclusion: the protocol, product of the research, was elaborated in the union of scientific evidences, with the reality of the service and the experience of the participating nurses. The utilization of the methodological steps of convergent care research was a facilitator, because, as it presupposes, it provided the union of care practice with scientific research. The participation of nurses in the construction and approval of the protocol enabled the subsequent implementation and use of this tool in nursing service.

Adverse reactions on day zero of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To identify the adverse reactions associated with the infusion of hematopoietic stem cells on day zero of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODOLOGY

Integrative literature review, without temporal cut, with search in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, BVS, SciELO, Web of Science and CAPES; the final sample consisted of 18 scientific articles, published between 1998 and 2017, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Mild and moderate adverse reactions were the most frequent in studies that used the classification by severity, and nausea and emesis had the highest incidence; the most affected organ systems were the cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSION

The main adverse reactions identified in the studies were nausea and emesis. Those classified as mild and moderate were the most frequent in the studies that used the severity classification; and the cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems were the most affected in those that used the classification by organic systems.

Trends in peripheral stem/progenitor cell manipulation and clinical application

Transplants using peripheral blood hemopoietic stem/progenitor (PBHS) cells are widely performed for the treatment of patients with hematologic disorders in routine practice and clinical trials. Although the process from mobilization to infusion of PBHS cells has been mostly established, optimal conditions for each process remain undetermined. Adverse reactions caused by PBHS cell infusions have not been systematically recorded. In transplants using PBHS cells, a number of problems still exist. In this section, the current status of and future perspectives regarding PBHS cells are described.

Adverse Events Associated With Infusion of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products: A Prospective and Multicenter Surveillance Study

Adverse events (AEs) associated with blood transfusions, including component-specific red cell, platelet, and plasma products, have been extensively surveyed. In contrast, surveillance of AEs associated with hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) products in HSC transplantation (HSCT) has been less rigorous, even though HSC products include a diversity of immature and mature hematopoietic cells, substantial plasma, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the case of cryopreserved HSC products. HSC infusion-related AEs have been attributed to DMSO toxicity, but AEs associated with the infusion of noncryopreserved HSC products are not uncommon. To quantify the frequencies, types, and risk factors of HSC infusion-related AEs, we implemented national surveillance for AEs observed within 24 hours after infusion. Herein we report on 1125 HSCTs, including 570 peripheral blood stem cell transplantations (PBSCTs) (290 autologous [auto-] and 280 allogeneic [allo-]), 332 allo-bone marrow transplantations (allo-BMTs) and 223 allo-cord blood transplantations (allo-CBTs). Unexpectedly, incidences of grade ≥ 2 AEs were most frequent in allo-BMTs (37.7%) with no DMSO in any product compared with auto-/allo-PBSCTs (20.9%, P < .001) and allo-CBTs (19.3%, P < .001) typically cryopreserved with DMSO. Hypertension was most often noted in BMTs, whereas nausea/vomiting, fever, and allergic reactions were most frequent in allo-PBSCTs. In a multivariate analysis, a history of transfusion reactions was a risk factor for overall AEs in all HSCTs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.459, P = .045). For grade ≥ 2 AEs in allo-HSCTs, a history of transfusion reactions (OR = 1.551, P = .044) for overall AEs, and high infusion volume (OR = 7.544, P = .005) and allo-PBSCTs (versus BMTs, OR = 9.948, P = .002) for allergic reactions were identified as risk factors. These findings suggest that some factors unrelated to DMSO, such as allo-antigens, contribute to HSC infusion-related AEs. As severe AEs, a total of 117 grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 1125 HSCTs, including life-threatening complications in 3 (0.3%) HSCTs: 1 allo-CBT (anaphylaxis) and 2 allo-PBSCTs (hypoxia, kidney injury) with cryopreserved product. Our data show that HSC infusion risks vary by product, can be severe, and should be monitored with the same rigor as modern transfusion hemovigilance programs.

Validating and implementing the use of an infusion pump for the administration of thawed hematopoietic progenitor cells-a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Direct thaw and administration of previously cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell products is a commonly used practice and should be performed rapidly to reduce cellular damage caused by dimethyl sulfoxide exposure. Cells are typically thawed at the bedside and infused by gravity through a high-flow-rate central venous catheter. An existing nontunneled catheter is occasionally used instead and often results in a slower infusion rate. To ensure expedient and consistent infusions, we validated and implemented the use of an infusion pump for thawed peripheral blood stem cells.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Validation was performed in two phases: in vitro simulation and in vivo clinical assessment. Total nucleated cell recovery and viability plus progenitor cell viability and potency were compared in vitro between two cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell units that were either passed through a preset infusion pump or drained by gravity. The infusion rate, adverse events, and engraftment times were retrospectively compared between patients who received infusions by infusion pump (n = 35) and by gravity (n = 38).

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in vitro between the infusion methods for all measured variables. Overall infusion rates were similar in vivo for both groups but were significantly lower for patients who had nontunneled catheters that delivered the infusion by gravity. The time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess the use of an infusion pump for stem cell transplant. The use of an infusion pump for peripheral blood stem cell infusion is safe, provides a reliable and consistent infusion method, and can mitigate the effect of the type of venous access line used.

Safety of hematopoietic cell infusion in children with malignant and non-malignant diseases

HPC infusions have been associated with a variety of adverse events related to either patient or HPC product-related factors. Studies documenting infusion-related AEs in children are limited. We reviewed HPC infusion records in 354 children. Infusion-related adverse events were classified as follows: grade 0-absent, grade I-mild, grade II-moderate, grade III-severe, grade IV-life-threatening, and grade V-death. The percentage of patients with grade 0, I, and II-IV AEs was as follows: 0 = 67%, I = 23.4%, and II-V = 9.6% (one patient had fatal anaphylactic reaction to dimethyl sulfoxide). The incidence of grade II-IV hypertension was 7.1%. There was a higher incidence of AEs with infusion of allogeneic bone marrow versus allogeneic PBSCs (47.4% vs 25.3%, P = .001). Cryopreserved products had a lower incidence of infusion-associated AEs compared with fresh HPC products (24% vs 39.4%, P = .003). Allogeneic HPC infusion volume (>100 mL) was a significant risk factor for infusion-associated AEs (P < .001). Patients >10 years who received autologous HPC infusions had higher risk of AEs when compared to patients <10 years (P = .01). Our study demonstrated that despite a high incidence of infusion-associated hypertension, HPC infusion is relatively safe in children. Investigating strategies to optimize management of hypertension in the setting of HPC infusion is warranted.

Adverse events of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell infusions in adults: a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation has been used for almost three decades for the management of malignant hematologic diseases and some solid tumors. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is used as a cryoprotective agent for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) collected by apheresis (HPC-A). We evaluated the factors contributing to the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) of cryopreserved HPC-A infusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between January 2009 and June 2014, a total of 1269 (1191 patients) consecutive HPC-A infusions were given to adult patients undergoing autologous HSC transplantation at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Only infusions on the first day of transplant were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

AEs were reported in 480 (37.8%) infusions. The most common AEs were facial flushing in 189 (39.4%) infusions, nausea and/or vomiting in 183 (38.1%) infusions, hypoxia requiring oxygen in 139 (29%) infusions, and chest tightness in 80 (16.7%) infusions. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.26; p < 0.0001), diagnosis other than multiple myeloma (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84; p = 0.004), larger volume of infusion per body weight (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.29-2.15; p < 0.0001), and number of granulocytes infused per body weight (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; p = 0.042) were significant predictors of occurrence of AEs during infusion.

CONCLUSION

AEs due to HPC-A infusion occurred in more than one-third of patients. Interventions need to be instituted to reduce AEs and thus improve the safety of HPC-A infusion. Many of these toxicities can be attributed to DMSO, and this is reflected in the volume of infusion. It might be warranted to consider implementing DMSO-reducing protocols before infusion.

Adverse reactions during stem cell infusion in children treated with autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Adverse reactions (ARs) during the infusion of cellular therapy products (CTPs) are common in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively studied pediatric patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic HSCT to determine the incidence and grade of ARs during stem cell infusion and their predictors. We analyzed data from 213 patients (120 allogeneic and 93 autologous) who received at least 1 CTP, totaling 361 infusion episodes. Serious ARs, defined as grade 2 and 3, occurred in 25 and 11% of infusions, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 ARs were noted. Independent risk factors for developing a serious AR included stem cell source (PBSC vs marrow (odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-9); cord vs marrow (OR 7.3, 95% CI: 1.3-40), overall P=0.0001) but manipulated CTPs were protective (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.7, P=0.004). Unlike previous adult studies, WBC and granulocyte content were not found to be risk factors in this pediatric population. These data suggest that children tolerate higher WBC content during infusion of CTPs and support the use of manipulated CTP, as indicated, to reduce the risk of adverse infusion reactions.

Implementation of electronic identification system for blood transfusion in the setting of hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion at the bedside

Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) infusion at the bedside is a critical step in HPC transplantation. In this study, we implemented a bar code-based electronic identification system (EIS) for blood transfusion in the setting of HPC infusion at the bedside. Between July 2003 and December 2014, a total of 518 HPC products were infused to 190 patients without a single misinfusion in the hospital. An overall compliance rate with the electronic pre-infusion check for HPC infusion at the bedside was 100%. Our observations suggest that an EIS can be successfully applied to the infusion of HPC products at the bedside.