A policy for the disposal of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells: report from an Italian consensus panel

Storage, Utilization, and Disposal of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy (HD-CHT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) represent the standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM) for transplantation-eligible patients. Up to 3 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments may be administered during the course of disease, including during late-onset relapse. Transplantation centers routinely collect more than 1 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft; however, subsequent HD-CHT/ABSCT treatments are often not performed, for various reasons. Currently, little is known about the actual utilization rate of stored PBSCs. The collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC products was analyzed in a large cohort of patients with MM (n = 1114) over a 12-year period with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The final dataset analysis was performed in March 2019, which was set as the reference date. Based on institution-specific charges, the costs for PBSC collection, processing, and storage were estimated. The median number of sufficient PBSC transplantations per patient was 3 (range, 0 to 6), which were stored in a median of 3 (range, 1 to 11) cryopreserved bags (overall, n = 3644). A total of 95% of all patients (n = 1059) underwent at least 1 HD-CHT/ABSCT treatment. However, multiple ABSCTs were performed in 51% of the patients (n_{2/3 ABSCTs} = 538), and only 14% of the patients underwent ABSCT 3 times (n_{3 ABSCTs} = 149). Only a small proportion of collected PBSC bags (5%; n = 109) were used after being stored for longer than 5 years. Overall, 23% of the products (n = 830) were discarded, and 16% (n = 566) were kept in storage until the reference date. From a retrospective standpoint, the collected and discarded (definitively not used) or stored (potentially not used) cryostored PBSCs were associated with considerable costs for long-term cryostorage of approximately €1,600,000. We identified considerable discrepancies between the collection/storage and utilization of PBSCs. This is associated with significant efforts and costs on the one hand; on the other hand, disposal may raise legal and ethical questions. Therefore, we implemented comprehensive guidelines for the systematic reevaluation of stored PBSC grafts at our institution.

Manipulation, and cryopreservation of autologous peripheral blood stem cell products in Italy: A survey by GITMO, SIDEM and GIIMA societies

There is considerable heterogeneity in manipulation and cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) for autologous HSC transplantation across Europe and Italy. To better address this point, three Italian Scientific Societies (GITMO- Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo; SIDEM- Società Italiana Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare; and GIIMA- Gruppo Italiano Interdisciplinare Manipolazione e Aferesi per Terapie Cellulari), in collaboration with the Competent Authority "National Transplant Center" (CNT) sent to 85 Italian transplant centers (TC) a survey, which included 12 questions related to the most critical elements in graft processing. Fifty-nine centers (70 %) responded to the questionnaire. Overall, this survey demonstrates that the majority (>90 %) of responding TC used standardized procedures for HSC processing; however, an intercenter heterogeneity was clearly documented in several standard operating procedures adopted by different TC. These results seem to suggest that further standardization and efforts are needed to provide recommendations and guidelines on HSC manipulation, cryopreservation and functional assessment of cryopreserved material for autologous HSCT.

Is long term storage of cryopreserved stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation a worthwhile exercise in developing countries?

Background

Stem cell units (SCUs) that are cryopreserved prior to both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (for donor lymphocyte infusion) remain unused or partially used several times, and become an increased burden to blood banks/SCU repositories. Because of the scarcity of data regarding the duration for which the storage is useful, there is no general consensus regarding disposal of SCUs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective audit of SCU utilization in 435 patients who planned to undergo either autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) (N=239) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (N=196) at a tertiary cancer care center between November 2007 to January 2015.

Results

Our cohort consisted of 1,728 SCUs stored for conducting auto-SCT and 729 SCUs stored for conducting donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) after allo-SCT. Stem cells were not infused in 12.5% of patients who had planned to undergo auto-SCT, and 80% of patients who underwent allo-SCT never received DLI. Forty-one percent of SCUs intended for use in auto-SCT remained unutilized, with a second auto-SCT being performed only in 4 patients. Ninety-four percent of SCUs intended for carrying out DLIs remained unused, with only minimal usage observed one year after undergoing allo-SCT.

Conclusion

The duration of storage of unused SCUs needs to be debated upon, so that a consensus can be reached regarding the ethical disposal of SCU.

Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting

Background

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty in the late 1970s, is one of the methods for multi-criteria decision making. The AHP disaggregates a complex decision problem into different hierarchical levels. The weight for each criterion and alternative are judged in pairwise comparisons and priorities are calculated by the Eigenvector method. The slowly increasing application of the AHP was the motivation for this study to explore the current state of its methodology in the healthcare context.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted by searching the Pubmed and Web of Science databases for articles with the following keywords in their titles or abstracts: “Analytic Hierarchy Process,” “Analytical Hierarchy Process,” “multi-criteria decision analysis,” “multiple criteria decision,” “stated preference,” and “pairwise comparison.” In addition, we developed reporting criteria to indicate whether the authors reported important aspects and evaluated the resulting studies’ reporting.

Results

The systematic review resulted in 121 articles. The number of studies applying AHP has increased since 2005. Most studies were from Asia (almost 30 %), followed by the US (25.6 %). On average, the studies used 19.64 criteria throughout their hierarchical levels. Furthermore, we restricted a detailed analysis to those articles published within the last 5 years (n = 69). The mean of participants in these studies were 109, whereas we identified major differences in how the surveys were conducted. The evaluation of reporting showed that the mean of reported elements was about 6.75 out of 10. Thus, 12 out of 69 studies reported less than half of the criteria.

Conclusion

The AHP has been applied inconsistently in healthcare research. A minority of studies described all the relevant aspects. Thus, the statements in this review may be biased, as they are restricted to the information available in the papers. Hence, further research is required to discover who should be interviewed and how, how inconsistent answers should be dealt with, and how the outcome and stability of the results should be presented. In addition, we need new insights to determine which target group can best handle the challenges of the AHP.