1
|
Castillo-Aleman YM. Crude collection efficiency of CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell apheresis. J Clin Apher 2024; 39:e22096. [PMID: 37937412 DOI: 10.1002/jca.22096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the apheresis principles for harvesting hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is critical for performing efficient procedures. However, despite significant advances in estimating the collection efficiency (CE) of aphereses, many confounding factors still need to be addressed in the classical calculations. The CE values are unrestricted, and many procedures exhibit CEs of a given cell population greater than 100%. This report introduces a simple equation that estimates the "crude" CE, which ranges from 0% to 100% and intrinsically considers the contribution of donor-related variables such as the pre-procedure mobilization and intra-apheresis recruitment of CD34+ cells (as a convenient marker for HSCs), as well as the performance of the apheresis system itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman
- Apheresis Unit, Department of Immunology, Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center (ADSCC), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castillo-Aleman YM, Ventura-Carmenate Y, Ann-Martinez M. Collection efficiency in apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 2023; 62:103758. [PMID: 37438245 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Significant advances in procedural information displayed by current apheresis machines have been made, but analyses of cell collection efficiency (CE) still rely on calculations done by apheresis professionals. Accordingly, understanding CE equations can support the optimization of apheresis techniques and identification of incidents that could impact the procedure's effectiveness. This report summarizes classical and novel CE analyses applied to apheresis exemplified by an actual case of hematopoietic progenitor cell collection. In addition to the apheresis yield and most common CE1 and CE2 formulas, we present the instantaneous and corrected CE, fold enrichment, collection throughput, collection rate and its variants, average inlet rate, classical and adjusted captured cells, recruitment pool, recruitment factor, recruitment coefficient, blood component loss, predictive apheresis yield, and performance ratio calculations. Moreover, the mathematical relationship between these CE equations is also shown, which can be helpful in many apheresis procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman
- Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center (ADSCC), Villa 25, Al Misahah St., Rowdhat, PO Box 4600, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| | - Yendry Ventura-Carmenate
- Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center (ADSCC), Villa 25, Al Misahah St., Rowdhat, PO Box 4600, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - May Ann-Martinez
- Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center (ADSCC), Villa 25, Al Misahah St., Rowdhat, PO Box 4600, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah EE, Young RP, Wong SW, Damon LE, Wolf JL, Shah ND, Leavitt AD, Loeffler P, Martin TG. Impact of Plerixafor Use at Different Peripheral Blood CD34 + Thresholds on Autologous Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 26:876-883. [PMID: 31785375 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) scheduled for autologous stem cell transplantation must undergo autologous stem cell mobilization; unfortunately, however, many do not obtain an adequate collection yield. Despite the availability of plerixafor, its widespread and uniform use is limited by its cost, and consequently, many institutions have adopted various risk-adapted algorithms. We report our mobilization experience as we have modified our plerixafor algorithm to a more liberal one, with the expectation of greater collection efficiency and mobilization success with higher plerixafor use. A total of 344 mobilization attempts were analyzed over 3 time periods and using 3 different peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts to guide plerixafor use: <15/µL (n = 66), <20/µL (n = 130), and <40/µL (n = 148). The primary endpoints were evaluation of changes in mean plerixafor utilization and apheresis days and assessment of the impact on overall mobilization costs. Secondary endpoints were a description of the impact of lenalidomide use on mobilization and evaluation of the rate of mobilization failure. We found that mean plerixafor use increased from 1.32 to 1.65 to 1.74 doses per mobilization (P = .026) and the mean days of apheresis decreased from 2.15 to 2.17 to 1.89 days per mobilization for the <15/µL, <20/µL, and <40/µL cohorts, respectively (P = .011). The combined cost of plerixafor and apheresis procedures at a threshold of 40/µL is close to that at a threshold of 15/µL, while saving 26 apheresis days per 100 patients. In general, there were low rates of mobilization failure across all thresholds. Patients who received more than 6 cycles of lenalidomide demonstrated impaired mobilization and required more apheresis sessions (P < .013) and greater plerixafor use (P < .001) to achieve target stem cell yields. Overall, using plerixafor in patients with MM, with a day 4 pCD34 count of <40/µL is a reasonable and cost-effective strategy to optimize apheresis utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eshana E Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rebecca P Young
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Sandy W Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Lloyd E Damon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeffrey L Wolf
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Nina D Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew D Leavitt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Paula Loeffler
- Department of Nursing, UCSF Health, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Thomas G Martin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cell collection is an effective approach to obtain a hematopoietic graft for stem cell transplantation. Developing hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization methods and collection algorithms have improved efficiency, clinical outcomes, and cost effectiveness. Differences in mobilization mechanisms may change the HSPC content harvested and result in different engraftment kinetics and complications. Patient-specific factors can affect mobilization. Incorporating these factors in collection algorithms and improving assays for evaluating mobilization further extend the ability to obtain sufficient HSPCs for hematopoietic repopulation. Technological advance and innovations in leukapheresis have improved collection efficiency and reduced adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Michael S Hsu
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Medicine and Cellular Therapy, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Box 251, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Melissa M Cushing
- Transfusion Medicine and Cellular Therapy, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Box 251, M09, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|