Fat removal during cell salvage: an optimized program for a discontinuous autotransfusion device

Combined Platelet and Red Blood Cell Recovery during On-pump Cardiac Surgery Using same™ by i-SEP Autotransfusion Device: A First-in-human Noncomparative Study (i-TRANSEP Study)

BACKGROUND

Centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices only salvage red blood cells while platelets are removed. The same™ device (Smart Autotransfusion for ME; i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage both red blood cells and platelets. The authors tested the hypothesis that this new device could allow a red blood cell recovery exceeding 80% with a posttreatment hematocrit exceeding 40%, and would remove more than 90% of heparin and 75% of free hemoglobin.

METHODS

Adults undergoing on-pump elective cardiac surgery were included in a noncomparative multicenter trial. The device was used intraoperatively to treat shed and residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood. The primary outcome was a composite of cell recovery performance, assessed in the device by red blood cell recovery and posttreatment hematocrit, and of biologic safety assessed in the device by the washout of heparin and free hemoglobin expressed as removal ratios. Secondary outcomes included platelet recovery and function and adverse events (clinical and device-related adverse events) up to 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 50 patients, of whom 18 (35%) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft, 26 (52%) valve surgery, and 6 (12%) aortic root surgery. The median red blood cell recovery per cycle was 86.1% (25th percentile to 75th percentile interquartile range, 80.8 to 91.6) with posttreatment hematocrit of 41.8% (39.7 to 44.2). Removal ratios for heparin and free hemoglobin were 98.9% (98.2 to 99.7) and 94.6% (92.7 to 96.6), respectively. No adverse device effect was reported. Median platelet recovery was 52.4% (44.2 to 60.1), with a posttreatment concentration of 116 (93 to 146) · 109/l. Platelet activation state and function, evaluated by flow cytometry, were found to be unaltered by the device.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-in-human study, the same™ device was able to simultaneously recover and wash both platelets and red blood cells. Compared with preclinical evaluations, the device achieved a higher platelet recovery of 52% with minimal platelet activation while maintaining platelet ability to be activated in vitro.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Intraoperative Cell Salvage as an Alternative to Allogeneic (Donated) Blood Transfusion: A Prospective Observational Evaluation of the Immune Response Profile

Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is associated with transfusion-related immune modulation (TRIM) and subsequent poorer patient outcomes including perioperative infection, multiple organ failure, and mortality. The precise mechanism(s) underlying TRIM remain largely unknown. During intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) a patient's own (autologous) blood is collected, anticoagulated, processed, and reinfused. One impediment to understanding the influence of the immune system on transfusion-related adverse outcomes has been the inability to characterize immune profile changes induced by blood transfusion, including ICS. Dendritic cells and monocytes play a central role in regulation of immune responses, and dysfunction may contribute to adverse outcomes. During a prospective observational study (n = 19), an in vitro model was used to assess dendritic cell and monocyte immune responses and the overall immune response following ABT or ICS exposure. Exposure to both ABT and ICS suppressed dendritic cell and monocyte function. This suppression was, however, significantly less marked following ICS. ICS presented an improved immune competence. This assessment of immune competence through the study of intracellular cytokine production, co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules expressed on dendritic cells and monocytes, and modulation of the overall leukocyte response may predict a reduction of adverse outcomes ( i.e., infection) following ICS.

Comparison of cell salvage with one and two suction devices during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Cell salvage has recently been recommended for obstetric use in cases with a high risk of massive hemorrhage during cesarean section (CS). However, limited data are available to support the use of one suction device to collect lost blood. This study aimed to investigate the volume of red blood cells (RBCs) salvaged and the components of amniotic fluid (AF) in blood salvaged by one suction device or two devices during CS in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete.

Methods

Thirty patients with placenta previa and/or accrete undergoing elective CS in the Women's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited for the present study from November 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups according to an Excel-generated random number sheet: Group 1 (n = 15), in which only one suction device was used to aspirate all blood and AF, and Group 2 (n = 15), in which a second suction device was mainly used to aspirate AF before the delivery of the placenta. Three samples of blood per patient (pre-wash, post-wash, and post-filtration) were collected to measure AF components. The salvaged RBC volumes were recorded. Continuous data of pre-wash, post-wash, and post-filtration samples were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test for multiple comparisons, or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn test for multiple comparisons. Comparisons of continuous data between Group 1 and Group 2 were conducted using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The salvaged RBC volume was significantly higher in Group 1 than that in Group 2 (401.6 ± 77.2 mL vs. 330.1 ± 53.3 mL, t = 4.175, P < 0.001). In both groups, squamous cells, lamellar bodies, and fat were significantly reduced by washing (all P<0.001) and squamous cells were further reduced by filtering (P < 0.001). Squamous cells were found in six post-filtration samples (three from each group). Lamellar bodies and fat were completely removed by filtering. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and potassium were significantly reduced post-wash (all P < 0.05), with no further significant reduction after filtration in either group (all P > 0.05). The mean percentage of fetal RBCs post-filtration was (1.8 ± 0.8)% with a range of 1.0% to 3.5% and (1.9 ± 0.9)% with a range of 0.7% to 4.0% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (U = 188.5, P = 0.651).

Conclusion

Cell salvage performed by one suction device could result in higher volume of salvaged RBCs and can be used safely for CS in patients with placenta previa and/or accrete when massive hemorrhage occurs.

Trial registration number

ChiCTR-INR-17012926, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

[Cell salvage : Scientific evidence, clinical practice and legal framework]

Cell salvage is an efficient method to reduce the transfusion of homologous banked blood, as documented by several meta-analyses detected in a systematic literature search. Cell salvage is widely used in orthopedics, trauma surgery, cardiovascular and abdominal transplantation surgery. The retransfusion of unwashed shed blood from wounds or drainage is not permitted according to German regulations. Following irradiation of wound blood, salvaged blood can also be used in tumor surgery. Cell salvage makes a valuable contribution to providing sufficient compatible blood for transfusions in cases of massive blood loss. Certain surgical procedures for Jehovah's Witnesses are only possible with the use of cell salvage. Another possible use is the washing of homologous banked blood, e. g. to prevent potassium-induced arrhythmia or sequestration of autologous platelets. Other advantages besides a good compatibility are the high vitality and functionality of the unstored autologous red blood cells. These have been declared a pharmaceutical product by the German transfusion task force in 2014, so that the autologous red blood cells are now under the control of the Pharmaceutical Products Act (AMG). The new hemotherapy guidelines, however, tolerate cell salvage only under strict rules, whereby the production of autologous blood during or after surgery is still possible without additional special permits. The new guidelines now require the introduction of a quality management system for cell salvage and regular quality controls. These quality controls include a control of the product hematocrit for every application, monthly controls of the protein and albumin elimination rates and the erythrocyte recovery rate for each cell salvage device. Testing for infection markers is not required. The application of cell salvage has to be reported to the appropriate authorities.

A new approach for fat removal in a discontinuous autotransfusion device-concept and evaluation

BACKGROUND

Fat present during blood salvage in orthopaedic or cardiac surgery can pose a risk of fat embolism and should be eliminated before transfusion. Based on observations of central fat accumulation at the bottom of Latham bowls, a fat reduction program was developed using two volume displacements, where blood temporarily is removed and respun in the bowl to force the fat through the RBC sediment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pooled ABO-matched RBC and FFP were adjusted to a haematocrit of 10%, and human fat tissue added to a concentration of 1·25 vol%. In six experiments, blood was processed with the new-generation cell salvage device CS Elite in a newly developed fat reduction program in bowls of three sizes. Volumetric quantification of fat was performed after centrifugation of blood samples in Pasteur pipettes. From volumes, haematocrits and the concentrations of fat, RBC recovery and fat elimination rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Fat removal rates of 93·2 ± 2·8, 97·0 ± 2·1 and 99·6 ± 0·3% were observed with a 70-ml, 125-ml and 225-ml bowl, respectively, and even higher rates when removal rates were calculated one cycle. At the same time, high RBC recovery and plasma elimination rates were maintained, not significantly different to the default program mode.

CONCLUSION

Modifications in process parameters and sequence led to a fat reduction program that significantly improves fat removal with the Cell Saver Elite from 77·4 ± 5·1% in the default mode to an average of 98·6 ± 1·1%, yielding results equivalent to the continuous cell salvage system (C.A.T.S).

Performance of a new-generation continuous autotransfusion device including fat removal and consequences for quality controls

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cell salvage plays a key role in blood conservation. To maintain high performance, quality management is recommended. Accordingly, a new-generation autotransfusion device was tested for its performance and compared with its predecessor. Two different calculations of quality parameters were applied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an experimental study, the continuous autotransfusion devices CATSmart and Continuous Autotransfusion System (C.A.T.S) plus were tested using banked blood adjusted to a haematocrit of 20% and anticoagulated with heparin 5 U/L. Test blood was processed using an emergency programme, a high-quality programme/smart wash programme and a low-volume wash programme. Samples were taken after the production of 200 mL of red blood cells (RBC) and after the final emptying of the separation chamber. In an additional set of tests, blood containing 1·25% fat was processed with both devices to examine fat removal.

RESULTS

Both devices demonstrated an equally high performance with regards to product hematocrit (Hct); RBC recovery; and elimination rates of protein, heparin and fat. The high fat elimination rate (>99·8%) reported for C.A.T.S plus was confirmed for CATSmart, regardless of the used programme. Samples taken during the ongoing process show a higher haematocrit and RBC recovery rate than samples taken after the final emptying of the separation chamber. Interface sensors were not affected by fat in the blood.

CONCLUSIONS

The new-generation autotransfusion device CATSmart is not inferior to its predecessor and shows high performance with regards to RBC recovery, plasma and fat elimination in all programme modes. Samples for quality controls should be taken during blood processing.