Prospective randomized and crossover comparison of two apheresis machines for peripheral blood stem cell collection: a multicenter study

Comparison of hematopoietic progenitor cell collection using different inlet flow rates with the Fenwal Amicus

PURPOSE

We have used a hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) algorithm (standard [STD]) that restricted the inlet flow rate to 65 mL/min for peripheral white blood cell count (PWBC) >35 × 109 /L (STD). In this study, we evaluated a technique that allows 85 mL/min, regardless of the PWBC count (high). For patients with PWBC >35 × 109 /L, a prospective, randomized comparison of the high flow rate vs the STD PWBC-based flow rate (65 mL/min) was performed, comparing CD34+ and lymphocyte yields, collection efficiencies (CE1), mononuclear cells (MNC), and granulocytes, red blood cell (RBC), and platelet content.

METHODS

The Fenwal Amicus version 4.5 with a heparinized ACD-A anticoagulant (AC) delivered at a 26:1 AC ratio was used. Paired comparisons between high and STD techniques were assessed with Wilcoxon signed rank tests, with P < .05 considered significant. Data are summarized as medians.

RESULTS

Forty patient pairs (autologous) were compared. Diagnoses included primarily multiple myeloma (60%) and lymphoma (37.5%). High had significantly higher median average inlet rates (69 vs 55 mL/min), whole blood processed (20 vs 16 L), and cycles (15 vs 14) than STD. There were no significant differences in pre-procedure counts. Collection contents were (high/STD): 306/328 × 106 CD34+ cells, 48/59% CD34+ CE1 (significant), 0.2/0.2 × 109 /kg lymphocytes, 45/57% lymphocyte CE1, 63/59 × 109 WBC, 15/16 × 109 granulocytes, and 1.9/1.7 × 1011 platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

The simpler, standardized high flow technique did not significantly increase or decrease CD34+ cells or lymphocyte yields, but did significantly decrease CD34+ CE1. The effects on cross-cellular content were minimal and not clinically significant.

Comparison of cryoprotectants in hematopoietic cell infusion-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

The standard cryoprotectant for human cellular products is dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which is associated with hematopoietic cell infusion-related adverse events (HCI-AEs) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation including peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT). DMSO is often used with hydroxyethyl starch (HES), which reduces DMSO concentration while maintaining the postthaw cell recovery. The cryoprotectant medium CP-1 (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial) is widely used in Japan. After mixture of a product with CP-1, DMSO and HES concentrations are 5% and 6%, respectively. However, the safety profile of CP-1 in association with HCI-AEs has not been investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To compare CP-1 with other cryoprotectants, we conducted a subgroup analysis of PBSCT recipients in a prospective surveillance study for HCI-AEs. Moreover, we validated the toxicity of CP-1 in 90 rats following various dose administration.

RESULTS

The PBSC products cryopreserved with CP-1 (CP-1 group) and those with other cryoprotectants, mainly 10% DMSO (non-CP-1 group), were infused into 418 and 58 recipients, respectively. The rate of ≥grade 2 HCI-AEs was higher in the CP-1 group, but that of overall or ≥grade 3 HCI-AEs was not significantly different, compared to the non-CP-1 group. Similarly, after propensity score matching, ≥grade 2 HCI-AEs were more frequent in the CP-1 group, but the ≥grade 3 HCI-AE rate did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant toxicity was detected regardless of the CP-1 dose in the 90 rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of a CP-1-containing PBSC product is feasible with the respect of HCI-AEs.

Comparison of CD34+ cell mobilization, blood graft cellular composition, and post-transplant outcome in myeloma patients mobilized with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim added to low-dose cyclophosphamide: A prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Scarce data exist on the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) type on the mobilizing capacity of CD34⁺ cells, graft cellular composition, and outcome in myeloma (MM) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, 70 patients with MM received filgrastim (FIL) and 20 patients received pegfilgrastim (PEG) as a G-CSF after low-dose cyclophosphamide. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the mobilization of CD34⁺ cells and cellular composition of blood grafts, hematologic recovery, and survival after auto-SCT according to the G-CSF choice.

RESULTS

The CD34⁺ cell yield of the first apheresis was higher in the FIL group (5.3 vs. 4.2 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .025). The better mobilizing capacity was observed in the FIL group especially after bortezomib-based induction based on the higher first apheresis yield of CD34⁺ cells (7.5 vs. 4.4 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .001). The median CD19⁺ cell count (1.0 vs. 0.4 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .010) and the number of CD3⁺ T lymphocytes (43.1 vs. 31.8 × 10⁶ /kg, p = .122) in the infused graft were higher in the patients mobilized with FIL. Both early (day +15) (56 vs. 108 × 10⁹ /L, p = .002) and later platelet recovery at 6 months (191 vs. 226 × 10⁹ /L, p = .026) were faster in the PEG group.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF type seems to impact on the mobilization capacity and cellular composition of infused graft and also platelet recovery post-transplant. A randomized study might be warranted to verify the effects of G-CSF choice in the mobilization field.

Retrospective comparison between COBE SPECTRA and SPECTRA OPTIA apheresis systems for hematopoietic progenitor cells collection for autologous and allogeneic transplantation in a single center

INTRODUCTION

COBE SPECTRA [COBE] (Terumo, BCT Lakewood CO) apheresis system has been the most used device for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) collection. Recently, it has been replaced by the SPECTRA OPTIA [OPTIA] (Terumo, BCT Lakewood CO) apheresis system. The aim of our study is to compare both methods for HPC collection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 302 HPC collection apheresis procedures (115 allogeneic donors and 187 autologous). The study cohort was divided according to the apheresis system used to analyze the differences between COBE and OPTIA, specifically efficacy of apheresis procedure and product characteristics.

RESULTS

OPTIA collections result in a higher CD34⁺ collection efficiency in both groups (autologous 45.3% vs 41%, P < .006; allogeneic 54.9% vs 45%, P < .0001). The total of CD34⁺ cells ×10⁶ /kg recipient collected in the product were comparable in both groups (autologous 2.9 in OPTIA group vs 2.8 in COBE group, P = .344; allogeneic 6.2 in OPTIA group vs 5.8 in COBE group, P = .186). The percentage of platelet loss in autologous donors was significantly lower (35.7% vs 40.8%, P < .01). Regarding quality of the product, we observed a significantly lower hematocrit in products collected with OPTIA in both groups (1.8% vs 4%, P < .0001) as well as significantly lower amount of leukocytes (median 153.4 vs 237.2 × 10⁹ /L in autologous, P < .0001; 239.5 vs 340.2 × 10⁹ /L in allogeneic P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Both apheresis systems are comparable in collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells, with significantly higher collection efficiency with the OPTIA system. Collection products obtained with OPTIA contain significantly lower hematocrit and leukocytes.

A new protocol for improving efficiency of autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients with high white blood cell counts

BACKGROUND

Collection efficiency (CE) of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections is negatively affected by increasing white blood cell (WBC) counts of the patient. This study compared a new optimized mononuclear cell (MNC) collection protocol (OPP) to the standard MNC collection protocol recommended by the manufacturer (STP) for PBSC collection in patients with WBC counts >35 000/μL.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Single-center, retrospective, and observational study of 81 autologous PBSC collections on Fenwal Amicus cell separators in 70 adult patients.

RESULTS

Median peripheral WBC count (×10³ /μL; 44.2 in OPP group vs 46.5 in STP group) and median CD34⁺ count (105/μL in OPP group vs 40/μL in STP group) at the beginning of PBSC collection did not differ significantly. Median CE2 (45% vs 31%; P < .001) as well as CD34⁺ yield of the apheresis product both with regards to median absolute CD34⁺ content (×10⁶ ; 793 vs 188; P = .001) as well as median CD34⁺ content (×10⁶ )/kg body weight (8.93 vs 2.51; P = .002) were significantly higher for the OPP. Overall, 18/21 (86%) patients with the OPP obtained their target CD34⁺ amount with a single apheresis session, compared to 25/50 (50%) with the STP (P = .005). PBSC collections using OPP lasted significantly longer (median 377 minutes vs 260 minutes; P < .001) than with the STP.

CONCLUSIONS

The OPP significantly improves CE2 for PBSC collections on Fenwal Amicus cell separators in patients with pre-apheresis WBC counts >35 000/μL and significantly reduces the necessity for multiple apheresis sessions. The OPP is therefore suited to reduce both patient burden and cost in autologous PBSC collection.

Therapeutic white blood cell and platelet depletions using the spectra OPTIA system continuous mononuclear cell protocol

The Spectra Optia apheresis system has only recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for therapeutic white blood cell (WBC) depletions and is not yet approved for platelet depletions. Prior to FDA-approval of the WBC depletion protocol, when our available COBE Spectra apheresis systems were out of service, we successfully performed WBC depletion using a modified Spectra Optia apheresis system Continuous Mononuclear Cell (CMNC) protocol. Using this modified Spectra Optia CMNC protocol, we created institutional protocols for WBC and platelet depletions. We performed 10 WBC depletions in 9 patients and 2 platelet depletions in 2 patients. We compared pre- and post-procedure WBC, platelet count, and hemoglobin to the same data from patients previously treated on the COBE Spectra and found no difference in % WBC and platelet reduction. We also found no significant difference in post-procedural hematocrit decline. Additionally, adverse reactions were not increased. Therefore, we conclude that the Spectra Optia CMNC protocol can be successfully modified for effective WBC and platelet depletions without increase in adverse reactions.

Comparison of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and lipegfilgrastim added to chemotherapy for mobilization of CD34+ cells in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND

Data are limited on the long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) pegfilgrastim (PEG) and lipegfilgrastim (LIPEG) compared with filgrastim (FIL) regarding the mobilization efficiency of CD34⁺ cells, graft cellular composition, and engraftment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this prospective nonrandomized study, 36 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma received FIL, 67 received PEG, and 16 patients received LIPEG as a cytokine after chemotherapy. We analyzed the mobilization and collection of CD34⁺ cells, cellular composition of blood grafts, and hematologic recovery after auto-SCT according to the type of G-CSF used.

RESULTS

Patients in the LIPEG group had fewer apheresis sessions (1 vs. 2, p = 0.021 for FIL and p = 0.111 for PEG) as well as higher median blood CD34⁺ cell counts at the start of the first apheresis (LIPEG 74 × 10⁶ /L vs. FIL 31 × 10⁶ /L, p = 0.084 or PEG 27 × 10⁶ /L, p = 0.021) and CD34⁺ yields of the first apheresis (FIL 5.1 × 10⁶ /kg vs. FIL 2.3 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.105 or PEG 1.8 × 10⁶ /kg, p = 0.012). Also, the costs associated with G-CSF mobilization and apheresis were lower in the LIPEG group. The graft composition was comparable except for the higher infused CD34⁺ cell counts in the LIPEG group. The engraftment kinetics were significantly slower in the FIL group.

CONCLUSION

LIPEG appears to be more efficient compared with PEG after chemotherapy to mobilize CD34⁺ cells for auto-SCT demonstrated as fewer sessions of aphereses needed as well as 2.8-fold CD34⁺ cell yields on the first apheresis day. Early hematologic recovery was more rapid in the LIPEG group. Thus further studies on LIPEG in the mobilization setting are warranted.

Trends in peripheral stem/progenitor cell manipulation and clinical application

Transplants using peripheral blood hemopoietic stem/progenitor (PBHS) cells are widely performed for the treatment of patients with hematologic disorders in routine practice and clinical trials. Although the process from mobilization to infusion of PBHS cells has been mostly established, optimal conditions for each process remain undetermined. Adverse reactions caused by PBHS cell infusions have not been systematically recorded. In transplants using PBHS cells, a number of problems still exist. In this section, the current status of and future perspectives regarding PBHS cells are described.

Adverse Events Associated With Infusion of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products: A Prospective and Multicenter Surveillance Study

Adverse events (AEs) associated with blood transfusions, including component-specific red cell, platelet, and plasma products, have been extensively surveyed. In contrast, surveillance of AEs associated with hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) products in HSC transplantation (HSCT) has been less rigorous, even though HSC products include a diversity of immature and mature hematopoietic cells, substantial plasma, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the case of cryopreserved HSC products. HSC infusion-related AEs have been attributed to DMSO toxicity, but AEs associated with the infusion of noncryopreserved HSC products are not uncommon. To quantify the frequencies, types, and risk factors of HSC infusion-related AEs, we implemented national surveillance for AEs observed within 24 hours after infusion. Herein we report on 1125 HSCTs, including 570 peripheral blood stem cell transplantations (PBSCTs) (290 autologous [auto-] and 280 allogeneic [allo-]), 332 allo-bone marrow transplantations (allo-BMTs) and 223 allo-cord blood transplantations (allo-CBTs). Unexpectedly, incidences of grade ≥ 2 AEs were most frequent in allo-BMTs (37.7%) with no DMSO in any product compared with auto-/allo-PBSCTs (20.9%, P < .001) and allo-CBTs (19.3%, P < .001) typically cryopreserved with DMSO. Hypertension was most often noted in BMTs, whereas nausea/vomiting, fever, and allergic reactions were most frequent in allo-PBSCTs. In a multivariate analysis, a history of transfusion reactions was a risk factor for overall AEs in all HSCTs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.459, P = .045). For grade ≥ 2 AEs in allo-HSCTs, a history of transfusion reactions (OR = 1.551, P = .044) for overall AEs, and high infusion volume (OR = 7.544, P = .005) and allo-PBSCTs (versus BMTs, OR = 9.948, P = .002) for allergic reactions were identified as risk factors. These findings suggest that some factors unrelated to DMSO, such as allo-antigens, contribute to HSC infusion-related AEs. As severe AEs, a total of 117 grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 1125 HSCTs, including life-threatening complications in 3 (0.3%) HSCTs: 1 allo-CBT (anaphylaxis) and 2 allo-PBSCTs (hypoxia, kidney injury) with cryopreserved product. Our data show that HSC infusion risks vary by product, can be severe, and should be monitored with the same rigor as modern transfusion hemovigilance programs.

Efficiency of autologous stem cell collection: Comparison of three different cell separators

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) infusion allows rapid haematological recovery after high dose chemotherapy. Efficient PBPC collection is therefore essential as rescue therapy for transplantation. In order to validate a new equipment (ComTec^®, Fresenius Kabi), we compared the efficiency of three cell separators for PBPC collection in patients with haematological malignant diseases. From June 2014 to December 2015, 83 PBPC were collected in 48 patients. Three aphaeresis machines were used: Cobe Spectra^® (Terumo BCT, 11), Amicus^® (Fenwall, 30), and ComTec^® (Fresenius Kabi, 42). The median collection efficiency was similar between the three separators. The evaluation of cell contamination in the final product revealed a lower red cell contamination with Spectra^® and ComTec^®, whereas the platelet contamination was lower with Amicus^®. The new equipment has been validated and can be further used in routine, with a total running cost that turned out to be quite lower. Each separator has its own characteristics and advantages. Further study is needed to suggest that the choice of separator could be guided following the patient's blood characteristics.