Time to plasma transfusion: a patient centered approach and modifiable risk factor

The Role of TEG and ROTEM in Damage Control Resuscitation

ABSTRACT

Trauma-induced coagulopathy is associated with very high mortality, and hemorrhage remains the leading preventable cause of death after injury. Directed methods to combat coagulopathy and attain hemostasis are needed. The available literature regarding viscoelastic testing, including thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), was reviewed to provide clinically relevant guidance for emergency resuscitation. These tests predict massive transfusion and developing coagulopathy earlier than conventional coagulation testing, within 15 min using rapid testing. They can guide resuscitation after trauma, as well. TEG and ROTEM direct early transfusion of fresh frozen plasma when clinical gestalt has not activated a massive transfusion protocol. Reaction time and clotting time via these tests can also detect clinically significant levels of direct oral anticoagulants. Slowed clot kinetics suggest the need for transfusion of fibrinogen via concentrates or cryoprecipitate. Lowered clot strength can be corrected with platelets and fibrinogen. Finally, viscoelastic tests identify fibrinolysis, a finding associated with significantly increased mortality yet one that no conventional coagulation test can reliably detect. Using these parameters, guided resuscitation begins within minutes of a patient's arrival. A growing body of evidence suggests this approach may improve survival while reducing volumes of blood products transfused.

10 Years of Experience with the First Thawed Plasma Bank in Germany

BACKGROUND

Plasma is stored at -30°C, which requires thawing before transfusion, causing a time delay between ordering and issuing of at least 30 min. In case of bleeding emergencies, guidelines strongly recommend a 2:1 transfusion ratio of RBCs and plasma. In addition, each minute delay in issuing of blood products in bleeding emergencies increases the mortality risk. To provide plasma in time in bleeding emergencies, a thawed plasma bank was introduced in 2011.

SUMMARY

The thawed plasma bank of University Medicine Greifswald has provided 18,924 thawed stored plasma units between 2011 and 2020. The workflow in the laboratory as well as in the emergency room, the operating room, and the intensive care unit have been optimized by thawed stored plasma. In case of emergencies, the stress factor for the transfusion medicine laboratory staff has been reduced substantially. The thawed plasma bank allows to transfuse patients with massive transfusion demand at a 2:1 ratio of RBCs and plasma according to guidelines. To reduce storage time, we issue all plasma requests from the thawed plasma bank except for pediatric patients. This results in a median storage time in the thawed plasma bank of 24 h. The "just in time" availability of plasma within the entire hospital based on the thawed plasma bank has reduced precautionary ordering of plasma, and hereby the unnecessary use of plasma. After introduction of the thawed plasma bank, plasma usage decreased substantially by 24% within the first year and by 60% compared to 2019/2020. However, as the overall approach to using blood products has changed over the last 10 years due to the patient blood management initiative, quantification of the effects of the thawed plasma bank in reduction of plasma transfusion is difficult.

KEY MESSAGES

(1) A thawed plasma bank for the routine supply of blood products in a large hospital is feasible in Germany. (2) The thawed plasma bank allows to supply RBCs and plasma in a 2:1 ratio in bleeding emergencies. (3) The beneficial logistical effects of the thawed plasma bank are optimal if all plasma requests are supplied from the thawed plasma bank. This results in a median storage time of 24 h for thawed plasma.

Prehospital Plasma during Air Medical Transport in Trauma Patients at Risk for Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

After a person has been injured, prehospital administration of plasma in addition to the initiation of standard resuscitation procedures in the prehospital environment may reduce the risk of downstream complications from hemorrhage and shock. Data from large clinical trials are lacking to show either the efficacy or the risks associated with plasma transfusion in the prehospital setting.

METHODS

To determine the efficacy and safety of prehospital administration of thawed plasma in injured patients who are at risk for hemorrhagic shock, we conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, cluster-randomized, phase 3 superiority trial that compared the administration of thawed plasma with standard-care resuscitation during air medical transport. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were evaluated: 230 patients received plasma (plasma group) and 271 received standard-care resuscitation (standard-care group). Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (23.2% vs. 33.0%; difference, -9.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -18.6 to -1.0%; P=0.03). A similar treatment effect was observed across nine prespecified subgroups (heterogeneity chi-square test, 12.21; P=0.79). Kaplan-Meier curves showed an early separation of the two treatment groups that began 3 hours after randomization and persisted until 30 days after randomization (log-rank chi-square test, 5.70; P=0.02). The median prothrombin-time ratio was lower in the plasma group than in the standard-care group (1.2 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.4] vs. 1.3 [interquartile range, 1.1 to 1.6], P<0.001) after the patients' arrival at the trauma center. No significant differences between the two groups were noted with respect to multiorgan failure, acute lung injury-acute respiratory distress syndrome, nosocomial infections, or allergic or transfusion-related reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In injured patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock, the prehospital administration of thawed plasma was safe and resulted in lower 30-day mortality and a lower median prothrombin-time ratio than standard-care resuscitation. (Funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; PAMPer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01818427 .).