Phased implementation of pathogen-reduced platelets in a health system facilitates increased manufacturing at the blood center

Pathogen Reduction for Platelets—A Review of Recent Implementation Strategies

The development of pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) for labile blood components is a long-pursued goal in transfusion medicine. While PRT for red blood cells and whole blood are still in an early phase of development, different PRT platforms for plasma and platelets are commercially available and routinely used in several countries. This review describes complementary strategies recommended by the US FDA to mitigate the risk of septic reactions in platelet recipients, including PRT and large-volume delayed sampling, and summarizes the main findings of recent reports discussing economical and organizational issues of platelet PRT implementation. Sophisticated mathematical analytical models are available to determine the impact of PRT on platelet costs, shortages and outdates in different settings. PRT implementation requires careful planning to ensure the availability of sufficient economical, technological and human resources. A phased approach was used in most PRT implementation programs, starting with adult and pediatric immunocompromised patients at higher risk of developing septic platelet transfusion reactions. Overall, the reviewed studies show that significant progress has been made in this area, although additional efforts will be necessary to reduce the storage lesion of PRT platelets and to expand the sustainable applicability of PRT to all labile blood components.

Estimating the impact on the inventory of implementing pathogen-reduced platelets in Canada

BACKGROUND

Pathogen reduction (PR) technology will be implemented in pooled platelets in Canada. It is anticipated that PR platelets will be licensed in Canada for a maximum shelf life of 5 days, while non-treated apheresis platelet products will continue to be licensed for 7 days.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study evaluates the impact on inventory, wastage, and shortages of implementing PR platelets. A custom-built simulation model was used to represent a regional distribution network. Experiments with the model were used to estimate product wastage and shortages when a 5-day PR pooled platelet product is introduced alongside a 7-day apheresis platelet product.

RESULTS

Pooled platelet waste and shortages both increase as pooled shelf life decreases. Apheresis platelets, however, show a different response: While shortages of apheresis platelets increase as the shelf life of pooled units decreases, apheresis waste declines as pooled shelf life decreases.

CONCLUSION

Additional platelet collections will be necessary to accommodate the shorter PR platelet shelf life and to cover increased patient transfusion needs due to a lower platelet yield in PR units. Increases of 9% for pooled units and 6% for apheresis units beyond expected demand, were found to be sufficient to ensure a non-inferior level of customer service while minimizing waste.

Pathogen-reduced platelets in pediatric and neonatal patients: Demographics, transfusion rates, and transfusion reactions

BACKGROUND

Pathogen-reduced platelets (PR PLT) are the emerging standard for proactive transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) mitigation. There is, however, continued hesitation to transfuse PR PLT in children due to limited published data. We report demographics, rates of transfusion, and transfusion reactions (TR) associated with FDA-approved PR PLT in pediatric and neonatal patients at an academic medical center.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed for patients <18 years receiving at least one platelet over a 300-day period at a large, tertiary care hospital. Patients were transfused PR or conventional (CONV) PLT, based on inventory availability. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher Exact Test.

RESULTS

During the study period, 191 patients received 1010 platelet transfusions (892 units). Sixty-eight patients received PR PLT only (1.3 units/patient, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5; 1.8 transfusions/patient, 95% CI 1.4-2.2), and 56 patients received CONV PLT only (1.4 units/patient, 95% CI 1.1-1.7; 1.6 transfusions/patient, 95% CI 1.3-1.9). Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy/radiation and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant received the most platelet transfusions and more commonly received both platelet types. Of 506 PR PLT units, 5 TRs occurred; 386 CONV PLT resulted in two TRs (p = .7052). Of 51 neonates, 37 received PR PLT without adverse events, including 13 receiving phototherapy. No TTIs were identified in any group.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in rates of transfusion or TRs between PR and CONV PLT. Our study provides additional evidence that PR PLT can be transfused to pediatric and neonatal patients without increasing the risk of acute adverse events.

Adoption trends of point of issue Verax PGD rapid test for bacterial screening of platelets between 2013 and 2018 among hospitals supplied by the American Red Cross and impact on platelet availability

BACKGROUND

Point-of-issue tests, such as the Verax Pan Genera Detection (PGD) test, can be used to mitigate the occurrence of septic reactions. Little is known about how widespread the adoption of the PGD test is across US hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

The Red Cross hemovigilance database was used to determine the numbers of PGD-positive test results between 2013 and 2018. An examination of the impact of a reactive PGD test on product availability was performed for 2018.

RESULTS

The number of reported cases doubled, rising from approximately 50 to 100 per year between 2013 and 2018. A total of 475 initially reactive PGD tests during the entire study period were reported, and 7 (1.5%) of these were determined to be true positives. Hospitals surveyed reported testing platelet units once, with no repeat testing if the unit was PGD reactive. Evaluation of the reported PGD reactive cases for apheresis platelets for 2018 (n = 93) resulted in an estimated cost to the blood center of $87,000, which included the labor and material costs of working up the cases and the estimated value of the lost 64 units and co-components. In addition, there was a loss of the opportunity to collect over 85 apheresis platelets during the time the implicated donor was temporarily deferred.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of hospital reports of reactive PGD tests has shown modest growth in the past 5 years. The number of initially reactive PGD tests that were confirmed was minimal. Blood centers can incur cost and platelet inventory loss from initially false-positive test results.

Inactivation of a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites by photochemical treatment of plasma and platelets using amotosalen and ultraviolet A light

BACKGROUND

The INTERCEPT Blood System pathogen reduction technology (PRT), which uses amotosalen and ultraviolet A light treatment (amotosalen/UV-PRT), inactivates pathogens in plasma and platelet components (PCs). This review summarizes data describing the inactivation efficacy of amotosalen/UVA-PRT for a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites.

METHODS

Twenty-five enveloped viruses, six nonenveloped viruses (NEVs), and four parasites species were evaluated for sensitivity to amotosalen/UVA-PRT. Pathogens were spiked into plasma and PC at high titers. Samples were collected before and after PRT and assessed for infectivity with cell cultures or animal models. Log reduction factors (LRFs) were defined as the difference in infectious titers before and after amotosalen/UV-PRT.

RESULTS

LRFs of ≥4.0 log were reported for 19 pathogens in plasma (range, ≥4.0 to ≥7.6), 28 pathogens in PC in platelet additive solution (PC-PAS; ≥4.1-≥7.8), and 14 pathogens in PC in 100% plasma (PC-100%; (≥4.3->8.4). Twenty-five enveloped viruses and two NEVs were sensitive to amotosalen/UV-PRT; LRF ranged from >2.9 to ≥7.6 in plasma, 2.4 or greater to greater than 6.9 in PC-PAS and >3.5 to >6.5 in PC-100%. Infectious titers for four parasites were reduced by >4.0 log in all PC and plasma (≥4.9 to >8.4).

CONCLUSION

Amotosalen/UVA-PRT demonstrated effective infectious titer reduction for a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites. This confirms the capacity of this system to reduce the risk of viral and parasitic transfusion-transmitted infections by plasma and PCs in various geographies.