Daudi cell stroma: An alternative to dithiothreitol to resolve daratumumab interference in pretransfusion testing

Is drug interference still an issue for pretransfusion testing of patients on anti CD38 and other monoclonal antibody therapies?

Certain therapies that target CD markers on some blood cells can affect pretransfusion testing. Key examples are anti-CD38, CD47 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies such as daratumumab (DARA) and magrolimab, which have presented a challenge for transfusion medicine laboratories around the globe. Scientists have been faced with not only introducing a protocol to provide safe blood to patients but also investigating the most effective method to remove the pretransfusion pan-agglutinating interference caused. A number of papers in the last 5 years have reported on various methods to remove pretransfusion interference; however, most of these studies have been conducted only in a few countries. Most recent reviews on this topic have focused on techniques and reagents to remove pretransfusion interference, and dithiothreitol is currently the gold standard for removing DARA interference. However, it was clear from this review that while many laboratories have developed processes for addressing interference in pretransfusion testing, and DARA interference may not be a major issue, there are still laboratories around the world, that may not have adequately addressed this issue. In addition, the impact of mAb interference on widely used techniques such as flow cytometry is unclear.

Efficient neutralization of daratumumab in pretransfusion samples using a novel recombinant monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody

BACKGROUND

Anti-CD38 antibodies such as daratumumab (DARA) are critical therapies for multiple myeloma and other diseases. Unfortunately, anti-CD38 antibodies cause panreactivity in indirect antiglobulin tests (IATs), complicating blood compatibility testing. The anti-CD38 interference is most often mitigated by treating reagent red blood cells (RBCs) with dithiothreitol (DTT). However, when using the DTT method, not all RBC antibody specificities can be detected (e.g., anti-K), and the DTT method is impractical for some transfusion services. We evaluated the ability of a new anti-idiotype antibody to neutralize DARA in vitro and eliminate the anti-CD38 interference.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A recombinant monoclonal rabbit anti-DARA idiotype antibody ("anti-DARA") was generated. The ratio of anti-DARA required to neutralize DARA in spiked samples was evaluated in IATs performed in gel. IATs performed in tube were used to demonstrate that anti-DARA allows alloantibody detection in the presence of DARA. Plasma samples from 29 patients receiving DARA were treated with a fixed quantity of anti-DARA (120 μg) before performing antibody detection tests (screens) in tube.

RESULTS

Anti-DARA used at or above a 1:1 ratio with DARA eliminated the DARA interference with IATs. Anti-DARA allowed detection of both alloanti-E and alloanti-K in the presence of DARA. In 27/29 (93.1%) clinical samples, 120 μg anti-DARA was sufficient to neutralize the DARA in 100 μl patient plasma.

DISCUSSION

An anti-DARA:DARA ratio as low as 1:1 is sufficient to neutralize DARA in solution. A fixed amount of anti-DARA eliminates the anti-CD38 interference in most patient samples.

Overcoming Drug Interference in Transfusion Testing: A Spotlight on Daratumumab

Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody therapeutic, is highly efficacious and widely used in all stages of multiple myeloma and amyloidosis and has promising activity in other hematologic disorders. Daratumumab interacts with red blood cells, interfering with pre-transfusion testing. This interference can lead to compromising transfusion safety, extensive blood bank work ups and delays in provision of compatible units. Several methods have been developed to negate daratumumab interference with indirect antiglobulin testing. They are based on i) standard blood bank techniques including dithiothreitol and enzymatic treatment of reagent cells, using reagent red blood cells negative for CD38, ii) blocking CD38 antigens on reagent or donor cells, iii) neutralization of anti-CD38 antibody in patient plasma prior to testing, and iv) extended antigen typing of patient red blood cells in conjunction with provision of phenotypically matched units for transfusion. Implementation of those methods by the blood bank should be a planned effort coordinated with the patient’s clinical team. Timely involvement of blood bank and transfusion services and educational efforts by both blood banks and clinical providers can improve the overall daratumumab safety profile in regard to blood transfusion.