Frequency of rare, serious donor reactions: International perspective

A rare vascular injury in a blood donor after whole blood donation

BACKGROUND

Blood donation is a safe process though reactions may still occur. We describe a rare vascular complication in a frequent donor, with improvements in the collection process aimed at avoiding future events.

METHODS

A 63-year-old woman presented with local pain and an apparent collection in the left arm 8 days after donation. Duplex ultrasound identified a superficial liquid collection and signs of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) between the cubital vein and an arterial branch. A computed tomography (CT)-angio performed 1 day after ultrasound did not identify signs of AVF, followed by a new duplex which confirmed CT-angio findings. It was assumed that a traumatic AVF evolved with spontaneous thrombosis. In the early follow-up (18 days), a progressive regression of hematoma was observed without any sequelae.

RESULTS

Investigation showed a faster whole blood bag collection time (3 min; normal: 5-9 min), and the processed packed red blood cell had a brighter red color than usual. The donor reported local bleeding after needle withdrawal, not observed in previous donations and a bruise forming on the same day. No arterial puncture (AP) was noticed by the collection staff during the procedure. The staff was retrained and actions were taken focusing on more active surveillance of late reactions, highlighting the importance of post-donation information by the donors, regardless of any adverse reaction observed, to detect late complications.

CONCLUSION

We described an uncommon AP in a donor that was not identified, leading to an AVF that spontaneously thrombosed.

A donor safety evidence literature review of the short- and long-term effects of plasmapheresis

Many blood establishments are expanding plasmapheresis collection capacity to achieve increasing plasma for fractionation volume targets, driven by immunoglobulin product demand. Some adverse events occur in both apheresis and whole blood collection, such as venepuncture-related trauma and vasovagal reactions. Others are specifically related to the apheresis procedure, such as citrate reactions, haemolysis, infiltration and air embolism. Whilst plasmapheresis procedures are generally well tolerated, theoretical longer term donor health considerations, such as the effects on donor plasma protein levels, bone mineral density, iron deficiency and malignancy also require consideration. An evidence-based framework that supports a safe and sustainable increase in the collection of plasma is essential. Our review demonstrates a lack of high-quality evidence on risks and outcomes specifically in plasmapheresis. Whilst conservative procedural controls and donor harm minimization policies will mitigate risk, high-quality evidence is needed to facilitate practice change that is safe and sustainable and maximizes the potential of individual donor differences.

Safety and protection of plasma donors: A scoping review and evidence gap map

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

As part of a large-scale project to safely increase plasma collection in Europe, the current scoping review identifies the existing evidence (gaps) on adverse events (AEs) and other health effects in plasmapheresis donors, as well as factors that may be associated with such events/effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched six databases and three registries. Study characteristics (publication type, language, study design, population, outcomes, associated factors, time of assessment, duration of follow-up, number and frequency of donations, convalescent plasma [y/n], setting and location) were synthesized narratively and in an interactive evidence gap map (EGM).

RESULTS

Ninety-four research articles and five registrations were identified. Around 90% were observational studies (57 controlled and 33 uncontrolled), and most of them were performed in Europe (55%) or the United States (20%). Factors studied in association with donor health included donor characteristics (e.g., sex, age) (n = 27), cumulative number of donations (n = 21), donation frequency (n = 11), plasma collection device or programme (n = 11), donor status (first time vs. repeat) (n = 10), donation volume per session (n = 8), time in donation programme (n = 3), preventive measures (n = 2) or other (n = 9).

CONCLUSION

The current scoping review provides an accessible tool for researchers and policymakers to identify the available evidence (gaps) concerning plasmapheresis donation safety. Controlled prospective studies with long-term donor follow-up are scarce. Furthermore, additional experimental studies comparing the health effects of different donation frequencies are required to inform a safe upper limit for donation frequency.

Vasovagal syncope after blood donation in active duty military personnel of the Spanish Army

BACKGROUND

All studies of vasovagal syncope (VVS) after blood donation have been performed with civilian donors. We hypothesized that military donors have a lower incidence of VVS and a particular set of predisposing factors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective case-control study matching every case of VVS seen from 2011 to 2019 with two controls without VVS from the same blood drive. We used the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), estimated by multivariate logistic regression, to identify independent predictors of VVS.

RESULTS

There were 105 episodes of VVS among 65.481 whole blood donations (0.15%). VVS was more frequent among donors from military academies than from other military units (0.37% vs. 0.10%, p < .001) and in collections conducted in mobile inside setups than in mobile buses (0.23% vs. 0.06%, p < .001). In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of VVS were the status of first-time donor (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4; p < .001) and pre-donation systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 120 mm Hg (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p = .01). Donors with both risk factors had a 5.5-fold increased risk of VVS than donors without any risk factor. Age and female sex were not predictive of VVS.

DISCUSSION

Active duty military blood donors have a lower incidence of VVS than that reported in civilian donors. First-time donors and donors with SBP < 120 mm Hg should be temporarily deferred when immediate reincorporation to hazardous or strenuous duty tasks after donation is inescapable.