High prevalence of weak D type 42 in a large-scale RHD genotyping program in the province of Quebec (Canada)

Transfusing children with sickle cell disease using blood group genotyping when the pool of Black donors is limited

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusion is an effective treatment for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Alloimmunization can occur after a single transfusion, limiting further usage of blood transfusion. It is recommended to match for the ABO, D, C, E, and K antigens to reduce risks of alloimmunization. However, availability of compatible blood units can be challenging for blood providers with a limited number of Black donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective cohort of 205 pediatric patients with SCD was genotyped for the RH and FY genes. Transfusion and alloimmunization history were collected. Our capacity to find RhCE-matched donors was evaluated using a database of genotyped donors.

RESULTS

Nearly 9.8% of patients carried a partial D variant and 5.9% were D-. Only 45.9% of RHCE alleles were normal, with the majority of variants affecting the RH5 (e) antigen. We found an alloimmunization prevalence of 20.7% and a Rh alloimmunization prevalence of 7.1%. Since Black donors represented only 1.40% of all blood donors in our province, D- Caucasian donors were mostly used to provide phenotype matched products. Compatible blood for patients with rare Rh variants was found only in Black donors. A donor with compatible RhCE could be identified for all patients.

CONCLUSION

Although Rh-compatible donors were identified, blood units might not be available when needed and/or the extended phenotype or ABO group might not match the patient. A greater effort has to be made for the recruitment of Black donors to accommodate patients with SCD.

Prevalence of weak D phenotypes in the general population of Québec, Canada: A focus on weak D type 42

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Weak D type 42 accounts for an unusually high proportion of weak D phenotypes in Québec (Canada), which contrasts with other predominantly White populations. However, its prevalence in the general population is unknown. We estimated the prevalence of weak D type 42 and other common weak D phenotypes in Québec.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We screened for RHD*01W.42 alleles among 1000 individuals of CARTaGENE-a cohort representative of Québec's population. The prevalence of weak D type 42 was calculated based on the allele frequency of RHD*01W.42 and d (i.e., all recessive alleles that confer a D- phenotype), assuming a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This prevalence was then leveraged to calculate that of other common weak D phenotypes, using published prevalence estimates among weak D phenotypes.

RESULTS

Two individuals harboured the RHD*01W.42/RHD*01 heterozygous genotype. Assuming an allele frequency of 38.19% for d, the overall prevalence of weak D type 42 was 0.08%. The following prevalence estimates were also obtained: 0.44% for all weak D phenotypes and 0.07%, 0.01% and 0.04% for weak D types 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Québec has the highest documented prevalence of weak D type 42, which was estimated at 0.08%.

RHD genotyping to resolve weak and discrepant RhD patient phenotypes

BACKGROUND

We instituted RHD genotyping in our transfusion service for obstetrical patients and transfusion candidates. We sought to examine how RHD genotyping resolved weak or discrepant automated microplate direct agglutination (MDA) RhD phenotypings and impacted needs for Rh Immune Globulin (RhIG) and D-negative RBCs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We investigated RhD phenotypes with equivocal or reagent-discrepant automated MDA (Immucor, Norcross, GA), weak-2+ immediate-spin tube typings, historically discrepant RhD typings, or D+ typings with anti-D. We performed microarray RHD genotyping (RHD BeadChip, Immucor BioArray Solutions, Warren, NJ). Patients were managed as D+ with weak-D types 1, 2, and 3, and as D-negative with all other results.

RESULTS

Our weak-D prevalence was 0.14%. Among 138 patients (73 obstetrics, 65 transfusion candidates), 38% had weak-D types 1, 2 or 3, 25% weak partial type 4.0, 21% other partial-D variant alleles, and 15% no variant detected. One novel allele with weak partial type 4.0 variants plus c.150T>C (Val50Val) was discovered. Weak D types 1, 2 or 3 were identified in 66% (48/73) of Whites versus 3% (2/62) of diverse ethnic patients (p < .0001). RHD genotyping changed RhD management in 60 patients (43%) (49 to D+, 11 to D-negative), resulting in net conservation of D-negative RBCs (98 avoided, 14 given) and RhIG (8 avoided, 3 given).

CONCLUSION

In our patient population, equivocal or reagent-discrepant MDA RhD phenotypes were highly specific for weak-D or partial-D RHD genotypes. Resolution of RHD genotype status reduced our use of D-negative RBCs and RhIG.

Weak D type 42: Antigen density and risk of alloimmunization in the province of Québec

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A high proportion of suspected weak D patients referred to Héma-Québec were genotyped as weak D type 42 (368/2105, 17.5%). These patients are currently considered D with regard to RhD immunoprophylaxis in pregnancy and transfusion. The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the risk of alloimmunization in weak D type 42 patients and to characterize their RhD surface molecule expression on red blood cells (RBCs) in comparison to other weak D types (1, 2 and 3).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis using the weak D type 42 patients' medical data to verify potential anti-D alloimmunization events was conducted. Quantitative analyses using flow cytometry were also performed on RBCs to quantify the cell surface density of the D antigen.

RESULTS

Data on 215 subjects with weak D type 42 were reviewed. None developed immune allo-anti-D; three had definite exposure to D+ red cells and 41 had possible exposure through pregnancy. Flow cytometry analysis showed that weak D types 1, 2, 3 and 42 had relative antigen densities of 2.7%, 2.2%, 8.1% and 3.6%, respectively, with R1R2 red cells referencing 100% density. The estimated antigen density range of weak D type 42 was 819-1104 sites per RBC.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective alloimmunization data analysis and antigen density study establish a basis for the consideration of a weak D type 42 individual as D+. This consideration would allow for a targeted reduction of RhD immunoprophylaxis in pregnancy and the unjustified use of D- units for transfusion.