A single-center, retrospective analysis of 17 cases of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn caused by anti-M antibodies

Alloimmune hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: genetics, structure, and function of the commonly involved erythrocyte antigens

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) can occur when a pregnant woman has antibody directed against an erythrocyte surface antigen expressed by her fetus. This alloimmune disorder is restricted to situations where transplacental transfer of maternal antibody to the fetus occurs, and binds to fetal erythrocytes, and significantly shortens the red cell lifespan. The pathogenesis of HDFN involves maternal sensitization to erythrocyte "non-self" antigens (those she does not express). Exposure of a woman to a non-self-erythrocyte antigen principally occurs through either a blood transfusion or a pregnancy where paternally derived erythrocyte antigens, expressed by her fetus, enter her circulation, and are immunologically recognized as foreign. This review focuses on the genetics, structure, and function of the erythrocyte antigens that are most frequently involved in the pathogenesis of alloimmune HDFN. By providing this information we aim to convey useful insights to clinicians caring for patients with this condition.

Clinical significances and distribution of unexpected antibodies found in infants

INTRODUCTION

The unexpected antibody test is an essential for ensuring the safety of blood transfusions. In infants, different pre-transfusion tests and transfusion strategies are needed due to their immature antigen/antibody system. This study aims to analyze the pattern of unexpected antibodies and their clinical significance in infants.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the results of unexpected antibody identification tests performed on infants under one year of age at Asan Medical Center from 1999 to 2022. Patients' unexpected antibody identification test results and clinical information were investigated. The results of unexpected antibody identification and phenotype of each patient's mother were collected.

RESULTS

45 cases of antibody results were studied. 25 cases were found in infants under 4 months of age, and 18 cases (76%) were associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The most common unexpected antibody in infants was anti-M (17 cases). There was one case of severe HDFN caused by anti-M. In 10 cases, anti-E and anti-c were found together, and 9 of these cases were associated with HDFN. There were four cases with a history of previous transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-ABO antibodies found in infants showed a different pattern compared to adults. Interpreting unexpected antibody tests in infants, it is important to consider the clinical status of the infant and the test results of the mother, due to possibility of HDFN. To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal the distribution and clinical significances of unexpected antibodies found in infants in Korea.

Management of anti-M antibody during pregnancy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Anti-M antibodies are relatively common and naturally occurring. When anti-M antibodies cross the placenta, they may cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Anti-M antibodies account for less than 15 cases of HDFN reported in the published English literature. HDFN can lead to foetal anaemia, hydrops fetalis, hypoxia, heart failure, and even death.

OBJECTIVE

To review the general guidelines and propose a less intensive management approach of anti-M antibody during pregnancy through the context of a case report.

METHODS

We report a 25-year-old healthy pregnant G3P1011 woman presenting for antepartum care. At the time of delivery for the patient's second pregnancy, she was found to have a positive anti-M blood screen, though she birthed a healthy-term infant. For her current pregnancy, the initial and repeat testings for anti-M were positive.

RESULTS

Since multiple samples from this patient were of low levels extensive maternal and foetal monitoring were deemed unnecessary in reflection of further reading and research. The patient had a spontaneous vaginal delivery of her third pregnancy at 38 weeks without complications.

CONCLUSION

Anti-RBC antibodies, including anti-M, are frequently identified in blood type and screening for pregnant patients. Guidelines call for intensive surveillance during pregnancy; however, knowledge of the specific antibody can help to provide more nuanced and less intensive care. As primary care physicians, being familiar with the guideline and the ability to counsel patients on anticipated care during pregnancy can help with family planning, compliance with testing, and patient anxiety and decrease intensive use of services that may not affect outcomes.