Kidneys from uncontrolled donors after cardiac death: which kidneys do worse?

Advances in Kidney Preservation Techniques and Their Application in Clinical Practice

The use of cold preservation solutions to rapidly flush and cool the kidney followed by static cold storage in ice has been the standard kidney preservation technique for the last 50 y. Nonetheless, changing donor demographics that include organs from extended criteria donors and donation after circulatory death donors have led to the adoption of more diverse techniques of preservation. Comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage techniques for deceased donor kidneys has long been debated and is still contested by some. The recent modification of hypothermic machine perfusion techniques with the addition of oxygen or perfusion at subnormothermic or near-normothermic temperatures are promising strategies that are emerging in clinical practice. In addition, the use of normothermic regional perfusion to resuscitate abdominal organs of donation after circulatory death donors in situ before cold flushing is also increasingly being utilized. This review provides a synopsis of the different types of preservation techniques including their mechanistic effects and the outcome of their application in clinical practice for different types of donor kidney.

Primary Nonfunction on Kidney Transplant Recipients From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors

BACKGROUND

The need for donor pool expansion remains an important task for kidney transplantation. The aim of this study is the evaluation of primary nonfunction (PNF) from donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2017, 100 kidney transplants from DCD donors were conducted in our department. We retrospectively analyzed PNF of kidney transplant recipients from DCD donors in terms of donors' and recipients' epidemiologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 100 grafts, 95 recipients (95.0%) had discontinued hemodialysis at the time of hospital discharge. Only 5 recipients (5.0%) developed PNF. All 5 PNF recipients received a single graft from an expanded criteria donor (ECD). The mean donor age in the PNF group was 65.0 (SD, 6.2) years. Significant differences between the PNF group and discontinued dialysis group were found for donor age (P < .01) and for the use of ECD kidneys (P < .02). Nevertheless, no significant difference was found between groups for several factors: a history of hypertension and cerebrovascular events, terminal creatinine levels, and graft weight.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PNF from DCD kidneys was very low. Although ECD kidneys in older donors might be a significant risk factor for PNF, these findings suggest that DCD kidneys should be used more frequently for donor expansion.

Kidney transplantation from donors after uncontrolled circulatory death: the Spanish experience

Donation after uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD) refers to donation from persons who have died following cardiac arrest and unsuccessful attempt at resuscitation. We report the Spanish experience of uDCD kidney transplantation, and identify factors related to short-term post-transplant outcomes. The Spanish CORE system compiles data on all donation and transplant procedures in the country. Between 2012-2015, 517 kidney transplants from 288 uDCD donors were performed. The incidence of primary non-function was 10%, and the incidence of delayed graft function was 76%. One-year death-censored graft survival was 87%. In a Cox-Model, donor age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-6.1), in situ cooling of kidneys versus normothermic regional perfusion (OR 5.6; 95% CI 2.7-11.5) or hypothermic regional perfusion based on the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.1-8.6), and a recipient history of prior kidney transplant (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5-8.3) all significantly increased the risk of graft loss during the first year after transplantation. Kidney transplantation from uDCD donors provides acceptable 1-year outcomes, although there is room for improvement. Hypothermic and normothermic regional perfusion strategies are preferable to in situ cooling of kidneys from uDCD donors.

Similar 5-Year Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Between Kidney Transplants From Uncontrolled and Controlled Donors After Circulatory Death-A Dutch Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Organ shortage persists despite a high rate of donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the Netherlands. The median waiting time for a deceased donor kidney in 2013 was 3.5 years. Most DCD kidneys are from controlled DCD (cDCD; Maastricht category III). Experience with uncontrolled donors after cardiac death (uDCD), that is, donors with an unexpected and irreversible cardiac arrest (Maastricht categories I and II), is increasing; and its effect on transplant outcomes needs evaluation.

METHODS

We used the Dutch Organ Transplantation Registry to include recipients (≥18 years old) from all Dutch centers who received transplants from 2002 to 2012 with a first DCD kidney. We compared transplant outcome in uDCD (n = 97) and cDCD (n = 1441).

RESULTS

Primary nonfunction in uDCD was higher than in the cDCD (19.6% vs 9.6%, P < 0.001, respectively). Delayed graft function was also higher in uDCD than in cDCD, but not significantly (73.7% vs 63.3%, P = .074, respectively). If censored for primary nonfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rates after 1 year and 5 years were comparable between uDCD and cDCD (1 year: uDCD, 44.3 (23.4) mL/min/m and cDCD, 45.8 (24.1) mL/min/m; P = 0.621; 5 years: uDCD, 49.1 (25.6) mL/min/m and cDCD, 47.7 (21.7) mL/min/m; P = 0.686). The differences in primary nonfunction between kidneys from uDCD and cDCD were explained by differences in the first warm ischemic period, cold ischemic time, and donor age.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that uDCD kidneys have potential for excellent function and can constitute a valuable extension of the donor pool. However, further efforts are necessary to address the high rate of primary nonfunction.

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: European practices and recommendations for the development and optimization of an effective programme

The shortage of organs remains one of the biggest challenges in transplantation. To address this, we are increasingly turning to donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors and now in some countries to uncontrolled DCD donors. We consolidate the knowledge on uncontrolled DCD in Europe and provide recommendations and guidance for the development and optimization of effective uncontrolled DCD programmes.

Fourteen years of experience in uncontrolled organ donation after cardio-circulatory death

BACKGROUND

Since 1999, a protocol for uncontrolled donation after cardio-circulatory death (DCD) has been carried out in our institution. We aimed at evaluating those 14 years of local experience.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of uncontrolled donors from 1999 till 2013. Potential donors with a no-flow period less than 30 minutes were considered. Kidneys were perfused by the use of a double balloon triple lumen catheter after at least a 2-minute period of no touch. We analyzed grafts outcome and warm and cold ischemia times.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine procedures were initiated: 19 were aborted because of family refusal (n = 7), medical reasons (n = 7), or canulation failures (n = 5) and 20 harvesting procedures were completed. Transplantation was considered for 35 kidneys (cold storage [n = 5] and hypothermic preservation system [n = 30]). The causes of withdrawal from transplantation were mostly macroscopic lesions (poor perfusion, macroscopic parenchyma or vascular lesions, or infectious risk). We transplanted 22 kidneys locally and 3 were shipped to another Eurotransplant center. Mean donor age was 40 ± 13 years. Among the 20 donors, 13 came from the emergency unit and 7 from the intensive care unit. Mean no-flow time for out-hospital management was 8.7 ± 3.6 minutes. Mean time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 71 ± 46 minutes. Mean cold ischemia time was 19 ± 5 hours. Primary nonfunction and delayed graft function occurred in 1 and 12 cases (4.5% and 54%), respectively. Graft survival was 86% at 1 year. Causes of graft loss during the entire follow-up were graft rejection (n = 3), ischemically damaged kidney (n = 2), and recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, uncontrolled donors represent a valuable source of kidney grafts, with a prognosis of graft function and survival similar to the literature. To increase the number of available DCD organs, new techniques, such as the use of Normothermic ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (NECMO), as well as improvement of recruitment of out of hospital potential donors have to be considered.