Effect of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors on cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients receiving polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins: a propensity score-matching analysis

Management of cytomegalovirus in adult solid organ transplant patients: GESITRA-IC-SEIMC, CIBERINFEC, and SET recommendations update

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant challenge in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The last international consensus guidelines on the management of CMV in SOT were published in 2018, highlighting the need for revision to incorporate recent advances, notably in cell-mediated immunity monitoring, which could alter the current standard of care. A working group including members from the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplantation and the Immunocompromised Host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), developed consensus-based recommendations for managing CMV infection in SOT recipients. Recommendations were classified based on evidence strength and quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.

QuantiFERON-CMV as a Predictor of CMV Events During Preemptive Therapy in CMV-seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation is costly and burdensome.

METHODS

Given its promising utility in risk stratification, we evaluated the use of QuantiFERON-CMV (QFCMV) and additional clinical variables in this prospective cohort study to predict the first clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMV, ranging from asymptomatic viremia requiring treatment to CMV disease) in the first posttransplant year. A cost-effectiveness analysis for guided prevention was done.

RESULTS

One hundred adult kidney transplant recipients, CMV IgG + , were given basiliximab induction and maintained on steroid/mycophenolate/tacrolimus with weekly CMV monitoring. Thirty-nine patients developed CS-CMV infection (viral syndrome, n = 1; end-organ disease, n = 9; and asymptomatic viremia, n = 29). A nonreactive or indeterminate QFCMV result using the standard threshold around day 30 (but not before transplant) was associated with CS-CMV rates of 50% and 75%, respectively. A higher QFCMV threshold for reactivity (>1.0 IU interferon-γ/mL) outperformed the manufacturer's standard (>0.2 IU interferon-γ/mL) in predicting protection but still allowed a 16% incidence of CS-CMV. The combination of recipient age and type of donor, along with posttransplant QFCMV resulted in a prediction model that increased the negative predictive value from 84% (QFCMV alone) to 93%. QFCMV-guided preemptive therapy was of lower cost than preemptive therapy alone ( P  < 0.001, probabilistic sensitivity analysis) and was cost-effective (incremental net monetary benefit of 210 USD) assuming willingness-to-pay of 2000 USD to avoid 1 CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided CMV prevention by the prediction model with QFCMV is cost-effective and would spare from CMV surveillance in 42% of patients with low risk for CS-CMV.

Two Cases of Kidney Transplant Recipients With Multiple Relapsing Pure Red Cell Aplasia Due to Parvovirus B19 Infection

Although anemia is common after kidney transplant, pure erythroid aplasia due to parvovirus B19 infection is rare. Therefore, there are delays in diagnosis in transplant patients. Here, we aimed to raise awareness that pure red blood cell aplasia due to parvovirus B19 should be considered in the differential diagnosis of posttransplant anemia. Our report analyzes 2 kidney transplant recipients under immunosuppressive therapy who were diagnosed with pure red blood cell aplasia due to parvovirus B19 infection. Both patients were examined for anemia as a cause for transfusion dependence. Normochromic, normocytic anemia, and reticulocyte levels were low. Leukocyte and platelet counts and biochemical parameters were within reference ranges.Therefore, pure red blood cell aplasia associated with parvovirus B19 was included in the differential diagnosis. Bone marrow showed erythroid hypoplasia and megaloblastic changes with giant erythroblasts containing dark-stained inclusion structures. Results from the other series (neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets) were within reference ranges. Parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M and G levels were negative inbothpatients, yet serum parvovirus B19 DNA polymerase chain reaction test results were positive. Therefore, diagnosis was parvovirus B19-associated pure red blood cell aplasia. Anemia resolved completely by 4 weeks after reduction of immunosuppression and intravenous immunoglobulin. Both patients relapsed in month 5 of treatment. One patient relapsed 3 times during follow-up, with complete response to intravenous immunoglobulin for all 3 events.The second patient showed partial response to intravenous immunoglobulin after relapse. We suggest that pure red blood cell aplasia associated with parvovirus B19 should be considered in transplant patients who present with anemia and reticulocytopenia. Negative serology does not exclude thediagnosis, anditis important to perform a parvovirus B19 DNA polymerase chain reaction test. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is effective to cure anemia within weeks. Follow-up of patients is important because relapse may occur after treatment.

Real-World Treatment Patterns of Antiviral Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus Among Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Linked USRDS-Medicare Database Study

Limited data exist on cytomegalovirus (CMV) antiviral treatment patterns among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Using United States Renal Database System registry data and Medicare claims (1 January 2011-31 December 2017), we examined CMV antiviral use in 22,878 KTRs who received their first KT from 2011 to 2016. Three-quarters of KTRs started CMV prophylaxis (85.8% of high-, 82.4% of intermediate-, and 32.1% of low-risk KTRs). Median time to prophylaxis discontinuation was 98, 65, and 61 days for high-, intermediate-, and low-risk KTRs, respectively. Factors associated with receiving CMV prophylaxis were high-risk status, diabetes, receipt of a well-functioning kidney graft, greater time on dialysis before KT, panel reactive antibodies ≥80%, and use of antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, and tacrolimus. KTRs were more likely to discontinue CMV prophylaxis if they developed leukopenia/neutropenia, had cardiovascular disease, or received their kidney from a deceased donor. These findings suggest that adherence to the recommended duration of CMV-prophylaxis for high and intermediate-risk patients is suboptimal, and CMV prophylaxis is overused in low-risk patients.

Polygenic Innate Immunity Score to Predict the Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection in CMV D+/R- Transplant Recipients. A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Several genetic polymorphisms of the innate immune system have been described to increase the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a polygenic score to predict CMV infection and disease in high risk CMV transplant recipients (heart, liver, kidney or pancreas). On hundred and sixteen CMV-seronegative recipients of grafts from CMV-seropositive donors undergoing heart, liver, and kidney or pancreas transplantation from 7 centres were prospectively included for this purpose during a 2-year period. All recipients received 100-day prophylaxis with valganciclovir. CMV infection occurred in 61 patients (53%) at 163 median days from transplant, 33 asymptomatic replication (28%) and 28 CMV disease (24%). Eleven patients (9%) had recurrent CMV infection. Clinically and/or functionally relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR9, AIM2, MBL2, IL28, IFI16, MYD88, IRAK2 and IRAK4 were assessed by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or sequence-based typing (PCR-SBT). A polygenic score including the TLR4 (rs4986790/rs4986791), TLR9 (rs3775291), TLR3 (rs3775296), AIM2 (rs855873), TLR7 (rs179008), MBL (OO/OA/XAO), IFNL3/IL28B (rs12979860) and IFI16 (rs6940) SNPs was built based on the risk of CMV infection and disease. The CMV score predicted the risk of CMV disease with an AUC of the model of 0.68, with sensitivity and specificity of 64.3 and 71.6%, respectively. Even though further studies are needed to validate this score, its use would represent an effective model to develop more robust scores predicting the risk of CMV disease in donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-) transplant recipients.

Viral-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant patients maintained on everolimus and low dose tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Maintenance with "everolimus + reduced dose tacrolimus" (Ev + Tac_low ) was reported to reduce the risk of viral infections compared to (Tac + MMF). Here we examined viremia and viral-specific T-cell (viral-Tc) responses in patients treated with Ev + Tac_low v. Tac + MMF in highly-HLA sensitized patients.

METHODS

HLA sensitized (HS) kidney transplant patients were monitored pre- and post-transplant for viremia (CMV, BK and EBV) by PCR in 19 Ev + Tac_low and 48 Tac + MMF patients. For CMV PCR analysis, we compared infection rates in 19 Ev + Tac_low patients to 48 CMV D+/R- (#28) or CMV D-/R- (#20) Tac + MMF patients. CMV-Tc and EBV-Tc were evaluated by cytokine flow cytometry, and DSA levels by Luminex for selected patients in both groups.

RESULTS

CMV, EBV viremia rates were similar in Ev + Tac_low v. Tac + MMF patients, but BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Tac_low patients. No patient in either group developed BKAN or PTLD. CMV- & EBV-Tc decreased significantly after alemtuzumab induction but returned to pre-treatment levels 1-2 months post-transplant in most patients. de novo DSA was similar in both groups as were patient and graft survival and graft rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

CMV-Tc, EBV-Tc were similar in Ev + Tac_low and Tac + MMF patients. EBV and CMV viremia rates were similar over 1 year. BKV rates were significantly higher in Ev + Tac_low patients suggesting no benefit for Ev + Tac_low in enhancing viral specific Tc effector functions or limiting viral infections. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Modulation of host cell signaling during cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation

Background

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) resides latently in cells of the myeloid compartment, including CD34+hematopoietic progenitor cells and circulating monocytes. Healthy hosts maintain the virus latently, and this infection is, for the most part, asymptomatic. However, given the proper external cues, HCMV reactivates from latency, at which point the virus disseminates, causing disease. The viral and cellular factors dictating the balance between these phases of infection are incompletely understood, though a large body of literature support a role for viral-mediated manipulation of host cell signaling.

Main body

To establish and maintain latency, HCMV has evolved various means by which it usurps host cell factors to alter the cellular environment to its own advantage, including altering host cell signaling cascades. As early as virus entry into myeloid cells, HCMV usurps cellular signaling to change the cellular milieu, and this regulation includes upregulation, as well as downregulation, of different signaling cascades. Indeed, given proper reactivation cues, this signaling is again altered to allow for transactivation of viral lytic genes.

Conclusions

HCMV modulation of host cell signaling is not binary, and many of the cellular pathways altered are finely regulated, wherein the slightest modification imparts profound changes to the cellular milieu. It is also evident that viral-mediated cell signaling differs not only between these phases of infection, but also is myeloid cell type specific. Nonetheless, understanding the exact pathways and the means by which HCMV mediates them will undoubtedly provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

Modulation of host cell signaling during cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation

Background

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) resides latently in cells of the myeloid compartment, including CD34⁺ hematopoietic progenitor cells and circulating monocytes. Healthy hosts maintain the virus latently, and this infection is, for the most part, asymptomatic. However, given the proper external cues, HCMV reactivates from latency, at which point the virus disseminates, causing disease. The viral and cellular factors dictating the balance between these phases of infection are incompletely understood, though a large body of literature support a role for viral-mediated manipulation of host cell signaling.

Main body

To establish and maintain latency, HCMV has evolved various means by which it usurps host cell factors to alter the cellular environment to its own advantage, including altering host cell signaling cascades. As early as virus entry into myeloid cells, HCMV usurps cellular signaling to change the cellular milieu, and this regulation includes upregulation, as well as downregulation, of different signaling cascades. Indeed, given proper reactivation cues, this signaling is again altered to allow for transactivation of viral lytic genes.

Conclusions

HCMV modulation of host cell signaling is not binary, and many of the cellular pathways altered are finely regulated, wherein the slightest modification imparts profound changes to the cellular milieu. It is also evident that viral-mediated cell signaling differs not only between these phases of infection, but also is myeloid cell type specific. Nonetheless, understanding the exact pathways and the means by which HCMV mediates them will undoubtedly provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

A case of recurrent anemia due to chronic parvovirus B19 infection in a kidney transplant recipient. Can everolimus make a difference?

Parvovirus B19 (PB19) is a common infection among solid transplant recipients. Usually, it is asymptomatic, but sometimes it can become a real therapeutic challenge. We report a case of a kidney transplant recipient with relapsing pure red cell aplasia due to PB19 infection. Our patient was initially managed with standard treatment consisting of intravenous immunoglobulins and minimization of immunosuppressive treatment. However, when this approach became ineffective, conversion from tacrolimus to everolimus was done, with favorable results. This paper explores infection by PB19 in kidney transplant recipients and the potential benefits of a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression and the antiviral properties of mTOR inhibitors.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a specific complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with a multifactorial etiology. There is little evidence published regarding the efficacy and factors influencing the outcome of substitution of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with other agentsas a widely accepted practice in this disorder; however, there are limited data on the options for immunosuppression manipulation (ISM). In our study, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 45 patients with TA-TMA with ISM and substitution either with steroids (steroid group) or anmTOR inhibitor sirolimus (sirolimus group). In our study, sirolimus was associated with significantly better 1-year overall survival (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.13-0.7, p = .004) and faster time to normalization of LDH (HR 2.2, 95% CI 0.99-4.99, p = .044). Replacing CNIs with sirolimus could be an effective option in patients with TA-TMA. A multicenter confirmatory study of CNIs replacement with sirolimus is justified.

Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes associated with cytomegalovirus in adult kidney transplant recipients: A systematic literature review of real-world evidence

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have increased risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease given the necessity of drug-induced immunosuppression. A comprehensive review of published literature reporting real-world data on prevention strategies utilized and associated CMV burden outcomes is limited. Such data could help inform future clinical practice and identify unmet needs in CMV management. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies published in Medline or EMBASE from January 2008 to November 2018 to identify current real-world CMV management approaches, CMV infection/disease risk factors, and outcomes associated with CMV infection. Descriptive statistics and pooled quantitative analyses were conducted. From 1608 records screened, 86 citations, including 69 803 adult KTR, were included. Prophylaxis and preemptive therapy (PET) were predominant approaches among D+/R- and R + CMV serostatus transplants, respectively. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir were frequently utilized across CMV risk strata. Despite prevention approaches, approximately one-fourth of KTR developed CMV infection. Age and D+/R- CMV serostatus were consistent risk factors for CMV infection/disease. CMV infection/disease was associated with increased mortality and graft loss. CMV was similarly associated with acute rejection (AR) risk, but with high heterogeneity among studies. Limited data were available on CMV and opportunistic infections (OIs) risk. CMV remains a significant issue. New strategies may be needed to optimize CMV management.

Modulation of mTORC1 Signaling Pathway by HIV-1

Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a master regulator of cellular proliferation and survival which controls cellular response to different stresses, including viral infection. HIV-1 interferes with the mTORC1 pathway at every stage of infection. At the same time, the host cells rely on the mTORC1 pathway and autophagy to fight against virus replication and transmission. In this review, we will provide the most up-to-date picture of the role of the mTORC1 pathway in the HIV-1 life cycle, latency and HIV-related diseases. We will also provide an overview of recent trends in the targeting of the mTORC1 pathway as a promising strategy for HIV-1 eradication.

Delayed vs initial cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after kidney transplantation

It is recommended to start cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis within 10 days of solid organ transplant, if indicated. Our center underwent a cost-savings initiative to delay CMV prophylaxis initiation from postoperative day zero to postoperative day 7 or upon discharge, hypothesizing this would not affect clinical outcomes but could impact costs. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effects of early vs delayed (<72 vs >72 hours after transplant) CMV prophylaxis in kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant recipients transplanted between June 2014 and January 2017. The primary endpoint was incidence of CMV infection within 1 year. Secondary endpoints included CMV disease, CMV testing, and valganciclovir cost during index hospitalization. A total of 173 patients (114 early, 59 delayed) were included. CMV infection occurred in 61% vs 54% in the early vs delayed group (P = .5). Excluding low-level DNAemia (QNAT < 200 IU/mL), infection occurred in 30% vs 22% in the early vs late group (P = .4). The median days to starting prophylaxis were 0 and 6 in the early and delayed group (P < .05), which led to a median cost savings of $497.00 per patient during index hospitalization (P < .05). Delaying prophylaxis initiation did not impact CMV outcomes in this cohort and decreased costs.

The Interferon-Gamma +874 A/T Polymorphism Is Not Associated With CMV Infection After Kidney Transplantation

The +874 A/T polymorphism in the interferon gamma (IFNG) gene has been associated with Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection risk in lung and kidney transplant recipients. To replicate this association, we performed a retrospective observational study of this polymorphism and immunosuppressive therapies considering the prophylactic treatment in 600 consecutive kidney transplanted recipients. We found no association of the aforementioned polymorphism with CMV infection in univariate and multivariate analyses regardless of the prophylactic treatment. In addition, the immunosuppressive treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (imTOR) showed a protective effect in all patients independently of prophylaxis. Moreover, in the adjusted model, we found interactions between prophylaxis with high-risk (Donor+/Recipient-, D+/R-) status (p-interaction = 0.01), with thymoglobulin induction therapy (p-interaction = 0.03) and with thymoglobulin anti-rejection therapy (p-interaction = 0.002). Data also revealed that prophylaxis was not an advantage in the not D+/R- and without thymoglobulin therapy group (HR = 0.98, p = 0.95). The benefit of prophylaxis was observed in all groups with thymoglobulin therapy, but it was maximal in the high-risk CMV infection group with both thymoglobulin induction therapy and thymoglobulin anti-rejection therapy (HR = 0.01, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the IFNG +874 polymorphism is not a predictive marker of CMV infection. The protective effect of imTOR is not improved with prophylaxis. Interestingly, the thymoglobulin therapy associated with prophylaxis is not a risk factor for CMV infection, and prophylaxis is not effective in recipients with no high-risk CMV status and without thymoglobulin therapy.

Combination of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a propensity score analysis based on current clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

The TRANSFORM study demonstrated that an immunosuppression based on a combination of calcineurin inhibitors and de-novo mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) is safe and effective in kidney transplant recipients. However, data that validate this approach in clinical practice are currently missing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of 401 kidney transplant recipients transplanted from June 2013 to December 2016. All patients received tacrolimus with prednisone in combination with either mycophenolate (n = 186) or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 215). A propensity score to receive mTORi was calculated based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) from the following parameters: age and sex of donor and recipient, BMI, previous transplants, diabetes, cPRA, dialysis before transplantation, dialysis vintage, type of donor, ABO-incompatibility, HLA-mismatches, induction and ischemia time. Median follow-up was 2.6 [1.9; 3.7] years.

RESULTS

Cox-regression analysis suggests good results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of 1-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, P = 0.063), 1-year graft loss (P = 0.025) and patient survival (P < 0.001). Results observed for BPAR and graft failure were largely attributed to those patients that would have been excluded by the TRANSFORM because of some exclusion criteria (52.9% of the population, P = 0.003 for 1-year BPAR and P = 0.040 for graft loss). In patients who met selection criteria for TRANSFORM, no effect of treatment for BPAR or graft failure was observed, while the beneficial effect on overall survival persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, a protocol based on de-novo mTORi with tacrolimus and prednisone could be employed as a standard immunosuppressive regimen and was associated with good outcomes.

Prospective randomized study comparing everolimus and mycophenolate sodium in de novo kidney transplant recipients from expanded criteria deceased donor

The optimal immunosuppressive regimen for recipients of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys has not been identified. In this single-center study, 171 recipients of ECD kidney transplants were randomized to receive antithymocyte globulin induction, and delayed introduction of reduced dose tacrolimus, prednisone and everolimus (r-ATG/EVR, n = 88), or mycophenolate (r-ATG/MPS, n = 83). No cytomegalovirus (CMV) pharmacological prophylaxis was used. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CMV infection/disease at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included treatment failure [first biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, or death] and safety. Patients treated with EVR showed a 89% risk reduction (13.6 vs. 71.6%; HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.220, P < 0.001) in the incidence of first CMV infection/disease. Incidences of BPAR (16% vs. 5%, P = 0.021), graft loss (11% vs. 1%, P = 0.008), death (10% vs. 1%, P = 0.013), and treatment discontinuation (40% vs. 28%, P = 0.12) were higher in the r-ATG/EVR, leading to premature study termination. Mean glomerular filtration rate was lower in r-ATG/EVR (31.8 ± 18.8 vs. 42.6 ± 14.9, P < 0.001). In recipients of ECD kidney transplants receiving no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis, the use of everolimus was associated with higher treatment failure compared with mycophenolate despite the significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT01895049).

The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation

Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.

The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in the Management of Viral Infections: A Review of Current Literature

Viruses are the leading cause of infections after solid organ transplant. The antiviral properties of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis) have been ascribed to a variety of mechanisms and historical data have supported their use over other immunosuppressants for a myriad of viruses. Herein, we summarize the most current data to highlight the role of mTORis in the management of viral infections after solid organ transplant. The mTORis play a clear role in the management of cytomegalovirus, and have data supporting their potential use for BK virus and human herpesvirus 8-related Kaposi sarcoma. No data definitively supports mTORis for use in Epstein-Barr virus-mediated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder or hepatitis C virus viral replication. Although theoretically an advantageous therapy for hepatitis C virus-related liver allograft fibrosis and human immunodeficiency virus, mTORi use specifically for these indications is less attractive with modern treatments currently available. Data surrounding mTORi efficacy in preventing rejection, and their toxicity profile must be balanced with their potential antiviral effects in combination with patient-specific factors.