Refinement of the criteria for ultrastructural peritubular capillary basement membrane multilayering in the diagnosis of chronic active/acute antibody-mediated rejection

THE RELATIONSHIP OF MICROVASCULAR INFLAMMATION WITH ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a key diagnostic feature of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), however recipients without donor specific antibodies (DSA) defy etiological classification using C4dptc and conventional DSA assignment. We evaluated MVI≥2 (Banff g+ptc≥2) using Banff 2019 AMR (independent of MVI≥2 but including C4dptc) with unconventional glomerular capillary (C4dglom) and arterial/endothelial (C4dart) immunoperoxidase detection, shared-eplet and subthreshold DSA (MFI 100-499), and capillary ultrastructure from 3398 kidney transplant samples for evidence of AMR. MVI≥2 (n=202 biopsies) from 149 kidneys (12.4% prevalence) correlated with DSA+, C4dptc+, C4dglom+, Banff cg, i, t, ti scores, serum creatinine, proteinuria, and graft failure compared with 202 propensity score matched normal controls. Laboratory reported DSA- MVI≥2 (MFI≥500) occurred in 34.7%, however subthreshold (28.6%), eplet-directed (51.4%), and/or misclassified anti-HLA DSA (12.9%) were identified in 67.1% by forensic reanalysis, with vascular C4d+ staining in 67.1%, and endothelial abnormalities in 57.1%, totalling 87.1%. Etiological analysis attributed 62.9% to AMR (77.8% for DSA- MVI≥2 with glomerulitis) and pure T cellular rejection is 37.1%. C4dptc-DSA- MVI≥2 was unrecognized AMR in 48.0%. Functional outcomes and graft survival were comparable to normal controls. We concluded that DSA- MVI≥2 frequently signified a mild "borderline" phenotype of AMR which was recognizable using novel serological and pathological techniques.

Comparison of long-term outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant versus simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant

Simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant (SPLK) has certain advantages over conventional simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and may be beneficial for overcoming the paucity of organs needed for diabetic patients requiring transplant. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either SPK (n = 149) or SPLK (n = 46) in terms of pre- and post-transplantation variables, development of de novo DSA, occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft survival rates. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the SPK and SPLK groups except for the shorter cold ischemic time of kidney grafts, shorter duration of diabetes, older age of pancreas graft-donors, and younger age of kidney graft-donors in the SPLK group. Our results showed that the death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was lower in the SPLK group. In addition, the incidence of BPAR of the pancreas graft was higher in the SPLK group. There was no significant difference in the presence of de novo DSA and the rates of kidney graft failure, kidney BPAR, and mortality. Our results show that SPLK can be considered an alternative option for SPK although higher incidences of BPAR and graft failure of pancreas after SPLK need to be overcome.

Urinary Exosomal Cystatin C and Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein as Biomarkers for Antibody−Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

We aimed to discover and validate urinary exosomal proteins as biomarkers for antibody−mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation. Urine and for-cause biopsy samples from kidney transplant recipients were collected and categorized into the discovery cohort (n = 36) and a validation cohort (n = 65). Exosomes were isolated by stepwise ultra-centrifugation for proteomic analysis to discover biomarker candidates for ABMR (n = 12). Of 1820 exosomal proteins in the discovery cohort, four proteins were specifically associated with ABMR: cystatin C (CST3), serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, retinol-binding protein 4, and lipopolysaccharide−binding protein (LBP). In the validation cohort, the level of urinary exosomal LBP was significantly higher in the ABMR group (n = 25) compared with the T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) group and the no major abnormality (NOMOA) group. Urinary exosomal CST3 level was significantly higher in the ABMR group compared with the control and NOMOA groups. Immunohistochemical staining showed that LBP and CST3 in the glomerulus were more abundant in the ABMR group compared with other groups. The combined prediction probability of urinary exosomal LBP and CST3 was significantly correlated with summed LBP and CST3 intensity scores in the glomerulus and peritubular capillary as well as Banff g + ptc scores. Urinary exosomal CST3 and LBP could be potent biomarkers for ABMR after kidney transplantation.

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection: Banff classification and beyond

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection is dependent on interpretation of renal allograft biopsies. The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology, which was developed as a standardized working classification system in 1991, has contributed to the standardization of definitions for histologic injuries resulting from renal allograft rejections and provided a universal grading system for assessing these injuries. It has also helped to provide insight into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to transplant rejection. In addition to histological and immunologic parameters, molecular tools are now being used to facilitate the diagnosis of rejection. In this review, I will discuss morphologic features of renal transplant rejections as well as major revisions and pitfalls of the Banff classification system, and provide future perspectives.

Clinical-pathological correlations in post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy

AIMS

Post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare and clinically challenging finding in renal transplant biopsies. In addition to recurrent atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome, TMA in renal transplants is associated with various conditions, such as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), viral infections, sepsis, pregnancy, malignancies, and surgery. The therapeutic implications of this diagnosis are considerable. In order to better understand post-transplant TMA and to identify histological or clinical differences between associated causes, we conducted a multicentre retrospective study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical parameters and transplant renal biopsy findings from 81 patients with TMA were analysed. Biopsies from 38 patients were also analysed with electron microscopy. On the basis of clinical-pathological correlation, TMA was attributed to a main aetiology, whenever possible. TMA occurred at a median of 30 days post-transplantation. Systemic features of TMA were present in only 18% of cases. Twenty-two per cent of cases were attributed to CNI and 11% to ABMR. Although other potentially contributing factors were found in 56% of patients, in most cases (63%) no clearly attributable cause of TMA was identified. Histological differences between groups were minimal. The detection of ultrastructural features that are usually associated with ABMR may help to establish ABMR as the cause of TMA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CNI and ABMR appear to be the main contributors to post-transplant TMA, the aetiology of most cases is probably multifactorial, and TMA cannot be unequivocally attributed to a single underlying aetiology. Morphological features of TMA are not discriminating, but electron microscopy may help to identify ABMR-associated TMA.

CD56+CD57+ infiltrates as the most predominant subset of intragraft natural killer cells in renal transplant biopsies with antibody-mediated rejection

Little is known about the characteristics and clinical implications of specific subsets of intragraft natural killer (NK) cells in kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed 39 for-cause renal transplant biopsies performed at our center from May 2015 to July 2017. According to histopathologic reports, 8 patients (20.5%) had no rejection (NR), 11 (28.2%) had T cell-mediated rejections (TCMR) only, and 20 (51.3%) had antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). NK cells were defined as CD3^–CD56⁺ lymphocytes that are positive for CD57, CD49b, NKG2A, or KIR. The density of NK cells was significantly higher in the ABMR group (2.57 ± 2.58/mm²) than in the NR (0.12 ± 0.22/mm²) or the TCMR (0.25 ± 0.34/mm²) group (P = 0.002). Notably, CD56⁺CD57⁺ infiltrates (2.16 ± 1.89) were the most frequently observed compared with CD56⁺CD49b⁺ (0.05 ± 0.13), CD56⁺NKG2A⁺ (0.21 ± 0.69), and CD56⁺KIR⁺ (0.15 ± 0.42) cells in the ABMR group (P < 0.001). Death-censored graft failure was significantly higher in patients with NK cell infiltration than those without (Log-rank test, P = 0.025). In conclusion, CD56⁺CD57⁺ infiltrates are a major subset of NK cells in kidney transplant recipients with ABMR and NK cell infiltration is significantly associated with graft failure post-transplant.