1
|
Bastos J, de Barros Machado DJ, Megale Moreira R, Fernandes Ferreira G, David-Neto E. Kidney Paired Donation in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Update. Transplantation 2024; 108:1257-1258. [PMID: 38809426 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Bastos
- Unidade de Transplantes, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Elias David-Neto
- Unidade de Transplante Renal, Hospital das Clínicas - FMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duus Weinreich I, Andersson T, Birna Andrésdóttir M, Bengtsson M, Biglarnia A, Bistrup C, Boulland L, Bruunsgaard H, Helanterä I, Kölvald K, Lauronen J, Lindahl JP, Skov K, Schwarz Sørensen S, Wennberg L, Lindner P. Scandiatransplant Exchange Program (STEP): Development and Results From an International Kidney Exchange Program. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1549. [PMID: 37854025 PMCID: PMC10581625 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplant candidates may be incompatible with their intended living donors because of the presence of antibodies against HLA and/or ABO. To increase the possibility of finding an acceptable kidney donor for these patients, the Scandiatransplant Exchange Program (STEP) program within Scandiatransplant was launched in 2019. Methods This is a retrospective review of our experiences from the first 4 y of the STEP program, including details about the match runs, performed transplantations, and recipient outcomes within the program. Results During 2019-2022, 11 match runs and 4 reruns were performed. In total, 114 pairs and 6 anonymous donors participated in these match runs. Fifty-one pairs (45%) participated in 1 match run, 31 pairs (27%) participated in 2 match runs, and 32 pairs (29%) participated in ≥3 match runs. Seventy-two individuals (63%) participated because of HLA incompatibility, 19 (17%) because of ABO incompatibility, and 7 (6%) because of both HLA and ABO incompatibility.Forty percent of the patients enrolled in the program underwent transplantation. In total, 49 transplantations have so far been performed within the program, and 46 (94%) of the recipients had a functioning kidney graft at follow-up in February 2023. Conclusions The STEP program offers sensitized patients an enlarged pool of living donors and a chance of a compatible international living donor, resulting in an increased number of total transplantations. Currently, STEP is one of the largest transnational kidney exchange programs and has improved the situation for patients waiting for kidney transplantation in Scandiatransplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mats Bengtsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Claus Bistrup
- Department of Nephrology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line Boulland
- Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helle Bruunsgaard
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kulli Kölvald
- Department of Nephrology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | | | - Karin Skov
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Søren Schwarz Sørensen
- Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Wennberg
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Lindner
- Transplantation Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Klerk M, Kal-van Gestel JA, Roelen D, Betjes MGH, de Weerd AE, Reinders MEJ, van de Wetering J, Kho MML, Glorie K, Roodnat JI. Increasing Kidney-Exchange Options Within the Existing Living Donor Pool With CIAT: A Pilot Implementation Study. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11112. [PMID: 37342179 PMCID: PMC10278123 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Computerized integration of alternative transplantation programs (CIAT) is a kidney-exchange program that allows AB0- and/or HLA-incompatible allocation to difficult-to-match patients, thereby increasing their chances. Altruistic donors make this available for waiting list patients as well. Strict criteria were defined for selected highly-immunized (sHI) and long waiting (LW) candidates. For LW patients AB0i allocation was allowed. sHI patients were given priority and AB0i and/or CDC cross-match negative HLAi allocations were allowed. A local pilot was established between 2017 and 2022. CIAT results were assessed against all other transplant programs available. In the period studied there were 131 incompatible couples; CIAT transplanted the highest number of couples (35%), compared to the other programs. There were 55 sHI patients; CIAT transplanted as many sHI patients as the Acceptable Mismatch program (18%); Other programs contributed less. There were 69 LW patients; 53% received deceased donor transplantations, 20% were transplanted via CIAT. In total, 72 CIAT transplants were performed: 66 compatible, 5 AB0i and 1 both AB0i and HLAi. CIAT increased opportunities for difficult-to-match patients, not by increasing pool size, but through prioritization and allowing AB0i and "low risk" HLAi allocation. CIAT is a powerful addition to the limited number of programs available for difficult-to-match patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marry de Klerk
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith A. Kal-van Gestel
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dave Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annelies E. de Weerd
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. J. Reinders
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcia M. L. Kho
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kristiaan Glorie
- Erasmus Q-Intelligence, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joke I. Roodnat
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van de Laar SC, Lafranca JA, Minnee RC, Papalois V, Dor FJMF. The Impact of Cold Ischaemia Time on Outcomes of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061620. [PMID: 35329945 PMCID: PMC8951281 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have been carried out to investigate the effect of a prolonged cold ischaemia time (CIT) on the outcomes of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). There is no clear consensus in the literature about the effects of CIT on LDKT outcomes, and therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide evidence on this subject. Searches were performed in five databases up to 12 July 2021. Articles comparing different CIT in LDKT describing delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival, and acute rejection were considered for inclusion. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019131438. In total, 1452 articles were found, of which eight were finally eligible, including a total of 164,179 patients. Meta-analyses showed significantly lower incidence of DGF (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, p < 0.01), and significantly higher 1-year graft survival (OR = 0.72, p < 0.001) and 5-year graft survival (OR = 0.88, p = 0.04), for CIT of less than 4 h. Our results underline the need to keep CIT as short as possible in LDKT (ideally < 4 h), as a shorter CIT in LDKT is associated with a statistically significant lower incidence of DGF and higher graft survival compared to a prolonged CIT. However, clinical impact seems limited, and therefore, in LDKT programmes in which the CIT might be prolonged, such as kidney exchange programmes, the benefits outweigh the risks. To minimize these risks, it is worth considering including CIT in kidney allocation algorithms and in general take precautions to protect high risk donor/recipient combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn C. van de Laar
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.C.v.d.L.); (J.A.L.); (V.P.)
- Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Jeffrey A. Lafranca
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.C.v.d.L.); (J.A.L.); (V.P.)
| | - Robert C. Minnee
- Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Vassilios Papalois
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.C.v.d.L.); (J.A.L.); (V.P.)
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Frank J. M. F. Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (S.C.v.d.L.); (J.A.L.); (V.P.)
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bastos J, Machado DJDB, David-Neto E. Increasing transplantability in Brazil: time to discuss Kidney Paired Donation. J Bras Nefrol 2021; 44:417-422. [PMID: 35107119 PMCID: PMC9518625 DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2021-0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for chronic kidney disease. In Brazil, there are currently more than 26 thousand patients on the waitlist. Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) offers an incompatible donor-recipient pair the possibility to exchange with another pair in the same situation, it is a strategy to raise the number of KT. Discussion: KPD ceased being merely an idea over 20 years ago. It currently accounts for 16.2% of living donors KT (LDKT) in the USA and 8% in Europe. The results are similar to other LDKT. It is a promising alternative especially for highly sensitized recipients, who tend to accumulate on the waitlist. KPD is not limited to developed countries, as excellent results were already published in India in 2014. In Guatemala, the first LDKT through KPD was performed in 2011. However, the practice remains limited to isolated cases in Latin America. Conclusion: KPD programs with different dimensions, acceptance rules and allocation criteria are being developed and expanded worldwide to meet the demands of patients. The rise in transplantability brought about by KPD mostly meets the needs of highly sensitized patients. The Brazilian transplant program is mature enough to accept the challenge of starting its KPD program, intended primarily to benefit patients who have a low probability of receiving a transplant from a deceased donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Bastos
- Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Juiz de Fora, Departamento de Transplante, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Elias David-Neto
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Transplante, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smeulders B, Pettersson W, Viana A, Andersson T, Bolotinha C, Chromy P, Gentile M, Hadaya K, Hemke A, Klimentova X, Kuypers D, Manlove D, Robb M, Slavcev A, Tubertini P, Valentin MO, van de Klundert J, Ferrari P. Data and optimisation requirements for Kidney Exchange Programs. Health Informatics J 2021; 27:14604582211009918. [PMID: 33878984 DOI: 10.1177/14604582211009918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Kidney Exchange Programs (KEP) are valuable tools to increase the options of living donor kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage kidney disease with an immunologically incompatible live donor. Maximising the benefits of a KEP requires an information system to manage data and to optimise transplants. The data input specifications of the systems that relate to key information on blood group and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) types and HLA antibodies are crucial in order to maximise the number of identified matched pairs while minimising the risk of match failures due to unanticipated positive crossmatches. Based on a survey of eight national and one transnational kidney exchange program, we discuss data requirements for running a KEP. We note large variations in the data recorded by different KEPs, reflecting varying medical practices. Furthermore, we describe how the information system supports decision making throughout these kidney exchange programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ana Viana
- INESC TEC, Portugal.,Polytechnic of Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aline Hemke
- Nederlandse Transplantatie Stichting (NTS), The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonij Slavcev
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Joris van de Klundert
- Prince Mohammad Bin Salman School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Ferrari
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Switzerland.,Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland.,University of New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Impact of Cold Ischaemia Time On Outcomes of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme. Ann Surg 2021; 274:859-865. [PMID: 34334648 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of cold ischaemia time (CIT) on living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) outcomes in the UK living kidney sharing scheme (UKLKSS) versus outside the scheme. BACKGROUND LDKT provides the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. ESKD patients with an incompatible living donor still have an opportunity to be transplanted through Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEP). In KEPs where kidneys travel rather than donors, CIT can be prolonged. METHODS Data from all UK adult LDKT between 2007 and 2018 were analysed. RESULTS 9969 LDKT were performed during this period, of which 1396 (14%) were transplanted through the UKLKSS, which we refer to as KEP. Median CIT was significantly different for KEP versus non-KEP (339 versus 182 minutes, p < 0.001). KEP LDKT had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) (4.08% versus 6.97%, p < 0.0001), lower 1-year (eGFR 57.90 versus 55.25 ml/min, p = 0.04) and 5-year graft function (eGFR 55.62 versus 53.09 ml/min, p = 0.01) compared to the non-KEP group, but 1- and 5-year graft survival were similar. Within KEP, a prolonged CIT was associated with more DGF (9.26% versus 4.80%, p = 0.03), and lower graft function at 1-year and 5-years (eGFR = 55 vs 50 ml/min, p = 0.02), but had no impact on graft survival. CONCLUSION Whilst CIT was longer in KEP, associated with more DGF and lower graft function, excellent 5-year graft survival similar to non-KEP was found.
Collapse
|
8
|
Smeulders B, Mankowski MA, van de Klundert J. Kidney Exchange Program Reporting Standards: Evidence-Based Consensus From Europe. Front Public Health 2021; 9:623966. [PMID: 33681134 PMCID: PMC7928410 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.623966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Kidney Exchange Programs can play an important role to increase access to the life saving and most cost-effective treatment for End Stage Renal Disease. The rise of national KEPs in Europe brings a need for standardized performance reporting to facilitate the development of an international evidence base on program practices. Methods: We systematically searched and reviewed the literature to extract kidney exchange program performance measures. Reported measures were initially categorized as structure, process, and outcome measures. Expert feedback was used to redefine categories and extend the set of measures to be considered. Using the Delphi method and a panel of 10 experts, the resulting measures were subsequently classified as mandatory (Base set), optional (Extended set), or deleted. Results: Out of the initial 1,668 articles identified by systematic literature search, 21 European publications on kidney exchange programs were included to collect performance measures, accompanied by three national program reports. The final measurement categories were Context, Population, Enrollment, Matching, Transplantation, and Outcomes. The set of performance measures resulting from the literature review was modified and classified as mandatory or optional. The resulting Base set and Extended set form the kidney exchange program reporting standard. Conclusions: The evidence-based and consensus-based kidney exchange program reporting standard can harmonize practical and scientific reporting on kidney exchange programs, thus facilitating the advancement of national programs. In addition, the kidney exchange program reporting standard can promote and align cross-national programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Smeulders
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Michal A Mankowski
- Computer, Electrical, and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Although overall donation and transplantation activity is higher in Europe than on other continents, differences between European countries in almost every aspect of transplantation activity (for example, in the number of transplantations, the number of people with a functioning graft, in rates of living versus deceased donation, and in the use of expanded criteria donors) suggest that there is ample room for improvement. Herein we review the policy and clinical measures that should be considered to increase access to transplantation and improve post-transplantation outcomes. This Roadmap, generated by a group of major European stakeholders collaborating within a Thematic Network, presents an outline of the challenges to increasing transplantation rates and proposes 12 key areas along with specific measures that should be considered to promote transplantation. This framework can be adopted by countries and institutions that are interested in advancing transplantation, both within and outside the European Union. Within this framework, a priority ranking of initiatives is suggested that could serve as the basis for a new European Union Action Plan on Organ Donation and Transplantation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ambagtsheer F, Haase‐Kromwijk B, Dor FJMF, Moorlock G, Citterio F, Berney T, Massey EK. Global Kidney Exchange: opportunity or exploitation? An ELPAT/ESOT appraisal. Transpl Int 2020; 33:989-998. [PMID: 32349176 PMCID: PMC7540591 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper addresses ethical, legal, and psychosocial aspects of Global Kidney Exchange (GKE). Concerns have been raised that GKE violates the nonpayment principle, exploits donors in low- and middle-income countries, and detracts from the aim of self-sufficiency. We review the arguments for and against GKE. We argue that while some concerns about GKE are justified based on the available evidence, others are speculative and do not apply exclusively to GKE but to living donation more generally. We posit that concerns can be mitigated by implementing safeguards, by developing minimum quality criteria and by establishing an international committee that independently monitors and evaluates GKE's procedures and outcomes. Several questions remain however that warrant further clarification. What are the experiences and views of recipients and donors participating in GKE? Who manages the escrow funds that have been put in place for donor and recipients? What procedures and safeguards have been put in place to prevent corruption of these funds? What are the inclusion criteria for participating GKE centers? GKE provides opportunity to promote access to donation and transplantation but can only be conducted with the appropriate safeguards. Patients' and donors' voices are missing in this debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Ambagtsheer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology & TransplantationErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Frank J. M. F. Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant CentreHammersmith HospitalLondonUK
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial CollegeLondonUK
| | - Greg Moorlock
- Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Franco Citterio
- Renal Transplantation UnitFondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. GemelliRomeItaly
| | - Thierry Berney
- Division of TransplantationUniversity of Geneva HospitalsGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Emma K. Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology & TransplantationErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kher V, Jha PK. Paired kidney exchange transplantation - pushing the boundaries. Transpl Int 2020; 33:975-984. [PMID: 32634850 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The scarcity of living organ donors makes it imperative to develop newer innovations to optimize and maximize the utilization of the available pool. ABO and HLA sensitization are important immunological barriers in renal transplant and can potentially lead to rejection of almost one-third of the willing living donors. Paired kidney exchange (PKE) is a rapidly growing method used to overcome these barriers and has grown in popularity over the last three decades since its introduction in 1986. Evolution of the matching strategies and use of complex algorithms has led to increase in the number of possible matches thereby benefiting multiple recipients. The use of altruistic donors and compatible pairs has also helped in increasing the possible exchanges. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the evolution, the present global scenario, and the future of PKE. It also discusses the recent trends of advanced donation, trans-organ paired exchange and global kidney exchange and the associated ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Kher
- Department of Nephrology & Transplant Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Harayana, India
| | - Pranaw Kumar Jha
- Department of Nephrology & Transplant Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Harayana, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Viklicky O, Krivanec S, Vavrinova H, Berlakovich G, Marada T, Slatinska J, Neradova T, Zamecnikova R, Salat A, Hofmann M, Fischer G, Slavcev A, Chromy P, Oberbauer R, Pantoflicek T, Wenda S, Lehner E, Fae I, Ferrari P, Fronek J, Böhmig GA. Crossing borders to facilitate live donor kidney transplantation: the Czech‐Austrian kidney paired donation program – a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1199-1210. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Sebastian Krivanec
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Department of Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Hana Vavrinova
- Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | | | - Tomas Marada
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Janka Slatinska
- Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Neradova
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Renata Zamecnikova
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Andreas Salat
- Department of Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Michael Hofmann
- Department of Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Gottfried Fischer
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Antonij Slavcev
- Department of Immunogenetics Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Chromy
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Department of Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Tomas Pantoflicek
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Sabine Wenda
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Elisabeth Lehner
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Department of Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Ingrid Fae
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Paolo Ferrari
- Department of Nephrology Ospedale Civico Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Lugano Switzerland
- Biomedical Faculty Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland
- Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Jiri Fronek
- Department of Surgery Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
| | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis Department of Medicine III Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Remport A, Wagner LJ, Molnar MZ. Is it the time to apply the model of Czech-Austrian kidney paired donation program? Transpl Int 2020; 33:1187-1189. [PMID: 32562560 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Remport
- Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Laszlo J Wagner
- Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Miklos Z Molnar
- Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,James D. Eason Transplant Institute, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable differences exist among the living donor Kidney Exchange Programmes (KEPs) that are in use and being built in Europe, contributing to a variation in the number of living donor transplants (Newsletter Transplant; International figures on donation and transplantation 2016). Efforts of European KEPs to exchange (best) practices and share approaches to address challenges have, however, been limited. METHODS Experts from 23 European countries, collaborating on the European Network for Collaboration on Kidney Exchange Programmes Cooperation on Science and Technology Action, developed a questionnaire to collect detailed information on the functioning of all existing KEPs in Europe, as well as their opportunities and challenges. Following a comparative analysis, results were synthesized and interpreted by the same experts. RESULTS The practices, opportunities and challenges reported by 17 European countries reveal that some of the 10 operating programs are mature, whereas others are in earlier stages of development. Over 1300 transplants were performed through existing KEPs up to the end of 2016, providing approximately 8% of their countries' living kidney donations in 2015. All countries report challenges to either initiating KEPs or increasing volumes. Some challenges are shared, whereas others differ because of differences in context (eg, country size, effectiveness of deceased donor program) and ethical and legal considerations (eg, regarding living donation as such, nonrelated donors, and altruistic donation). Transnational initiatives have started in Central Europe, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe. CONCLUSIONS Exchange of best practices and shared advancement of national programs to address existing challenges, aided by transnational exchanges, may substantially improve access to the most (cost) effective treatment for the increasing number of patients suffering from kidney disease.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Abramowicz D, Oberbauer R, Heemann U, Viklicky O, Peruzzi L, Mariat C, Crespo M, Budde K, Oniscu GC. Recent advances in kidney transplantation: a viewpoint from the Descartes advisory board. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:1699-1707. [PMID: 29342289 PMCID: PMC6168736 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplantation medicine is a rapidly evolving field. Keeping afloat of the published literature to offer the best clinical care to our patients is a daunting task. As part of its educational mission, the Descartes advisory board identified seven topics in kidney transplantation where there has been substantial progresses over the last years: kidney allocation within Eurotransplant; kidney exchange strategies; kidney machine perfusion strategies; the changing landscape of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies; the new immunosuppressive drugs in the pipeline; strategies for immunosuppression minimization; and the continuous enigma of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis recurrence after transplantation. Here, we have summarized the main knowledge and the main challenges of these seven topics with the aim to provide transplant professionals at large with key bullet points to successfully understand these new concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Abramowicz
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Nephrology, KH Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
| | - Licia Peruzzi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Department, Regina Margherita Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Christophe Mariat
- Department of Nephrological Intensive Care, University Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kute VB, Prasad N, Shah PR, Modi PR. Kidney exchange transplantation current status, an update and future perspectives. World J Transplant 2018; 8:52-60. [PMID: 29988896 PMCID: PMC6033740 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i3.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney exchange transplantation is well established modality to increase living donor kidney transplantation. Reasons for joining kidney exchange programs are ABO blood group incompatibility, immunological incompatibility (positive cross match or donor specific antibody), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility (poor HLA matching), chronological incompatibility and financial incompatibility. Kidney exchange transplantation has evolved from the traditional simultaneous anonymous 2-way kidney exchange to more complex ways such as 3-way exchange, 4-way exchange, n-way exchange,compatible pair, non-simultaneous kidney exchange,non-simultaneous extended altruistic donor, never ending altruistic donor, kidney exchange combined with desensitization, kidney exchange combined with ABO incompatible kidney transplantation, acceptable mismatch transplant, use of A2 donor to O patients, living donor-deceased donor list exchange, domino chain, non-anonymous kidney exchange, single center, multicenter, regional, National, International and Global kidney exchange. Here we discuss recent advances in kidney exchanges such as International kidney exchange transplantation in a global environment, three categories of advanced donation program, deceased donors as a source of chain initiating kidneys, donor renege myth or reality, pros and cons of anonymity in developed world and (non-) anonymity in developing world, pros and cons of donor travel vs kidney transport, algorithm for management of incompatible donor-recipient pairs and pros and cons of Global kidney exchange. The participating transplant teams and donor-recipient pairs should make the decision by consensus about kidney donor travel vs kidney transport and anonymity vs non-anonymity in allocation as per local resources and logistics. Future of organ transplantation in resource-limited setting will be liver vs kidney exchange, a legitimate hope or utopia?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek B Kute
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Dr Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Narayan Prasad
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, SGPGI, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Pankaj R Shah
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Dr Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| | - Pranjal R Modi
- Department of Urology and transplantation, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre, Dr Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad 380016, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|