1
|
Assfalg V, Miller G, Stocker F, Hüser N, Hartmann D, Heemann U, Tieken I, Zanen W, Vogelaar S, Rosenkranz AR, Schneeberger S, Függer R, Berlakovich G, Ysebaert DR, Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D, Mikhalski D, van Laecke S, Kuypers D, Mühlfeld AS, Viebahn R, Pratschke J, Melchior S, Hauser IA, Jänigen B, Weimer R, Richter N, Foller S, Schulte K, Kurschat C, Harth A, Moench C, Rademacher S, Nitschke M, Krämer BK, Renders L, Koliogiannis D, Pascher A, Hoyer J, Weinmann-Menke J, Schiffer M, Banas B, Hakenberg O, Schwenger V, Nadalin S, Lopau K, Piros L, Nemes B, Szakaly P, Bouts A, Bemelman FJ, Sanders JS, de Vries APJ, Christiaans MHL, Hilbrands L, van Zuilen AD, Arnol M, Stippel D, Wahba R. Rescue Allocation Modes in Eurotransplant Kidney Transplantation: Recipient Oriented Extended Allocation Versus Competitive Rescue Allocation-A Retrospective Multicenter Outcome Analysis. Transplantation 2024; 108:1200-1211. [PMID: 38073036 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whenever the kidney standard allocation (SA) algorithms according to the Eurotransplant (ET) Kidney Allocation System or the Eurotransplant Senior Program fail, rescue allocation (RA) is initiated. There are 2 procedurally different modes of RA: recipient oriented extended allocation (REAL) and competitive rescue allocation (CRA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patient survival and graft failure with RA mode and whether or not it varied across the different ET countries. METHODS The ET database was retrospectively analyzed for donor and recipient clinical and demographic characteristics in association with graft outcomes of deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) across all ET countries and centers from 2014 to 2021 using Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS Seventeen thousand six hundred seventy-nine renal transplantations were included (SA 15 658 [89%], REAL 860 [4.9%], and CRA 1161 [6.6%]). In CRA, donors were older, cold ischemia times were longer, and HLA matches were worse in comparison with REAL and especially SA. Multivariable analyses showed comparable graft and recipient survival between SA and REAL; however, CRA was associated with shorter graft survival. Germany performed 76% of all DDRTs after REAL and CRA and the latter mode reduced waiting times by up to 2.9 y. CONCLUSIONS REAL and CRA are used differently in the ET countries according to national donor rates. Both RA schemes optimize graft utilization, lead to acceptable outcomes, and help to stabilize national DDRT programs, especially in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Felix Stocker
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter Zanen
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander R Rosenkranz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reinhold Függer
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Dirk R Ysebaert
- Department of HPB and Transplantation Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Dimitri Mikhalski
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anja S Mühlfeld
- Department of Nephrology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik CCM/CVK, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ingeborg A Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bernd Jänigen
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Transplant Unit, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rolf Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology/Renal Transplantation, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Richter
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susan Foller
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Kevin Schulte
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertensiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christine Kurschat
- Department II of Internal Medicine and Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ana Harth
- Medizinische Klinik I Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Germany
| | - Christian Moench
- General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Sebastian Rademacher
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Nitschke
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Dionysios Koliogiannis
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, UKM Muenster, Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Hoyer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Medical Center, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- I. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mario Schiffer
- Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Abteilung für Nephrologie, Universitäres Transplantationszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kai Lopau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Wuerzburg-Kidney Transplant Program, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Laszlo Piros
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balazs Nemes
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Institute of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Szakaly
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Antonia Bouts
- Pediatric Nephrology Department, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan S Sanders
- Departement of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Aiko P J de Vries
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center and Transplant Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger Wahba
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller G, Ankerst DP, Kattan MW, Hüser N, Vogelaar S, Tieken I, Heemann U, Assfalg V. Kidney Transplantation Outcome Predictions (KTOP): A Risk Prediction Tool for Kidney Transplants from Brain-dead Deceased Donors Based on a Large European Cohort. Eur Urol 2023; 83:173-179. [PMID: 35000822 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European kidney donation shortages mandate efficient organ allocation by optimizing the prediction of success for individual recipients. OBJECTIVE To develop the first European online risk tool for kidney transplant outcomes on the basis of recipient-only and recipient plus donor characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We used individual recipient and donor risk factors and three outcomes (death, death with functioning graft [DWFG], and graft loss) for 32 958 transplants within the Eurotransplant kidney allocation system and the Eurotransplant senior program between January 2006 and May 2018 in eight European countries to develop and validate a risk tool. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze the association of risk factors with overall patient mortality, and proportional subdistribution hazard regression models for their association with graft loss and DWFG. Prediction models were developed with recipient-only and recipient-donor risk factors. Sensitivity analyses based on time-specific area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with leave-one-country-out validation were performed and calibration plots were generated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The 10-yr cumulative incidence rate was 37% for mortality, 12% for DWFG, and 41% for graft loss. In recipient-donor models the leading risk factors for mortality were recipient diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 10.73), retransplantation (HR 3.08 per transplant), and recipient age (HR 1.08). Effects were similar for DWFG. For graft loss, diabetes (subdistributional HR [SHR] 1.32), increased donor age (SHR 1.02), and prolonged cold ischemia time (SHR 1.02) had increased SHRs. All p values were <0.001. CONCLUSIONS Previously identified risk factors for outcomes following kidney transplants allow for outcome prediction with 10-yr AUC values of up to 0.81. PATIENT SUMMARY Using European data, we estimated individual risks to predict the success of kidney transplants and support physicians in decision-making. An online tool is now available (https://riskcalc.org/ktop/) for predicting kidney transplant outcomes both before and after a donor has been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
| | - Donna P Ankerst
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany; Department of Life Science Systems, Munich Data Science Institute, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
| | - Michael W Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM - Munich Transplant Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Assfalg V, Miller G, Stocker F, van Meel M, Groenevelt T, Tieken I, Ankerst D, Renders L, Novotny A, Hartmann D, Jell A, Rahmel A, Wahba R, Mühlfeld A, Bouts A, Ysebaert D, Globke B, Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D, Piros L, Stippel D, Heller K, Eisenberger U, van Laecke S, Weimer R, Rosenkranz AR, Berger S, Fischer L, Kliem V, Vondran F, Sester U, Schneeberger S, Harth A, Kuypers D, Függer R, Arnol M, Christiaans M, Weinmann-Menke J, Krüger B, Hilbrands L, Banas B, Hakenberg O, Minnee R, Schwenger V, Heyne N, van Zuilen A, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Lopau K, Hüser N, Heemann U. Kidney Transplantation After Rescue Allocation-the Eurotransplant Experience: A Retrospective Multicenter Outcome Analysis. Transplantation 2022; 106:1215-1226. [PMID: 34608103 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At Eurotransplant (ET), kidneys are transferred to "rescue allocation" (RA), whenever the standard allocation (SA) algorithms Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) and Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) fail. We analyzed the outcome of RA. METHODS Retrospective patient clinical and demographic characteristics association analyses were performed with graft outcomes for 2422 recipients of a deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) after RA versus 25 481 after SA from 71 centers across all ET countries from 2006 to 2018. RESULTS Numbers of DDRTs after RA increased over the time, especially in Germany. RA played a minor role in ESP versus ETKAS (2.7% versus 10.4%). RA recipients and donors were older compared with SA recipients and donors, cold ischemia times were longer, waiting times were shorter, and the incidence of primary nonfunction was comparable. Among ETKAS recipients, HLA matching was more favorable in SA (mean 3.7 versus 2.5). In multivariate modeling, the incidence of graft loss in ETKAS recipients was reduced in RA compared with SA (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [0.70-0.91], P < 0.001), whereas other outcomes (mortality, death with functioning graft (DwFG)) were not significantly different. None of the 3 outcomes were significantly different when comparing RA with SA within the ESP program. CONCLUSIONS Facing increased waiting times and mortality on dialysis due to donor shortage, this study reveals encouragingly positive DDRT outcomes following RA. This supports the extension of RA to more patients and as an alternative tool to enable transplantation in patients in countries with prohibitively long waiting times or at risk of deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Felix Stocker
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Marieke van Meel
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tiny Groenevelt
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Donna Ankerst
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Alexander Novotny
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Alissa Jell
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Axel Rahmel
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Roger Wahba
- Department of General Visceral Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Mühlfeld
- Department of Nephrology, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Antonia Bouts
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Ysebaert
- Department of Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital & University of Antwerp, Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Brigitta Globke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - László Piros
- Department of Transplantation and Surgery, School of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dirk Stippel
- Department of General Visceral Cancer and Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center Cologne, University of Cologne Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katharina Heller
- Medizinische Klinik 4, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen-Nürnberg, Transplantation szentrum Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ute Eisenberger
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Rolf Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Clinic of Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Giessen, Germany
| | - Alexander R Rosenkranz
- Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Nephrologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Berger
- Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volker Kliem
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Transplantationszentrum Hannoversch Münden, Münden, Germany
| | - Florian Vondran
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Urban Sester
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ana Harth
- Medizinische Klinik I, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin II, Nephrologie, Uniklinik Witten/Herdecke, Köln, Germany
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Reinhold Függer
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Elisabethinen Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maarten Christiaans
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Nierentransplantation, Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernd Krüger
- Department of Nephrology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Universitäres Transplantationszentrum, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Robert Minnee
- Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Nils Heyne
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arjan van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Kai Lopau
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine 1, University hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM Munich Transplant Center, Interdisciplinary Transplant Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, München, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. The use of marginal kidneys in dual kidney transplantation to expand kidney graft utilization. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:75-85. [PMID: 34939967 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and identify opportunities to improve utilization of marginal deceased donor (MDD) kidneys through DKT. RECENT FINDINGS The practice of DKT from adult MDDs dates back to the mid-1990s, at which time the primary indication was projected insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short- and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects: Identifying appropriate selection criteria/scoring systems based on pre- and postdonation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing longer-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. MDDs with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or nonrecovery. SUMMARY DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. New and innovative technologies targeting ex vivo organ assessment, repair, and regeneration may have a major impact on the decision whether or not to use recovered kidneys for single or DKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Harriman
- The Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Komal Gurung
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Assfalg V, Misselwitz S, Renders L, Hüser N, Novotny A, Jäger C, Büttner-Herold M, Amann K, Schmaderer C, Heemann U, Wen M, Haberfellner F, Torrez C, Bachmann Q, Kemmner S. Kidney transplantation after rescue allocation-meticulous selection yields the chance for excellent outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:551-560. [PMID: 33367794 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The small number of organ donors forces transplant centres to consider potentially suboptimal kidneys for transplantation. Eurotransplant established an algorithm for rescue allocation (RA) of kidneys repeatedly declined or not allocated within 5 h after procurement. Data on the outcomes and benefits of RA are scarce to date. METHODS We conducted a retrospective 8-year analysis of transplant outcomes of RA offers based on our in-house criteria catalogue for acceptance and decline of organs and potential recipients. RESULTS RA donors and recipients were both older compared with standard allocation (SA). RA donors more frequently had a history of hypertension, diabetes or fulfilled expanded criteria donor key parameters. RA recipients had poorer human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matches and longer cold ischaemia times (CITs). However, waiting time was shorter and delayed graft function, primary non-function and biopsy-proven rejections were comparable to SA. Five-year graft and patient survival after RA were similar to SA. In multivariate models accounting for confounding factors, graft survival and mortality after RA and SA were comparable as well. CONCLUSIONS Facing relevant comorbidities and rapid deterioration with the risk of being removed from the waiting list, kidney transplantation after RA was identified to allow for earlier transplantation with excellent outcome. Data from this survey propose not to reject categorically organs from multimorbid donors with older age and a history of hypertension or diabetes to aim for the best possible HLA matching and to carefully calculate overall expected CIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Assfalg
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Svea Misselwitz
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Hüser
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Novotny
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Study Site for Clinical Research, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maike Büttner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Amann
- Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Schmaderer
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ming Wen
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Flora Haberfellner
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlos Torrez
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Quirin Bachmann
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Kemmner
- TransplanTUM, Munich Transplant Center, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Immohr M, Boeken U, Mehdiani A, Boettger C, Aubin H, Dalyanoglu H, Erbel S, Scheiber D, Westenfeld R, Akhyari P, Lichtenberg A. Use of Organs for Heart Transplantation after Rescue Allocation: Comparison of Outcome with Regular Allocated High Urgent Recipients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 69:497-503. [PMID: 32443158 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of patients waiting for heart transplantation (HTx) is exceeding the number of actual transplants. Subsequently, waiting times are increasing. One possible solution may be an increased acceptance of organs after rescue allocation. These organs had been rejected by at least three consecutive transplant centers due to medical reasons. METHODS Between October 2010 and July 2019, a total of 139 patients underwent HTx in our department. Seventy (50.4%) of the 139 patients were transplanted with high urgency (HU) status and regular allocation (HU group); the remaining received organs without HU listing after rescue allocation (elective group, n = 69). RESULTS Donor parameters were comparable between the groups. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between HU patients (11.4%) and rescue allocation (12.1%). Primary graft dysfunction with extracorporeal life support occurred in 26.9% of the elective group with rescue allocated organs, which was not inferior to the regular allocated organs (HU group: 35.7%). No significant differences were observed regarding the incidence of common perioperative complications as well as morbidity and mortality during 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Our data support the use of hearts after rescue allocation for elective transplantation of patients without HU status. We could show that patients with rescue allocated organs showed no significant disadvantages in the early perioperative morbidity and mortality as well at 1-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Immohr
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Udo Boeken
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Arash Mehdiani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Charlotte Boettger
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Hug Aubin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Hannan Dalyanoglu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sophia Erbel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Scheiber
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Ralf Westenfeld
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Payam Akhyari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Artur Lichtenberg
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou S, Massie AB, Holscher CM, Waldram MM, Ishaque T, Thomas AG, Segev DL. Prospective Validation of Prediction Model for Kidney Discard. Transplantation 2019; 103:764-771. [PMID: 30015701 PMCID: PMC6330256 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many kidneys are discarded every year, with 3631 kidneys discarded in 2016 alone. Identifying kidneys at high risk of discard could facilitate "rescue" allocation to centers more likely to transplant them. The Probability of Delay or Discard (PODD) model was developed to identify marginal kidneys at risk of discard or delayed allocation beyond 36 hours of cold ischemia time. However, PODD has not been prospectively validated, and patterns of discard may have changed after policy changes such as the introduction of Kidney Donor Profile Index and implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS). METHODS We prospectively validated the PODD model using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data in the KAS era (January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2018). C statistic was calculated to assess accuracy in predicting kidney discard. We assessed clustering in centers' utilization of kidneys with PODD >0.6 ("high-PODD") using Gini coefficients. Using match run data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, we examined distribution of these high-PODD kidneys offered to centers that never accepted a high-PODD kidney. RESULTS The PODD model predicted discard accurately under KAS (C-statistic, 0.87). Compared with utilization of low-PODD kidneys (Gini coefficient = 0.41), utilization of high-PODD kidneys was clustered more tightly among a few centers (Gini coefficient, 0.84 with >60% of centers never transplanted a high-PODD kidneys). In total, 11684 offers (35.0% of all high-PODD offers) were made to centers that never accepted a high-PODD kidney. CONCLUSIONS Prioritizing allocation of high-PODD kidneys to centers that are more likely to transplant them might help reduce kidney discard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Zhou
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Courtenay M Holscher
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Madeleine M Waldram
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tanveen Ishaque
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alvin G Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schütte-Nütgen K, Finke M, Ehlert S, Thölking G, Pavenstädt H, Suwelack B, Palmes D, Bahde R, Koch R, Reuter S. Expanding the donor pool in kidney transplantation: Should organs with acute kidney injury be accepted?-A retrospective study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213608. [PMID: 30865677 PMCID: PMC6415810 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the gap between patients in need of a renal transplantation (RTx) and organs available, transplantation centers increasingly accept organs of suboptimal quality, e.g. from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS To determine the outcome of kidney transplants from deceased donors with AKI (defined as ≥ AKIN stage 1), all 107 patients who received a RTx from donors with AKI between August 2004 and July 2014 at our center were compared to their respective consecutively transplanted patients receiving kidneys from donors without AKI. 5-year patient and graft survival, frequencies of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejections and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, CKD-EPI) were assessed. RESULTS Patient survival was similar in both groups, whereas death-censored and overall graft survival were decreased in AKI kidney recipients. AKI kidney recipients showed higher frequencies of DGF and had a reduced eGFR at 7 days, three months and one and three years after RTx. However, mortality was noticeably lower compared to waiting list candidates. Rejection-free survival was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, both short-term and long-term renal function was inferior in recipients of AKI kidneys, while patient survival was similar. Our data indicates that recipients of donor AKI kidneys should be carefully selected and additional factors impairing short- and long-term outcome should be minimized to prevent further deterioration of graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schütte-Nütgen
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Finke
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ehlert
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Gerold Thölking
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hermann Pavenstädt
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Daniel Palmes
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Ralf Bahde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Raphael Koch
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fehr T, Immer F. Marginal organ allocation: old and new REALity. Transpl Int 2018; 30:1212-1214. [PMID: 28796924 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Fehr
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland.,Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Franz Immer
- Swiss National Foundation for Organ Allocation and Transplantation (Swisstransplant), Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|