Concurrent biopsies of both grafts in recipients of simultaneous pancreas and kidney demonstrate high rates of discordance for rejection as well as discordance in type of rejection - a retrospective study

Predicted Indirectly Recognizable T-cell Epitope (PIRCHE) Load Correlates With Rejection Events After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Background

Given the lack of specificity of current blood and urine testing and the resistance/inability to perform pancreas allograft biopsies, additional noninvasive investigational tools to assess the risk for rejection are needed. This study examines the clinical impact of molecular HLA matching in a large single-center simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant program.

Methods

The study cohort comprised 238 SPK recipients between 2012 and 2021. The number of HLA mismatches, eplet, Snow (that counts the number of protein-specific surface-accessible donor HLA amino acid mismatches), and predicted indirectly recognizable T-cell epitope (PIRCHE, version 4.2; 100%) loads were calculated on the basis of 2-field HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 typing of recipients and donors. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard, as well as Kaplan-Meier analyses, were performed considering either first rejection events of a graft or a composite endpoint of de novo donor-specific antibodies, first rejection, and uncensored graft failure of either organ.

Results

Kaplan-Meier analyses considered class II PIRCHE groups separated by a threshold of 7. From the considered histocompatibility metrics, multivariable regression analysis revealed only PIRCHE-II derived from donor HLA class II as statistically significantly correlated with clinical events and rejection after SPK, mostly driven by pancreas rejections. Furthermore, longer dialysis time and the induction agent had significant negative impacts on the defined composite endpoint.

Conclusions

Our data support the clinical benefit of incorporating PIRCHE scores for the interpretation of class II HLA mismatches among patients undergoing SPK transplantation.

Pre-Transplant Hypoalbuminemia Is Not Associated With Early Key Outcomes Among Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients

The role of pre-transplant hypoalbuminemia and its impact on post-transplant outcomes in patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains unclear. We analyzed all SPK recipients at our center, who had at least 2 weeks of pancreas and kidney graft survival and had serum albumin measured within 45 days pre-transplant. Recipients were categorized based on pretransplant albumin level as normal (≥4.0 g/dL, N = 222, 42%), mild hypoalbuminemia (≥3.5-<4.0 g/dL, N = 190, 36%), and moderate hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL, N = 120, 23%). Kidney delayed graft function (DGF), length of stay (LOS) after transplant, re-hospitalization within 30 days after discharge, and need for a return to the operating room (OR) related to transplant surgical complications, acute rejection, and uncensored and death-censored graft failure, within the first years post-transplant were outcomes of interest. A total of 532 SPK recipients were included. Mild or moderate hypoalbuminemia was not associated with DGF, LOS, re-hospitalization, or return to the OR in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Similarly, mild or moderate hypoalbuminemia was not associated with a risk of graft rejection or graft failure. Among SPK recipients, pre-transplant hypoalbuminemia was not associated with worse outcomes and should not be the determining factor in selecting patients for SPK transplant.

Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management

Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.

Subclinical Pancreas Rejection on Protocol Biopsy Within the First Year of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant

This single-center retrospective study investigated subclinical rejection prevalence and significance in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients. We analyzed 352 SPKT recipients from July 2003 to April 2022. Our protocol included pancreas allograft surveillance biopsies at 1, 4, and 12months post-transplant. After excluding 153 patients unable to undergo pancreas biopsy, our study cohort comprised 199 recipients. Among the 199 patients with protocol pancreas biopsies, 107 had multiple protocol pancreas biopsies in the first year, totaling 323. Subclinical rejection was identified in 132 episodes (41%). Of these, 72% were Grade 1, 20% were indeterminate, and 8% were Banff Grade 2 or higher. All episodes of subclinical rejection were treated. Rates of pancreas graft loss (10% vs. 7%) and clinical rejection (21% vs. 20%) at 3 years were similar between those with and without subclinical rejection. Subclinical rejection Banff Grade 2 or more was associated with poor pancreas graft survival HR of 5.5 (95% CI: 1.24-24.37, p = 0.025). Of 236 simultaneous protocol kidney and pancreas biopsies, 102 (43%) showed pancreas subclinical rejection, while only 17% had concurrent kidney subclinical rejection. Our findings suggest limited predictive value of pancreatic enzymes and euglycemia in detecting pancreas rejection. Furthermore, poor concordance existed between pancreas and kidney subclinical rejection.

Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies.

RESULTS

Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods

The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.

Medical and Surgical Management of the Failed Pancreas Transplant

Despite the continued improvements in pancreas transplant outcomes in recent decades, a subset of recipients experience graft failure and can experience substantial morbidity and mortality. Here, we summarize what is known about the failed pancreas allograft and what factors are important for consideration of retransplantation. The current definition of pancreas allograft failure and its challenges for the transplant community are explored. The impacts of a failed pancreas allograft are presented, including patient survival and resultant morbidities. The signs, symptoms, and medical and surgical management of a failed pancreas allograft are described, whereas the options and consequences of immunosuppression withdrawal are reviewed. Medical and surgical factors necessary for successful retransplant candidacy are detailed with emphasis on how well-selected patients may achieve excellent retransplant outcomes. To achieve substantial medical mitigation and even pancreas retransplantation, patients with a failed pancreas allograft warrant special attention to their residual renal, cardiovascular, and pulmonary function. Future studies of the failed pancreas allograft will require improved reporting of graft failure from transplant centers and continued investigation from experienced centers.

Chronic Pancreas Allograft Rejection Followed by Successful HLA-Incompatible Islet Alloautotransplantation: A Novel Strategy?

The purpose of pancreas or islet transplantation is to restore glycemic control in order to mitigate diabetes-related complications and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Complications from chronic pancreas allograft rejection may lead to transplantectomy, even when the endocrine function remains preserved. We present first evidence of a successful HLA incompatible islet re-transplantation with islets isolated from a rejecting pancreas allograft after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. The pancreas allograft was removed because of progressively painful pancreatic panniculitis from clinically uncontrolled chronic rejection. The endocrine function was preserved. Induction treatment for this "islet alloautotransplantation" consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIg and alemtuzumab. At 1 year, the patient retained islet graft function with good glycemic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia, despite persistent low-grade HLA donor-specific antibodies. His panniculitis had resolved completely. In our point of view, islet alloautotransplantation derived from a chronically rejecting pancreas allograft is a potential option to salvage (partial) islet function, despite preformed donor-specific antibodies, in order to maintain stable glycemic control. Thereby it protects against severe hypoglycemia, and it potentially mitigates kidney graft dysfunction and other diabetes-related complications in patients with continued need for immunosuppression and who are otherwise difficult to retransplant.

The Presence of Donor-specific Antibodies Around the Time of Pancreas Graft Biopsy With Rejection Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Graft Failure

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA are an important biomarker predicting graft injury, rejection (Rej), and failure in various solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the impact of DSA with or without histopathological evidence of rejection among pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs) is unknown.

METHODS

In this study, we included all PTRs at our center between 2005 and 2020, with pancreas allograft biopsy before March 31, 2021, and with DSA checked within 15 d of the biopsy. PTRs were divided into 4 groups based on the biopsy findings on the index biopsy and DSA status as Rej-/DSA-, Rej+/DSA-, Rej-/DSA+, and Rej+/DSA+.

RESULTS

Two hundred two PTRs had a pancreas allograft biopsy during the study period. Thirty-nine were in Rej-/DSA-, 84 Rej+/DSA-, 24 Rej-/DSA+, and 55 Rej+/DSA+. The mean interval from transplant to index biopsy was not statistically different between the 4 groups. The most common type of rejection was T cell-mediated rejection; however, antibody-mediated rejection was more prevalent in the Rej+/DSA+ group. At 5 y postbiopsy, the rate of death-censored graft failure (DCGF) for Rej-/DSA- was 18%, 24% in Rej+/DSA-; 17% in Rej-/DSA+ and 36% in Rej+/DSA+ (P = 0.14). In univariate analysis, mixed rejection (hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.22-7.39; P = 0.02) along with solitary pancreas transplantation and Rej+/DSA+ were associated with DCGF. In multivariate analysis, compared with Rej-/DSA-, Rej+/DSA+ was significantly associated with DCGF (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.03-5.20; P = 0.04); however, Rej+/DSA- was not (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.32-3.56; P = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

PTRs with pancreas allograft rejection and concomitant DSA have an increased risk of DCGF.

Association of human leukocyte antigen mismatches between donor-recipient and donor-donor in pancreas after kidney transplant recipients

The effects of HLA mismatching on pancreas outcomes among pancreas after kidney (PAK) recipients are undefined. Outcomes might potentially differ depending on whether there is a mismatch between pancreas donor and recipient (PD-R) or pancreas donor and kidney donor(PD-KD). All primary PAK at our centre were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of HLA mismatching: low (L-MM) as 0-4 and high (H-MM) as 5-6. We analysed all (N = 73) PAK for PD-R mismatch and the subset of PAK for PD-KD mismatch (N = 71). Comparing PD-R L-MM (n = 39) and H-MM (n = 34) PAKs, we observed no difference in the rate of pancreas graft failure. There was also no difference in the rate of rejection (L-MM 33% vs. H-MM 41%) or the severity of rejection. However, we observed a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter time to acute pancreas rejection in the H-MM group (6.8 ± 8.7 mo) versus the L-MM cohort (29.0 ± 36.2 mo) (P < 0.001). Similar to the PD-R mismatched cohort, we did not observe a detrimental effect of HLA mismatching on graft outcomes in the PD-KD cohort; time to rejection was again shorter in the H-MM subset. In this study, we found no impact of HLA mismatch on either pancreas graft survival or rejection rates, though rejection occurred earlier in high mismatched PAK transplants.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

[Pancreas transplantation-clinic, technique, and histological assessment]

BACKGROUND

In Germany pancreas transplants are performed in only a few selected and specialized centres, usually combined with a kidney transplant. Knowlegde of the indications for and techniques of transplantation as well as of the histopathological assessment for rejection in pancreas and duodenal biopsies is not very widespread.

AIM

To give an overview of the development and status quo in pancreas-kidney-transplantation in Germany summarizing the experience of the largest German pancreas transplant centre and to give a résumé of the results of histological diagnoses of biopsy specimens submitted between 06/2017 and 12/2020. Moreover, a detailed description and illustration of histological findings is included.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A thorough literature search for aspects of the history, technique and indication for pancreas transplantation was performed and discussed in the context of the local experience and technical particularities specific for the transplant centre in Bochum. The occurrence of complications was compared with international reports. Results of pancreas and duodenal biopsies submitted to Erlangen between 06/2017 and 12/2020 for histological evaluation, which were evaluated according to the Banff classification, were summarized. For a better understanding key histological findings of pancreas rejection and differential diagnoses were illustrated and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 93 pancreas transplant specimens and 3 duodenal biopsies were included. 34.4% of pancreas specimens did not contain representative material for a diagnosis. In the remaining 61 biopsies 24.6% showed no rejection, 62.3% were diagnosed with acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and 8.2% with signs suspicious of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Acute acinary epithelial injury was seen in 59%, pancreatitis in 8.2% and allograft fibrosis was reported in as many as 54.1%. Calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity was discussed in only 4.9%.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas-kidney-transplantation and standardized histological assessment of the transplanted pancreas or rarely duodenum with reporting according to the updated Banff classification of pancreas transplants or previous reports of duodenal rejection are important mainstays in the management of patients with diabetes.

Survival benefit of the homologous kidney allograft in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants and its potential protective role

The superior death-censored graft survival of the pancreas allograft in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants (SPK) over pancreas alone transplants (PTA) has long been recognized. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and a high-volume pancreas transplant program, we investigated the possible protective role of the kidney allograft in SPK transplants. We analyzed 19,043 primary pancreas transplants between 2000 and 2020, including 735 transplants performed at the University of Minnesota. SPK transplants demonstrated a superior death-censored graft survival over pancreas after kidney (PAK) and simultaneous pancreas and living donor kidney (SPLK) transplants, which both demonstrated better survival than PTA transplants. This effect was not affected by mode or duration of renal replacement therapy prior to transplant. Furthermore, we found that HLA match at the B-locus between the prior kidney and current pancreas allografts demonstrated a protective effect (HR 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.29-1.00), with a 2-antigen match demonstrating superior death-censored graft survival to a 1- or 0-antigen match. We propose that a homologous kidney allograft in SPK transplants affords protection to the pancreas allograft - likely through a combination of better surveillance for rejection and direct immunoprotection offered by the same-donor kidney. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Utility of Donor-specific Antibody Monitoring and the Role of Kidney Biopsy in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Recipients With De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

There is limited information about the utility of donor-specific antibody (DSA) against HLA monitoring and the role of protocol kidney biopsy for de novo DSA (dnDSA) in simultaneous liver and kidney (SLK) transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed SLK transplant recipients transplanted between January 2005 and December 2017, who had DSA checked posttransplant. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they developed dnDSA posttransplant (dnDSA+) or not (dnDSA-). Kidney graft rejection ±45 d of dnDSA and a kidney death-censored graft survival were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 SLK transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria. Of those, 23 were dnDSA+ and 60 were dnDSA-. Twenty-two of 23 dnDSA+ patients had DSA against class II HLA, predominantly against DQ. Fifteen recipients underwent kidney biopsy ±45 d of dnDSA. Six of these were clinically indicated due to kidney graft dysfunction. The other 9 had a protocol kidney biopsy only due to dnDSA, and 6 of these 9 had a rejection. Also, 3 recipients had sequential biopsies of both the kidney and liver grafts. Among those with sequential biopsies of both grafts, there was a difference between the organs in the rate and types of rejections. At last follow up, dnDSA was not associated with graft failure of either the kidney or liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our study was limited by a small sample size, it suggests the potential utility of DSA monitoring and protocol kidney biopsy for dnDSA.

Alloimmunity in pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival.

SUMMARY

The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.

Incidence and Outcomes of Significant Weight Changes After Pancreas Transplant Alone

Background.

Weight change, primarily weight gain, is a common problem among solid organ transplant recipients. The incidence of weight gain or loss after successful pancreas transplant alone (PTA) and the effect on graft survival is unknown.

Methods.

This was a single-center observational study among PTA recipients, transplanted at our center between January 1, 2005, and July 31, 2017, who had a functional pancreas graft for at least 1 year and documented weight change at the 1-year clinic visit.

Results.

In this cohort study of 105 PTA recipients, 28 had significant weight gain, 27 had significant weight loss, and the remaining 50 did not have significant weight change at 1-year posttransplant. When comparing the weight gain and no weight change groups, the weight gain cohort started to gain weight at 3 months posttransplant to 5 years or last follow up. Similarly, the weight loss group lost weight at 3 months posttransplant up to last follow up. Clinically significant weight gain or weight loss were not associated with uncensored or death censored graft failure in univariate regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Also, there were no significant differences between the groups in the glycated hemoglobin at last follow up.

Conclusions.

Approximately 50% of PTA recipients had a significant weight change at 1-year posttransplant, of which 25% gained significant weight and 25% loss. There was no significant difference in graft survival due to the significant weight changes. Further research is needed in this field.

Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the "sentinel" organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection-related pathologies.

Pancreas transplant rejection episodes are not revealed by biopsies of the donor duodenum in a prospective study with paired biopsies

The surgical technique with duodeno-duodenal enteroanastomosis of pancreas transplants allows for representative endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle biopsies of the donor duodenum and the pancreas graft. We assessed whether histological findings in transplanted donor duodenal biopsies can indicate rejection in the transplanted pancreas. Since September 2012, a duodeno-duodenal enteroanastomosis has been the default technique for pancreas transplantations at our center. In 67 recipients we prospectively examined 113 endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures with representative biopsies from the duodenum grafts and the pancreas grafts (97 per protocol and 16 on indication). All graft biopsies were evaluated according to established rejection criteria. A total of 22 biopsy-proven pancreas rejections were detected, with 2 matching duodenal biopsies showing rejection. This gives a sensitivity of 9% for detection of a pancreas rejection by duodenal biopsies. The other matching duodenal biopsies were either normal (n = 13) or indeterminate (n = 7). Rejection of the donor duodenum was found in only 6/113 biopsies, with 2 concurrent pancreas rejections. In conclusion, the donor duodenum is not a useful reporter organ for rejection in the pancreas graft.

[Transplantation strategy in type 1 diabetic patients]

Beta cell replacement by pancreas or Langerhans islets transplantation is the only way to restore glucose homeostasis in type 1 diabetic patients. The counterpart is the need for long-term immunosuppression. These transplantations are therefore mainly indicated for patients candidates for kidney transplantation and for patients with poor quality of life due to unstable diabetes with life-threatening hypoglycemic events. Both beta cell replacement techniques have different benefits and risks and should be adapted to each type 1 diabetic patient. The transplant strategy must be personalized according to parameters assessed in the pre-transplant period, validated by a multidisciplinary team and reassessed regularly until transplantation.