Perioperative antithrombotic therapy does not increase the incidence of early postoperative thromboembolic complications and bleeding in kidney transplantation - a retrospective study

Kidney transplantation and perioperative complications: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients face complex perioperative challenges due to comorbidities from chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to assess perioperative complications in kidney transplant recipients and evaluate the association between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complication severity using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary hospital in South Brazil from September 2020 to March 2022, including 230 adult kidney transplant recipients. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and complications were collected. Complications were categorized using the CD scale, and their relationship with CCI was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49.2 ± 12.7 years, with 58.7% male recipients. The mean CCI score was 3.65 ± 1.5 points. Intraoperative complications occurred in 10.9% of patients, with notable issues including bleeding and airway difficulties. In the immediate postoperative period, 9.1% required urgent dialysis. In the 30-day follow-up, 57.8% had delayed graft function, 21.7% infections, 11.3% had vascular complications, and the mortality was 1.7%. CCI was not a significant predictor of severe complications; however, congestive heart failure was strongly associated with severe complications (HR = 6.6 95% CI 2.6-6.7, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a low overall comorbidity profile, kidney transplant recipients faced significant perioperative challenges. The lack of a significant association between the CCI score and severe complications suggests that traditional risk assessment tools may not fully capture the risks specific to the early postoperative period in kidney transplantation, and future research should focus on developing more refined risk assessment models for chronic kidney disease patients.

Pathophysiological Changes in the Hemostatic System and Antithrombotic Management in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Nowadays, the main cause for early graft loss is renal graft thrombosis because kidney transplant outcomes have improved drastically owing to advances in immunological techniques and immunosuppression. However, data regarding the efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in the prevention of renal graft thrombosis are scarce. Adequate antithrombotic management requires a good understanding of the pathophysiological changes in the hemostatic system in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, ESKD and dialysis disrupt the fine balance between pro- and anticoagulation in the body, and further changes in the hemostatic system occur during kidney transplantation. Consequently, kidney transplant recipients paradoxically are at risk for both thrombosis and bleeding. This overview focuses on the pathophysiological changes in hemostasis in ESKD and kidney transplantation and provides a comprehensive summary of the current evidence for antithrombotic management in (adult) kidney transplant recipients.

Predictive Value of HAS-BLED Score Regarding Bleeding Events and Graft Survival following Renal Transplantation

Objective: Due to the high prevalence and incidence of cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases among dialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal disease (ERSD) scheduled for kidney transplantation (KT), the use of antiplatelet therapy (APT) and/or anticoagulant drugs in this patient population is common. However, these patients share a high risk of complications, either due to thromboembolic or bleeding events, which makes adequate peri- and post-transplant anticoagulation management challenging. Predictive clinical models, such as the HAS-BLED score developed for predicting major bleeding events in patients under anticoagulation therapy, could be helpful tools for the optimization of antithrombotic management and could reduce peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data from 204 patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) between 2011 and 2018 at the University Hospital Leipzig were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified and categorized postoperatively into the prophylaxis group (group A)—patients without pretransplant anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy and receiving postoperative heparin in prophylactic doses—and into the (sub)therapeutic group (group B)—patients with postoperative continued use of pretransplant antithrombotic medication used (sub)therapeutically. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative bleeding events, which was evaluated for a possible association with the use of antithrombotic therapy. Secondary analyses were conducted for the associations of other potential risk factors, specifically the HAS-BLED score, with allograft outcome. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression as well as a Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify risk factors for long-term allograft function, outcome and survival. The calibration and prognostic accuracy of the risk models were evaluated using the Hosmer−Lemshow test (HLT) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: In total, 94 of 204 (47%) patients received (sub)therapeutic antithrombotic therapy after transplantation and 108 (53%) patients received prophylactic antithrombotic therapy. A total of 61 (29%) patients showed signs of postoperative bleeding. The incidence (p < 0.01) and timepoint of bleeding (p < 0.01) varied significantly between the different antithrombotic treatment groups. After applying multivariate analyses, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) (OR 2.89 (95% CI: 1.02−8.21); p = 0.04), procedure-specific complications (blood loss (OR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.0−1.05); p = 0.014), Clavien−Dindo classification > grade II (OR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.0−1.05); p = 0.018)), HAS-BLED score (OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.08−2.07); p = 0.018), vit K antagonists (VKA) (OR 5.89 (95% CI: 1.10−31.28); p = 0.037), the combination of APT and therapeutic heparin (OR 5.44 (95% CI: 1.33−22.31); p = 0.018) as well as postoperative therapeutic heparin (OR 3.37 (95% CI: 1.37−8.26); p < 0.01) were independently associated with an increased risk for bleeding. The intraoperative use of heparin, prior antiplatelet therapy and APT in combination with prophylactic heparin was not associated with increased bleeding risk. Higher recipient body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.32 per 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI (95% CI: 0.12−0.91); p = 0.023) as well as living donor KT (OR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18−0.94); p = 0.036) were associated with a decreased risk for bleeding. Regarding bleeding events and graft failure, the HAS-BLED risk model demonstrated good calibration (bleeding and graft failure: HLT: chi-square: 4.572, p = 0.802, versus chi-square: 6.52, p = 0.18, respectively) and moderate predictive performance (bleeding AUC: 0.72 (0.63−0.79); graft failure: AUC: 0.7 (0.6−0.78)). Conclusions: In our current study, we could demonstrate the HAS-BLED risk score as a helpful tool with acceptable predictive accuracy regarding bleeding events and graft failure following KT. The intensified monitoring and precise stratification/assessment of bleeding risk factors may be helpful in identifying patients at higher risks of bleeding, improved individualized anticoagulation decisions and choices of antithrombotic therapy in order to optimize outcome after kidney transplantation.

Impact of intra-abdominal pressure on early kidney transplant outcomes

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is common among post-surgical patients and may cause organ dysfunction. However, its impact after kidney transplantation on early postoperative complications and graft recovery remains unclear. We designed a prospective, observational cohort study to describe the prevalence and determinants of IAP, as well as its effect on delayed graft function, postoperative complications, and graft recovery. IAP was measured in 205 kidney transplant recipients every 8 h during the first 72 h after surgery using the urinary bladder technique. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg. Patients were followed for 6 months or until graft failure/death. Mean IAP was 12 ± 3.3 mmHg within the first 24 h. 78% of subjects presented with intra-abdominal hypertension during the first 72 h. Increased IAP was associated with higher renal resistive index [r = 0.213; P = 0.003] and lower urine output [r =  - 0.237; P < 0.001]. 72 h mean IAP was an independent risk factor for delayed graft function [OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.13-1.51], postoperative complications [OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33], and absence of graft function recovery [HR for graft function recovery: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-0.99]. Increased IAP was highly prevalent after transplantation and was independently associated with delayed graft function, postoperative complications, and absence of graft function recovery. Routine IAP monitoring should be considered post-transplantation to facilitate early recognition of relevant complications.

Prophylactic antithrombotic management in adult and pediatric kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

RGT is a major cause for early graft loss after KTx. Although evidence-based recommendations are lacking, aP is often used to prevent RGT. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of aP in adult and pediatric KTx recipients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, conference proceedings, and electronic databases for trial registries were searched for eligible studies using search terms relevant to this review (April 21, 2020). The systematic review was carried out following the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement.

RESULTS

Twelve studies comprising 2370 patients (adult = 1415, pediatric = 955) were included, of which three were RCTs. The overall risk for developing RGT was lower in the group with aP compared with the control group (RR 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.49). The antithrombotic drugs used were heparin (7/12), acetylsalicylic acid (2/12), a combination of both (2/12), and dipyridamole (1/12) with a high variability in timing, dosing, and mode of application. Adverse effects were reported rarely, with minor bleeding as the main complication. The non-randomized studies had significant risks of bias in the domains of patient selection, confounder, and measurement of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on pooled analysis, aP seems to reduce the risk of RGT in KTx. However, the reliability of these results is limited, as the quality of the available studies is poor and information on adverse effects associated with aP is scarce. Additional high-quality research is urgently needed to provide sufficient data supporting the use of aP in KTx.

Is intraoperative heparin during renal transplantation useful to reduce graft vascular thrombosis?

OBJECTIVES

The standard treatment for end-stage renal disease is renal transplantation. As vascular anastomoses are performed during the surgery, it may expose to a risk of vascular thrombosis. This raises the question of using intravenous heparin during the procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of renal transplant vascular thrombosis in the perioperative period based on whether the patients received or not intraoperative heparin.

METHODS

A single center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: patients not receiving heparin vs. receiving heparin at the dose of 0.5mg/kg. A Doppler ultrasound was performed at day one postoperatively to assess the occurrence of vascular thrombosis. Hemorrhagic complications and the need for postoperative transfusion were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 261 patients were included. Fifty-one patients received heparin (19.5%). Patient's baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. No significant difference was found regarding the incidence of vascular thrombosis (6% for both groups, P=1). In addition, no difference was found regarding hemorrhagic complications requiring surgical revision (P=1) as well as early postoperative transfusion rate (P=0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that intraoperative IV heparin doesn't improve the risk of vascular thrombosis following renal transplantation. However, intraoperative IV heparin was not significantly associated with a higher rate of hemorrhagic complications suggesting that heparin can be safely used if required in some selected patients at higher risk of thrombosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Clinical outcome of kidney transplantation after bariatric surgery: A single-center, retrospective cohort study

Patients with class II and III obesity and end‐stage renal disease are often ineligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) due to increased postoperative complications and technically challenging surgery. Bariatric surgery (BS) can be an effective solution for KTx candidates who are considered inoperable. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of KTx after BS and to compare the outcomes to obese recipients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) without BS. This retrospective, single‐center study included patients who received KTx after BS between January 1994 and December 2018. The primary outcome was postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were graft and patient survival. In total, 156 patients were included, of whom 23 underwent BS prior to KTx. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications. After a median follow‐up of 5.1 years, death‐censored graft survival, uncensored graft survival, and patient survival were similar to controls (log rank test p = .845, .659, and .704, respectively). Dialysis pre‐transplantation (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.55; 95%CI 1.03–6.34, p = .043) and diabetes (HR 2.41; 95%CI 1.11–5.22, p = .027) were independent risk factors for all‐cause mortality. A kidney from a deceased donor was an independent risk factor for death‐censored graft loss (HR 1.98; 95%CI 1.04–3.79, p = .038). Patients who received a KTx after BS have similar outcomes as obese transplant recipients.

Current practice of antithrombotic prophylaxis in pediatric kidney transplantation-Results of an international survey on behalf of the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology

BACKGROUND

Renal graft thrombosis (RGT) is one of the main causes for early graft loss in pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx). Despite the lack of evidence-based recommendations, antithrombotic prophylaxis (aP) is used to prevent RGT.

METHODS

An online survey supported by the European Society for Pediatric Nephrology was developed to investigate the current practice of aP in pediatric KTx recipients <18 years.

RESULTS

A total of 80 pediatric KTx centers from 37 countries participated in the survey. Antithrombotic prophylaxis was performed in 96% of the pediatric renal transplant centers (all/selected patients: 54%/42%). The main overall used drugs were as follows: low-molecular-weight heparin (89%), unfractionated heparin (UFH) (69%), and acetylsalicylic acid (ASS) (55%). Ten different aP management strategies were identified as follows: 51% used a single drug and 48% combined two drugs sequentially. The corresponding centers started aP predominantly within 24 hours after pediatric KTx; 51% preferred UFH for starting aP. In centers switching to a second drug (51%), this change was performed after 10 ± 6 days; of these 57% preferred ASS for maintenance aP. Reported median aP duration was 51 days (range 1-360).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of aP in almost all responding pediatric KTx centers, there is no uniform management strategy. Notwithstanding, UFH seems to be the preferred drug for the early post-operative period of pediatric KTx, and ASS for maintenance prophylaxis following pediatric KTx. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the benefits and risks of aP, preferably resulting in guidelines for the management in pediatric KTx.