Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients?

Kidney transplants from elderly donors: what we have learned 20 years after the Crystal City consensus criteria meeting

Based on the current projection of the general population and the combined increase in end-stage kidney disease with age, the number of elderly donors and recipients is increasing, raising crucial questions about how to minimize the discard rate of organs from elderly donors and improve graft and patient outcomes. In 2002, extended criteria donors were the focus of a meeting in Crystal City (VA, USA), with a goal of maximizing the use of organs from deceased donors. Since then, extended criteria donors have progressively contributed to a large number of transplanted grafts worldwide, posing specific issues for allocation systems, recipient management, and therapeutic approaches. This review analyzes what we have learned in the last 20 years about extended criteria donor utilization, the promising innovations in immunosuppressive management, and the molecular pathways involved in the aging process, which constitute potential targets for novel therapies.

Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant: Risk Factors, Consequences and Prevention Strategies

Background. Delayed graft function is a frequent complication of kidney transplantation that requires dialysis in the first week posttransplant. Materials and Methods. We searched for the most relevant articles in the National Institutes of Health library of medicine, as well as in transplantation, pharmacologic, and nephrological journals. Results. The main factors that may influence the development of delayed graft function (DGF) are ischemia–reperfusion injury, the source and the quality of the donated kidney, and the clinical management of the recipient. The pathophysiology of ischemia–reperfusion injury is complex and involves kidney hypoxia related to the duration of warm and cold ischemia, as well as the harmful effects of blood reperfusion on tubular epithelial cells and endothelial cells. Ischemia–reperfusion injury is more frequent and severe in kidneys from deceased donors than in those from living donors. Of great importance is the quality and function of the donated kidney. Kidneys from living donors and those with normal function can provide better results. In the peri-operative management of the recipient, great attention should be paid to hemodynamic stability and blood pressure; nephrotoxic medicaments should be avoided. Over time, patients with DGF may present lower graft function and survival compared to transplant recipients without DGF. Maladaptation repair, mitochondrial dysfunction, and acute rejection may explain the worse long-term outcome in patients with DGF. Many different strategies meant to prevent DGF have been evaluated, but only prolonged perfusion of dopamine and hypothermic machine perfusion have proven to be of some benefit. Whenever possible, a preemptive transplant from living donor should be preferred.

Non-Immunologic Causes of Late Death-Censored Kidney Graft Failure: A Personalized Approach

Despite continuous advances in surgical and immunosuppressive protocols, the long-term survival of transplanted kidneys is still far from being satisfactory. Antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent autoimmune diseases, and death with functioning graft are the most frequent causes of late-kidney allograft failure. However, in addition to these complications, a number of other non-immunologic events may impair the function of transplanted kidneys and directly or indirectly lead to their failure. In this narrative review, we will list and discuss the most important nonimmune causes of late death-censored kidney graft failure, including quality of the donated kidney, adherence to prescriptions, drug toxicities, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, new onset diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and lifestyle of the renal transplant recipient. For each of these risk factors, we will report the etiopathogenesis and the potential consequences on graft function, keeping in mind that in many cases, two or more risk factors may negatively interact together.

Outcome of kidney transplantations from ≥65-year-old deceased donors with acute kidney injury

Kidney transplantation (KT) from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) has been associated with delayed graft function (DGF) but similar graft survival compared with KT from donors without AKI. Kidneys from ≥65-year-old donors with comorbidities are more susceptible to cold ischemia time and DGF and it is unknown whether such elderly kidneys with AKI can also be transplanted with satisfactory outcomes. All KTs from ≥65-year-old donors performed at our centre from 1999 to 2019 (n = 233) were retrospectively analysed and short- as well as long-term outcomes were compared for KTs from donors with (n = 64) and without AKI (n = 169). There were no significant differences regarding the frequency of DGF as well as the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) one and three years post-transplant between the no-AKI and the AKI group (DGF: no-AKI 30.2% vs. AKI 40.6%, P = 0.17; eGFR at one-year: 31.9 ml/min/1.73m² vs. 35.5 ml/min/1.73m² , P = 0.32; at three-years: 33.8 ml/min/1.73m² vs. 40.9 ml/min/1.73m² , P = 0.18; respectively). Death-censored graft survival and patient survival were also not significantly different. Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not identify AKI as a significant risk factor for graft loss or death. Following careful donor and recipient selection, kidneys from ≥65-year-old AKI donors may potentially be transplanted with satisfactory outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of the explanting surgeon's impression of donor arteriosclerosis on outcome of kidney transplantations from donors aged ≥65 years

PURPOSE

Careful donor selection is important for kidney transplantations (KT) from suboptimal donors aged ≥65 years. Several tools such as histopathological assessment of preimplant biopsies have been shown to predict allograft survival and can be applied for selection. Whether the explanting surgeon's appraisal is associated with outcomes of KTs from suboptimal donors is unknown.

METHODS

We compared outcomes of KTs from ≥65-year-old deceased donors performed at our centre between 1999 and 2018 for which grading of macroscopic 'donor arteriosclerosis' (n=104) and 'organ quality' (n=208) as judged by the explanting surgeon and documented on the Eurotransplant kidney organ report was available.

RESULTS

No association was observed between degree of macroscopic donor arteriosclerosis and death-censored graft survival in univariable or multivariable regression analyses. Compared to KTs from donors with no/mild arteriosclerosis, KTs from donors with moderate/severe arteriosclerosis were associated with a significantly impaired allograft function 3 months, 1 year and 3 years after transplantation (e.g. at 3 years: 176.8 µmol/l vs 137.0 µmol/l, P=0.003). Following multivariable regression analysis, these differences remained significant at 3 months and 3 years after KT. No association was observed between degree of macroscopic arteriosclerosis and mortality or primary non-function as well as no consistent association with delayed graft function and histological arteriosclerosis. Assessment of 'organ quality' was not associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the explanting surgeon's assessment of donor arteriosclerosis is associated with allograft function. Larger studies and better standardization of kidney inspection after explantation are required to further explore the impact of surgeon's appraisal in KT.

Age disparities in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to outline disparities in liver and kidney transplantation across age spectrum. Disparities do not involve only recipients whose age may severely affect the possibility to access to a potentially life-saving procedure, but donors as well. The attitude of transplant centers to use older donors reflects on waiting list mortality and drop-out. This review examines which age categories are currently harmed and how different allocation systems may minimize disparities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specific age categories suffer disparities in the access to transplantation. A better understanding of how properly evaluate graft quality, a continuous re-evaluation of the most favorable donor-to-recipient match and most equitable allocation system are the three key points to promote 'justice and equality' among transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

The duty to protect younger patients waiting for transplantation and the request of older patients to have access to potentially life-saving treatment urge the transplant community to use older organs thus increasing the number of available grafts, to evaluate new allocation systems with the aim to maximize 'utility' while respecting 'equity' and to avoid 'futility' thus minimizing waiting list mortality and drop-out, and improving the survival benefits for all patients requiring a transplant.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COOT/A9.

Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on outcome of kidney transplantations from braindead donors aged ≥65 years

Patients with a history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and subsequent brain death are frequently evaluated for organ donation. Whether kidneys from ≥65-year-old braindead donors with a history of CPR can be transplanted with satisfactory outcomes is unknown. All kidney transplants (KT) from ≥65-year-old donors performed at our centre from 1999 to 2018 (n = 185) were retrospectively analysed and outcome was compared for KTs from donors with and without a history of CPR (n = 27 and n = 158, respectively). No significant differences in the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) as well as one- and three-year graft function were observed between the CPR and the no-CPR group (DGF: 26.0% vs 31.0%, P = 0.76; one-year serum creatinine: 150.4 μmol/l vs 177.0 μmol/l, P = 0.11; three-year serum creatinine: 150.4 μmol/l vs 168.2 μmol/l, P = 0.52, respectively). Death-censored graft survival was comparable after one and five years (CPR group: 81.5% and 76.7% vs no-CPR group: 86.6% and 75.7%, P = 0.70). Likewise, patient survival was not significantly different. Multivariable Cox regression analysis also did not identify CPR as a significant risk factor for graft loss or death. Our study suggests that, following stringent donor selection, the outcome of KTs from ≥65-year-old braindead donors with and without a history of CPR is comparable. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Influence of cold ischemia time on the outcome of kidney transplants from donors aged 70 years and above - A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

BACKGROUND

The use of kidney allografts from ≥70-year-old donors has increased persistently over the last twenty years. Prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) is well known to increase graft failure risk. However, despite their growing importance, no data is available on the impact of CIT specifically on survival of allografts from ≥70-year-old donors.

METHODS

47,585 kidney transplantations from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) performed during 2000-2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analysed. The impact of CIT on five-year death-censored graft and patient survival was studied for transplantations from <70- (n=33,305) and ≥70-year-old ECDs (n=14,280).

RESULTS

Compared to the reference of ≤12-hours CIT, a CIT of 13-18 hours did not increase the risk of graft failure significantly, neither for recipients of kidneys from <70- nor from ≥70-year-old ECDs. In contrast, graft failure risk increased significantly when CIT exceeded 18 hours, both in recipients of kidneys from <70- and, more pronounced, from ≥70-year-old ECDs (CIT 19-24 hours: hazard ratio (HR) =1.19 and =1.24; P<0.001; CIT ≥24 hours: HR=1.28 and =1.32, P<0.001 and =0.003, respectively). Within the 18-hour CIT interval, additional human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching further improved survival of ECD transplants significantly, whereas the negative impact of a prolonged CIT >18 hours was stronger in >65-year-old recipients and for transplants with multiple HLA mismatches. The influence of CIT on patient survival was less pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

CIT, as long it is kept ≤18 hours, has no significant impact on survival of kidney transplants even from ≥70-year-old ECDs.

Impact of HLA compatibility in recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria donors: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

Due to a widespread organ shortage, the use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in kidney transplantation has increased persistently, reaching approximately 40% in recent years. Whether human leucocyte antigen (HLA) matching between donor and recipient should be part of allocation algorithms in transplantation of ECD kidneys, and especially of ECD kidneys from ≥70-year-old donors, is still in question. To this end, 135,529 kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analysed and the impact of HLA-A+B+DR mismatches on death-censored graft and patient survival as well as on rejection episodes was investigated. Results were stratified according to donor status (standard criteria donor (SCD) versus ECD) and age of ECD. HLA incompatibility increased the five-year death-censored graft failure risk similarly strong in recipients of ECD and SCD transplants (hazard ratio (HR) per HLA mismatch 1.078 and 1.075, respectively; p < .001 for both). Its impact on rejection treatments during the first post-transplant year was also significant but slightly weaker for recipients of ECD transplants (risk ratio (RR) per HLA mismatch 1.10 for ECD transplants and 1.13 for SCD transplants; p < .001 for both). Mortality increased gradually from zero to six HLA mismatches in recipients of SCD transplants, whereas for ECD transplants a significant increase was notable only from zero to more than zero mismatches. A significant but slightly less pronounced impact of HLA incompatibility on graft failure was observed in transplants from ≥70- compared with <70-year-old ECDs (HR per mismatch 1.047 and 1.093; p = .009 and < 0.001, respectively). The influence of HLA mismatches on rejection treatments was the same for both ECD age groups (RR = 1.10, p < .001 and p = .004, respectively). Our data indicate that HLA matching should be part of allocation algorithms not only in transplantation of kidneys from SCDs but also from ECDs.