C3d-positive donor-specific antibodies have a role in pretransplant risk stratification of cross-match-positive HLA-incompatible renal transplantation: United Kingdom multicentre study

Complement-activating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal

Introduction

Several studies have investigated the impact of circulating complement-activating anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA DSAs) on organ transplant outcomes. However, a critical appraisal of these studies and a demonstration of the prognostic value of complement-activating status over anti-HLA DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal evaluating the role of complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on allograft outcomes in different solid organ transplants. We included studies through Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase since inception of databases till May 05, 2023. We evaluated allograft loss as the primary outcome, and allograft rejection as the secondary outcome. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and funnel plots to assess risk of bias and used bias adjustment methods when appropriate. We performed multiple subgroup analyses to account for sources of heterogeneity and studied the added value of complement assays over anti-HLA DSA MFI level.

Results

In total, 52 studies were included in the final meta-analysis (11,035 patients). Complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were associated with an increased risk of allograft loss (HR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.29, p<0.001; I²=46.2%), and allograft rejection (HR 4.98; 95% CI 2.96-8.36, p<0.01; I²=70.9%). These results remained significant after adjustment for potential sources of bias and across multiple subgroup analyses. After adjusting on pan-IgG anti-HLA DSA defined by the MFI levels, complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of allograft loss.

Discussion

We demonstrated in this systematic review, meta-analysis and critical appraisal the significant deleterious impact and the independent prognostic value of circulating complement-activating anti-HLA DSAs on solid organ transplant risk of allograft loss and rejection.

Complement activation and kidney transplantation; a complex relationship

Although kidney transplantation is the best treatment for end stage kidney disease, the benefits are limited by factors such as the short fall in donor numbers, the burden of immunosuppression and graft failure. Although there have been improvements in one-year outcomes, the annual rate of graft loss beyond the first year has not significantly improved, despite better therapies to control the alloimmune response. There is therefore a need to develop alternative strategies to limit kidney injury at all stages along the transplant pathway and so improve graft survival. Complement is primarily part of the innate immune system, but is also known to enhance the adaptive immune response. There is increasing evidence that complement activation occurs at many stages during transplantation and can have deleterious effects on graft outcome. Complement activation begins in the donor and occurs again on reperfusion following a period of ischemia. Complement can contribute to the development of the alloimmune response and may directly contribute to graft injury during acute and chronic allograft rejection. The complexity of the relationship between complement activation and allograft outcome is further increased by the capacity of the allograft to synthesise complement proteins, the contribution complement makes to interstitial fibrosis and complement's role in the development of recurrent disease. The better we understand the role played by complement in kidney transplant pathology the better placed we will be to intervene. This is particularly relevant with the rapid development of complement therapeutics which can now target different the different pathways of the complement system. Combining our basic understanding of complement biology with preclinical and observational data will allow the development and delivery of clinical trials which have best chance to identify any benefit of complement inhibition.

Isolated Pre-existing HLA-DP Donor-Specific Antibodies are Associated With Poorer Outcomes in Renal Transplantation

Introduction

The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in renal transplantation has long been recognized, but the significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DP antibodies remains less clear. We performed a retrospective single center study of renal transplants with pre-existing isolated HLA-DP-DSAs to assess clinical outcomes.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with isolated HLA-DP-DSAs were compared with 3 control groups as follows: standard immunological risk (calculated reaction frequency [cRF] < 85%, no current or historical DSA, no repeat mismatched antigens with previous transplants, n = 46), highly sensitized (cRF > 85%, n = 27), and patients with HLA-DP antibodies that were not donor-specific (n = 18). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)-free and graft survival. Factors in the final multivariable models included patient group, % cRF, B-cell flow crossmatch (BFXM) positivity and regrafts.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 1197 days, 65% of HLA-DP-DSA patients had ABMR on indication biopsies, and 30% of HLA-DP-DSA patients lost their graft. Pre-existing HLA-DP DSAs remained the single factor associated with ABMR after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.578, P = 0.012). Patients with HLA-DP DSAs had increased microvascular scores (P = 0.0346) and worse transplant glomerulopathy (P = 0.015) on biopsy compared with the standard immunological risk group. Furthermore, flow crossmatch (FXM) positivity did not help inform on the risk of graft failure or ABMR in patients with preformed DP-DSA.

Conclusion

Transplants with pre-existing HLA-DP-DSAs should be considered high risk. Routine laboratory tests are unable to further risk stratify these patients. Recipients should be considered for intensified immunosuppression and closely monitored.