1
|
Vital A, Siman-Tov M, Shlomai G, Davidov Y, Cohen-Hagai K, Shashar M, Askenasy E, Ghinea R, Mor E, Hod T. Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Directed Versus Directed Kidney Donors: Implications for the Promotion of Non-Directed Donation. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12417. [PMID: 38283057 PMCID: PMC10811092 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Living kidney donation has increased significantly, but little is known about the post-donation health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of non-directed donors (NDs) vs. directed donors (DDs). We thus examined the outcomes of 112 living kidney donors (82 NDs, 30 DDs). For the primary outcomes-namely, the mean physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores of the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) questionnaire-scores were significantly higher for the NDs vs. the DDs (PCS: +2.69, MCS: +4.43). For secondary outcomes, NDs had shorter hospital stays (3.4 vs. 4.4 days), returned to physical activity earlier (45 vs. 60 days), exercised more before and after donation, and continued physical activity post-donation. Regression analyses revealed that donor type and white blood cell count were predictive of the PCS-12 score, and donor type was predictive of the MCS-12 score. Non-directed donation was predictive of a shorter hospital stay (by 0.78 days, p < 0.001) and the odds of having PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores above 50 were almost 10 and 16 times higher for NDs, respectively (p < 0.05). These findings indicate the safety and potential benefits of promoting non-directed donation. However, careful selection processes must be maintained to prevent harm and exploitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assaf Vital
- Arrow Program for Medical Research Education, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
- Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Maya Siman-Tov
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gadi Shlomai
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Internal Medicine D and Hypertension Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Yana Davidov
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Liver Disease Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Keren Cohen-Hagai
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Moshe Shashar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel
| | - Enosh Askenasy
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ronen Ghinea
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Eytan Mor
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tammy Hod
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Renal Transplant Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gonen LD, Bokek-Cohen Y, Tarabeih M. The general public's attitude towards accepting payment for kidney donation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1282065. [PMID: 38162890 PMCID: PMC10756681 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1282065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Kidney transplantation has become the most cost-effective treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and offers them the highest quality of life. Yet, kidney donation is often inaccessible due to cultural and traditional beliefs about organ donation. The goal of our study is to assess the value of kidney donation using the Willingness to Accept (WTA) technique. We also aim to understand the factors influencing an individual's willingness to donate an organ. Methods A self-administered survey was completed by 985 participants from the general public. The quantitative method and survey design that were chosen used descriptive, correlational, nonparametric, and multivariate statistical tests. Results Most of the respondents, 895 (90.9%) are not willing to donate a kidney while alive. Four hundred and five (41.1%) of the respondents are not willing to donate a kidney after their death, while the rest are willing to donate their kidney after their death without financial compensation. The same attitude applies to the donation of a kidney from their relatives. Significant predictors from the results of the logistic regression model in predicting the lowest (minimal) amount that will encourage donation of one kidney after death were: Marital status; Nationality; Adi card holder; Knowing people who need a kidney donation; confidence in the medical staff; and consideration of the family's opinions regarding organ donation. Discussion Using cost benefit analysis (CBA), with the aim of evaluating the willingness of individuals to accept payment for innovative medical procedures, such as kidney donation, allows an assessment of the perceived value of the medical procedure and enables policymakers to decide whether to allocate funds or offer subsidies for kidney donation, given the limited healthcare resources available. During our research, we found that most participants did not support the commercialization of organs. Our recommendation for policymakers and health professionals is to continue providing adequate funding for kidney donations and to implement educational programs aimed at improving attitudes towards organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mahdi Tarabeih
- School of Nursing, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Courtney AE, Moorlock G, Van Assche K, Burnapp L, Mamode N, Lennerling A, Dor FJMF. Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Older Individuals: An Ethical Legal and Psychological Aspects of Transplantation (ELPAT) View. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11139. [PMID: 37152615 PMCID: PMC10161899 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Living donor transplantation is the optimal treatment for suitable patients with end-stage kidney disease. There are particular advantages for older individuals in terms of elective surgery, timely transplantation, and early graft function. Yet, despite the superiority of living donor transplantation especially for this cohort, older patients are significantly less likely to access this treatment modality than younger age groups. However, given the changing population demographic in recent decades, there are increasing numbers of older but otherwise healthy individuals with kidney disease who could benefit from living donor transplantation. The complex reasons for this inequity of access are explored, including conscious and unconscious age-related bias by healthcare professionals, concerns relating to older living donors, ethical anxieties related to younger adults donating to aging patients, unwillingness of potential older recipients to consider living donation, and the relevant legislation. There is a legal and moral duty to consider the inequity of access to living donor transplantation, recognising both the potential disparity between chronological and physiological age in older patients, and benefits of this treatment for individuals as well as society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling E. Courtney
- Regional Nephrology and Transplant Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Aisling E. Courtney,
| | - Greg Moorlock
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Kristof Van Assche
- Research Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Surgery, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Annette Lennerling
- The Transplant Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Frank J. M. F. Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Butani L, Tancredi D. Outcomes of living unrelated donor kidney transplants in children: An Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database analysis. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14368. [PMID: 35869899 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are conflicting data on long-term outcomes of pediatric LURD renal Txs compared to Txs of kidneys from other donor sources. METHODS An analysis of the OPTN database was conducted in children (<18 years) who had received their 1st kidney-only Tx between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was time to graft failure or death. Cox event history regression model for time to primary outcome, categorized by donor source and adjusting for confounders was performed. RESULTS Of the 12 089 subjects, 327 (2.7%) received kidneys from LURDs, 4349 (36%) from LRDs and 7413 (61%) from DD. One year graft failure rate was 3.56%. On regression analyses, compared to LRD kidney recipients, LURD recipients had comparable graft survival (graft failure AHR 1.15, 95th percentile confidence interval 0.87-1.51; p .31) and DD recipients had lower graft survival (graft failure hazard ratio 1.26, 95th percentile confidence interval 1.10-1.43; p < .001). When using living unrelated kidney recipients as the reference group, DD kidney recipients had comparable graft survival, with a wide confidence interval (hazard ratio for graft failure 1.09; 0.83-1.43, p .53). CONCLUSIONS Pediatric LURD kidney recipients have comparable graft survival to LRD kidney recipients; DD kidney recipients had the poorest survival. Our study, the largest to date, should encourage centers to embrace non-commercial living-unrelated transplantation as a viable option for children, preferable to DD kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavjay Butani
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Daniel Tancredi
- Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kurleto P, Tomaszek L, Milaniak I, Bramstedt KA. Polish attitudes towards unspecified kidney donation: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:142. [PMID: 35418039 PMCID: PMC9006497 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02767-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease effects about 4.2 million people in Poland, yet Polish organ donation research is rare. In addition, compared to other countries in the world, Poland has a relatively low living donation rate. Still, little is known about how Poles would react to the possibility of living kidney donation to strangers. A study was conducted to examine public opinion about living kidney donation, as well as their knowledge about it, willingness to donate to a stranger, and support for a possible expansion of existing Polish organ donation legislation to include living donation to strangers. METHODS A self-report questionnaire, which included a socio-demographic datasheet (9 questions), 16 questions about attitudes towards living donation, and 1 question about knowledge concerning transplantation law was sent to the respondents from December 2020 - February 2021. Logistic regression was used to assess factors affecting the support of the legalization of unspecified kidney donation amongst the participants. RESULTS More than sixty percent (62.1) of respondents supported legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. Such legalization would be accepted by people who accept a choice of a family member to donate a kidney to a stranger (OR = 3.50; Cl 95%: 1.49 to 4.85), who think bone-marrow transplant is safe (OR = 2.65; Cl 95%: 1.80 to 3.91), recognize the benefit of carrying out tests before donating a kidney (OR = 2.56; Cl 95%: 1.79 to 3.69), would agree to receive a kidney from another person (OR = 2.24; Cl 95%: 2.53 to 3.13), or would agree to donate organs after death (OR = 2.06; Cl 95%: 1.45 to 2.95). However, support for unspecified living kidney donation would not be given by respondents fearing the risk of organ trafficking (OR = 0.54; Cl 95%: 0.38 to 0.79). CONCLUSIONS In Poland there is strong support for legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. It is vital that future legislation define organ trafficking as a crime with serious punishment so that legal unspecified living kidney donation is not hindered. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04789122 ) on 08/03/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Kurleto
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Lucyna Tomaszek
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland
| | - Irena Milaniak
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.,John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland
| | - Katrina A Bramstedt
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive Gold Coast, Gold Coast, QLD, 4226, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:582-586. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.12.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
7
|
Pronk MC, Burnapp L, Reinders MEJ, Massey EK. Relinquishing Anonymity in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned From the UK Policy for Anonymous Donors. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10091. [PMID: 35185377 PMCID: PMC8842267 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Anonymous living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is performed in many countries and policies on anonymity differ. The UK is the only European country with a conditional policy, allowing pairs to break anonymity post-transplant. There is little evidence on how contact after anonymous LDKT is experienced. In this cross-sectional study participants who donated or received a kidney through non-directed altruistic kidney donation or within the UK living kidney sharing scheme completed a questionnaire on their experiences with and attitudes towards anonymity. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyse the data. 207 recipients and 354 donors participated. Anonymity was relinquished among 11% of recipients and 8% of donors. Non-anonymous participants were generally content with non-anonymity. They reported positive experiences with contact/meeting the other party. Participants who remained anonymous were content with anonymity, however, 38% would have liked to meet post-transplant. If the other party would like to meet, this number increased to 64%. Although participants agreed with anonymity before surgery, they believe that, if desired, a meeting should be allowed after surgery. UK donors and recipients were satisfied with conditional anonymity and experiences with breaking anonymity were positive. These results support the expansion of conditional anonymity to other countries that allow anonymous LDKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde C. Pronk
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Mathilde C. Pronk,
| | - Lisa Burnapp
- Department of Transplantation and Nephrology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marlies E. J. Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emma K. Massey
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|