1
|
Buemi A, Mourad NI, Bouzin C, Devresse A, Hoton D, Daumerie A, Zech F, Darius T, Kanaan N, Gianello P, Mourad M. Exploring Preservation Modalities in a Split Human Pancreas Model to Investigate the Effect on the Islet Isolation Outcomes. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1654. [PMID: 38881744 PMCID: PMC11177812 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In islet transplantation, the use of dynamic hypothermic preservation techniques is a current challenge. This study compares the efficacy of 3 pancreas preservation methods: static cold storage, hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), and oxygenated HMP. Methods A standardized human pancreas split model was employed using discarded organs from both donation after brain death (n = 15) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) (n = 9) donors. The pancreas head was preserved using static cold storage (control group), whereas the tail was preserved using the 3 different methods (study group). Data on donor characteristics, pancreas histology, isolation outcomes, and functional tests of isolated islets were collected. Results Insulin secretory function evaluated by calculating stimulation indices and total amount of secreted insulin during high glucose stimulation (area under the curve) through dynamic perifusion experiments was similar across all paired groups from both DCD and donation after brain death donors. In our hands, islet yield (IEQ/g) from the pancreas tails used as study groups was higher than that of the pancreas heads as expected although this difference did not always reach statistical significance because of great variability probably due to suboptimal quality of organs released for research purposes. Moreover, islets from DCD organs had greater purity than controls (P ≤ 0.01) in the HMP study group. Furthermore, our investigation revealed no significant differences in pancreas histology, oxidative stress markers, and apoptosis indicators. Conclusions For the first time, a comparative analysis was conducted, using a split model, to assess the effects of various preservation methods on islets derived from pancreas donors. Nevertheless, no discernible variances were observed in terms of islet functionality, histological attributes, or isolation efficacy. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Buemi
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nizar I Mourad
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Caroline Bouzin
- IREC Imaging Platform (2IP, RRID:SCR_023378), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Devresse
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Delphine Hoton
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aurelie Daumerie
- IREC Imaging Platform (2IP, RRID:SCR_023378), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francis Zech
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom Darius
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nada Kanaan
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Gianello
- Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Mourad
- Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mesnard B, Ogbemudia E, Bruneau S, Le Bas-Bernardet S, Minault D, Hervouet J, Kervella D, Masset C, Cantarovich D, Rigaud J, Badet L, Friend P, Ploeg R, Blancho G, Hunter J, Prudhomme T, Branchereau J. Pancreas Preservation: Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion to Improve Graft Reperfusion. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00799. [PMID: 38995954 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical standard for pancreas preservation for transplantation is static cold storage (SCS). Oxygenation during preservation has been shown to be advantageous in clinical studies. This study evaluates the efficiency of different oxygenation modalities during hypothermic pancreas preservation. METHODS Thirty-two porcine pancreases were procured in a controlled donation after circulatory death model and were divided to be preserved in 8 groups: (1) SCS, (2) hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), (3) hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) with 21% oxygen, (4) HOPE and 100%, (5) SCS and oxygen carrier, M101, (6) HMP and M101, (7) HOPE 21% and M101, and (8) HOPE 100% and M101. All the groups underwent 24 h of hypothermic preservation, followed by 2 h of normothermic reperfusion. Oxygen partial pressures were assessed using parenchymal probes. Perfusion parameters, perfusate samples, and tissue biopsies were analyzed. RESULTS This study showed that HMP was linked to higher tissue oxygen partial pressures, lower succinate levels, and better reperfusion parameters. Furthermore, the addition of M101 to either SCS or HMP was associated with lower succinate and creatinine phosphokinase accumulation, suggesting a protective effect against ischemia. CONCLUSIONS Our research has demonstrated the efficacy of machine perfusion in hypothermic conditions in providing oxygen to the pancreas during preservation and conditioning the pancreatic microvasculature for reperfusion during transplantation. Furthermore, the addition of M101 suggests a protective effect on the graft from ischemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Mesnard
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | | | - Sarah Bruneau
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphanie Le Bas-Bernardet
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - David Minault
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Jeremy Hervouet
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Delphine Kervella
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Christophe Masset
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Diego Cantarovich
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Jérôme Rigaud
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Department of Urology Surgery and Transplantation, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Peter Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rutger Ploeg
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - James Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Prudhomme
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Julien Branchereau
- Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes1, INSERM, Centre for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Science, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li JH, Xu X, Wang YF, Xie HY, Chen JY, Dong NG, Badiwala M, Xin LM, Ribeiro RVP, Yin H, Zhang H, Zhang JZ, Huo F, Yang JY, Yang HJ, Pan H, Li SG, Qiao YB, Luo J, Li HY, Jia JJ, Yu H, Liang H, Yang SJ, Wang H, Liu ZY, Zhang LC, Hu XY, Wu H, Hu YQ, Tang PF, Ye QF, Zheng SS. Chinese expert consensus on organ protection of transplantation (2022 edition). Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:516-526. [PMID: 36376226 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Hui Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang Shuren University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Yan-Feng Wang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Hai-Yang Xie
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jing-Yu Chen
- Wuxi Lung Transplantation Center, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, China
| | - Nian-Guo Dong
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Mitesh Badiwala
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Li-Ming Xin
- School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
| | | | - Hao Yin
- Organ Transplant Center, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Jian-Zheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Feng Huo
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510040, China
| | - Jia-Yin Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hong-Ji Yang
- Organ Transplantation Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Hui Pan
- Department of Lung Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shao-Guang Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Yin-Biao Qiao
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jia Luo
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao-Yu Li
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jun-Jun Jia
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Yu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Han Liang
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Si-Jia Yang
- Department of Lung Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Zhong-Yang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Li-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yi-Qing Hu
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Pei-Fu Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China; National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Qi-Fa Ye
- Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Transplant Center of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Wuhan 430062, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Liver Transplantation, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang Shuren University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310022, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campsen J, Zimmerman MA. Pancreas transplantation following donation after circulatory death. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
5
|
Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Folch-Puy E, Llaves-López A, García-Pérez R, Fuster J. Breaking the limits of experimental pancreas transplantation: Working toward the clinical ideal graft. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2022; 1:1035480. [PMID: 38994386 PMCID: PMC11235275 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2022.1035480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Pancreas transplantation is, at present, the only curative treatment for type-1 diabetes that maintains normoglycemia thus avoiding complications arising from poor glycemic control. Despite its great benefits, the number of pancreas transplants has decreased significantly since its inception in the late 1960s, largely due to demographic changes and the consequent suboptimal quality of donors. The selection criteria for pancreas donors mainly depend on morphological variables such as fatty infiltration, fibrosis, or edema, as well as both functional (amylase and lipase) and clinical variables of the donor. However, the final criterion in the decision-making process is the somewhat subjective assessment of a trained surgeon. That being said, the recent incorporation of graft perfusion machines into clinical practice seems to be changing the work dynamics of the donor organ retrieval team, facilitating decision-making based on objective morphological and functional criteria. Normothermic perfusion using perfusate with supplemental oxygen replicates near physiological parameters thus being a promising strategy for organ preservation. Nevertheless, optimum perfusion parameters are difficult to establish in pancreas transplantation given its complex vascular anatomy combined with an intrinsically low blood flow. The objective of this work is to analyze the results published in the recent literature relating to the considerations of ex-vivo normothermic graft perfusion machines and their usefulness in the field of pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, Clinic Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDiM), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Biomedical Research in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emma Folch-Puy
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Experimental Pathology Department, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IIBB-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Llaves-López
- Experimental Pathology Department, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IIBB-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío García-Pérez
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, Clinic Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDiM), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Fuster
- Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Liver and Pancreatic Transplantation Unit, Clinic Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDiM), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Biomedical Research in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ogbemudia AE, Hakim G, Dengu F, El-Gilani F, Dumbill R, Mulvey J, Sayal K, Prudhomme T, Mesnard B, Rozenberg K, Lo Faro L, James T, Oliver J, Sharples E, Mittal S, Johnson P, Friend PJ, Ploeg R, Hunter J, Branchereau J. Development of ex situ normothermic reperfusion as an innovative method to assess pancreases after preservation. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1630-1642. [PMID: 34448276 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Static cold storage (SCS) is the standard method for pancreas preservation prior to transplantation; however, it does not permit organ assessment. Normothermic reperfusion (NR) is utilized clinically for other organs to assess viability. Our aim was to develop NR using normothermic machine perfusion technique to simulate reperfusion at the time of transplantation, enabling evaluation of oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMPO2) as a newer strategy to optimize pancreas preservation. 13 porcine pancreases procured after circulatory death were divided into 3 groups: 4 pancreases preserved using SCS, and 2 groups preserved by HMPO2 (n = 4 and n = 5, differing by type of preservation solution). Duration of perfusion or cold storage was 6 hours before the 1-hour assessment using NR. Outcome measures were perfusion characteristics, biochemistry and change in tissue water mass as oedema assessment. During NR, the HMPO2 groups demonstrated better perfusion characteristics, normal macroscopic appearances, decreased water mass and one HMPO2 group demonstrated a response to glucose stimulation. Conversely, the SCS group showed an increased water mass and developed early macroscopic appearances of oedema, interstitial haemorrhage and minimal portal outflow. This study suggests that ex situ assessment of pancreases by NR is promising, and that HMPO2 may be better than SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Etohan Ogbemudia
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Gabriella Hakim
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fungai Dengu
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Faysal El-Gilani
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Dumbill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - John Mulvey
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karen Sayal
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,CRUK, Oxford Cancer Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Prudhomme
- Department Urology, Kidney Transplantation and Andrology, Toulouse Rangueil University, Toulouse, France
| | - Benoit Mesnard
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Kaithlyn Rozenberg
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Letizia Lo Faro
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Timothy James
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Joshua Oliver
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Edward Sharples
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Shruti Mittal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Johnson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,DRWF Human Islet Isolation Facility, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rutger Ploeg
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - James Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Julien Branchereau
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford Transplant Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.,Centre de Recherche en Transplantation Et Immunologie (CRTI), UMR1064, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|