Delayed introduction of sirolimus in paediatric intestinal transplant recipients: indications and long-term benefits

Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Use to Preserve Renal Function in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation Patients

BACKGROUND

As calcineurin inhibitors are associated with renal impairment post intestinal transplant, use of everolimus (EVR) may provide renal-sparing benefits.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis focused on EVR use and renal function after intestinal or multivisceral transplant. No prisoners were used in the study. This study is compliant with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients, 18 patients who underwent isolated intestinal transplant, and 10 patients who underwent multivisceral transplant, were included in this study. For 13 patients that never received EVR, the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline at the time of transplant were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -18.1%; 2 years = -43.7%; 3 years = -44.1; and 5 years = -43.3%. For 15 patients who received EVR after transplant, average duration of EVR therapy was (579.60 ± 784.15) days with 87% of patients ultimately removed from medication due to side effects. In the EVR group, the average change in eGFR compared to baseline were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -37.5%; 2 years = -43.5%; 3 years = -54.2%; and 5 years = -42.9%. After the initiation of EVR, the average change in eGFR compared to eGFR at time of EVR initiation was as follows: 1 year = +5.9%; 2 years = -1.57%; 3 years = -5.01%; and 5 years = -1.79%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that EVR can play an important role in preserving renal function in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients, but tolerance of EVR is highly variable in this patient population.

Update on Maintenance Immunosuppression in Intestinal Transplantation

Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.

Immune reactions following intestinal transplantation: Mechanisms and prevention

For patients with intestinal failure, small bowel transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments despite continuous advancements in parenteral nutrition techniques. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition can result in serious complications that lead to metabolic dysfunction and organ failure. However, the small intestine is a highly immunogenic organ with a large amount of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and histocompatibility antigens; therefore, the small intestine is highly susceptible to severe immune rejection. This article discusses the mechanisms underlying immune rejection after small bowel transplantation and presents various options for prevention and treatment. Our findings offer new insights into the development of small bowel transplantation.

Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years.

AREAS COVERED

Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

Precision sirolimus dosing in children: The potential for model-informed dosing and novel drug monitoring

The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus is prescribed to treat children with varying diseases, ranging from vascular anomalies to sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis to transplantation (solid organ or hematopoietic cell). Precision dosing of sirolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sirolimus concentrations in whole blood drawn at the trough (before the next dose) time-point is the current standard of care. For sirolimus, trough concentrations are only modestly correlated with the area under the curve, with R 2 values ranging from 0.52 to 0.84. Thus, it should not be surprising, even with the use of sirolimus TDM, that patients treated with sirolimus have variable pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and effectiveness. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) will be beneficial and should be implemented. The data do not suggest dried blood spots point-of-care sampling of sirolimus concentrations for precision dosing of sirolimus. Future research on precision dosing of sirolimus should focus on pharmacogenomic and pharmacometabolomic tools to predict sirolimus pharmacokinetics and wearables for point-of-care quantitation and MIPD.

First case report of multivisceral transplant from a deceased cardiac death donor

The current shortage of pediatric multivisceral donors accounts for the long time and mortality on the waiting list of pediatric patients. The use of donors after cardiac death, especially after the outbreak of normothermic regional perfusion, has increased in recent years for all solid organs except the intestine, mainly because of its higher susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion injury. We present the first literature case of multivisceral donors after cardiac death transplantation in a 13-month-old recipient from a 2.5-month-old donor. Once exitus was certified, an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit was established, cannulating the aorta and infrarenal vena cava, while the supra-aortic branches were clamped. The abdominal organs completely recovered from ischemia through normothermic regional perfusion (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initially and beating heart later). After perfusion with the preservation solution, the multivisceral graft was uneventfully implanted. Two months later, the patient was discharged without any complications. This case demonstrates the possibility of reducing the time spent on the waiting list for these patients.

Immunosuppression Regimens for Intestinal Transplantation in Children

Pediatric intestinal transplant serves as the only definitive treatment for children with irreversible intestinal failure. Successful intestinal transplant hinges upon appropriate management of immunosuppression. The indications for intestinal transplant have changed over time. Immunosuppression regimens can be divided into induction and maintenance phases along with treatment of acute rejection. Intestinal transplant induction now often includes antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab in addition to corticosteroids. Maintenance regimens continue to be dominated by tacrolimus, with additional agents used to either decrease goal tacrolimus levels to limit toxicity or as an adjunct in sensitized patients. Careful monitoring can help to limit serious complications, such as rejection, infection, and malignancy. Future work will aim to decrease variation in practice and identify methods to determine optimal immunosuppression for a particular patient. Furthermore, there is a need for non-invasive monitoring of the intestinal graft and functional assessments of immunosuppression.

Update on immunosuppressive strategies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intestine is the most immunologically complex solid organ allograft with the greatest risk of both rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). High levels of immunosuppression are required, further increasing morbidity. Due to low volume of transplants and few centers with experience, there is paucity of evidence-based, standardized, and effective therapeutic regimens. We herein review the most recent data about immunosuppression, focusing on novel and emerging therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data are moving the field toward increasing use of basilixumab and consideration of alemtuzumab for induction and inclusion of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and antimetabolites for maintenance. For rejection, we highlight novel roles for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition, α4β7 integrin inhibition, microbiome modulation, desensitization protocols, and tolerance induction strategies. We also highlight emerging novel therapies for GVHD, especially the promising role of Janus kinase inhibition.

SUMMARY

New insights into immune pathways associated with rejection and GVHD in intestinal allografts have led to an evolution of therapies from broad-based immunosuppression to more targeted strategies that hold promise for reducing morbidity from infection, rejection, and GVHD. These should be the focus of further study to facilitate their widespread use.

Antibody-removal therapies for de novo DSA in pediatric intestinal recipients: Why, when, and how? A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) impact negatively on the outcome of intestinal grafts. Although the use of antibody-removal therapies (ART) is becoming more frequent in the last few years, issues regarding their timing and effectiveness remain under discussion.

METHODS

In the present study, we report our experience with eight ART procedures (based on plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab) in eight pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplants with de novo DSA (dnDSA).

RESULTS

ART were performed when dnDSA appeared in two contexts: (1) concomitant with rejection (acute or chronic) or (2) without rejection or any other clinical symptom. Complete DSA removal was observed in seven out of eight patients, showing an effectiveness of 88%. In the group treated for dnDSA without clinical symptoms, the success rate was 100%, with complete DSA removal and without rejection afterward. A shorter time between DSA detection and ART performance appeared as a significant factor for the success of the therapy (p = 0.0002). DSA against HLA-A and DQ alleles were the most resistant to ART, whereas anti-DR DSA were the most sensitive. In addition, the 8-year allograft survival rate in recipients undergoing ART was similar to that in those without DSA, being significantly lower in non-treated DSA-positive recipients (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the effectiveness of ART in terms of DSA removal and allograft survival and encourage its early use even in the absence of clinical symptoms.