1
|
Uetsu Y, Houston D, Bailey C, Kilpatrick S. Association of the origin of contamination and species of microorganisms with short-term survival in dogs with septic peritonitis. Aust Vet J 2023; 101:83-89. [PMID: 36424833 DOI: 10.1111/avj.13220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association between anatomical location of contamination and mortality in dogs with gastrointestinal and biliary origin of septic peritonitis. METHODS Medical records at two private referral hospitals between 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were included if the origin of contamination was confirmed intraoperatively within the gastrointestinal or biliary tract. Cases were excluded if the dog died or was euthanized intraoperatively or where the data regarding the origin of contamination were not available. The association of anatomical origin with survival was assessed specifying the locations as stomach, small intestine, large intestine and biliary tract. The gastrointestinal tract origin was further subdivided into pylorus, nonpylorus, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon. RESULTS The overall survival rate was 75.9% (n = 44/58). There were no significant differences in survival among different anatomical origins of contaminations before or after subdivision (P = 0.349 and 0.832, respectively). Also, there was no association between isolated microorganism species in microbiological culture and the anatomical origin (P = 0.951) and the microorganism species was not associated with survival (P = 0.674). CONCLUSIONS There was no association between anatomical location of leakage, microorganism species and survival although further studies are warranted to analyse the relationships between anatomical leakage site and microorganism species as well as microorganism species and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Uetsu
- North Shore Veterinary, Specialist & Emergency Centre, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Houston
- Small Animal Specialist Hospital, Prospect, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C Bailey
- North Shore Veterinary, Specialist & Emergency Centre, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hiebert EC, Barry SL, Sawyere DM, DeMonaco SM, Muro NM. Intestinal dehiscence and mortality in cats undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24:779-786. [PMID: 34663127 PMCID: PMC10812278 DOI: 10.1177/1098612x211048454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for both gastrointestinal (GI) incisional dehiscence and mortality in a large cohort of cats undergoing GI surgery. We hypothesized that cats with preoperative septic peritonitis (PSP), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis would have higher GI dehiscence and mortality rates than unaffected cats. METHODS A medical records search identified cats with surgically created, full-thickness incisions into their stomach, small intestines or large intestines. Preoperative data, including signalment, clinical signs, comorbidities, surgical history, current medications, presenting physical examination findings, complete blood counts and serum biochemistry values, were collected. It was determined whether or not cats had PSP, SIRS or sepsis at admission. Intraoperative data, final diagnosis and postoperative variables such as vital parameters, bloodwork and (if applicable) the development of GI dehiscence or mortality were noted. Postoperative follow-up of at least 10 days was obtained in survivors. RESULTS In total, 126 cats were included. One cat developed GI dehiscence following complete resection of a jejunal adenocarcinoma. Twenty-three cats (18.2%) died within 10 days of surgery. Cats with PSP (P = 0.0462) or that developed hypothermia 25-72 h postoperatively (P = 0.0055) had higher odds of mortality in multivariate analysis. Cats with PSP had 6.7-times higher odds of mortality than cats not diagnosed with PSP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In cats receiving GI surgery, the incidence of GI incisional dehiscence was <1%. Cats with PSP had a higher likelihood of mortality. SIRS was a common finding in cats with septic peritonitis, but was not associated with mortality. Postoperative mortality during the home recovery period might be significant in cats. Future studies evaluating postoperative mortality in cats should consider extending the research period beyond the date of discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Hiebert
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sabrina L Barry
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- Pet Emergency & Specialty Center of Marin, San Rafael, CA, USA
| | - Dominique M Sawyere
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Stefanie M DeMonaco
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Noelle M Muro
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- VCA Veterinary Specialists of CT, West Hartford, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anderson T, Beever L, Hall J, Moores A, Llanos C, Adams R, Meakin L, Coppola M, Bowlt-Blacklock K, Holmes MA, Barnes D. Outcome following surgery to treat septic peritonitis in 95 cats in the United Kingdom. J Small Anim Pract 2021; 62:744-749. [PMID: 33999425 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the cause, management and outcome in cats with septic peritonitis within the United Kingdom (2008 to 2018) and to identify if previously identified prognostic factors were associated with survival in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical records from 10 referral hospitals in United Kingdom were reviewed. Data collected included signalment, clinicopathological data and management techniques. Serum albumin, glucose, lactate and ionised calcium concentration; presence of intraoperative hypotension and correct empirical antibiosis were analysed via logistic regression for association with survival. RESULTS Ninety-five cats were included. The overall survival rate was 66%. Lethargy (89%) and anorexia (75%) were the most common clinical signs, with abdominal pain and vomiting in 44% and 27% of cases, respectively. Gastro-intestinal leakage was the most common source of contamination. The presence of an abdominal mass on clinical examination was not strongly predictive of the presence of neoplasia on histology and did not confer a worse prognosis. Cats presenting with dehiscence of a previous enterotomy/enterectomy did not have a worse prognosis than those presenting with other aetologies. Intraoperative hypotension (adjusted odds ratio 0.173, 95% confidence intervals 0.034 to 0.866, P=0.033) was associated with non-survival. Cats that survived beyond 1 day postoperatively had an improved likelihood of survival (87.5%). All cats that survived beyond 6 days were successfully discharged. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE This study describes the largest group of cats with septic peritonitis with an overall survival rate of 66%. The presence of an abdominal mass on clinical examination or having dehiscence of a previous gastrointestinal surgery did not confer a worse prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Anderson
- Surgery Department, Dick White Referrals, Six Mile Bottom, Cambridgeshire, CB8 0UH, UK
| | - L Beever
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK
| | - J Hall
- Surgery Department, Wear Referrals, Bradbury, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 2ES, UK.,Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK
| | - A Moores
- Surgery Department, Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Winchester, Hampshire, SO21 2LL, UK
| | - C Llanos
- Surgery Department, Willows Referral Service, Solihull, West Midlands, B90 4NH, UK
| | - R Adams
- Surgery Department, Northern Ireland Veterinary Specialists, Hillsborough, Co. Down, NI, BT26 6 PB, UK.,Surgery Department, Davies Veterinary Specialists, Higham Gobion, Hitchin, SG5 3HR, UK
| | - L Meakin
- Surgery Department, Langford Vets, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK
| | - M Coppola
- Surgery Department, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | - K Bowlt-Blacklock
- Surgery Department, Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk, CB8 7UU, UK
| | - M A Holmes
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK
| | - D Barnes
- Surgery Department, Dick White Referrals, Six Mile Bottom, Cambridgeshire, CB8 0UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|