HPA-5 typing discrepancy reveals an Ile503Leu substitution in platelet GPIa (α2 integrin)

Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests by Evanescence Biosensor Technology for Rapid Phenotyping of the Human Platelet Alloantigens 1a and 5b

Background

The human platelet alloantigens (HPA) HPA-1a and HPA-5b are located on glycoproteins on the platelet surface and are the most relevant to cause neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT). The antigens are defined by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the glycoprotein genes, and the antigen status can be determined by genotyping the SNPs. However, genotyping is time-consuming and costly depending on the method and sample throughput. Here, we tested the reliability of the evanescence wave based fluorescence (EVA) biosensor technology for the rapid phenotyping of the HPA-1a and HPA-5b antigens on blood donor samples in two laboratories.

Methods

HPA-1a and HPA-5b phenotyping was performed on EDTA blood samples from 336 blood donors (Lyon: 216 donors; Mannheim: 120 donors) using EVA typing assays and the biosensor system (Davos Diagnostics, Davos, Switzerland). For genotyping, validated PCR-SSP and TaqMan-PCR methods were used.

Results

HPA-1a phenotyping was positive for all samples with HPA-1aa (n = 244; EVA value 807 ± 167 U/s) and HPA-1ab (n = 82; 542 ± 110 U/s) genotypes. All samples (n = 10) with negative EVA values (<10 U/s) had the HPA-1bb genotype. HPA-5b phenotyping was negative for all HPA-5aa genotypes (n = 267) and positive for the HPA-5ab (n = 66; 83 ± 22 U/s) and HPA-5bb (n = 3; 118 ± 25 U/s) genotypes. EVA values from heterozygotes were significantly lower compared to HPA-1a or HPA-5b homozygotes. A strong correlation of the EVA values with the platelet count in the blood samples was observed.

Conclusion

EVA is a reliable method for rapid phenotyping of the clinically relevant HPA-1a and HPA-5b platelet antigens. All phenotyping results were 100% concordant with the HPA-1 or HPA-5 genotype. The test can be performed from only 10 µl of fresh or frozen blood samples within less than 15 min time-to-result.

Advances in alloimmune thrombocytopenia: perspectives on current concepts of human platelet antigens, antibody detection strategies, and genotyping

Alloimmunisation to platelets leads to the production of antibodies against platelet antigens and consequently to thrombocytopenia. Numerous molecules located on the platelet surface are antigenic and induce immune-mediated platelet destruction with symptoms that can be serious. Human platelet antigens (HPA) cause thrombocytopenias, such as neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, post-transfusion purpura, and platelet transfusion refractoriness. Thirty-four HPA are classified into 28 systems. Assays to identify HPA and anti-HPA antibodies are critically important for preventing and treating thrombocytopenia caused by anti-HPA antibodies. Significant progress in furthering our understanding of HPA has been made in the last decade: new HPA have been discovered, antibody-detection methods have improved, and new genotyping methods have been developed. We review these advances and discuss issues that remain to be resolved as well as future prospects for preventing and treating immune thrombocytopenia.

Comparison of a simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques for HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping results obtained by a simple-probe real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique with the multiplex PCR technique.

METHODS

Five hundred DNA samples from the Thai National Stem Cell Donor Registry (TSCDR) of the National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society were included. Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping was performed by simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques.

RESULTS

HPA-1, HPA-2, HPA-3, and HPA-4 genotyping results obtained by both techniques were in agreement. The misinterpretation of HPA-5, HPA-6, and HPA-15 genotypes was found in eight samples by simple-probe real-time PCR and HPA genotypes were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Two samples of HPA-5 were misinterpreted as HPA-5a5a instead of HPA-5a5b due to an NM_002203.3:c.1594A>C mutation (rs199808499) near the HPA-5 polymorphism (5' side). Five samples of HPA-6a6b were misinterpreted as HPA-6b6b because of an NM_000212.2:c.1545G>A mutation (rs4634) adjacent to the HPA-6 polymorphism (3' side). Interestingly, one sample of HPA-15a15b was misinterpreted as HPA-15b15b due to an NM_133493.1:c.2118C>A mutation near the HPA-15 polymorphism (3' side).

CONCLUSIONS

HPA genotyping results by two PCR techniques were compared. Incorrect assignments were found due to genetic variations near each HPA single nucleotide polymorphism. Therefore, to avoid false assignation, the use of two genotyping techniques is recommended.