Prevention of transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection: Standards of care

Platelet Pathogen Reduction Technology-Should We Stay or Should We Go…?

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has significantly challenged blood transfusion services (BTS) for providing blood products and for keeping blood supplies available. The possibility that a similar pandemic event may occur again has induced researchers and transfusionists to investigate the adoption of new tools to prevent and reduce these risks. Similarly, increased donor travelling and globalization, with consequent donor deferral and donor pool reduction, have contributed to raising awareness on this topic. Although recent studies have validated the use of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for the control of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) this method is not a standard of care despite increasing adoption. We present a critical commentary on the role of PRT for platelets and on associated problems for blood transfusion services (BTS). The balance of the cost effectiveness of adopting PRT is also discussed.

Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence among blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Screening for cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific antibodies is not routine in some settings. Thus, transfusion of blood products poses risks for susceptible individuals.

Objectives

To investigate the global pooled CMV seroprevalence among volunteer blood donors.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases searched included Embase, Google Scholar, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted independently and analyzed using STATA version 11.

Results

The global seroprevalence of CMV IgG, CMV IgM, and both CMV IgM and IgG was 83.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.55–87.77%, I² = 99.5%), 13.77% (95% CI: 11.59–15.95%, I² = 98.8%), and 23.78% (95% CI: 10.50–37.06%, I² = 98.7), respectively.

Conclusion

The global seroprevalence of CMV was high among blood donors. Therefore, regular CMV screening should be conducted to identify CMV-seronegative blood donors.

Transfusion-transmitted and community-acquired cytomegalovirus infection in seronegative solid organ transplant recipients receiving seronegative donor organs

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients who are cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative (R-) and receive seronegative donor (D-) organs have a small but currently unquantified risk of both transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) and community-acquired CMV (CA-CMV). We retrospectively studied the incidence and clinical symptoms of TT-CMV (infection <1 year posttransplant) and CA-CMV (infection >1 year posttransplant) in a cohort of D-/R- adult and pediatric SOT recipients receiving leukoreduced blood products not screened for CMV seronegativity transplanted at our center between 2000 and 2011. CMV infection was defined as IgG seroconversion or detectable CMV antigenemia/DNAemia. Among 536 consecutive D-/R- recipients, 398 (81.8%) had adequate follow-up, and 231 (58%) received cellular blood products (total: 1626 red blood cell units, 470 platelet units) 30 days pretransplant to 90 days posttransplant. We observed no confirmed TT-CMV cases, but 14 CA-CMV cases (64% symptomatic) were seen. The estimated incidence rate of CA-CMV was higher in children (3.0/100 patient years) than adults (0.46/100 patient years, incident rate ratio of 6.52). The absence of TT-CMV over 11 years suggests neither seronegative blood products nor CMV DNA blood donor screening would provide significant incremental safety when blood is already leukoreduced. D-/R- SOT recipients, particularly children, have a significantly higher and ongoing risk of CA-CMV.

Transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus: behaviour of cell-free virus during blood component processing. A study on the safety of labile blood components in Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, most blood products are leukocyte-reduced. After this procedure, the residual risk for transfusion transmitted cytomegalovirus (TT-CMV) is mostly attributed to cell-free viruses in the plasma of blood donors following primary infection or viral reactivation. Here, objectives are: 1) to study the behaviour of cell-free CMV through the blood component processing; 2) to determine the anti-CMV seroprevalence, the level of viremia, the window-period in blood donor population; and 3) to identify cases of TT-CMV in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell-free CMV was injected into blood bags originating from regular donors. Blood components were processed according to either the CompoSelect^® or the CompoFlow^® (Fresenius Kabi AG) techniques. Samples were analysed at each step for presence of virus DNA using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The anti-CMV seroprevalence in our donor population was taken from our donor data system. The viremia was assessed in pooled plasmas samples from routine donations by quantitative PCR. Medical charts of 165 BMT anti-CMV seronegative recipients/anti-CMV seronegative donors who received CMV-unscreened blood products were reviewed.

RESULTS

Cell-free CMV passes without any decrease in viral load through all stages of blood processing. The anti-CMV seroprevalence was 46.13%. Four DNA positive samples out of 42,240 individual blood donations were identified (0.009%); all had low levels of viremia (range 11-255 IU/mL). No window-period donation was identified. No TT-CMV was found.

DISCUSSION

Cell-free CMV remains a concern with current blood component processing as it passes through all the processes. However, since low levels of CMV DNA were identified in the donations tested, and no BMT recipients had TT-CMV, the residual threat of TT-CMV after leukocyte reduction appears to be very low.

Reconsideration of blood donation testing strategy for human T-cell lymphotropic virus in Australia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Universal testing of blood donations for human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) in Australia may no longer be appropriate given the low prevalence of HTLV infection and the mitigating effect of universal leucodepletion for cellular components. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate HTLV testing strategy using the Risk-Based Decision-Making Framework for Blood Safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The risk of HTLV transfusion-transmission using three testing strategies (universal, new-donor and no testing) and cost-effectiveness of the first two strategies were assessed using adaptations of published mathematical models.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence for 2004-2014 was three HTLV-positives per million donations. It was estimated that annually, universal testing incurred a cost of approximately AUD $3 million and prevented 83 HTLV-positive cellular components from being issued, and new-donor testing cost approximately $225 000 and prevented 81 components. The number of cases of transfusion-transmitted HTLV and HTLV-associated disease prevented per year by universal and new-donor testing was essentially equivalent. According to preset risk thresholds, the risk of transfusion-transmission was negligible for universal and new-donor testing, and minimal without testing.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion-transmission of HTLV is a minimal risk in Australia even without testing. However, any revision of testing strategy must consider not only risk and cost-effectiveness, but also stakeholder, ethical and regulatory perspectives. Considering all relevant criteria, new-donor testing is judged the optimal strategy because it is able to achieve almost the same outcomes as universal testing, at a fraction of the cost.

Transfusion-transmitted CMV infection - current knowledge and future perspectives

Transmission of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) via transfusion (TT-CMV) may still occur and remains a challenge in the treatment of immunocompromised CMV-seronegative patients, e.g. after stem cell transplantation, and for low birthweight infants. Measures to reduce the risk of TT-CMV have been evaluated in clinical studies, including leucocyte depletion of cellular blood products and/or the selection of CMV-IgG-negative donations. Studies in large blood donor cohorts indicate that donations from newly CMV-IgG-positive donors should bear the highest risk for transmitting CMV infections because they contain the highest levels of CMV-DNA, and early CMV antibodies cannot neutralise CMV. Based on this knowledge, rational strategies to reduce the residual risk of TT-CMV using leucoreduced blood products could be designed. However, there is a lack of evidence that CMV is still transmitted by transfusion of leucoreduced units. In low birthweight infants, most (if not all) CMV infections are caused by breast milk feeding or congenital transmission rather than by transfusion of leucoreduced blood products. For other patients at risk, no definitive data exist about the relative importance of alternative transmission routes of CMV compared to blood transfusion. As a result, only the conduction of well-designed studies addressing strategies to prevent TT-CMV and the thorough examination of presumed cases of TT-CMV will achieve guidance for the best transfusion regimen in patients at risk.

Survey of Institutional Policies for Provision of "CMV-Safe" Blood in Ontario

OBJECTIVES

Debate continues on whether leukoreduction alone (LR) is sufficiently similar to leukoreduced cellular products drawn from cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative (SN) donors to minimize the risk of transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV). We sought to determine the policy, inventory, and practice landscape of the province for TT-CMV mitigation.

METHODS

A web-based survey was distributed to hospitals in Ontario by Canadian Blood Services to collect data on their policies with respect to TT-CMV prevention.

RESULTS

TT-CMV mitigation practices varied by patient population, hospital size, and region. Smaller institutions remain committed to dual prevention, whereas academic hospitals favor a single-measure approach. Although smaller institutions attempt to align their policies with leadership sites, emulation is often inaccurate. The demands for SN products also appear to be significantly lower than the current screening practices of Canadian Blood Services.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization is lacking on practices to prevent TT-CMV. Although there are barriers to harmonizing practices, the apparent shift to policies acknowledging LR as a sufficient protection is likely to continue.

Leucoreduction of blood components: an effective way to increase blood safety?

Over the past 30 years, it has been demonstrated that removal of white blood cells from blood components is effective in preventing some adverse reactions such as febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions, immunisation against human leucocyte antigens and human platelet antigens, and transmission of cytomegalovirus. In this review we discuss indications for leucoreduction and classify them into three categories: evidence-based indications for which the clinical efficacy is proven, indications based on the analysis of observational clinical studies with very consistent results and indications for which the clinical efficacy is partial or unproven.

Human T-lymphotropic virus and transfusion safety: does one size fit all?

Human T-cell leukemia viruses (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) are associated with a variety of human diseases, including some severe ones. Transfusion transmission of HTLV through cellular blood components is undeniable. HTLV screening of blood donations became mandatory in different countries to improve the safety of blood supplies. In Japan and Europe, most HTLV-infected donors are HTLV-1 positive, whereas in the United States a higher prevalence of HTLV-2 is reported. Many industrialized countries have also introduced universal leukoreduction of blood components, and pathogen inactivation technologies might be another effective preventive strategy, especially if and when generalized to all blood cellular products. Considering all measures available to minimize HTLV blood transmission, the question is what would be the most suitable and cost-effective strategy to ensure a high level of blood safety regarding these viruses, considering that there is no solution that can be deemed optimal for all countries.

Systematic Evaluation of Different Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays for Cytomegalovirus Detection: Feasibility of Blood Donor Screening

Acute primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, which commonly occur asymptomatically among blood donors, represent a significant risk for serious morbidity in immunocompromised patients (a major group of transfusion recipients). We implemented a routine CMV pool screening procedure for plasma for the identification of CMV DNA-positive donors, and we evaluated the sensitivities and performance of different CMV DNA amplification systems. Minipools (MPs) of samples from 18,405 individual donors (54,451 donations) were screened for CMV DNA using the RealStar CMV PCR assay (Altona Diagnostic Technologies), with a minimum detection limit of 11.14 IU/ml. DNA was extracted with a high-volume protocol (4.8 ml, Chemagic Viral 5K kit; PerkinElmer) for blood donor pool screening (MP-nucleic acid testing [NAT]) and with the Nuclisens easyMAG system (0.5 ml; bioMérieux) for individual donation (ID)-NAT. In total, six CMV DNA-positive donors (0.03%) were identified by routine CMV screening, with DNA concentrations ranging from 4.35 × 10(2) to 4.30 × 10(3) IU/ml. Five donors already showed seroconversion and detectable IgA, IgM, and/or IgG antibody titers (IgA(+)/IgM(+)/IgG(-) or IgA(+)/IgM(+)/IgG(+)), and one donor showed no CMV-specific antibodies. Comparison of three commercial assays, i.e., the RealStar CMV PCR kit, the Sentosa SA CMV quantitative PCR kit (Vela Diagnostics), and the CMV R-gene PCR kit (bioMérieux), for MP-NAT and ID-NAT showed comparably good analytical sensitivities, ranging from 10.23 to 11.14 IU/ml (MP-NAT) or from 37.66 to 57.94 IU/ml (ID-NAT). The clinical relevance of transfusion-associated CMV infections requires further investigation, and the evaluated methods present powerful basic tools providing sensitive possibilities for viral testing. The application of CMV MP-NAT facilitated the identification of one donor with a window-phase donation during acute primary CMV infection.