Vox Sanguinis International Forum on typing and matching strategies in patients on anti-CD38 monoclonal therapy: summary

Risk of new alloimmunization in patients on anti-CD38 treatment using tube LISS-IAT method

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD38, a transmembrane protein expressed on many cells including RBCs and to a greater extent on myeloma cells. It has been used for treatment of multiple myeloma and autoimmune diseases. Transfusion management of patients on such therapy can be challenging as these drugs cross-react with RBC surface antigens and cause panreactivity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of the 68 patients treated with anti-CD38 from 2018-2023 was carried out. Data regarding transfusion history and antibody screens were analyzed. Depending whether they had immunohematological work-up before or during the treatment- DAT, antibody screen (CAT and tube), RBC pheno/genotyping and serologic cross-matches (CAT and tube) were performed for each patient. All cases with positive CAT IAT were retested in LISS-tube and cross-matches were performed with phenotypically matched units in LISS-tube.

RESULTS

Antibody screen has shown panagglutination with all panel cells with low and variable agglutination intensity (weak to 2 +). Panagglutination remained positive for 1 - 6 months after drug cessation. Positive DAT was seen in 60,6% patients, while autocontrol was negative. Ficin treated panel-cells eliminated nonspecific reactivity. LISS-tube antibody screen and cross-matches were negative for all patients, apart from 3 patients who had preexisting antibodies. No new antibodies were detected during the course of the study.

CONCLUSION

Among study group there were no newly identified alloantibodies, meaning that the policy of transfusing them with matched RBCs and performing IAT/cross-matches in tube is a safe and effective policy according to the findings of this study.

Optimizing transfusion management of multiple myeloma patients receiving daratumumab-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab, a human anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody used to treat multiple myeloma, interferes with pretransfusion testing and can mask alloantibodies. Incidence of alloimmunization in patients on daratumumab has not been well characterized, and optimal transfusion guidelines regarding prophylactic antigen matching, accounting for both patient safety and efficiency, have not been well established for these patients.

METHODS

Records of patients who received daratumumab between January 1, 2014 and July 2, 2019 were reviewed. Daratumumab interference with pretransfusion testing was managed by testing with reagent red blood cells (RBCs) treated with 0.2 M dithiothreitol. When daratumumab was present during antibody testing, patients were transfused with RBC units prophylactically matched for D, C, c, E, e, and K antigens per hospital policy.

RESULTS

Out of 90 patients identified, 52 received a total of 638 RBC transfusions (average of 12.3 units per patient, SD 17.2, range 1-105, median 5 among those transfused). Alloantibodies existing before daratumumab initiation were identified in seven patients. No new alloantibodies were detected in any patients after starting daratumumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of alloimmunization in patients receiving daratumumab is low. Whether this is due to the effect of daratumumab, underlying pathophysiology, or other factors, is unknown. Because these patients require a large number of RBC transfusions overall and have little observed alloimmunization, phenotype matching (beyond RhD) may be unnecessary. Since the use of dithiothreitol cannot rule out the presence of anti-K, we recommend transfusion of ABO-compatible units, prophylactically matched for the D and K antigens only.

A newly devised flow cytometric antibody binding assay helps evaluation of dithiothreitol treatment for the inactivation of CD38 on red blood cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, including daratumumab and isatuximab, often interfere with pretransfusion testing. Dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment of red blood cells (RBCs) negates this interference. However, the optimum DTT concentration and treatment time have not been well defined. Here, we quantified CD38 on RBCs before and after DTT treatment using a flow cytometric antibody binding assay (FABA) to specify the optimum conditions for CD38 inactivation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For FABA, untreated or DTT-treated RBCs were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled anti-CD38 antibody, in the presence or absence of 100-fold or more excess of unlabelled anti-CD38 antibody, and then analysed by flow cytometry (FCM). Dissociation of CD38-positive and control histograms was determined from the D-value using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The results from FABA were compared with those from conventional FCM, indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) and Western blotting.

RESULTS

The results from FABA were more consistent than those from conventional FCM. The D-value was found to be reliable in the analysis of difference between CD38 before and after DTT treatment. Our data showed that 0·0075 mol/l DTT for 30 min is sufficient to inactivate CD38 on RBCs. These results were stable and consistent with the findings from IAT.

CONCLUSION

Flow cytometric antibody binding assay is an objective way of evaluating the efficacy of DTT treatment for CD38 on RBCs. This approach allows the detection of a small number of cell surface antigens and will be useful for assessing the various chemical treatments to denature RBC antigens.