Weak D type 42: Antigen density and risk of alloimmunization in the province of Québec

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serologic typing with monoclonal anti-D is mandatory for RHD antigen determination before transfusion, but due to aberrant (weak or partial) variants of RHD, results may be ambiguous and molecular RHD-typing is required. Before that, RHD-negative (RHD -) red blood cells concentrates (RBCs) shall be transfused to avoid anti-D formation, which probably leads to wastage of RHD - RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and molecular RHD-typing were assessed retrospectively. The proportions of patients at risk for anti-D formation and the proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily were evaluated for the following transfusion strategies: (1) RHD-positive (RHD + )RBCs for all patients, (2) RHD + RBCs for patients with at least 2+ reaction with anti-D, (3) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype, (4) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E and at least 2+ reaction, and (5) RHD - RBCs for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included. Most had weak D type 1-3 and a minority had other, rare RHD variants. The risk of anti-D formation was 4.5%, 2.9%, 1.8%, 1.0%, and 0% for strategies 1-5, respectively. The proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily was 0%, 49.5%, 0.9%, 50.5%, and 95.5%.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing patients with a C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype with RHD + RBCs resulted in a very low risk of immunization while avoiding wastage of RHD - RBCs. Therefore, this strategy should be used for some patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and pending results of molecular RHD-typing.

Prevalence of weak D phenotypes in the general population of Québec, Canada: A focus on weak D type 42

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Weak D type 42 accounts for an unusually high proportion of weak D phenotypes in Québec (Canada), which contrasts with other predominantly White populations. However, its prevalence in the general population is unknown. We estimated the prevalence of weak D type 42 and other common weak D phenotypes in Québec.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We screened for RHD*01W.42 alleles among 1000 individuals of CARTaGENE-a cohort representative of Québec's population. The prevalence of weak D type 42 was calculated based on the allele frequency of RHD*01W.42 and d (i.e., all recessive alleles that confer a D- phenotype), assuming a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This prevalence was then leveraged to calculate that of other common weak D phenotypes, using published prevalence estimates among weak D phenotypes.

RESULTS

Two individuals harboured the RHD*01W.42/RHD*01 heterozygous genotype. Assuming an allele frequency of 38.19% for d, the overall prevalence of weak D type 42 was 0.08%. The following prevalence estimates were also obtained: 0.44% for all weak D phenotypes and 0.07%, 0.01% and 0.04% for weak D types 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Québec has the highest documented prevalence of weak D type 42, which was estimated at 0.08%.

How do I provide rare red cells to patients?

BACKGROUND

The demand for rare blood is expected to increase in Canada as its population continues to expand through immigration from diverse regions of the world.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper outlines a national approach to providing rare red cells for patients through the Rare Blood Program of Canadian Blood Services (CBS). Data detailing the rare red cell requests and inventory managed by CBS' Rare Blood Program is provided.

RESULTS

The provision of rare red cells involves multiple considerations such as multidisciplinary communication, serologic/molecular confirmation, donor recruitment, inventory optimization and logistical factors.

CONCLUSION

The description of CBS' Rare Blood Program will inform others that seek to create, optimize, or expand programs that facilitate the provision of rare blood. New technologies such as next-generation sequencing may also affect how rare donors are identified and recruited in the future.