Lack of alloimmunization to the D antigen in D-negative orthotopic liver transplant recipients receiving D-positive red blood cells perioperatively

Incidence of formation of anti-D between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Solid organ transplant surgeries including liver transplants constitute a substantial risk of bleeding complications and given frequent national blood shortages, supporting D-negative transplant recipients with D-negative red blood cell products perioperatively can be difficult for the transfusion services. This study was designed to compare the incidence of alloimmunization after D-mismatched red cell transfusions between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant at a single tertiary care hospital. The patients undergoing solid organ transplants are on strong immunosuppressive regimens perioperatively to help reduce the risk of rejection. We hypothesized that the use of these immunosuppressive agents makes these patients very less likely to mount an immune response and form anti-D antibodies when exposed to the D-positive red blood cell products perioperatively.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

At our center, D-negative patients who received ≥1 unit of D-positive red blood cell products were identified using historical transfusion records. Antibody testing results were examined to determine the incidence of the formation of anti-D and any other red cell alloantibodies after transfusion and these results were compared between patients with and without a history of solid organ transplant.

RESULTS

We were able to identify a total of 22 patients over 10 years with D-negative phenotype who had undergone a solid organ transplant and had received D-positive red blood cell products during the transplant surgeries. We also identified a second group of 54 patients with D-negative phenotype who had received D-positive red blood cell products for other indications including medical and surgical. A comparison of the data showed no new anti-D formation among patients with a history of D mismatched transfusion during solid organ transplant surgeries.

CONCLUSION

Among our limited study population, we observed a very low likelihood of D alloimmunization among solid organ transplant recipients. A larger, prospective study could help further evaluate the need for prophylactic D matching for red cell transfusions during solid organ transplant surgeries.

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serologic typing with monoclonal anti-D is mandatory for RHD antigen determination before transfusion, but due to aberrant (weak or partial) variants of RHD, results may be ambiguous and molecular RHD-typing is required. Before that, RHD-negative (RHD -) red blood cells concentrates (RBCs) shall be transfused to avoid anti-D formation, which probably leads to wastage of RHD - RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and molecular RHD-typing were assessed retrospectively. The proportions of patients at risk for anti-D formation and the proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily were evaluated for the following transfusion strategies: (1) RHD-positive (RHD + )RBCs for all patients, (2) RHD + RBCs for patients with at least 2+ reaction with anti-D, (3) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype, (4) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E and at least 2+ reaction, and (5) RHD - RBCs for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included. Most had weak D type 1-3 and a minority had other, rare RHD variants. The risk of anti-D formation was 4.5%, 2.9%, 1.8%, 1.0%, and 0% for strategies 1-5, respectively. The proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily was 0%, 49.5%, 0.9%, 50.5%, and 95.5%.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing patients with a C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype with RHD + RBCs resulted in a very low risk of immunization while avoiding wastage of RHD - RBCs. Therefore, this strategy should be used for some patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and pending results of molecular RHD-typing.