Cell‐free fetal DNA and fetal blood group genotyping: non‐invasive prenatal testing

Fetal RHD Screening in RH1 Negative Pregnant Women: Experience in Switzerland

RH1 incompatibility between mother and fetus can cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In Switzerland, fetal RHD genotyping from maternal blood has been recommended from gestational age 18 onwards since the year 2020. This facilitates tailored administration of RH immunoglobulin (RHIG) only to RH1 negative women carrying a RH1 positive fetus. Data from 30 months of noninvasive fetal RHD screening is presented. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 7192 plasma samples using a commercial kit, followed by an in-house qPCR to detect RHD exons 5 and 7, in addition to an amplification control. Valid results were obtained from 7072 samples, with 4515 (64%) fetuses typed RHD positive and 2556 (36%) fetuses being RHD negative. A total of 120 samples led to inconclusive results due to the presence of maternal or fetal RHD variants (46%), followed by women being serologically RH1 positive (37%), and technical issues (17%). One sample was typed false positive, possibly due to contamination. No false negative results were observed. We show that unnecessary administration of RHIG can be avoided for more than one third of RH1 negative pregnant women in Switzerland. This reduces the risks of exposure to a blood-derived product and conserves this limited resource to women in actual need.

Confirmed non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal Rh blood group genotyping along with bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms as a positive internal control

BACKGROUND

Determination of foetus rhesus blood group at risk of hemolytic disease has potential application for early non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). There are several challenges in developing NIPT rhesus blood group genotyping assays by using cell-free foetal DNA (cff-DNA) in plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women. So, the aim of this study was optimization of Real-time PCR assay for NIPT rhesus genotyping and development of Bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (INDELs) as internal control to optimise and validate rhesus genotyping based on Real-time PCR to avoid false or negative results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

NIPT Rhesus genotyping including RHD (exon 7), RHCc, and RHEe genes were performed by TaqMan Real-time PCR on 104 maternal samples at different gestation ages (12 to ≥40 weeks) from 51 alloimmunized pregnant women. The sensitivity protocol was confirmed with standard DNA samples. Eight selected INDELs were designed and used to detectable cff-DNA in maternal plasma. INDELs frequency and inheritance were determined on 6 family and 61 unrelated individuals. Finally, multiplex Real-time PCR was performed for each sample with INDELs pairs and Rh probes.

RESULTS

The results showed 100% accuracy rhesus typing for RHD, RHC and RHE assays and 95.7% accuracy for RHc. Also, eight selected INDELs as internal control for NIPT were 100% concordance for typed samples.

CONCLUSION

The Real-time PCR assay is a suitable method with high sensitivity and specificity for rhesus typing as NIPT for prediction of hemolytic disease in foetuses. The INDELs described here are suitable internal control for confirmation of NIPT on cff-DNA.

Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies.

Methods

The FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn’s serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results.

Results

Since 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn’s serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61–99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86–99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies.

Conclusion

NIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Non-invasive prenatal testing for management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn induced by maternal alloimmunisation

Anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces the risk of RhD negative women becoming alloimmunised to the RhD antigen and is a major preventative strategy in reducing the burden of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). HDFN also arises from other maternal red cell antibodies, with the most clinically significant, after anti-D, being anti-K, anti-c and anti-E. Among the 39 human blood group systems advanced genomic technologies are still revealing novel or rare antigens involved in maternal alloimmunisation. Where clinically significant maternal antibodies are detected in pregnancy, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA provides a safe way to assess the fetal blood group antigen status. This provides information as to the risk for HDFN and thus guides management strategies. In many countries, NIPT fetal RHD genotyping as a diagnostic test using real-time PCR has already been integrated into routine clinical care for the management of women with allo-anti-D to assess the risk for HDFN. In addition, screening programs have been established to provide antenatal assessment of the fetal RHD genotype in non-alloimmunised RhD negative pregnant women to target anti-D prophylaxis to those predicted to be carrying an RhD positive baby. Both diagnostic and screening assays exhibit high accuracy (over 99 %). NIPT fetal genotyping for atypical (other than RhD) blood group antigens presents more challenges as most arise from a single nucleotide variant. Recent studies show potential for genomic and digital technologies to provide a personalised medicine approach with NIPT to assess fetal blood group status for women with other (non-D) red cell antibodies to manage the risk for HDFN.

Impact of long-term storage of plasma and cell-free DNA on measured DNA quantity and fetal fraction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Optimal sample storage conditions are essential for non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free fetal and total DNA. We investigated the effect of long-term storage of plasma samples and extracted cfDNA using qPCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fetal and total cfDNA yield and fetal fraction were calculated before and after storage of plasma for 0-6 years at -25°C. Dilution experiments were performed to investigate PCR inhibition. Extraction with or without proteinase K was used to examine protein dissociation. Storage of extracted cfDNA was investigated by testing aliquots immediately, and after 18 months and 3 years of storage at -25°C.

RESULTS

We observed a marked increase in the levels of amplifiable fetal and total DNA in plasma stored for 2-3 years, and fetal fraction was slightly decreased after 3 years of storage. cfDNA detection was independent of proteinase K during DNA extraction in plasma samples stored >2 years, indicating a loss of proteins from DNA over time, which was likely to account for the observed increase in DNA yields. Measured fetal and total DNA quantities, as well as fetal fraction, increased in stored, extracted cfDNA.

CONCLUSION

Fetal and total cell-free DNA is readily detectable in plasma after long-term storage at -25°C. However, substantial variation in measured DNA quantities and fetal fraction means caution may be required when using stored plasma and extracted cfDNA for test development or validation purposes.