Baron JK, Casale SA, Monnet E, Mayhew PD, Runge JJ, Follette CM, Phipps K, Powell ME, Reczynska AI, Squire NT, Barton BA, Berg J. Paramedian incisional complications after prophylactic laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy in 411 dogs.
Vet Surg 2019;
49 Suppl 1:O148-O155. [PMID:
31814138 DOI:
10.1111/vsu.13348]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine the frequency and types of paramedian incisional complications after prophylactic laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy (LAG) in dogs and to evaluate potential risk factors for complications.
STUDY DESIGN
Multi-institutional retrospective study.
ANIMALS
Client-owned dogs (N = 411).
METHODS
Records for dogs that underwent single-incision-port laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy (SIPLAG) or multiple-port laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy (MPLAG) at five veterinary referral hospitals were reviewed. Information regarding signalment, surgical procedures, perioperative care, and incisional complications was collected. Follow-up information was obtained by review of medical records and/or communication with owners. Potential risk factors for complications were examined statistically.
RESULTS
Paramedian incisional complications were observed in 78 of 411 (19%) dogs. The most common complication was seroma formation, which occurred in 51 (12.4%) dogs. Surgical site infections were observed in 16 (3.9%) dogs, and dehiscence or development of excessive scar tissue at the incision site were each observed in nine (2.2%) dogs. Complications resolved with conservative treatment in 75 of 78 (96.2%) dogs and with surgical treatment in three of 78 (3.8%) dogs. The odds of complications were approximately twice as high in dogs undergoing SIPLAG than in dogs undergoing MPLAG (odds ratio, 2.03; P = .006).
CONCLUSION
Minor paramedian incisional complications, particularly seroma formation, were frequently observed after LAG. Most complications were successfully managed conservatively. Single-incision-port laparoscopy-assisted gastropexy was associated with a higher complication rate compared with MPLAG.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Owners should be informed that there is a relatively high rate of minor paramedian incisional complications after LAG. The risk of complications appears to be higher for SIPLAG than for MPLAG.
Collapse