Influence of crotch suture augmentation on leakage pressure and leakage location during functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses in dogs

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

OBJECTIVE

To compare time to construct completion and resistance to leakage for five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats and to report normal feline gastrointestinal thickness.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Grossly normal intestinal segments (n = 120) from 10 fresh cat cadavers.

METHODS

A total of 8 cm segments of fresh feline cadaveric intestine were collected, and mural thickness was recorded. Segments were randomly allocated between a control group (n = 20 segments) and five treatment groups (20 segments/group with 2 segments/construct = 10 constructs per group): (1) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple interrupted (HSA-SI), (2) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple continuous (HSA-SC), (3) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA), (4) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis with oversew (FEESA-O), (5) skin stapled anastomosis (SS). Time to construct completion, leakage location, initial leak pressure (ILP), and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared.

RESULTS

Mean mural thickness ± SD (mm) for the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 1.66 ± 0.28, 2.05 ± 0.18, 2.28 ± 0.30, and 2.11 ± 0.39, respectively. ILPs (mean ± SD) for HSA-SI (165 ± 122 mmHg), HSA-SC (149 ± 83), FEESA-O (63 ± 25, FEESA (84 ± 59), SS (77 ± 56), and control segments (>500) were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in ILP (p > .08) or MIP (p > .084) between any treatment groups. Nonoversewn FEESAs were 2.4 times faster to perform compared to oversewn FEESA and SS groups, and 4.7 times faster than HSA (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

All anastomosis techniques provide resistance to leakage that is supraphysiological to that of the normal maximum intraluminal pressure. HSA take longer to complete than stapled anastomoses.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

All anastomotic techniques may be appropriate in cats. Hand-sewn anastomoses result in a longer surgical time.

Influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis in a canine jejunal enterectomy model

Objective

To evaluate the influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end‐to‐end stapled anastomosis (FEESA) in dogs.

Study design

Randomized, experimental, ex vivo.

Animals or sample population

Grossly normal jejunal segments from 14 adult canine cadavers.

Methods

Ninety‐eight jejunal segments (n = 14/FEESA group, n = 14 controls) were harvested and randomly assigned to a control group, FEESA + monofilament suture oversew, FEESA + unidirectional barbed suture oversew or FEESA + bidirectional barbed suture oversew. Oversew techniques were performed using a Cushing suture pattern. Initial (ILP) and maximum leakage pressure (MLP), repair time (s), and location of observed leakage were recorded.

Results

No differences were detected in ILP (p = .439) or MLP (p = .644) respectively between experimental groups. Repairs times using barbed suture were ~ 18% faster (~25 s faster; p < .001) compared to monofilament suture. There was no difference between barbed suture types (p = .697). Mean ILP (p < .001) and MLP (p < .0001) were 6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively in the control group. Leakage location occurred predominately at the crotch of the FEESA in all groups.

Conclusion

FEESAs closed with a transverse staple line oversew using barbed suture, regardless of barb orientation, were completed faster and resulted in similar resistance to anastomotic leakage compared to monofilament suture.

Clinical significance

Oversewing the transverse staple line following FEESA using barbed suture offers similar resistance to anastomotic leakage, and may be associated with decreased surgical times in dogs compared to monofilament suture. Further studies are necessary to determine the benefits of barbed suture use in both open and laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgical applications following FEESA in dogs.