Translation and validation of the Chinese powerlessness assessment tool

The Mediating Role of Self-efficacy and Coping Mode Between Powerlessness and Quality of Life in Patients with Venous Leg Ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To explore the mediating effect of self-efficacy and coping mode between powerlessness and quality of life in patients with a venous leg ulcer (VLU).

METHODS

The authors used a convenience sampling method to select 208 patients with a VLU in four tertiary grade A hospitals in Qingdao and Tianjin from June 2021 to August 2022. Instruments included the Powerlessness Assessment Tool, Venous Leg Ulcer Self-efficacy Tool, Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, and Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of Life Questionnaire. The authors used descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and PROCESS macros for data analysis.

RESULTS

The powerlessness score was significantly negatively associated with self-efficacy and confrontation coping mode scores and positively associated with patients' quality-of-life scores. In addition, self-efficacy and confrontation coping modes separately and sequentially mediated the relationship between powerlessness and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-efficacy and confrontation coping mode play important mediating roles between powerlessness and quality of life in patients with VLUs. By decreasing patients' sense of powerlessness, boosting their self-efficacy, and encouraging them to adopt confrontation coping mode, health professionals can improve patients' quality of life.

Quality of Life and Its Influencing Factors in Chinese Patients with Chronic Wounds

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factors influencing quality of life in patients with chronic wounds.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients with chronic wounds were included and completed the Chinese version of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire after researchers assessed their wound severity.

RESULTS

The mean scores of physical symptoms and everyday living, social life, and well-being on the Chinese version of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule were 55.65 ± 15.82, 52.69 ± 16.46, and 40.75 ± 13.82, respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that depression, coping style, and education level were the primary factors, explaining 51.7% of the variance in physical symptoms and everyday living. Depression and coping style explained 49.6% of the variance in social life. Anxiety and primary disease explained 36.2% of the variance in well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors influencing quality of life for these Chinese patients with chronic wounds included education level, primary disease, anxiety, depression, and coping style. Speaking with patients about living with a chronic wound and their potential for healing, understanding their fears about significant changes to their life, and encouraging them to accept such changes can be important for patients and their recovery.