Effects of reduction in the alpha-gal antigen on bony union: a model of xenobone graft using GalT knockout mouse

Repair of bone defects in rhesus monkeys with α1,3-galactosyltransferase-knockout pig cancellous bone

Introduction: Since xenografts offer a wide range of incomparable advantages, they can be a better option than allografts but only if the possibility of immunological rejection can be eliminated. In this study, we investigated the ability of α1,3-galactosyltransferase (α1,3-GT) gene knockout (GTKO) pig cancellous bone to promote the repair of a femoral condyle bone defect and its influence on heterologous immune rejection.

Materials and methods: Cylindrical bone defects created in a rhesus monkey model were transplanted with GTKO bone, WT bone or left empty. For immunological evaluation, T lymphocyte subsets CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ in peripheral blood were assayed by flow cytometry, and the IL-2 and IFN-γ contents of peripheral blood serum were analyzed by ELISA at 2, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days post-surgery. Micro-CT scans and histological assessment were conducted at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation.

Results: Compared with WT-pig bone, the heterologous immunogenicity of GTKO-pig bone was reduced. The defect filled with fresh GTKO-pig bone was tightly integrated with the graft. Histological analysis showed that GTKO-pig cancellous bone showed better osseointegration and an appropriate rate of resorption. Osteoblast phenotype progression in the GTKO group was not affected, which revealed that GTKO-pig bone could not only fill and maintain the bone defect, but also promote new bone formation.

Conclusion: GTKO-pig cancellous bone decreased the ratio of CD4⁺ to CD8⁺ T cells and cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-2) to inhibit xenotransplant rejection. Moreover, GTKO group increased more bone formation by micro-CT analysis and osteoblastic markers (Runx2, OSX and OCN). Together, GTKO-pig cancellous bone showed better bone repair than WT-pig cancellous bone.

GGTA1/iGb3S Double Knockout Mice: Immunological Properties and Immunogenicity Response to Xenogeneic Bone Matrix

Background

Animal tissues and tissue-derived biomaterials are widely used in the field of xenotransplantation and regenerative medicine. A potential immunogenic risk that affects the safety and effectiveness of xenografts is the presence of remnant α-Gal antigen (synthesized by GGTA1 or/and iGb3S). GGTA1 knockout mice have been developed as a suitable model for the analysis of anti-Gal antibody-mediated immunogenicity. However, we are yet to establish whether GGTA1/iGb3S double knockout (G/i DKO) mice are sensitive to Gal antigen-positive xenoimplants.

Methods

α-Gal antigen expression in the main organs of G/i DKO mice or bovine bone substitutes was detected via a standardized ELISA inhibition assay. Serum anti-α-Gal antibody titers of G/i DKO mice after immunization with rabbit red blood cells (RRBC) and implantation of raw lyophilized bone substitutes (Gal antigen content was 8.14 ± 3.17 × 10¹²/mg) or Guanhao Biotech bone substitutes (50% decrease in Gal antigen relative to the raw material) were assessed. The evaluation of total serum antibody, inflammatory cytokine, and splenic lymphocyte subtype populations and the histological analysis of implants and thymus were performed to systematically assess the immune response caused by bovine bone substitutes and bone substitute grafts in G/i DKO mice.

Results

α-Gal epitope expression was reduced by 100% in the main organs of G/i DKO mice, compared with their wild-type counterparts. Following immunization with RRBC, serum anti-Gal antibody titers of G/i DKO mice increased from 80- to 180-fold. After subcutaneous implantation of raw lyophilized bone substitutes and Guanhao Biotech bone substitutes into G/i DKO mice, specific anti-α-Gal IgG, anti-α-Gal IgM, and related inflammatory factors (IFN-γ and IL-6) were significantly increased in the raw lyophilized bone substitute group but showed limited changes in the Guanhao Biotech bone substitute group, compared with the control.

Conclusion

G/i DKO mice are sensitive to Gal antigen-positive xenogeneic grafts and can be effectively utilized for evaluating the α-Gal-mediated immunogenic risk of xenogeneic grafts.

The assessment of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity and risk management study

Background

Xenogeneic bone has been widely used in a variety of clinical bone-related disease to promote bone healing and restore bone defects. However, the adverse effects of immune system limit its application in the clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate xenogeneic bone safety of immunotoxicity and explore the methods for immune risk supervision.

Results

Xenogeneic bone, which is freeze-dried bovine cancellous bone, was implanted into the muscle of mice. On day 7, 14 and 28, the effects of xenogeneic bone were examined on humoral immunity and cellular immunity, including the levels of IgG, IgM, C3, inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the lymphocyte phenotype. The data showed that xenogeneic bone implantation had no potential to induce immune responses not only in humoral immunity but also in cellular immunity. To reveal the risk of immunogenicity, the residual DNA and the clearance of α-gal epitope were analyzed in 2 different bones (bone 1 is deproteinized bone, bone 2 is acellular and defatted bone). It was suggested that DNA of xenogeneic bone can be limited to < 50 ng per mg dry weight for the repair or regeneration with the acceptable immune risk. And α-gal clearance of xenogeneic bone could be an effective risk factor for improving xenograft quality management.

Conclusions

Through the detection of xenogeneic bone immunotoxicity, our findings indicated that the supervisions of risk factors could contribute to reduce the immune risk. And the risk factors under the acceptable limitation could decrease or replace animal experiment. However, it still needs to be studied on the limitation of α-gal epitope to predict rejection of xenogeneic bone more accurately.

Xenogeneic bone matrix immune risk assessment using GGTA1 knockout mice

Homeotransplantation of bones for replacement therapy have been demonstrated reliably in clinical data. However, human donor bones applicable for homeotransplantation are in short supply, which facilitates the search for suitable alternatives, such as xenografts grafts. The α-Gal antigen-related immune risk of xenografts directly affects the safety and effectiveness of the biomaterials and limits their applications in the clinic. The immune risk can be prevented by depletion or breaking anti-Gal antibody prior to transplant. Therefore, how to assess the immune risk of the bone substitutes and select the reliable animal research model become extremely important. In this study, we prepared lyophilized bone substitutes (T1) and Guanghao Biotech bone substitutes (T2, animal-derived biomaterials with α-Gal antigen decreased), aimed to assess the immune risk of xenografts bone substitutes on GGTA1 knockout mice. The α-Gal antigen contents of T1 and T2 were firstly detected by ELISA method in vitro. The bone substitutes were then implanted subcutaneously into GGTA1 knockout mice for 2, 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. The total serum antibody levels, anti-α-Gal antibody levels, inflammatory cytokine and splenic lymphocyte surface molecules were detected and histology analysis of skin and thymus were performed to systematically evaluate the immune response caused by the T1 and T2 bone substitutes in mice. In vitro results showed that the amount of α-Gal epitopes in T1 bone substitutes was significantly higher than T2 bone substitutes, and the clearance rate of α-Gal antigen in T2 bone substitutes achieved about 55.6%. Results of antibody level in vivo showed that the T1 bone substitutes group possessed significantly higher total IgG, IgM, IgA and anti-α-Gal IgG levels than T2 and control group, while T2 group showed no significant changes of these indexes compared with control. In terms of inflammatory cytokines, T1 bone substitutes showed evidently higher levels of IL-4, IL-12P70 and IL-10 than T2 and control, while T2 group was comparable to control. No changes in the levels of splenic lymphocyte surface molecules were found in the three groups (T1, T2 and control group) during the experimental periods. The pathological results demonstrated that the inflammatory response in T2 group was lighter than the T1 group, which was in accordance with the inflammatory cytokines levels. The above results indicated that the process of antigen removal effectively reduced the α-Gal antigens content in T2 bone substitutes, which caused little immune response in vivo and could be used as bone healing materials. This study also demonstrated that GGTA1 knockout mice can be used as a routine tool to assess the immune risk of animal-derived biomaterials.